Você está na página 1de 25

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Gas Chromatographic-Mass Spectrometry


Is Olive Oil the healthiest oil?
Introduction
Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a very powerful and ubiquitous
analytical technique. It is often the analytical method of choice in toxicology, forensics, food
science, and environmental research. In essence, this hybrid instrument replaces the traditional
thermal-conductivity detector (TCD) or flame-ionization chromatographic detector (FID) with a
very sensitive and information-rich mass spectrometer (MS). Not only can a GC-MS separate
the volatile components of complex mixtures, but it can also record a mass spectrum of each
component. This hybrid instrument provides two separate dimensions of information about the
components in the sample, GC retention times and electron ionization (EI) mass spectra. GC
retention time is related to specific chemical properties of the molecules in question (e.g.
volatility, polarity, presence of specific functional groups) while molecular weight (derived from
the mass spectrum) is indicative of atomic composition.
Chromatographic techniques separate mixtures of species based on their interactions with
a stationary phase and a mobile phase. In the A315 gas chromatography experiment, volatile and
semi-volatile species are vaporized into a flow of helium (mobile phase) and blown through a
fused silica open tubular capillary (stationary phase). The capillary is usually derivatized to
control its polarity (ranging from hydrophobic dimethylsiloxane to hydrophilic polyethylene
glycol or any of a wide array of specialty coatings). The gas phase molecules interact with the
surface and exist in dynamic equilibrium between being adsorbed onto the inner wall of the
column and dissolved in the carrier gas. Gas chromatographs most often use temperature to
control this equilibrium (higher temperatures shift the equilibrium more towards the mobile
phase while lower temperatures shift it to the stationary phase). This is analogous to changing
the polarity of the solvent mixture in thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Various components of
mixtures will have different equilibria with the stationary phase and will consequently move
through the column at different rates. The temperature can be left constant for maximum
resolution or varied to minimize analysis time. A detector at the end of the column records the
amount of time required for a given compound to elute off of the column (cf. RF values in TLC).
With the proper conditions and column chemistries, very similar compounds can be separated by
GC (e.g. isomers of dichlorobenzene, cis- and trans- fatty acids, racemic mixtures, etc.).
The GC-MS places an electron ionization quadrupole mass spectrometer at the end of the
column. The mass spectrum provides two valuable pieces of information; the retention time and
the EI mass spectrum. Molecules eluting from the column are directed into the source of the
mass spectrometer and ionized by a beam of 70 eV electrons from a hot filament (M + e- M+
+ 2e-). It is important to point out that EI generates odd-electron radical cations. The resulting
positive ions are then analyzed by a quadrupole mass filter. Ideally, the molecular weight of the
compound can be directly inferred from its mass spectrum. The mass spectrum indicates the
mass to charge ratio of the ions, not the molecular weight of the neutral species (amu/e or Da/z
where e is the charge on an electron, Da is Daltons (1 Da = 1 amu) and z is the number of
positive charges). However, the vast majority of ions generated by EI are singly charged and the
charging is accomplished by removing an electron (an electron weighs 0.0048 amu), thus the
masses of the ions in an EI mass spectrum are nearly identical to the neutral species from which
they are derived. Because EI is a rather energetic process, most organic compounds fragment in
the MS ion source, therefore the EI mass spectrum also indicates the masses of these fragments.
While this may seem to be a weakness at first (spectra are more complex and sensitivity for the
intact species will suffer), a careful analysis of a fragmentation pattern can be used to determine
the connectivity of the atoms in the original molecule. In addition, the GC-MS system in the 315
laboratory contains a computerized library that can match mass spectral fingerprints with
known spectra to aid in the identification of unknowns. Figure 1 contains the mass spectrum of
9- tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, the hallucinogenic agent in marijuana) from the NIST 02 mass
spectrum library. The NIST 02 database contains the 70 eV EI mass spectra of over 150,000
compounds.
314
100

299
OH
231
50 41
271

29 O 243 258
55 67 81 91 193
107 121 147 160 174 217
0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320
(ma inlib ) Drona b inol

Figure 1: 70 eV mass spectrum of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol

The Quadrupole Mass Filter and Spectral Skew


The mass analyzer of the Agilent 5973 inert mass-selective detector is a quadrupole mass
filter. As the name implies, this device allows only a narrow range of ions (having a specified
mass-to-charge ratio, m/z) to pass through at any given time. Thus, the quadrupole is directly
analogous to the grating monochromator used in optical spectroscopy techniques. Consequently,
quadrupole mass spectrometers are scanning instruments. To generate a complete mass
spectrum, they pass ions of a particular m/z for a brief period of time, record the ion current,
move on to the next m/z value, and repeat the entire process over the specified range. Depending
on the range of m/z ratios scanned, the electronics driving the instrument, and the quality of data
required, a quadrupole mass analyzer may require 0.110 sec to construct a single mass spectrum
(i.e., spectra are created at a rate of 0.110 Hz).
When a quadrupole mass analyzer is used to monitor the output of a chromatographic
column (as in GC-MS), a phenomenon referred to as spectral skew results. As compounds elute
from the column, they are physically separated into bands which arrive at the detector in
sequence. As viewed from a fixed point near the end of the column, the concentration of any
given compound will appear to rapidly rise and fall upon the arrival of its band, creating the
familiar chromatographic peak. Since a quadrupole mass analyzer requires a finite amount of
time to monitor each m/z ratio, the intensities of different ions will be recorded at different points
within a single chromatographic peak. Depending on which direction the quadrupole is scanning
and where the scan lies within the chromatographic peak, the intensities of either larger or
smaller m/z ratios are artificially inflated relative to other ions in the mass spectrum, causing a
skewed spectrum to be recorded. The critical question one must ask to assess spectral skew is,
How does the scan rate compare with the width of a typical chromatographic peak? If the scan
time is not significantly less than the width of a peak, spectral skew will be problematic. One
way to reduce the effect of spectral skew is simply to increase the scanning speed of the mass
analyzer. For a quadrupole mass filter, this is most often achieved by narrowing the range of m/z
ratios scanned. As the time required to obtain a single scan becomes smaller, the width of the
chromatographic peak traversed during the scan becomes smaller, and the degree of skew is
lessened. If mass spectra can be recorded instantaneously (which can be approached by some
time-of-flight [TOF] mass spectrometers), spectral skew is eliminated entirely.
SCAN and Select-Ion Monitoring (SIM)The 5973N GCMS quadrupole mass analyzer
can be operated in two modes: SCAN and select-ion monitoring (SIM). In the SCAN mode, the
quadrupole continuously and repeatedly ramps the monitored m/z ratio from a preset lower limit
to a preset upper limit, generating a series of complete mass spectra. At the conclusion of each
individual scan, the intensities of all the m/z ratios within the scan are summed, giving a total ion
current. A chromatogram is then constructed by plotting the series of total ion current versus
retention time. This plot is called the total ion chromatogram, or TIC. Analyzing a GCMS
chromatogram obtained in the SCAN mode therefore consists of selecting the portion of the TIC
that corresponds to a given peak and extracting the mass spectra from that time period.
In the select-ion monitoring (SIM) mode, the quadrupole remains fixed on a small set of
m/z ratios, effectively allowing only those predetermined masses to pass through to the detector.
An analysis in the SIM mode is useful when one is looking for small quantities of known
compounds under circumstances in which they cannot be separated from other compounds
chromatographically (i.e., in very complicated mixtures). In addition, the SIM detection scheme
often yields substantially lower detection limits than the SCAN mode (more time is spent
monitoring the m/z of interest) and also minimizes spectral skew.
Automated Data CollectionThe 6890 GC is fitted with a 100-position autosampler
which allows the GC-MS to record data without user intervention. Analytical chemists use
autosamplers to increase the number of samples run by an instrument over the course of a day
(injections can be made after the technicians have gone home) and to increase productivity
(analysts can perform other tasks while the autosampler is working). Furthermore, they free the
analyst to focus on data interpretation rather than data collection. Another advantage of robotic
sample handling is that it is ensures that all injections are made in a highly reproducible manner.
Human users may inject 1.5 uL or 0.95 L instead of 1.0 L or push the plunger with a different
speed for each injection. These small variations can lower the precision of the data. The robotic
injector always injects samples the same way every time. Another useful feature is that
autosamplers can perform many different analyses within a sample set. For example, one can
direct the instrument to record data using a SCAN mode method followed by a second analysis
in SIM mode method. As long as a hardware change (e.g. switching column chemistries) is not
required, the autosampler can perform an analysis. You will take full advantage of these
capabilities. The instrument will continue to inject samples after the assigned laboratory period
is over. The data can be analyzed at any time on any computer that has Agilents ChemStation
1701DA software.

Analysis of Mass-Spectral Data - Important terms and ideas:

1. Molecular ion peak (M+) or parent ion peak: the peak that results from the loss of an
electron from the molecule. Since the electron is of negligible mass, the M+ peak gives
you the mass of the original molecule. Note that you may not be able to find a molecular
ion peak in mass spectra of molecules that fragment easily (e.g., aliphatic hydrocarbons).
Furthermore, the M+ peak is considered the mass peak containing atoms of the most
abundant isotope for each element (i.e., 12C, 1H, 16O, 35Cl, 79Br, etc.) and not the less
abundant isotopes (i.e., 13C, 37Cl, 81Br, etc.). This is often one of the highest m/z ratio
ions in an EI mass spectrum. The official name for this peak is the monoisotopic peak.
The second peak in an isotope cluster is called the M+1 peak; the third peak in an
isotopic envelope is called the M+2 peak, and so on. Be aware that co-eluting
compounds, background contamination in the ion source, and portions of the column
stationary phase bleeding into the mass spectrometer can create high m/z ions.

2. Base Peak: the largest peak (highest abundance) in the spectrum. The abundance of each
mass peak in the spectrum is representative of the ions stability in the source, thus the
base peak is almost always the most stable ion. Occasionally, the base peak is the same
as the molecular ion peak, but this not always the case. Since aliphatic compounds tend
to fragment extensively, the base peak is usually a fragment of the original compound.

3. Recall that the atomic weights reported on the periodic table are weighted averages for all
isotopes. The mass spectrometer can distinguish between the isotopes. Thus, use the
mass of the predominant isotope for each atom. For example, the mass of 12C (the most
abundant isotope of carbon with a nominal mass of 12) is 12.0000 (not 12.0107) Da
(Daltons, 1 Da = 1 atomic mass unit), the mass of 1H is 1.0078 and the mass of 16O is
15.9949 (the resolution of the 5973 inert is such that you can round off to the nearest 0.1
Dalton). These differences may seem slight, but they add up quickly in a large molecule
(e.g. for octane, C8H18 has a monoisotopic mass of 114.1409, not 114.0000 (0.1409 =
0.007825 * 18)). The molecular weight calculated using mass values from the periodic
table is called the average mass. This is the molecular weight written on the sides of
reagent bottles and used for stoichiometric calculations.

4. The intensity of a particular ion is proportional to its concentration in the source at any
given time. Thus, a doubling in the intensity of a particular ion implies that the
concentration of the molecular species responsible for that ion has also doubled. This is
analogous to Beers Law used in absorption spectroscopy and enables the analyst to use
the same quantification methodologies used for GC-FID or GC-TCD experiments for
GC-MS. You will calculate response ratios for various fatty acids to allow you to
compare their abundances in commercial cooking oils.

Steps to identifying a compound based on its mass spectrum:

1) Preliminary survey
a. How many carbon atoms are present?
b. Are there any N, Cl, Br, or S atoms?
c. Is the molecule aromatic or aliphatic?
d. What is the molecular weight of the molecule?
2) What functional groups are present?
3) The molecular formula can be determined by piecing the functional groups together.
Hydrogen and oxygen can be filled in as needed.

1a. How many carbon atoms are present?


Recall that most carbon is in the form of 12C (12.0000 amu), but 1.1% of carbon is 13C
(13.0034 amu). Start with the M+ peak. This is the monoisotopic mass of the molecule. In
carbon containing molecules there will be a less abundant M+1 peak due to the presence of 13C
(~1 Dalton heavier). The rule of thumb that follows does begin to break down for molecules
larger than 500 Da (as the chance of a molecule having two or more 13Cs becomes significant),
but very few compounds with molecular weights greater than 500 are volatile enough for gas
chromatography.
Although the plotted mass spectrum is useful for obtaining an overview of the main
spectral features, the tabulated list of mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) versus abundance values is
essential for an accurate determination of the number of carbon atoms. Below is an example of
how the number of carbons in a given molecule can be calculated:

Peak: m/z: Abundance: Abundance as a % of M+


M+ 90 73.0 73.0/73.0*100 = 100
M+1 91 3.3 3.3/73.0*100 = 4.5
Number of carbon atoms = relative abundance of M+1 peak / 1.1

Using the numbers from above: # of carbons = 4.5/1.1 = 4 carbons.

1b. Are there any N, Cl, Br or S atoms?


According to the nitrogen rule, a molecule with an odd M+ must contain an odd number
of nitrogen atoms and an even M+ implies an even number of nitrogen atoms (0 counts as an
even number in this case). For Cl, S, and Br, look for at the M+2 peak. These elements, like
carbon, have heavy isotopes that can be detected by the mass spectrometer. However the heavy
isotopes of these atoms are two Daltons heavier than the most abundant isotope. Lack of an M+2
peak is a clear indication that the molecule does not contain these atoms. If there is a significant
M+2 peak present, then you need to look a little closer at the ratio.
If (M+/M+2 = 3), then a single chlorine is present; if (M+/M+2 = 19), then one sulfur is
present; if (M+/M+2 = 1), then one bromine is present. These ratios are based on the relative
abundances (just as in the case of carbon) of each heavy isotope. While these ratios are useful,
there is one note of warning that ought to be made about using them to identify which atom is
present. If there are multiple Cl, Br or S atoms present in the molecule, then a distribution of
peaks in a series (M+, M+2, M+4, M+6, etc.) will result. In these cases, the intensities of these
peaks will follow a statistical distribution that is more complicated than the simple ratios above
imply. However, in this case there are other ways to determine which atom is present. Look for
losses of 35 (for chlorine) or 79 (for bromine) since halogens usually fragment from molecules
rather easily.

1c. Is the molecule aromatic or aliphatic?


Since aromatic compounds tend to be quite stable, they show less fragmentation under
electron impact ionization. Thus, you will see more intense peaks at higher masses with a strong
M+ peak. If the compound is primarily a substituted benzene ring, then a strong m/z = 77 is
certain to show up in the spectrum due to the C6H5+ fragment ion. An aliphatic compound will
show extensive fragmentation and exhibit a very weak M+ peak. Straight chain aliphatic
compounds should show a series of peaks at m/z = 15 + 14n, where n is the number of CH2
groups in the chain and m/z = 15 corresponds to the terminal methyl group.

1d. What is the molecular weight?


By now it should be clear that the molecular weight of the molecule corresponds to the
m/z of its M+ peak.

2. What functional groups are present?


Frequently the functional groups on the molecule can be determined by searching for
particular patterns. Here are some examples:

a) Alcohols: M = 31 + 14n (formation of R-CH=OH+, where R is composed of n CH2


groups)

b) Aliphatics: M = 15 + 14n

c) Benzene: M = 78 (subtract one mass unit for each substitution on the ring)

d) Ketones: M = 43 + 14n (formation of R-CH2-CO+)

More examples can be found in textbooks (e.g. Interpretation of Mass Spectra, 4th edition
by F. W. McLafferty and F. Tureek). Sometimes identification is not this straightforward. It is
not uncommon for a hydrogen atom or a methyl group to migrate to form a more stable ion.
Generally, fragmentation will occur where functional groups connect, such as places where
branching occurs or where a side chain is attached to an aromatic ring.

3. Piecing it all together


At this point you ought to have some idea of what your molecule looked like before
fragmentation. You should know the number of carbon atoms and whether or not any N, Cl, Br
or S atoms are present. Any mass left over can be accounted for by adding oxygen (M = 16) and
hydrogen (M = 1) until you manage to assemble a coherent structure for the molecule.
Figure 2 is an example.

Figure 2: Mass spectrum of unknown 136 Da compound

The first thing to notice is that the base peak is M = 94. The M+ peak is M = 136.
Based on the data the molecular weight of the compound is 136. Computing the number of
carbons yields:

2.5/25*100 = 10 = M+1 relative to M+ peak

Therefore, M+1/1.1 = 10/1.1 = 9.09 9 carbons

There is no significant M+2 peak, so there likely arent any chlorine, bromine or sulfur atoms in
the molecule. Since M+ is even, there is either an even number of nitrogen atoms or none at all.
Notice that there is an intense m/z = 77 peak, which corresponds to a mono-substituted benzene.
This leaves three other carbons to figure out.

Molecular weight = 136


-77 from the benzene ring
-36 (from 3 12C atoms)
____________________
23 mass units left over

There must be an even number of nitrogen atoms present, however since two nitrogen atoms
(m/z = 14) would give a mass of 28, the possibility of nitrogen can be eliminated.

The remaining mass can be accounted for by filling in with oxygen and hydrogen. Obviously the
three remaining carbons are not going to carry 23 hydrogen atoms, however if we use one
oxygen atom:

23 (mass unaccounted for) 16 (oxygen) = 7 mass units left over.

It is reasonable to imagine seven hydrogen atoms on three carbon atoms. With all of the mass
accounted for the next step is to propose a likely structure. There are several possible
combinations, but only a few actually make sense.

Perhaps the molecule is an alcohol. Recall that alcohols show a 31 + 14n mass pattern. There are
no m/z = 31, m/z = 45, or m/z -= 59 peaks in the spectrum, so it is probably not an alcohol.

How about a ketone? There is an m/z = 43 peak present. However if the molecule were a ketone
then it could not accommodate seven hydrogen atoms.

What about an ether? That seems to work.

What if the structure were: (C6H5)-CH2-O-CH2-CH3?


As mentioned above, molecules generally fragment between functionalities. If this were the
actual structure, we would probably see an intense fragment with M = 91, resulting from the
bond breakage between the leftmost CH2 and the oxygen atom. However there is no fragment at
this mass in the spectrum.

Perhaps the molecule is an isomer: (C6H5)-O-CH2-CH2-CH3

If the molecule fragmented such that the oxygen was attached to the aromatic ring, but the rest of
the chain broke off, then these fragments would be left:

(C6H5)-O and +CH2-CH2-CH3.

Generally a hydrogen atom will shift to stabilize an oxyanion, resulting in this fragment:

(C6H5)-OH+ (m/z = 94)

Referring back to the mass spectrum, m/z = 94 is the most prominent peak, making this structure
the most likely candidate. Thus the final proposed structure is (C6H5)-O-CH2-CH2-CH3.

Clearly, the interpretation of mass spectra takes a lot of finesse. If you were to do this
more frequently, common fragmentation patterns would become much more obvious to you.
Fortunately modern chemists can utilize the on-line spectral libraries of GC-MS systems to
narrow down the likely choices. The Mass Spectrometry Facility has purchased a copy of the
NIST 02 library which contains reference spectra for over 150,000 compounds. Most database
searching programs arrive at their suggestions by comparing the analyte mass spectrum to all of
those in the library. However it is essential to understand how to properly interpret mass spectra
in order to properly assess the validity of a computer-generated database matches.

4. Incomplete Mass Spectra

Although mass spectra databases are very powerful tools for identifying the components
of a complex mixture, they are far from perfect. No database is complete, and there will be times
(especially when synthesizing novel compounds) that the molecule of interest simply will not be
in the database. The NIST 02 library contains over 170,000 entries (150,000 compounds, there
is some redundancy in this database), but there are millions of potential organic compounds.
Another challenge arises when a component of a mixture is present at very low levels. Often the
mass spectra observed will be incomplete. That is, only the most intense fragment ions in the
mass spectrum will show up because the other peaks will be too weak to be considered by the
software. One solution to this would be to inject a more concentrated sample, thus increasing the
concentration of the component in question. This is not always an option however as analysts
are often sample limited in the real world. Furthermore, injection of a more concentrated sample
may foul the column or EI source of the GC-MS significantly shortening the lifetime of those
components. Remember, the concentration of the major components in a mixture will increase
as well.
Figure 3 contains the mass spectra of dodecane, 1-dodecene, and 1-dodecyne and an
unknown, low abundance compound with 14 carbons. Look at the three 12-carbon molecule
spectra and notice the differences in the masses of the low mass (<100) fragment ions.
By comparing the low mass portion of the unknown spectrum to the other three, the
identity should be clear. Check with your AI during the lab period for the correct answer. A
similar analysis can be to identify compounds with shared structure features. In this experiment,
one of the components of olive oil will likely be insufficiently abundant for a proper database
match. You will have to compare its mass spectrum to the mass spectra from olive oils other
components to determine its identity.
Figure 3: Mass spectra of dodecane, 1-dodecene, 1-dodecyne and an
unknown 14-carbon hydrocarbon. Note: the bottom 25% of the 14-carbon
mass spectrum has been deleted to simulate the mass spectrum from a low
abundance compound.

Response Factors and Quantitation

As stated above, the response observed for a given compound is proportional to its
concentration in the gas stream. Unfortunately, not all compounds are ionizable or detectable
with similar efficiencies. This problem is also encountered in optical spectroscopy. Recall that
Beers law contains a proportionality constant (the molar absorptivity, ) that relates how well
any compound absorbs the wavelength in question. If is not readily known, a line relating peak
area and concentration of a compound can be created by analyzing a handful of standards with
known concentrations of the compound in question. This method can become cumbersome as
the number of analytes in a given sample increases.
An alternative to generating a calibration curve for each analyte is computing response
factors. A response factor is a ratio between the observed response (peak area) for a given
concentration of a molecule with the response from the same amount of a closely related
standard (e.g. a stable isotope labeled version or a structural isomer). According to method
8270C from the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the response factor is
computed as follows:

areaanalyte concstd
RF =
areastd concanalyte

The response factor is used to normalize the peak areas of the other analytes using this equation:

area analyte
area corrected =
RFanalyte
In this experiment, you will normalize all response factors to that of palmitic acid methyl ester.
The corrected areas will then be used to compute the compositions of the oils.

Fatty Acid Analysis

The calorie, vitamin, mineral, protein, carbohydrate, and fat content of nearly every food
item sold in the United States must be clearly shown on the package to allow consumers to make
informed nutrition choices. These values are determined using a wide array of analytical
chemistry techniques including atomic absorption spectroscopy, bomb calorimetry, gas
chromatography, gravimetric analysis, liquid chromatography, and ultraviolet-visible
spectroscopy. This particular experiment will use GC-MS to determine the fatty acid profiles of
a handful of commercially available cooking oils.
For most foods, a chemical method is required to isolate the nutrient of interest from the
food prior to analysis (typically homogenization followed by refluxing solvent extraction (aka
Soxhlet extraction), supercritical fluid extraction, solid phase extraction, enhanced microwave
extraction, etc.). The extracted nutrients are often then further modified to make them more
amenable to a particular analysis method (e.g. a chromophore may be added, the nutrient may be
converted to an easily quantified small molecule, the nutrient may be esterified, etc.).
Fats exist as triglycerides, three fatty acids attached to a glycerol molecule with ester
bonds. Fatty acids are long chain carboxylic acids that are isolated from naturally occurring fats.
They can be saturated (fully hydrogenated, i.e. all carbon-carbon bonds are single bonds), mono-
unsaturated (one double bond between carbon bonds in the chain), and poly-unsaturated (more
than one double bond in the carbon chain). All double bonds in natural fatty acids are cis
isomers. The degree of saturation determines many important properties of the fat including
flavor, resistance to oxidation, melting point, and smoke point. Olive oil, which contains more
than 70% unsaturated fatty acids melts at -6 C and has a smoke point of about 210 C. Refined
coconut oil (8% unsaturated fatty acids) melts at 25 C and does not smoke until 232 C. Food
processors often partially hydrogenate vegetable oils to raise their melting points, lengthen their
shelf lives, or change the texture of the finished product. The high temperatures and pressures of
the hydrogenation process can cause isomerization in unsaturated fatty acids, creating trans fatty
acids. Table 1 contains a list of common fatty acids and their sources.
There is an overwhelming body of evidence concerning the health effects of the various
types of fatty acids, and as a result food labels must now list the amount of saturated,
unsaturated, and trans fatty acids in each serving. These effects are summarized in an American
Heart Association publication (http://www.webmd.com/content/article/124/115606). Saturated
fatty acids have been shown to raise low density lipoproteins (LDL or bad cholesterol). Cis
isomers of mono- and poly-unsaturated fatty acids have been shown to lower blood cholesterol
levels. Trans isomers of unsaturated fatty not only raise LDL but lower heart protecting high
density lipoproteins (HDLs or good cholesterol); some researchers consider them worse than
saturated fats. The federal government has mandated that the saturated, unsaturated, and trans-
fat content of all foods be included on the label. It also stipulated that foods with less than 0.5 g
of trans fatty acids per serving could be labeled as having 0 g trans fat.
Table 1: Names, properties, and sources of common fatty acids.
Carbon double
Common Name atoms bonds IUPAC name Sources
Butyric acid 4 0 butanoic acid Butterfat
Caproic Acid 6 0 hexanoic acid Butterfat
Caprylic Acid 8 0 octanoic acid coconut oil
Capric Acid 10 0 decanoic acid coconut oil
Lauric Acid 12 0 dodecanoic acid coconut oil
Myristic Acid 14 0 tetradecanoic acid palm kernel oil
Palmitic Acid 16 0 hexadecanoic acid palm oil
Palmitoleic Acid 16 1 9-hexadecenoic acid animal fats
Stearic Acid 18 0 octadecanoic acid animal fats
Oleic Acid 18 1 cis 9-octadecenoic acid olive oil
Elaidic Acid 18 1 trans 9-octadecenoic acid Hydrogenated oils
12-hydroxy-9-octadecenoic
Ricinoleic acid 18 1 acid castor oil
Vaccenic Acid 18 1 11-octadecenoic acid Butterfat
Linoleic Acid 18 2 9,12-octadecadienoic acid grape seed oil
Alpha-Linolenic 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic Flaxseed
Acid 18 3 acid (linseed) oil
Gamma-Linolenic
Acid 18 3 6,9,12-octadecatrienoic acid borage oil
Arachidic Acid 20 0 eicosanoic acid peanut oil, fish oil
Gadoleic Acid 20 1 9-eicosenoic acid fish oil
5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic
Arachidonic Acid 20 4 acid liver fats
5,8,11,14,17-
EPA 20 5 eicosapentaenoic acid fish oil
Behenic acid 22 0 docosanoic acid rapeseed oil
Erucic acid 22 1 13-docosenoic acid rapeseed oil
4,7,10,13,16,19-
DHA 22 6 docosahexaenoic acid fish oil
small amounts in
Lignoceric acid 24 0 tetracosanoic acid most fats
Table adapted from
http://www.scientificpsychic.com/fitness/fattyacids.html

In this experiment, we will saponify the oils to release the fatty acids. Saponification, or
treating the fat with a strong base, hydrolyzes the triglyceride, creating one molecule of glycerol
and three fatty acid molecules. Since the free fatty acids are not very volatile, they will be
converted into methyl esters by reacting them with boron triflouride in methanol. The resulting
fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) are then injected into the GC-MS. Mass spectra will be used to
determine the identities of the FAMEs; GC retention times will be used to discriminate between
various FAME isomers.
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Experiment

Materials

Glassware and other equipment: Reagents:


5 8 test tubes 75 L of olive oil
1 250 mL beaker 75 mg of 0 g trans fat shortening
1 hot plate 75 L/mg of 3 different fats of your choosing (not olive
1 10 mL graduated cylinder or 0 g trans fat shortening)
2 25 mL graduated cylinders 18 mL of 0.5 M NaOH in CH3OH
10 125 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 24 mL of 14% BF3 in CH3OH
stoppers 120 mL of saturated NaCl in H2O
100 uL variable pipette 150 mL of hexane
1 mL pipette 100 g of anhydrous Na2SO4
7 autosampler vials 1 mL of standard FAME mix in hexane
1 mL of 25 ppm oleic acid (cis 18:1) methyl ester in
hexane
1 mL of 25 ppm elaidic acid (trans 18:1) methyl ester in
hexane

Procedure
(adapted from J. F. Robinson and J. Neyer-Hilvert in J. of Chem. Educ. 74:1106-1108 (1997))

Part 1: Saponification of the Oils

1) Place a half-filled 250 mL beaker of water onto a hot plate. Bring this to a slow boil.
2) Get small samples of olive oil, 0 g trans fat shortening, and three other fats for analysis.
NOTE: The solids should be scooped out with a spatula and put on weighing paper. You
will need ~75 mg of the solid greases. Be sure to place the glob of grease at the
BOTTOM of the test tube so it can react with the NaOH. Also, you will be unable to
quantitatively transfer the solid greases; this is acceptable as all measurements in this
experiment are relative to the total amount in the test tube. You will need 75 L of each
of the liquid fats.
3) Be sure to CLEARLY LABEL all test tubes, flasks and autosampler vials as all solutions
in this experiment are clear.
4) Pour 3 mL of the NaOH solution into five 8 test tubes.
5) Add 75 L/mg of each fat into a clean test tube and place it in a boiling water bath.
6) Boil them until the solutions are homogenous.
7) Remove the test tubes from the bath and let them cool for 3-5 minutes.
Part 2: Esterifying the free fatty acids

8) Add a boiling chip and 5 mL of 14% BF3/MeOH solution to each tube.


9) Boil the solution for 5 minutes in the water bath.
10) Remove the test tubes from the bath and let them cool.

Part 3: Extracting the FAMEs from the reaction mixture

11) Pour 20 mL of saturated NaCl and 25 mL of hexane into five 125 mL flasks.
12) Pour each cooled reaction mixture into a separate 125 mL flask containing the NaCl
solution and hexane.
13) Seal the flask and shake vigorously for 2 minutes. You want to make sure the 2 layers
are mixed very well. Make sure to vent the flask occasionally to release the pressure.
14) Allow the layers to settle for ~1 minute.
15) Decant the hexane layer (the upper layer) into another 125 mL flask containing several
grams of sodium sulfate.
16) Add 25 mL of hexane to the salt/methanol solution and extract any remaining FAMEs
from the salt water and methanol.
17) Combine the 2nd hexane extract with the first extract.

Part 4: Diluting the FAME extract for GC-MS analysis

18) Add 20 L of each FAME extract into separate autosampler vials containing 1 mL of
hexane and mix well.
19) Place 1 mL of each standard solution into separate autosampler vials.
20) Take all the autosampler vials and some clean hexane up to the mass spectrometry lab
(A411) for analysis.

Part 5: Recording Data with the GC-MS

21) Setting up the instrument for the experiments: If the software is not already open, log on
to the computer using your network ID and password and start the ChemStation software
by opening Instrument 1 (located on the desktop as well as in the Start menu). Select
Method >> Load and 315_FAME.m (it is in the directory
C:\MSDCHEM\1\315\Methods). This step MUST be completed first.

22) Loading the autosampler: Place the autosampler vials containing the three standard
solutions into positions 1, 2, and 3 of the autosampler tray; put the five vegetable oil
FAME extracts into positions 4-8; put an autosampler vial containing clean hexane into
position 9. Make sure the vial labeled A on the turret is full (nearly to the top) with
clean hexane.

23) Creating the autosampler sequence table: This step creates the table that determines types
of analyses to perform on each sample and specifies the order in which they are to be
performed. The table is generated as follows:

a. Click the Open Sequence: icon (it has a folder and three autosampler vials in it)
and select the sequence BLANK.S from the C:\MSDCHEM\1\315\Sequences
directory.
b. Click on the Edit Sequence icon (it has a pencil and three autosampler vials).
Make sure the data directory is C:\MSDCHEM\1\315\Data\ and the method
directory is set to C\MSDCHEM\1\315\Methods.
c. Select sample type Sample for all entries. The other sample types are only used
with automated data analyses. Enter 1 for the vial. Put a descriptive sample
name in the Sample column (e.g. standard FAME mix or corn oil extract).
Select the method 315_FAME after clicking inside the box under
Method/Keyword. Enter a file name for the run. It is suggested that you use
your initials and a three digit number (e.g. ABC_001). Enter a descriptive
comment (similar to the Sample column) in the Comment/Keyword String.
Leave the other columns (Sample Amt, Multiplier, Level, etc.) blank. When you
are finished, your table row should look something like this:

d. Make a two more entries so the contents of the autosampler vial 1 are analyzed
three times (for computing averages and standard deviations). Make sure to
increment the number in the file name. Create similar triplicate entries for each
vial. You should analyze the blank only once with 315_FAME.
e. Your completed sample table should have 25 entries and should look similar to
the table below.
24) Validate the Autosampler Sequence Table: This step ensures that no errors were made in
typing the names of the methods and that there is enough room on the hard drive to
record your data. Save your completed table by clicking the Save Sequence icon (it has
a red disk and 3 vials on it). Save the sequence in the directory
C:\MSDChem\1\315\Sequences. Give it a file name involving your initials so it will be
easy to find again, if necessary. Click the Simulate Sequence icon (it has a red check
mark and 3 vials on it). Make sure the Full Method button is selected in the Method
Sections To Run box. Then click Run Sequence. Correct any errors that arise and
resave your sequence. Make sure to view and print the verification report so you can
check your notebook entries. Close the sequence verification report after you have
printed it.

25) Start the Instrument: Click on the Run Sequence icon (it has a running figure and 3
autosampler vials on it). Make sure the Full Method button is selected in the Method
Sections To Run box. Then click Run Sequence. The instrument will perform the 26
analyses specified in the sequence table.
At the end of each day

Dispose of any unneeded hexane solutions in the ORGANIC WASTE container. Dispose of the
BF3/methanol/salt water solution in the AQUEOUS WASTE container. If you need to keep a
hexane solution overnight, cap it and seal the top with a small strip of Parafilm. Make sure any
flasks you keep are labeled and stored upright in the refrigerator or freezer rather than a drawer.
Always clean your glassware, the balance area, and your bench space before you leave.

Part 6: Analyzing the GC-MS Data

(Note: this section may be performed either in the Mass Spectrometry Facility, A454. See the
Appendix entitled How to use ChemStation in the Library for C315 Students for instructions
on remote access to the GC-MS computer. It also contains a brief introduction to ChemStation.)

26) Load the software and method: Open Enhanced Data Analysis by double clicking on its
icon. Load the 315_FAME.M method.

27) Analyze the Data from the FAME mixture:


a. Open the data from the standard FAME mixture.
b. Click the integrate button on the software (it looks like a chromatogram with 2
peaks and an arrow pointing between them). If you are unsure what a particular
button does, mouse over it for a few seconds, and a brief description of that
buttons function will appear.
c. Print the chromatogram by clicking the printer icon. You will need this for your
report.
d. Select Integration Results from the Chromatogram menu. Copy the table by
clicking the Copy button and paste the data into a spreadsheet for later
processing.
e. Zoom in on each peak and extract its mass spectrum by dragging across the peak
with the right mouse button.
f. Make sure the NIST 02 library is selected and search the mass spectra against the
NIST 02 library. Use the results from the searches to add names to the table in
your lab report.
g. Using the peak areas from the table and the equations in the handout, determine a
response factor for each fatty acid. Use palmitic acid methyl ester as the basis of
your factors. Ask your AI for the Certificate of Analysis for the FAME standard.

28) Determine the elution order for cis and trans 9-octadecenoic acid methyl esters: Open the
data file from the oleic acid methyl ester (cis 9-octadecenoic acid) solution. Note the
retention time. Do the same for the elaidic acid methyl ester (trans 9-octadecenoic acid).
29) Determine the response factor for elaidic acid methyl ester: Using a procedure similar to
that in step 26, compute the response factor for elaidic acid methyl ester.

30) Analyze the data from the oil samples:


a. Open the data file from the olive oil sample and integrate the chromatogram.
b. Using both mass spectra and retention times, identify the components of each oil.
You will need to tabulate these data for your report.
c. Using the response factors calculated in steps 26 and 27, compute the fatty acid
composition for each oil. Add these results to your table. Be sure to list all fatty
acids more than 0.5% abundant.
d. Repeat steps 29a-29c for the remaining oil samples.
e. For any fatty acid for which a response factor was not computed, assume a
response factor of 1.00
f. For the olive oil sample, determine the identity of the low intensity feature that
elutes just before palmitic acid methyl ester.
Part 7: Lab Report

1. Attach at the end of your report one representative chromatogram for each standard sample
analyzed (standard FAME mixture chromatogram, oleic acid chromatogram, and elaidic acid
chromatogram). DO NOT print each chromatogram it is not necessary and wastes paper.

2. Create a table summarizing the chromatographic conditions used for the analyses. Include
the type of column used, the dimensions of the column, the injection volumes, split ratios,
and the temperature program. Column data are posted on the instrument and the temperature
program can be viewed from the Oven icon in the Acquisition window. Discuss how the
method should be modified if the fatty acids had longer hydrocarbon chains.

3. Create a table summarizing the retention times for the FAMEs in the standard mixture.
Include the averages and standard deviations for the retention times for each FAME in the
standard. In separate columns in this table, include the name, concentration (from the
certificate of analysis), peak area (average and standard deviation), and response factor for
each standard FAME.

4. Include in your report the mass spectra for the oleic acid and elaidic acid FAMEs. Describe
how you can determine which of the two isomers is present when only one is found in an
unknown sample.

5. For each of the unknown oils, create a table that lists each of the fatty acid components with
a relative abundance of 0.5% or higher. This table should include name, retention time, peak
area, corrected peak area, and relative concentration (average and standard deviation). Find a
reliable reference and report the amount of each fatty acid known to be present in each oil.
Compare the relative concentration you measured to this known amount. Comment on how
well these numbers agree with each other.

6. Based on the data collected for your unknowns, which oil would you report to be the
healthiest?

7. In the chromatogram for olive oil, you should find a small peak with a retention time of
approximately 7.9 minutes. Include a mass spectrum of this compound in your report and
any evidence that you can use to help identify this compound. Explain the quality of the
mass spectrum and the impact of this quality on the data interpretation.

8. Based on your data table for trans-fat free Crisco, compute the number of grams of trans fat
in one serving (one tablespoon, which is 14 g for liquid oils and 12 g for solid oils/greases).
Is this product truly trans-fat free? Comment on your findings.
9. Other than the balance and the glassware used, what are the major sources of error in
GC-MS? How can these errors be minimized or eliminated? Does the autosampler address
any of these issues? If so, how?

Gas ChromatographyMass Spectrometry Report Grade Sheet

Section Points
Qualifier 25
Introduction 10
Experimental 10
Results and Discussion
FAME Analysis
(a) Chromatographic conditions
Table of chromatographic conditions 5
Conditions for longer chain fatty acid 5
(b) Standard results
Chromatograms 5
Table of results 5
Response factors 5
Oleic & elaidic acid MS 5
(c) Unknown oils
Table of results 10
Comparison to known values 10
Healthiest oil 5
Olive oil peak 5
Trans-fat free Crisco 5
(d) Sources of error 5
Conclusions 5
Literature references 5
Appendix: How to use ChemStation in the Library for C315 Students:

ChemStation is installed on PC # 5 in the library. This PC is located next to the emergency exit
at the far end of the library (near where the journal, Tetrahedron Letters is shelved).

Login to PC #5 using your IU username and password.

When the PC boots up, double click on the Instrument #1 Data Analysis icon. It should be on
the desktop. If not, it can be found on the start menu in Programs Dept. Sponsored
Chemistry MSD Chem Instrument #1 Data Analysis

You will need to map C315 directory on the GC-MS computer in the mass spectrometry lab as
follows:

Click on the start bar and select Run

Put \\bl-chem-msfgcmf into the Open dialog box.

Right click on the C315_Data_Methods icon.

Select Map Network Drive

Select a drive letter for the connection (e.g. W:).

DO NOT SELECT Reconnect at logon!

Click on Finish (see below)

Your data will now be on the drive with the letter you selected. For example, if you chose W:,
your data will be found in the directory W:\Data.

A copy of the NIST02 library is also found in the C315 directory.

Be sure to go to the Spectrum pull-down menu and choose Select Library


Click on the Browse icon and go to the C315 directory (e.g. W:) and select NIST02.

This will allow you to do your data searches.

You will need to check with library personnel to see where printouts from PC 5 appear.
Quick Guide to Data Analysis on ChemStation:

The left mouse button is used to zoom in on peaks. This feature works in either the
chromatogram or mass spectrum windows. You draw a box around the area you want to zoom in
on. The Y axis does NOT autoscale in the chromatogram window. Whatever is in the box is
what fills the chromatogram window after the zoom. I suggest you start your zoom boxes from
the bottom of the chromatogram. This way you can be sure that you do not cut off the tops of
peaks.

Double left-clicking will undo a previous zoom. If you want to redraw and entire chromatogram,
click on the Draw Chromatogram icon (the icon looks like a little teal chromatogram with no
arrows, letters, or other stuff in it).

The GC method (containing temperature program, split ratio, mass spec conditions, etc.) can be
found by selecting List Header from the File menu. The instrument parameters are found
in the acqmeth.txt window.

The Copy Window item under the Tools menu can be used for copying chromatograms
and/or spectra into other programs. Window 1 is mass spectrum, Window 2 is the
chromatogram.

You can direct the computer to integrate the chromatogram by clicking on the integrate icon. It
looks like a little blue chromatogram with a single, downward pointing arrow on it.
Alternatively you can select Integrate from the Chromatogram menu.

The results of the integration are viewed by selecting the Integration Results icon from the
Chromatogram menu.

The right mouse button is used to select the portion of the chromatogram from which you wish to
extract mass spectra. I suggest you draw the extraction boxes INSIDE chromatographic peaks to
avoid extracting too much noise.

Double right-clicking on a mass spectrum searches it against the selected library. You should
only search SCAN mode data and use the NIST02 library.

The Tabulate option under the Spectrum menu generates a table of masses and intensities
from the displayed mass spectrum. This table can then be copied and pasted into Excel for
further analysis.

ChemStation does have a rather complete set of online help documents which can be accessed
from the Help menu.

Direct any further questions to Jonathan Karty, jkarty@indiana.edu.

Você também pode gostar