Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
by
IN
October 1983
D a t e OOTDOg^ / 7 j
DE-6 (3/81)
-ii-
ABSTRACT
are used to interpret the screw plate data, and the l i m i t a t i o n s of each
i n a v a r i e t y of s o i l conditions.
Suggested topics for future research are presented which would further
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT i i
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES l x
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS x
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Test P r i n c i p l e s 1
1.2. H i s t o r i c a l Review 1
Analysis 9
3.2. I n s t a l l a t i o n System 2 9
Page
Pressuremeter Moduli 51
Loads 56
Assessment 64
Installation 70
Page
Reload Curves 88
6.1.2. I n s t a l l a t i o n System 9 1
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 0 1
-vi-
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Method 15
Page
Modulus Determination 61
Young's Modulus 63
Resistance 71
Sensitive Clay 77
Page
Site . 86
Clay Site 87
- ix _
LIST OF TABLES
Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Test data from the clay sites was obtained by the Graduate
appreciated.
thesis i s dedicated.
1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Test P r i n c i p l e s
2000 cm . 2
This plate Is screwed down to the test depth and a load
strengths.
1.2. H i s t o r i c a l Review
soils.
Schwab (1976) and Schwab and Broms (1977) examined the time-
and provide a framework within which the screw plate test can be
study i n - s i t u shear moduli. Kay and Parry (1982) evaluated the use
research are i d e n t i f i e d .
4
behavior.
The parameters which can be derived from drained analyses are the
consolidation f o r r a d i a l drainage, c .
f
p
a
k = modulus number
m
p' = v e r t i c a l e f f e c t i v e stress
= .5 f o r sand and s i l t
equation:
6 = 1 - _2_ (2.2)
k p
m a
in which: 6 = plate d e f l e c t i o n
km = modulus number
B = plate diameter.
pressure.
J,
p-1
PLATE D I S P L A C E M E N T <J
the s o i l i s very much dependent upon the stress level and history,
state.
s i t u stress l e v e l .
1.0 -
t
s oc - CLAY:
OS-
M
0-
0 10 20 30
0-1 1 1 1 1
0 -, tO 20 30 40
O 10 20 30 40
tangents to the test curve when the applied stress equalled the
overburden stress.
space.
e = ( l + v) [(l-2v)A + FJ (2.3)
Z
E
where: = v e r t i c a l s t r a i n at depth
p = v e r t i c a l stress on c i r c u l a r plate of radius 'r'
E = e l a s t i c modulus
v = Poisson*s r a t i o
A,F = dimensionless factors which are a function of the
point l o c a t i o n .
t h e o r e t i c a l and experimental a n a l y s i s .
whereby:
p
C = 1 - 0.5() (2.5)
Ap
Ap = P~P Q
=
net foundation pressure increase.
> t = P [ l + 0 log(t/t ) j
0 (2.6)
= reference settlement at t
o o
3 = constant = 2 to 3.
o
11
factor:
C 2 = 1 + B log(t/t ) o (2.7)
influence y i e l d s :
2B I
P = / e z dz Ap j dz
o o E
s
2B I
= C Ap I (-*) Az (2.8)
0 E
s
determined:
E s = C x ^ 1.2 B (2.9)
P
p = measured plate d e f l e c t i o n
B = plate diameter.
the basic r e l a t i o n s h i p :
Td 2
(2.10)
c =
t
where: c = c o e f f i c i e n t of consolidation
d = drainage path
t = time a f t e r load increase
T = dimensionless time factor,
14
D2 TJ2
c
r = T
90 * 3 3 5 ( 2 > 1 1 )
C
90 90
fc
where: c o e f f i c i e n t of r a d i a l consolidation
plate radius = length of drainage path "d"
90
r time factor f o r 90% consolidation = 0.335.
completeness.
shear strength.
IMPERVIOUS
i
PERMEABLE
C = Q335 . f
r
*90
IMPERVIOUS
, _
1 2 4 6
. 15
0 VELDS
C * 420 m /yeor
r
2
(RNE SAND)
5! On
131 x
y
IX)
P^E" = A
<' >
2 12
a = plate radius
A = modulus factor.
Solution * -A Reference
pa/E u
6 = plate displacement
Solution Remarks
the test curve for the modulus determination, rather than the
c i r c u l a r footing, whereby:
in which: c undrained shear strength
u
ultimate average plate stress
P
ult
a t o t a l overburden stress
vo
bearing capacity factor.
\ =
p
ult
= ^ - 9.0 for p a r t i a l bonding (2.15)
c
u
= 11.35 for f u l l bonding
clays. Kay and Parry (1982) propose a method whereby the load-
hyperbolic relationship;
Pult = 2
' 5 4
Py " '
X 5 4
Px <' >
2 16
where:
which the h e l i c a l auger can rotate, the screw plate has a conical
TORQUE PLATE LOAD CELL
TORQUE MOTOR
-OUTER RING CONNECTED
- 2000 Nm (17,000 In.lbs.) TORQUE
TO PISTONS
OUTPUT ot 140 bar (2000 pl)
INPUT PRESSURE
- 0-100 RPM 'INNER RMG ATTACHEO TO
BASE OF TORQUE MOTOR
LOAO CELL
MAIN TRUCK ' ROLLER BEARINGS
HYDRAULICS
MANUAL
PISTON CONTROLl
MALE SPLINE
SERVO-LOOP 2cm TRAVEL
CONTROLLER
F I G U R E 3*1-SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION
0 F
SCREW PLATE SYSTEM
Is}
U>
point i n advance of the plate i t s e l f .
criteria:
plate,
presented.
for the plate to rotate about a point located on the cutting edge,
disturbance w i l l be l e s s .
(see F i g . 3.2) which was found to have broken during a load test i n
this study.
Figure 3.2 - Example o f D o u b l e P i t c h e d Screw Plates
n
3.1.2. E f f e c t o f P l a t e S t i f f n e s s
t h e i r a n a l y s i s , we c a n g a i n some i n s i g h t i n t o the e f f e c t o f v a r y i n g
p = average p l a t e load
a = plate radius
E = s o i l modulus
v = Poisson's r a t i o f o r s o i l
X = modulus f a c t o r
12(l-v ) ( l - v ) E a
{v } p and {E } = e l a s t i c c o n s t a n t s f o r p l a t e .
p
relationship becomes:
E = X SI (3.4)
6
Ej = f l e x i b l e plate modulus,
8 = s t i f f n e s s correction factor
= 1.5 f o r a f l e x i b l e plate
= 1.0 f o r a s t i f f plate.
3.2. I n s t a l l a t i o n System
e f f e c t of rod f r i c t i o n .
Torque Motor
motor.
compatible with the screw plate system, the hydraulic pistons had to
control system.
screw plate rods, and at the same time apply an axial load, a thrust
advancement or withdrawal.
9-
FLOW DIVIDERS
O II CONTROL
LOCKING
VALVE
AD
R E L '.EF ! j
L l_l I l_j ADJ. i U-J
R E L I E F L_
VARIABLE VOLUME
P R E S S U R E COMPENSATED PUMP
INTAKE STRAINER
torque load c e l l .
applied load.
surface load beneath the truck pads did not influence the
1) installation torque
2) a x i a l load
3) axial displacement
summarized below.
revolution.
displacement transducer.
3.1 below.
STRESS AT FAILURE
(bars)
S i l t y Clay 4-6
Sensitive Clay 1-2.5
Fine Sand, Loose 8-14
Medium Sand, Dense g r e a t e r than 14
eliminate s i g n i f i c a n t s u p e r p o s i t i o n o f s t r a i n on successive
tests.
(4) Upon completion of the p r o f i l e , the plate rotation was reversed
the plate passed was unable to support the weight of the plate
Schmertmann (1970).
f r i c t i o n becomes excessive.
also evaluated. Calculations showed that the screw plate rods would
cycle.
4. DESCRIPTION OF FIELD PROGRAMMES
p r o f i l e consists of:
Cone penetration p r o f i l e s 6
Standard penetration tests 13
FIELD Self boring pressuremeter p r o f i l e 3
Dilatometer p r o f i l e s 2
push-in cone pressuremeter p r o f i l e 2
Screw plate p r o f i l e s 12
LAB c y c l i c t r i a x i a l tests 7
t r i a x i a l compression tests 5
Figure 4.4. These curves were analyzed using Janbu and Senneset's
k = 120 to 550 .
m
SBPMT-2
O
1-4 PPMT-2
DMTZ A P C >
PC6
PCS
A ^ OSBPMT-
PPMT-I
DMT-1
4 m
SCALE
RANGE OF CONE
RESISTANCE
(.9 to 1.2) (k )
E i n fine sand
52
o
A
o A
o
o A
5 +
o
o
o O'
A (k ) PRESSUREMETER
o
E
O
a.
u
(kg) LABORATORY o o o
o O (kj JANBU'S METHOD o
10
O
O o
O
O
o
o
O
15 I
100 ZOO 300 400 500 600
M
(l+v)(l-2v) <'>
4 2
E = e l a s t i c Young's modulus
v = Poisson's ratio,
laboratory k .
degrees of s o i l disturbance.
accordingly:
(k )
m
=
r U
(2.7 to 3.6) i n fine sand
^m^ Janbu
3.2, and i t was concluded that the U.B.C. plate was very f l e x i b l e .
plate.
design.
boring pressuremeter.
= I n i t i a l e l a s t i c modulus.
E
i
PLATE DISPLACEMENT (cm)
displacement curve.
Figure A.10, on the other hand, shows how the modulus also
ance p r o f i l e .
the boundary stress condition, including the load acting on the back
PLATE D I S P L A C E M E N T (cm)
60
the s i t e .
1000
10 J
1 >- ' 1 1
10 20 40 100 200 400
METHOD)
MCDONALD SITE
64
OS.)
s'corr
E x B (4.7)
p l a t e s t i f f n e s s , and
E u n c o r r e c t e d modulus, and
s
1.5 f o r f l e x i b l e plates
1 forrigid plates.
A p p l i c a t i o n o f t h i s c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r t o the t r e n d o b t a i n e d i n t h i s
t i o n of test data.
4.1.3.5. C y c l i c L o a d i n g f o r L i q u e f a c t i o n Assessment
c u m u l a t i v e s t r a i n t o a l a r g e e x t e n t , however s t a n d a r d i z a t i o n of test
2 4 6 8 10
herein.
the tests done i n the s i l t y clay at depth were done while the author
UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH Cu
kPo
SCREW PLATE N K = 9
CONE N c = 17
A PRESSUREMETER
DILATOMETER
effect of rod f r i c t i o n .
dation may be taking place after the drop i n the plate load.
a 250 cm plate are presented i n Figure 4.17, along with the appro-
2
approximation:
where: T = torque i n Nm
site.
2 50 cm'
NOTt -. IN Nm
500 cm plate
TOOObt
2
gc IN IMS
(T/q,J SAND .6
ratio)
consolidated.
summarized below:
Cone penetrometer 1
Dilatometer 1
Vane 1
Piezometer Cone 1
Cone Pressuremeter 1
Screw Plate 1
the screw p l a t e .
FIGURE 4-18 - CONE PROFfLE AT LANGLEY CLAY SITE
74
LEGEND
PI C P T I O C T . 14, 1982
P2 DILATOMETER NOV. 4 ,1982
P3 VANE TEST N O V . 18, 1982
P4 PORE PRESSURE DISSIPATIONS N O V .18, 1982
P5 PUSH IN CONE PRESSUREMETER N O V . 2 5 , 1982
P6 SCREW PLATE D E C . 2, 1 9 8 2
load. When the rods were clamped as shown i n Figure 4 . 2 1 , the peak
Note also that the apparent undrained modulus does not appear
4.22. The screw plate moduli reported are E^Q, taken as a secant
the f i r s t reload cycle. The screw plate moduli give modulus values
approximately twice that estimated from the cone. This seems quite
.2
JL_ , 1 1-
0 5 10
PLATE DISPLACEMENT (cm)
at the s i t e i s :
LEGEND
VANE SHEAR
. DILATOMETER
U.B.C. CONE N =I7 C
SCREW PLATE
0 ( N = 9)
K
PUSH-IN CONE
+ PRESSUREMETER
5+ ASSUMING P - IQ=5CU
L
PUSH-IN CONE
PRESSUREMETER
(GIBSON a
ANDERSON)
i ( P - P )= 52 Cu
L Q
a.
10-
/
At this s i t e the torque rods were not clamped, hence the true peak
loads were probably not attained. Based upon the tests at Langley,
at s u r f a c e t o 0.28
at 14 m
Cv = 0.01 ctn /min 2
k - 4.9 X 10-8cm/sec
Soft, sensitive
normally c o n s o l i -
dated s i l t y - c l a y
S increases
u
l i n e a r l y w i t h depth
about 26 kPa-47 kPa
S /P' r a t i o i s
u
constant w i t h depth
at 0.28.
E n t i r e stratum
has tandom & occa-
s i o n a l l e n s e s of s i l t
SAND
Normally c o n s o l i d a t e d
clay
Dense g l a c i a l t i l l
End o f Hole ~
GRAVEL
ROAD
LEGEND
TEST HOLE NO
-BRIDGE
PAVED ROAD
NOT TO SCALE
50 4
r e f l e c t s the fact that the screw plate modulus may more closely
ultimate load reached during the test may have been underestimated.
86
of varying densities.
that plate rotation during load testing i n sensitive clays can lead
to an underestimation of c . u
homogeneous, e l a s t i c , i s o t r o p i c media.
(1) double-flighted
clay
6.1.2. I n s t a l l a t i o n System
used.
The screw plate rods should be pinned so that the plate may be
f r i c t i o n during loading.
approximately:
12 kN i n s i l t and clays
50 to 75 kN i n sand.
frame.
accordingly.
unlikely that the rods would drop completely down the hole.
manner.
curve recorded.
2) The constrained tangent modulus i s then obtained by:
M = k (-r~
j/jl-a
p
a
(2.D
p
a
Janbu and Senneset (1974)
k = modulus number
m
p = reference stress (1 bar)
3.
p' = v e r t i c a l e f f e c t i v e stress
S n
P B
6 = (2.2)
k
m p *a
compression
B = plate diameter
where necessary
2.2) .
s t i f f n e s s factor R, whereby:
95
12 (1-v ) ( l - v ) E 3
P
Selvadurai et a l . (1979)
a = plate radius
B = 1.5 f o r log R = 0.
M
t r u e
= (2.3 to 3.6) i n sand. (4.5)
^Janbu
A
P = P ~ P Q
p Q = i n - s i t u e f f e c t i v e overburden pressure
B = plate diameter
= embedment correction
Po
{ 1 - .5t-!4 }
P- o
p
that order.
rebound modulus w i l l be r e l i a b l e .
97
Pult * u\ vo '
c +
0 ( 2 1 5 )
where: P ]_t
u
= u
l t :
*- m a t e
plate capacity
= bearing factor = 9
o = i n - s i t u v e r t i c a l effective stress,
vo
Selvadurai et a l . (1979):
= X (2.13)
pa/E
u
Selvadurai and Nicholas (1979)
p = plate load
a = plate radius
E = undrained e l a s t i c modulus
u
6 = plate displacement.
p , - a
ult VO /o i c \
c
u =
57 ( 2
' 1 5 )
a = i n - s i t u v e r t i c a l stress
vo
= bearing factor = 9.
softening.
(6) The plate should be advanced at least one metre to the next
to 2% of B.
Janbu's formula:
S Pn B
6
* IT
m a
B = plate diameter.
foundations.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Vol. 22.
Gould, J.H., 1967, "A Comparative Study of the Screw Plate and Rigid
University of F l o r i d a .
California.
Janbu, N., (1963), " S o i l Compressibility as Determined by Oedometer
Ladd, C.C., Foot, R., Ishihara, K., Schlosser, F., and Poulous,
Montreal.
1982.
Stockholm.
Germany, Vol. 3.