Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Damage Properties of
Rocks Under Dynamic Loading
GAO Wen-xue Liu Yun-tong
(Beijing University of Technology Beijing 100022 China)
Abstract
The damage properties of two types of rocks under dynamic loading are studied. The shock-induced experiments are
done using planar impact technique on the one-stage light gas gun, and the ultrasonic tests on the damaged rocks
have been made by use of the ultrasonic pulse-transmission method. The shock-induced damage of rock is related to
the shock speed and the attenuation coefficient of sonic wave, and the latter reflects the damage degree in rock fairly
well. The attenuation coefficient a can be used as main damage parameter for constructing dam-age model of rock
under dynamic loading.
The experimental research on rock damage and its evolution under dynamic loading is a most attractive problem in
the field of explosive mechanics, rock mechanics and material science and etc. Up to now this research can be
divided into two parts. One is microscopic observation of the samples damaged by dynamic loading, microscopic
analysis of the construction change in material to understand the material break process[1]. The other uses ultrasonic
methods to test the changes in damage rock during shocking, and then defines the damage parameters with
ultrasonic characteristics[2-4]. Because the attenuation takes place when stress wave spreads in damaged rock, with
ultrasonic method we can set up the relationship between the attenuation coefficient and damage parameters. In this
paper, the shock-induced experiments for two kinds of rocks are done using planar impact technique on the one-stage
light gas gun, and the ultrasonic signals in the damaged rocks are measured. Based on this, fitting the relationship
formula of attenuation coefficient of sonic wave, damaged variables and shock-induced damage dissipated energy, it
provides experiment data for constructing rock damage model
1. ROCK DAMAGE EXPERIMENTS Where Cpo and CP are respectively the velocities of
UNDER DYNAMIC LOADING elastic longitudinal waves before and after damaging.
Although the target board is complete after dynamic
The experiments are carried out with the one-stage light loading, it is seriously damaged so that echo test signal is
gas gun of 37 mm in diameter. The gun is 4.2 m long and quite week and disturbing signal is very strong. Satisfactory
the moving velocity of pills is 50~1000 m/s. signals are incepted with transmission method under
Sticking the flying piece on the pill the high-pressure gas middle frequency 50 kHz Because the damage in
released drives the pill moving along the vacuum gun tube. aluminum loop is quite trifling, the ultrasonic test can be
When the moving pill impacts the target board at high done for the whole target board reclaimed. That is firstly to
speed the higher-pressure impulse was produced and measure the sound transmit time through the whole target
recorded that is useful for analyzing dynamic response and then measure the time for aluminum loop the thickness
characteristic and damage mechanism. of the rock sample divided by the time difference is the
In order to obtain symmetrical. plane shock wave the velocity of rock sample. If the ultrasonic velocity of the
sample must be designed with the ratio of thickness to sample before damage was measured under the same
diameter to eliminate the effect of side sparseness and condition we can obtain the damage parameter in the rock
chase waves The flying piece is made of aluminum (LY12). by Eq.(1).
The target board is composed of the cover board,
aluminum ring transducer rock sample and probe The 2.1 The Results of Ultrasonic Velocity
cover board is 1.5 mm thick and 47.0 mm in diameter. The The results of ultrasonic velocities in two kinds of rocks
sample is designed as roundness 30.0 mm in diameter and are shown in Tab.1 and Tab.2. From Tab.1 and Tab.2. it is
with different thicknesses. Two-spire managing transducer shown that the wave velocities of two typical samples are
is embedded in the rock sample. The aluminum ring is low and damage is obvious. Impact-induced damaged
placed around the sample to prevent radial cracking. In area in marble is wider than that in sandstone, which bears
order to realize reclaim softly the special reclaiming on impacting speed.
canister installation is used filled up with cushion material to If amplitude spectrum has multiple main frequencies, fo
freeze up the break in the sample effectively. is the maximum one.
2. THE ULTRASONIC TESTS ON DAMAGED ROCK 2.2 The Attenuation and Frequency
Spectrum Analysis of Ultrasonic
Through ultrasonic measurement of the velocities of 2.2.1 The attenuation coefficient
elastic longitudinal waves before and after damaging, we Ultrasonic attenuation reflects the characteristic of stress
can evaluate quantitatively the damage parameter in the wave traveling in the impact-induced damaged rock[5]. When
rock The damage can be calculated as follows ultrasonic is traveling in the rock, its energy gradually decreases
with the distance increasing. It is written as
2
D = 1 (C p C p 0 ) (1) E (x) = E0 e x (2)
Where is the attenuation coefficient of material. characteristic change of wave frequency spectrum is
In experiments, the ultrasonic attenuation for original more sensitive than that of wave velocity change [6].
sample and for damaged sample under impacting at Frequency spectrum analysis is to disperse the wave
different speeds are measured separately in full signal; and signal received, and to calculate the valid wave parts
the difference among them is the attenuation coefficient, in reflecting rock characteristic with fast Fourier transform
terms of dB/ cm Strictly speaking from physical meaning, (FFT) to obtain the spectrum, so as to analyze deeply
the attenuation coefficient should be an even attenuation, the damage characteristic in the rock. The spectrum
or a comparative measure. It is different from that one area reflects the quantity of ultrasonic energy, which
defined in Ref. [2]. Experiment results are shown in Tab.1 shows the dissipation of the stress wave. The
and Tab.2. Fig.1 gives the relationship between damage relationship between spectrum area and attenuation
parameter D and attenuation coefficient. The relationship coefficient is shown in Fig.3 and the relationship
with linear fitting is expressed as: between spectrum area and damage is in Fig.4, from
which you will find that both attenuation coefficient and
= A + BD (3) damage are inversely proportional to the spectrum
area. It is evident that the spectrum area in marble is
where A and B are regress parameters; A -28.60 B 49.45 greater than that in sandstone, which explains why the
for marble, and A -157.70 B 194.66 for sandstone. All the damage degree in marble is less, and the integrality is
correlation coefficients exceed 98%. It can be made out better than sandstone, Because spectrum area reflects
from Fig.1 that there is linear correlation between damage the magnitude. of ultrasonic energy, it indirectly reflects
and attenuation coefficient, which reflects the damage the energy dissipation of stress wave in the damaged
degree in the rock. rock. Thus the spectrum area is regarded as the
characteristic parameter of the stress wave traveling in
the damaged rock;
The ultrasonic test and frequency spectrum analysis in
two kinds of rocks indicate:
1. There is correlation between ultrasonic attenuation
coefficient and damage in the rock?which is
quantitatively propitious to the measurement of the
damage in the rock;
2. Attenuation coefficient and damage are all
inversely proportional to the spectrum area (area
(a) marble (b) sandstone of wave). The spectrum area practically reflects the
transfer and dissipation of energy in the damaged
Figure 2: The relationship of damage parameter and rock;
attenuation coefficient. 3. The higher the speed of impacting, the more serious the
damage degree in the rock;
2.2.2 Frequency spectrum analysis 4. It is important for the original damage to affect the
During the whole process of rock break, including damage evolution.
fracture producing, enlarging and cracking, the
REFERENCES
3. CONCLUSIONS