Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
MATTHEW 6:19-34-MEANING
AND SIGNIFICANCE
CRAIG L. BLOMBERG
Denver Seminary
Denver, CO
As it really impossible to serve both God and money (Matt 6:24)? The
lifestyle of most American Christians suggests that they are not con
vinced of the truth of this claim. May believers completely free them
selves from worry about the basic provisions of life (v 25)? The
dramatic increase of neuroses and other psychological afflictions in
our churches makes Christians often indistinguishable from other
cross-sections of the country's population. Some disciples have sought
God's kingdom first (v 33), but how then can we account for the mil
lions of Christians today and in the past who have starved to death?
The Sermon on the Mount is filled with puzzling and challenging say
ings of Jesus; some of the most crucial of these come in Matt 6:19-34.
1. Context
Of the numerous interpretive approaches to Jesus' great sermon,1
that which interprets it as promoting "inaugurated eschatology" is surely
the best.2 Matt 5:1-2 provides the context of Jesus' original audience; the
antecedent of ("them") in 2 is oi ("the disciples") in 1.
1
For a history of interpretation, see W. S. Kissinger, The Sermon on the Mount: A
History of Interpretation and Bibliography (Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow, 1975). For a de
lineation of 36 discrete, influential perspectives, see C. Bauman, The Sermon on the
Mount: The Modern Quest for Its Meaning (Macon: Mercer, 1985).
2
For detailed defense and exposition, see R. A. Guelich, The Sermon on the
Mount (Waco: Word, 1982). For the same perspective but more briefly and popularly, cf.
J. R W. Stott, Christian Counter-Culture (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1978);
and D. A. Carson, The Sermon on the Mount (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1978).
3
For an elaboration of these views and a brief critique, cf. C. L Blomberg, Mat
thew (Nashville: Broadman, 1992) 94-95. For commentary on 6:19-34, more generally, cf.
pp. 122-27.
4
Cf. esp. R. Lischer, "The Sermon on the Mount as Radical Pastoral Care," Int 41
(1987) 157-69; C. L. Blomberg, "How the Church Can Turn the Other Cheek and Still Be
Political," Southern Baptist Public Affairs 2.1 (1990) 10-12.
5
Cf. further R. A. Guelich, "Interpreting the Sermon on the Mount" (117-30); J. D.
Kingsbury, "The Place, Structure and Meaning of the Sermon on the Mount within
Matthew" (131-43); and L. S. Cahill, "The Ethical Implications of the Sermon on the
Mount" (144-56), all in Int 41 (1987).
6
The outline adopted here is greatly indebted to D. C. Allison, Jr., "The Structure
of the Sermon on the Mount," JBL106 (1987) 423-25.
7
There is also an important "catchword" connection between the uses of
in 6:16 and 6:19-20. See A. Sand, Das Evangelium nach Matthus (Regensburg: Pustet,
1986) 19-21.
Craig Blomberg: ON WEALTH AND WORRY 75
somewhat more loosely, dealing with how to treat others, but is very sim
ilarly structured as 6:19-34; 7:12 sums up both w 1-11 and the entire body
of the sermon with the famous "Golden Rule." 7:13-27 brings Jesus'
words to afittingconclusion by calling his audience to respond in obe
dience rather than ignoring his manifesto.
Matt 6:19-34 divides into two major sections: w 19-24 (on wealth)
and 25-34 (on worry). These sections are united, however, by the com
mon theme that believers must ruthlessly reject whatever distracts
from full devotion to God in Christ, because God will make necessary
provisions for those who above all seek the greaterrighteousnessof his
kingdom.8 Verses 19-24 fall into three discrete units: w 19-21 contrast
earthly and heavenly treasures, w 22-23 contrast people of light with
those of darkness, and 24 contrasts two mastersGod and mammon.
Together these three units drive home Jesus' injunction to choose di
vine rather than worldly priorities, because it is impossible to do both
simultaneously. Verses 25-34 are less clearly divisible, combining to
stress the single point that we need not (indeed, must not) worry about
physical provisions, because God cares enough for us to supply those
needs if our priorities are correct. Verse 25 gives the basic command in
three areasprovisions of food, drink and clothing. Verses 26-30 sup
ply the rationale in each of these three areas by a fortiori logicif God
nourishes and clothes lesser life forms, surely he will care all the more
for human beings. Verse 31 restates the thesis of the paragraph as a se
ries of three rhetorical questions. Verses 32-33 give further rationale
for why we can trust God. Verse 34 restates the initial command once
more and appends one further reason for obedience.
Attempts to trace the tradition history of these various sayings
usually result in complex reconstructions of tradition and redaction,
9
authentic and inauthentic materials. Matt 6:19-24 is not paralleled in
any one unified passage elsewhere in the Gospels, but w 20b-21 reap
pear in Luke 12:33b-34; parts of w 22-23 in Luke 11:34-35; and 24 in
Luke 16:13. When isolated logia "float" like this among disparate Syn
optic contexts, it is virtually impossible to know if the evangelists are
transmitting independent sayings from discrete contexts in Jesus' min
istry or variant oral traditions not attached to any one context, or if they
are drawing on a common written source which they have variously
10
edited. Matt 6:25-34, on the other hand, is very closely paralleled in
8
Cf. . M. Newman and P. C. Stine, A Translators Handbook on the Gospel of
Matthew (New York: UBS, 1988) 186.
9
The most recent, detailed analysis is M. G. Steinhauser, "The Sayings on Anxi
eties: Matt 6:25-34 and Luke 12:22-32," Forum 6.1 (1990) 67-79.
10
This is true particularly of double-tradition material found in connected form
in Matthew's sermons of Jesus but broken up into shorter, separate sayings scattered
throughout Luke's central section. See esp. C. L Blomberg, "Midrash, Chiasmus, and the
76 CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
Outline of Luke's Central Section," in Gospel Perspectives, ed. R. T. France and D. Wen-
ham (6 vols.; Sheffield: JSOT, 1983) 3.217-61.
11
E.g., Matthew is the only NT writer to use the expression "kingdom of heaven,"
and he uses it 33 times.
12
On Matthew's distinctive interest in , see esp. B. Przybylski, Righ
teousness in Matthew and His World of Thought (Cambridge: University Press, 1980).
13
See esp. the reconstruction of the Q form of the second half of this passage by
R J. Dillon, "Ravens, Lilies and the Kingdom of God (Matthew 6:25-33/Luke 12:22-31),"
CBQ 53 (1991) 605-27.
14
"Rust" is literally "eating," as perhaps in the corrosion of metal, but also in the
gnawing of clothing by vermin. R. H. Mounce, Matthew (San Francisco: Harper & Row,
1985) 56, states that the rendering "rust" was introduced into the English by William
Tyndale.
Craig Blomberg: ON WEALTH AND WORRY 77
15
Cf. J. P. Louw and E. A. Nida, eds., Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament
Based on Semantic Domains, vol. 1 (New York: UBS, 1988) 621: "that which is of excep
tional value and kept safe."
16
Cf. F. W. Beare, The Gospel according to Matthew (San Francisco: Harper &
Row, 1981) 182: "The words assume that the treasures are hoarded; they are prized for
their own sake, not put to work to create jobs and produce goods."
17
Cf. O. S. Brooks, The Sermon on the Mount: Authentic Human Values (Lanham:
UPA, 1985) 75: the "outward expression of a disciple's inner devotion."
18
On which, see esp. C. L. Blomberg, "Are There Degrees of Reward in the King
dom of Heaven?" JETS 35 (1992) forthcoming; W. D. Davies and D. C. Allison, Jr., A Crit
ical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew (2 vols.;
Edinburgh: & Clark, 1988) 1.632-34.
78 CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
19
Cf. . . Ridderbos, Matthew (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1987) 138.
20
S. T. Lachs, A Rabbinic Commentary on the New Testament: The Gospels of
Matthew, Mark, and Luke (Hoboken, NJ: KTAV, 1987) 127.
21
R G. Bratcher, A Translators Guide to the Gospel of Matthew (New York: UBS,
1981) 65, offers as possible translations, "Your eyes provide/let in light for the body/
whole person."
D. A. Carson, "Matthew," in Expositor's Bible Commentary (ed. F. E. Gaebelein,
12 vols.; Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1984) 8.178.
23
R T. France, The Gospel According to Matthew (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1985) 139.
Craig Blomberg: O N WEALTH AND WORRY 79
24 No one can serve two lords. For either he will hate the one and love
the other, or he will remain loyal24 to the one and despise the other. You
cannot serve God and mammon.
Verse 24 rounds out w 19-24 with yet a third antithetical paral
lelism. This time the point is made twice and the opposite options are
presented within each independent clause. There is also a small chi
1
asmus (A-B-B^A ) with "hate-love-loyal-despise," placing greater
weight on the desirable option in the central position of B-B1. Verse
24a and d bracket this chiasmus with the main proposition of the
verse; w b and c supply the rationale. Today, of course, many people
do serve several masters, but is used here in its absolute sense
of a lord who owns his slaves or servants. "Love" and "hate" reflect the
Semitic idiom of "choose" and "not choose" (or "accept" and "reject")
and imply that one master will inevitably be favored over the other. 5
Mammon includes all manner of material possessions and resources.
In and of itself, it is neutralnot necessarily bad and potentially put
to good use for God (Luke 16:9).26 But all too easily it seduces those
who possess it and becomes a powerfully destructive tool.
25 For this reason I say to you, stop being anxious for your lifewhat you
will eat or what you will drink,28 nor even with what you will clothe your
body. Life is more than nourishment and the body more than clothing,
aren't they?29
Verse 25 introduces the second major section of this passage
( w 25-34). The inferential connective demonstrates that
here begin the logical implications of serving God rather than mam
mon (v 24). The command which forms the central thrust of the entire
paragraph comes right at the outsetdo not worry over basic provi
sions for life, such as food, drink and clothing. The reason is because
24
In Greek, can mean "to join with," "maintain loyalty," and "adhere to"
(Louw and Nida, Lexicon, vol. 1,449).
25
E. Schweizer, The Good News according to Matthew (Richmond: Knox, 1975)
163-64. D. Hill, The Gospel of Matthew (London: Oliphants, 1972) 143, adds that "to
hate" means "to be indifferent to, or unconcerned for.'7
26
Newman and Stine, Matthew, 191.
27
See esp. J. Ellul, Money and Power (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1984).
28
Numerous manuscripts have "and" instead of "or," but the meaning is little
changed. Several important early witnesses omit "or what you will drink," but the
clause has probably dropped out by homoioteleuton ("you will eat") and
("you will drink") end identically. The parallelism with 31 further suggests that the
clause originally stood in the text. Cf. further B. M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on
the Greek New Testament (New York: UBS, 1971) 17.
29
The Greek with the interrogative suggests that an emphatically affirmative
answer is required.
80 CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
true (spiritual) life far transcends these bodily needs. The contrast be
tween earthly and heavenly treasures continues. The command not to
worry is again appropriately understood as a command to stop an ac
tion in progress. The KJV translation "take no thought" is inaccurate
and misleading. As the example of the birds (v 26) will highlight,
Jesus is not precluding planning or working to provide for oneself.
The basic meaning of is "to have an anxious concern, based
on apprehension about possible danger or misfortune. If we really
trust God, we will not worry. The most we can lose is our physical
lives, but our eternal lives, which make all the suffering or depriva
tion of this present age pale into insignificance (Rom 8:18), will re
main secure.
26 Consider the birds of heaven: they neither sow nor harvest nor gather
into barns, and your heavenly father nourishes them. You matter more
than they, don't you? 3 27 Moreover, which of you by being anxious can
add the smallest amount to one's age? 2 8 And why are you anxious con
cerning clothing? Learn from the flowers of the field, how they grow:
they neither labor nor spin. 34 2 9 Yet I say to you that not even Solomon
in all his glory was being clothed as one of these. 3 0 Now if God so
clothes the grass of the field, even though it exists 3 5 today and tomorrow
is thrown into the oven, 36 how much more you of little faith?
Jesus now further explains why his people can dare to be so free
from worry. Conceptually, he gives four reasons: worry is unnecessary
(v 26), it is useless (v 27), it is blind (w 28-29), and it demonstrates a
lack of faith (v 30). 7 Grammatically, however, these verses comprise
three illustrationsone about birds (v 26), one about human life-span
(v 27) and one about plants (w 28-30a). Verses 26b and 30b spell out
30
France, Matthew, 140.
31
Louw and Nida, Lexicon, 1,313.
32
Again the interrogative is negated by (), implying an affirmative answer,
though without the emphasis present in 25.
33
is best taken as an instrumental participle.
34
Among a nest of textual variants, the only other widely attested option is to
change "labor" and "spin" from plural to singular verbs, inasmuch as neuter plural sub
jects () often take singular verbs. Other options perhaps reflect a loss of an original
Aramaic word play between "labor" (cmal ) and "spin" {azal )Hill, Matthew, 144. Cf.
further Metzger, Textual Commentary, 18.
35
" is not naturally taken as an adjectival participle (as implied by the NIV
"which is here"), because it is anarthrous, while ("grass"), which it would modify,
is articular. Better therefore to take it as adverbial; more specifically, I would suggest, as
concessive.
36
"Oven" is better than NIV "fire." People often picked plants and used them as
fuel for the ovens in which they baked bread (Bratcher, Matthew, 68).
37
M. Green, Matthew for Today (Dallas: Word, 1989) 35-36. Mounce, Matthew,
58, refers to worry as "practical atheism and an affront to God."
Craig Blomberg: ON WEALTH AND WORRY 81
the point of the first and third of these illustrations; the logic is from
the lesser to the greater. If God cares this much for birds and plants,
how much more will he not care for his own people? In fact, w 26
and 28-30 parallel each other closely. Each begins with a command to
consider an example from the world of nature, comments on the rela
tive powerlessness of the plant and animal world, reminds us never
theless of God's concern for them, and concludes with a rhetorical
question underlining the greater value of human life. Verse 26 makes
the point concerning nourishment (combining the concerns of what to
eat and drink); w 28-30, concerning clothing.
The examples of birds and vegetation parallel each other, too, be
cause each is wild. Domestic animals and cultivated plants do not
need to rely as directly on God as do their counterparts in the wild.
The contrast with humans is thus heightened; God takes care even of
those forms of life whose existence is most fragile and tenuous.
Birds differ from plants, however, in that they do work industriously
to find food, build nests, and provide for themselves, even if they can
not entirely imitate human agricultural practices. As noted above,
Jesus is not enjoining a lackadaisical, lazy or carefree attitude toward
provisions. Still, wild fowl depend considerably on the vagaries of na
ture, over which God rules, reminding Christians that they dare not
try to secure their lives against every conceivable calamity. Such
foolproof security does not exist in this life; those who nevertheless
pursue it will be consumed in the process and unable to serve God.
Verse 27 gives a slightly different kind of reason for not being
anxious. Not only does worry fail to recognize God's great love for us,
it simply does not work. At best it accomplishes nothing; at worst it
actually shortens our lives, as modern medicine recognizes. The
phrase is somewhat ambiguous.
normally means a "cubit" (about 18 inches), while can
mean either a length of time or unit of size. The more natural render
ing of the Greek would be "one cubit to one's height." But to add this
amount would scarcely be the trifling quantity apparently demanded
by the context.41 Although the terms are less commonly used this way,
38
Bratcher, Matthew, 67, takes the expression "birds of heaven" to indicate that
they are wild birds. (NIV "lilies") is more likely a generic term for wild flowers
(France, Matthew, 140-41).
39
Schweizer, Matthew, 164.
40
Cf. esp. Dillon, "Ravens," 625-26: " 'Seeking the kingdom' is the way of life in
which the compulsion to 'manage' the future for oneself and others has been replaced
by a self-sacrificial trust in the saving plan of Cod, of which we can know only that it is
advanced by any and all faithful following of Christ"
41
Ridderbos, Matthew, 140.
82 CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
the better translation remains "the smallest amount to one's age" (cf.
42
NIV-"a single hour to his life").
Verses 28-30 are substantially longer than their parallel in 26
because of Jesus' additional reference to Solomon. Instead of a simple
comparison between plants and humans, Jesus sets up a three-stage ar
gument. First, he points out God's care for the wild flowers or grasses,
despite their relative impotence and evanescence. But instead of mov
ing immediately to God's greater concern for humans, he next marvels
at the beauty of theseflowers,which he believes surpasses that of the
one king in Israel's history most fabled for his splendor and earthly
glories. So if the flowers are that much more wonderfully "clothed"
than even Solomon, and if we are that much more cared for than the
flowers, then God loves those in Christ in certain ways inestimably
more than even the greatest of OT believers. This is a recurrent theme
in Matthew (cf. esp. 11:11) and drives home the point about our ability
and need to entrust our anxieties to God that much more forcefully.
31 Therefore do not be anxious, saying, "What shall we eat?" or "What
shall we drink?" or "With what shall we be clothed?" 32 For the pagans
seek all these things. And your heavenly father knows that you need all
these things.
Jesus now repeats the original command of 25 with a simple
aorist imperative, envisioning again the same three concerns, this
time by means of hypothetical direct quotationsthree deliberative
questions people might ask themselves. Again he supplies a rationale
for his command by appealing to an a fortiori argument. This time the
comparison is not between humans and other life forms but between
God's people and the pagans. in Matthew, as in the NT more
generally, normally means "Gentiles" or "nations" (people groups), but
here it must refer to those who are neither Jews nor Jesus' disciples
those who do not have a direct personal knowledge of God through
his special revelation. Anxiety for basic provisions of life often char
acterized ancient pagan religions, not least in the Greco-Roman em
pire, and hence necessitated regular rituals to placate whimsical
deities in charge of nature. Surely those who know the one true liv
ing God ought to act far differently. They will know that God is aware
of their needs and intends to take care of them.
42
Davies and Allison, 1.652. Entirely unconvincing is the suggested emendation of
a reconstructed Aramaic original, which would result in a length equivalent to the
small joint of a knuckle, by G. Schwarz, " ,"
ZAW71 (1980) 244-47.
43
An excellent introduction to the pagan religions of the biblical world is J. Fine-
gan, Myth and Mystery (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1989).
Craig Blomberg: ON WEALTH AND WORRY 83
33 But seekfirstthe kingdom of God44 and its righteousness, and all these
things will be added to you.
Here is the central positive command of w 25-34. If we are not to
worry, what are we to do? Jesus' answer is to pursue therighteousand
just priorities of the kingdom of God. Then our physical needs will be
looked after.45 The problem of course is that countless Christians, past
and present, have not had this promise fulfilled in their experiences in
this life. Not surprisingly, many commentators therefore treat this
promise as entirely eschatological and relegate it to the "not yet" of the
"already-not yet" equation.46 But a promise limited to heavenly recom-
pense would not necessarily serve as a very effective motivator to es-
chew worry in the present.
Interestingly, the only major Lukan deviation from "Q" in this pas-
sage is Luke 12:33, separated by only one verse from the Lukan parallel
(v 31) to our text here. In it, Jesus goes on to command his disciples to
sell their goods and give alms. Mark 10:29-30 records presumably the
oldest form of a dialogue between Peter and Jesus, in which the latter
specifically declares that those who give up family or property for the
Lord will receive in return a hundredfold in both categories, not only
in the life to come but also in this age. Inasmuch as the hundredfold ad-
dition of family must refer to the larger community of disciples, the ex-
tra houses orfieldsmust also be those which belong to fellow believers.
Combining Luke 12:33 and Mark 10:29-30 suggests that the correct in-
terpretation of Matt 6:33 is that Christians should be able to expect to
have their physical needs cared for, when their spiritual priorities are
correct, because Jesus calls all his followers to share their possessions
with other Christians in need.47 But he is notfirstof all addressing in-
dividual believers but the disciples as a community. If Christian con-
gregations do seek God's kingdom above all else, then by definition they
44
A variety of important manuscripts omit "of God" but the omission is not likely
original. Of 54 total appearances of "kingdom" in Matthew, in no other instance does
the term appear without either some qualifying word or some word which "kingdom"
itself is qualifying. See further Metzger, Textual Commentary, 18.
45
Cf. France, Matthew, 142: "This positive climax makes it clear that w. 25ff. are
not prescribing an irresponsible, happy-go-lucky optimism, or a fatalistic acceptance of
the status quo, nor are they decrying the body and its concerns as sordid and unworthy
of our attention. They call the disciple to an undistracted pursuit of his true goal, to
which lesser (though legitimate) concerns must give way; and they assure him that if he
will putfirstthingsfirst,God will take care of the rest."
46
E.g., T. E. Schmidt, "Burden, Barrier, Blasphemy: Wealth in Matt 6:33, Luke
14:33, and Luke 16:15," TrinJ n.s. 9 (1988) 173.
47
Cf. Guelich, Sermon, 373: "Part of the presence of the Kingdom is indeed mate-
rial blessings. Therefore, we can hardly live under God's reign, receive his blessings,
and not use them to help alleviate the evil of hunger and need elsewhere."
84 CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
will care for the poor within their midst.48 As G. Getz puts it bluntly,
"Situations occur where people's needs are not met because followers
of Christ have not been obedient in applying the principles that God
has outlined in His Word."49
34 So then do not be anxious for tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious
for itself. Sufficient for today is its evil.
The command with which this paragraph began, and which was
repeated in its center, occurs one last time. The second two clauses of
the verse guard against idealizing 33. That which is bad ( ) will
continue to characterize this age. But Christians ought not to exacer
bate the evil of the fallen world by failing to give generously to those
in need.50 There is also a "one day at a time" mentality here which re
calls the petition of the Lord's prayer, "Give us today our daily bread"
(6:11).51 God promises to satisfy our needs, not our greeds.
3. Application
The key question of contemporary significance which arises out
of this passage deals with what Christians should do with their
money and other material possessions. Save for the most destitute,
almost all North American Christians have certain funds or physical
objects which they prize highly.52 A major barometer of spiritual ma
turity and obedience involves one's financial priorities. Careful scru
tiny of a person's checkbook ledger may be more telling than various
outward forms of piety, if one is trying to determine who is truly com
mitted to Christ. Verse 24 suggests that materialism may be one of the
greatest competitors with God for human allegiance. A. Kodjak elabo
rates persuasively: mammon "is the most direct channel for self-
assertion, the establishment of security, the acquisition of a sense of
superiority over other mortals, and thus the presumed removal of the
curse of mortality." Second, it has a lasting power outliving the one
53
who accumulated it and thus functions as a "surrogate immortality."
48
Cf. esp. D. M. May, "Leaving and Receiving: A Social-Scientific Exegesis of
Mark 10:29-31," PRS17 (1990) 141-54.
49
G. A. Getz, A Biblical Theology of Material Possessions (Chicago: Moody, 1990) 92.
50
Carson, Sermon, 93, thinks that the exceptions to 33 should thus be due to
"suffering forrighteousness'sake" (5:11-12).
51
Cf. the similar sentiments in b. Sanh. 100b, discussed in W. C. Allen, A Critical
and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Matthew (Edinburgh: &
Clark, 1907) 65.
52
But the more one has, the more one may fall prey to the anxiety of trying to
protect it. Cf. esp. G. Strecker, The Sermon on the Mount: An Exegeiical Commentary
(Nashville: Abingdon, 1988) 137.
53
A. Kodjak, A Structural Analysis of the Sermon on the Mount (Berlin: de
Gruyter, 1986) 126-27.
Craig Blomberg: ON WEALTH AND WORRY 85
54
T. Sine, Wild Hope (Dallas: Word, 1991) 272-74.
55
Matt 23:23 refers to GodTs will under the Mosaic covenant (cf. Carson, "Mat-
thew," 481).
56
As an example, see the helpful suggestions throughout R. J. Sider, Rich Chris-
tians in an Age of Hunger (Dallas: Word, 1990).
57
See esp. A. Kirk, The Good News of the Kingdom Coming (Downers Grove, IL:
InterVarsity Press, 1983); C. R. Padilla, Mission Between the Times: Essays on the King-
dom (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1985); O. E. Costas, Liberating News: A Theology of Con-
textual Evangelization (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989).
58
See F. Tillapaugh, The Church Unleashed (Ventura: Regal, 1982).
86 CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
59
Sine, Wild Hope, 274-76, who notes other possibilities in alternative housing as
well.
Craig Blomberg: ON WEALTH AND WORRY 87
60
Numerous practical suggestions appear in works like D. J. Longacre, Living
More with Less (Scottdale: Herald, 1980); and R. J. Sider, ed., Living More Simply: Bibli-
cal Principles and Practical Models (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1980).
61
Most notably R. J. Sider, Completely Pro-Life (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity
Press, 1987).
88 CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
what does it profit?" (Jas 2:15-16). This illustration appears in the con-
text of a rhetorical question (implying the answer "no"), which asks if
anyone professing to have faith and behaving in this way can truly be
saved! This is not to charge James with teaching works-righteousness,
as he often has been accused, but simply to stress that true salvation
involves making God in Christ one's Lord or master (as in Matt 6:24;
cf. Rom 10:9-10; Acts 16:31), which will by definition result over time
in a changed lifestyle that produces good works.62 These are not
quantifiable, lest we return to legalism, but sooner or later, in percep-
tible ways, when the Spirit of Christ truly indwells a person, one's
heart will be changed so as to affect how one spends one's money.
Giving will increase, including giving to the physically needy, and
particularly to needy fellow Christians. If none of this ever happens,
professions of faith in Christ remain vacuous.63
Others with more sensitive consciences may fear that Christians
who heed Jesus' words may get carried away and give up too much.
This of course has rarely happened in church history and, given hu-
man nature, is not often a realistic danger!64 2 Cor 8:13-15 suggests
that few are ever called to give up more than half of their income.65
The Zacchaeus episode, coming in the middle of a Lukan triad of pas-
sages on what to do with one's wealth (Luke 18:18-30, 19:1-10, 19:11-
27), may be viewed as a "golden mean" which teaches a similar
truth.66 More obviously, each of the three accounts partially relativ-
izes the others. God clearly calls different believers to different kinds
of stewardship. In the earlier Markan version of the first of these sto-
ries, it is plain that Jesus' command to the rich young ruler to sell all
is based on what stands in the way of this specific man's ability to be-
come a disciple (Mark 10:21b).67 But one should be wary of breathing
a sigh of relief too quickly. As R Gundry explains, "That Jesus did not
62
See esp. J. F. MacArthur, Jr., "Faith According to the Apostle James," JETS 33
(1990) 13-34.
63
Cf. U. Luz, Matthew 1-7: A Commentary (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1989) 399:
"Worship of God as well as worship of mammon become visible in deeds involving
money."
64
Cf. Schmidt, "Burden," 188: "To stand still because the end is so far away is to
miss the point of discipleship as a journey. Most of us could travel a considerable dis-
tance on that road before anyone suspected us of extreme obedience."
65
C. Kruse, The Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians (Grand Rapids: Eerd-
mans, 1987) 157: "It is worth noting that it is from the abundance or surplus of those
who are better-off that Paul expects the needs of those who are worse-off to be met. He
does not advocate that those who are better-off reduce themselves to poverty also."
66
W. E. Pilgrim, Good News to the Poor (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1981) 129-34.
67
D. O. Via, Jr., The Ethics of Mark's Gospel-in the Middle of Time (Philadelphia:
Fortress, 1985) 137, charts a good middle ground between over-absolutizing and over-
relativizing this text.
Craig Blomberg: ON WEALTH AND WORRY 89
command all his followers to sell all their possessions gives comfort
only to the kind of people to whom he would issue that command"!68
In the conclusion to the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus warns
against professing Christians who claim to know him as Lord, but to
whom Christ will one day say, "I never knew you; depart from
me... " (7:23). Tragically, these will include persons in ministry (v 22).
How can we recognize such people? "By their fruits you shall know
them" (v 20). But apparently their powerful words and deeds are not
necessarily the telltale fruit (v 22). What then is determinative?
Doubtless Jesus' answer would be the "greaterrighteousness"which
permeates his commandments. Matt 6:19-34 reminds us that a central
element in that righteous living is appropriate stewardship of all our
resources, in ways which demonstrate that anxiety for physical provi-
sion does not outweigh our claims to serve God rather than mammon.
68
R. H. Gundry, Matthew: A Commentary on His Literary and Theological Art
(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1982) 388. Gf. Ridderbos, Matthew, 358: The man of course
did not think that his riches were more than eternal life, but he must have told himself
that he did not really have to give up his wealth to gain it."
^ s
Copyright and Use:
As an ATLAS user, you may print, download, or send articles for individual use
according to fair use as defined by U.S. and international copyright law and as
otherwise authorized under your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement.
No content may be copied or emailed to multiple sites or publicly posted without the
copyright holder(s)' express written permission. Any use, decompiling,
reproduction, or distribution of this journal in excess of fair use provisions may be a
violation of copyright law.
This journal is made available to you through the ATLAS collection with permission
from the copyright holder(s). The copyright holder for an entire issue of a journal
typically is the journal owner, who also may own the copyright in each article. However,
for certain articles, the author of the article may maintain the copyright in the article.
Please contact the copyright holder(s) to request permission to use an article or specific
work for any use not covered by the fair use provisions of the copyright laws or covered
by your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement. For information regarding the
copyright holder(s), please refer to the copyright information in the journal, if available,
or contact ATLA to request contact information for the copyright holder(s).
About ATLAS:
The design and final form of this electronic document is the property of the American
Theological Library Association.