Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ABSTRACT
This article focuses on the use of Computer-Mediated Communication
by the movement for global justice, with special attention to the
organisations involved in the movement and its activists. We examined
data collected during two supranational protest events: the anti-G
protest in Genoa in July and the European Social Forum (ESF) in
Florence in November . In both cases, we have complemented an
analysis of the Genoa Social Forum and ESF websites with a survey of
activists, including questions about their use of the Internet. We then
examine hypotheses about changes new technologies introduce in
collective action. The Internet empowers social movements in: (a) purely
instrumental ways (an additional logistical resource for resource-poor
actors), (b) a protest function (direct expression of protest); (c) symboli-
cally (as a medium favouring identification processes in collective actors)
and (d) cognitively (informing and sensitising public opinion).
Spreading information
The Internet also has a cognitive function through information dissemina-
tion and gathering. A case often quoted is the Ejercito Zapatista de
Liberacion Nacional, that via the net attracted attention to a region of
the globe that was until then virtually unknown and to mobilisation that
the traditional mass-media had neglected. Online resource networks
facilitate organisation: they function as a common Internet getaway to
hundreds of NGOs; they offer them and individual activists Internet
based services; they provide established means for the affiliates to
communicate, and they serve as information resource sites for whoever is
interested. (Warkentin : ). Also, new media can influence the mass
media (Bennett : ).
Epistemic communities and advocacy networks (Keck and Sikkink
) have communicated information on global issues they highlighted
the negative consequences of economic globalisation and pointed to
possible alternatives to neoliberalism. They encouraged the creation of
Donatella della Porta and Lorenzo Mosca
the movement for global justice by providing alternative knowledge on
specific issues, as well as access and visibility on the web and linking
organisations acting in different parts of the globe. Beyond supra-national
protest events, long-lasting campaigns make use of the Internet: weblogs,
lists, and networked campaign sites create an epistemic community that
makes the campaign a source of knowledge about credible problems,
while making the target an example of both problems and solutions
(Bennett ).
Within the global justice movement, some organisations specialise in
the diffusion of information via the Internet. The Institute for Global
Communication (IGC), the Association for Progressive Communication
(APC) and Oneworld are online resource networks that operate as
Internet portals for a large number of NGOs. The IGC (http://
www.igc.org) is a network of networks, incorporating PeaceNet (pacifist
portal promoting the constructive resolution of conflicts), EcoNet (the
worlds first computer network dedicated to environmental preservation
and sustainability), WomensNet (portal advancing the interests of women
worldwide), and AntiRacismNet (platform providing information and
technical support for those interested in issues of civil rights, racism
and diversity related issues). LaborNet also originally part of the ICG,
and now with an autonomous network (http://www.labornet.org)
connects labour protest on the Internet. Another anti-neoliberal portal
focusing on the issue of labour and unemployment is the website of
Euromarches (http://www.euromarches.org) created in to mobilise
against unemployment, insecure jobs and poverty in Europe. As the site
specifies within this network, these organisations regularly exchange
information, experiences and reflections, defining what they have in
common; they elaborate common claims at the EU level and organise
together some actions at this level.
In , the IGC co-founded the APC (http://www.apc.org) in
partnership with six international organisations, creating an international
coalition operating in more than countries that includes affiliated
(wholly autonomous) members and partners. Since , the APC
have had consultative status to the United Nations Economic and
Social Council (ECOSOC). Its mission consists in empowering and sup-
porting organisations, social movements and individuals in and through
the Internet in order to contribute to equitable human development,
social justice, participatory political processes and environmental
sustainability.
OneWorld (http://www.oneworld.net/) claims to be the online
media gateway that most effectively informs a global audience
about human rights and sustainable development. It created themed
portals on AIDS (http://www.aidschannel.org), the knowledge divide
Global-net for Global Movements?
(http://www.learningchannel.org), the digital divide (http://
www.digitalopportunity.org) and for counterinformation in general
(http://www.mediachannel.org). Besides OneWorld, there are lots of
networks that promote alternative and critical information such as the
French Samizdat (http://www.samizdat.net), the German Nadir (http://
www.nadir.org), the Italian ECN (http://www.ecn.org), and the Spanish
Nodo (http://www.nodo.org). For instance, Nodo is a server
hosting more than alternative and anticapitalist groups. It was
created in Spain in to provide virtual support to the campaign !
anos bastan! (Fifty years is enough) challenging the commemoration of
the th anniversary of the World Bank (WB) and the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) (Bonet i Mart , Pastor ). Since then, it
continues a campaign of counterinformation to spread the real struggles
starting from cyberspace.
The better known alternative media is Indymedia (http://
www.indymedia.org) that defines itself in its homepage as a collective of
independent media organisations and hundreds of journalists offering
grassroots, non-corporate coverage. Indymedia is a democratic media
outlet for the creation of radical, accurate, and impassioned truthtelling.
Indymedia is formed by more than fifty nodes all around the world.
The raison detre of the network is the critique of the established media
(Rucht b) and promotion of the democratization of information
and citizens media (Cardon and Granjon ). Open publishing
is an essential element of the Indymedia project that allows everybody
from independent journalists to unknown activists to publish the news
they gather instantaneously on a globally accessible website; since there
is no editorial board filtering information (Cristante ; Freschi
). Anyone who respects a few ground rules can create a local knot
of Indymedia. Indeed, besides global issue and counter information
on the main network, local knots of Indymedia have dedicated them-
selves to the coverage of specific mobilisations against neoliberal
globalisation; for instance, in June a demonstration against a
meeting of the World Bank in Barcelona (later cancelled) was the
occasion for the formation of a local knot of Indymedia. In the days of
Seattle protest, the Independent media centre claimed to have received
. million hits.
Due to its multi-media nature, CMC offers important tools to
organisations active on human rights violations, police repression and
environmental pollution. Anyone interested in knowing about any
harmful, unethical, or wasteful activities of companies or governments
can now locate websites that contain a constantly updated historical
record of transgressions against public interest (OBrien ). Web-
cams enabled activists to shame enterprises who contaminated the
Donatella della Porta and Lorenzo Mosca
environment by discharging toxic liquid into rivers (Warkentin : ).
Police violence in Genoa was documented by video activists using their
cameras and spreading photos, images and films through the Internet. In
Florence, the activists organised marshalls armed with cameras.
In short, CMC creates easily accessible spaces in which any organi-
sation can, at a low cost, communicate interpretative schemes and
definitions of the situation which are alternative to the official ones spread
by the mass-media. CMC provides the movements with the opportunity
to create unmediated and unfiltered flows of information, addressing
public opinion and diversifying the message in accordance with their
specific target. Nevertheless cyberspace also seems to possess, at least
partially, hierarchies and gate-keepers of different types (Koopmans and
Zimmerman ). The visibility of websites is submitted to a series of
criterions and it rewards actors more gifted with resources that make
their presence in cyberspace felt through professionals who have more
knowledge of the rules that favour prominence on the Net.
Second, the fact that the Internet makes an enormous quantity of
information available does not automatically increase interest in politics
(Margolis and Resnick ). In this sense, there is a risk that the Internet
will merely turn out to be a new, additional resource for those already
involved in public life (Bimber : ). CMC would then be a new
resource for old activists and not getting new social sectors involved in
politics (Bentivegna ).
Thirdly, the development of the web changed the political functioning
of the Internet by heightening the problem of news verification (Gurak
and Logie : ; see also Lebert , on Amnesty International).
Rucht (b) rightly observes that information in cyberspace is unreli-
able because there are no obligatory checking procedures. Also because
of the highly temporary nature of the Internet itself, online information
tends to disappear whereas information on traditional media is usually
archived and accessible.
Fourthly, although CMC becomes increasingly a source of information
for the journalists of more traditional media (Cardon and Granjon ),
the capability of information to spread from the cyberspace to the more
traditional media is unclear. As Bennett () notes since Seattle, it
seems that a more familiar press pattern has emerged in both U.S. and
European media coverage of demonstrations: protesters have generically
been cast as violent and anarchists, and even equated with soccer
hooligans in some European accounts. According to a research on media
representation of the Genoa G summit (Vindrola ) during the days
of the meeting the three most important Italian television news dedicated
only per cent of the time spent on the summit to the counter-summit
agenda and per cent of that time to the agenda of the official meeting;
Global-net for Global Movements?
most television coverage focused on security and public order ( per
cent) and the organisations of protest ( per cent); the police ( per cent)
and the black bloc ( per cent) had the highest level of visibility, while
the Genoa Social Forum got scant mention ( per cent). Similarly,
research on the press coverage by four of the most important Italian
newspapers before, after and during the summit indicated a low attention
to the content of the summit and of the protest ( per cent; of which per
cent was devoted to the official agenda of the protest). (See also Cristante
: ). In the coverage of the ESF (Cosi ), from October rd to
November rd only . per cent of the articles selected from the
three most important Italian newspapers gave coverage to the contents of
the social forum; and almost per cent in the alarm phase leading up
to the ESF were devoted to violence and public order. Studies on media
coverage of the movement for global justice in other European countries
show similar results: newspaper coverage of the Spanish EU presidency
was centred mainly on security and public order ( per cent) while .
per cent of articles covered alternative globalisation (Jimenez ); only
. per cent of German press coverage of five protest events in Seattle,
Prague, Genoa, Gothenburg and Berlin reported on the substantive
arguments of the institutional organisers and per cent those of
demonstrators while violence, police and security scored . per cent
(Rucht b). The passage from desktop to television screen (Bennett
) seems quite difficult.
Opinion polls indicate, however, that the movement on globalisation
had indeed a high capacity of agenda setting, turning attention to
globalisation processes and global issues. In countries like Italy, it was
able to attract support from a very wide base. The Internet is a source of
information for the activists, that work then as message amplifiers.
NOTES
. Partial results of our research are published in Andretta, della Porta, Mosca and Reiter, and
. A previous version of this chapter was presented at the conference on Internet and
Governance, Oxford Internet Institute, January . We are grateful to the participants in
the conference, and in particular to Richard Rose, as well as to Massimiliano Andretta and Herbet
Reiter for useful comments. We also acknowledge the valuable assistance of Claudius Wagemann
with data analysis.
. To analyse websites no longer extant we used an online database that periodically downloads
websites and files them under different dates (http://www.archive.org).
. Although the distribution of most socio-demographic characteristics (education, age, and social
situation, such as whether student status or not) was significantly different between the Italian
sample and the overall population of Italy (likelihood ratio chi square test), the Italian sample was
not stratified for these conditions, because the distributions of some other countries also differed
from their respective national populations. Varying the Italian sample would have meant reducing
the Italian sample to a median category and foregoing variation. However, the gender distribution
was equal among all the other countries; only the Italian gender distribution deviated from this with
males dominating. Therefore, a stratified subsample was drawn from the Italian sample which
respected the equal distribution of men and women in the population. Furthermore, the Italian
sub-sample was reduced in numbers, since overrepresenting the Italians would have biased the
results and made some types of statistical analysis less applicable.
. Arabic, Greek and Russian translations were also advertised on the site but were never made
accessible to Internet users.
. The participants that declared affiliation to organisations participating in the ESF were considered
within organisational macro-sectors of the movement: eco-pacifism, anti-neoliberalism and
anti-capitalism (on the definition of these, see Andretta, della Porta, Mosca and Reiter ). The
category eco-pacifism includes environmental and pacifist groups, catholic associations, lay
volunteer organisations and NGOs; the category anti-neoliberalism covers ATTAC, trade unions,
the institutional leftwing parties and party youth organisations, student organisations of the
institutional leftwing; and the category anti-capitalism includes various kinds of squats (indepen-
dent social centres), White Overalls/Disobedient, radical unions, neo-communist organisations,
anarchist groups and autonomous organisations.
. Even though there is no law against it, participation in a netstrike is considered by some experts as
illegal. Netstrikers base the legality and legitimacy of this form of online protest on the right to strike
(Freschi ).
. Especially if attention is turned to such factors as the issues of debate, the degree of autonomy of
the setting, the technological applications used, the rules of discourse instituted and the type of
discussion management undertaken (Dahlberg ; see also Salter ).
. Among , respondents, the three questions were answered affirmatively by respectively . per
cent, . per cent and . per cent. It should be noted, however, that differently from the normal
practice in conducting online surveys, this enabled more than one vote to be cast from the same
PC.
. Latent ties are created on the Internet in asynchronous shared communicative spaces and they can
be activated by sending an email message. If the message stimulates an interactive relationship a
weak tie is activated (Haythornthwaite b).
. Models were tested using as dependent variables three dummy variables ( = none/a little/enough;
= a lot).
Donatella della Porta and Lorenzo Mosca
REFERENCES
Alisei, CIES, Movimondo, () Il digital divide e le ONG, (http://www.bologna.social-forum.org/
documentazione/eventi/g/ong_digital_divide.htm).
Alfonso, C. () APC statement on mail bombing as a method of political protest (http://www.apc.org/
english/press/archive/apc_p.shtml).
Ancelovici, M. () Organizing against globalization. The case of Attac in France. Politics and Society,
, , .
Andretta, M., della Porta, D., Mosca, L. and Reiter, H. () Global, noglobal, new global. Le proteste
contro il G a Genova, Roma, Laterza.
Andretta, M., della Porta, D., Mosca, L. and Reiter, H. () Global, new global. Soziale Bewegungen und
Globalisierung, Frankfurt am Main, Campus Verlag.
Bedoyan, I., Van Aelst, P. and Walgrave, S. () Limitations and possibilities of transnational mobilization.
The case of the EU summit protesters in Brussels, , unpublished paper.
Bennett, W.L. () Communicating global activism: strengths and vulnerabilities of networked
politics. Information, Communication & Society, , , .
Bennett, W.L., Givens, T.E. and Willnat, L. () Crossing the Political Divide: Internet Use and Political
Identication in Transnational Anti-War and Social Justice Activists in Eight Nations, paper presented at the
ECPR Joint Sessions, Uppsala, April .
Bentivegna, S. () La politica in Rete, Meltemi, Roma.
Bentivegna, S. () Politica e Nuove Tecnologie della Comunicazione. Laterza: Roma-Bari.
Bimber, B. () Toward an empirical mapping of political participation on the Internet, paper presented at
APSA annual conference, Boston.
Bonet, M.J. i () Movimientos sociales y nuevas tecnologias en Barcelona: potencia y debilidad de una relacion,
paper presented at the Graduate Conference on Globalization, conflicts and social movements,
Trento ( June).
Cardon, D. and Granjon, F. () Peut-on se liberer des formats mediatiques? Le mouvement
alter-mondialisation et lInternet. Mouvements, no. .
Castells, M. () The Power of Identity, Blackwell, Oxford.
Castells, M. () The Internet Galaxy. Reections on the Internet, Business and Society. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Clark, J. and Themundo, N. () The age of protest: Internet-based Dot Causes and the
Anti-Globalization movement, in J. Clark (ed.) Globalizing Civic Engagement. Civil Society and
Transnational Action, . London: Earthscan.
Cleaver, H. () The Zapatista Eect: The Internet and the Rise of an Alternative Political Fabric (online paper,
http://www.eco.utexas.edu/Homepages/Faculty/Cleaver/zapeffect.html).
Cleaver, H. () The Zapatistas and the International Circulation Struggle: Lessons Suggested and
Problems Raised (online paper, http://www.eco.utexas.edu/Homepages/Faculty/Cleaver/
lessons.html).
Cosi, S. () Il forum sociale europeo nella stampa italiana, in L. Cedroni (ed.) Sistema Politico e
Movimenti Sociali. Milano: Franco Angeli, forthcoming.
Cristante, S. (ed.) () Violenza Mediata. Il Ruolo dellInformazione nel G di Genova. Roma: Editori
Riuniti.
Dahlberg, L. () Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: a critical analysis.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, , .
della Porta, D. () I New Global. Chi Sono e Cosa Vogliono i Critici della Globalizzazione. Bologna: Il
Mulino.
della Porta, D. and Diani, M. () Social Movements. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Diani, M. () Social movement networks: virtual and real, in F. Webster (ed.) Culture and Politics in
the Information Age: a New Politics, . London: Routledge.
Freschi, A.C. () Comunita virtuali e partecipazione. Dallantagonismo ai nuovi diritti. Quaderni di
Sociologia, , .
Freschi, A.C. () La Societa dei Saperi. Reti Virtuali e Partecipazione Sociale. Roma: Carocci.
Freschi, A.C. () Dalla rete delle reti al movimeto dei movimenti. Gli hacker e laltra comunicazi-
one, in D. della Porta and L. Mosca (eds.) Globalizzazione e Movimenti Sociali, . Roma:
Manifestolibri.
Garrido, M. and Halavais, A. () Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista movement, in M.
McCaughey and M.D. Ayers (eds.) Cyberactivism. Online Activism in Theory and Practice, . New
York and London: Routledge.
Global-net for Global Movements?
Gerlach, L.P. () The structures of social movements: environmental activism and its opponents, in
J. Arquila and D. Ronfeldt (eds.) Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime and Militancy,
. Rand: Santa Monica.
Geser, H. () On the Functions and Consequences of the Internet for Social Movements and Voluntary Associations
(online publications, http://socio.ch/movpar/t_hgeser.htm).
Granovetter, M. () The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, , , .
Gurak, L.J. and Logie, J. () Internet protests, from text to web, in M. McCaughey and M.D. Ayers
(eds.) Cyberactivism. Online Activism in Theory and Practice, . New York and London: Routledge.
Hampton, K. and Wellman, B. () Long distance community in network society: contact and
support beyond Netville. American Behavioral Scientist, , , .
Haythornthwaite, C. (a) The internet in everyday life. American Behavioral Scientist, , , .
Haythornthwaite, C. (b) Tie Strength and the Impact of New Media, paper presented at the Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Hick, S. and McNutt, J. () Communities and advocacy on the Internet: A conceptual framework,
in S. Hick and J. McNutt (eds.) Advocacy, Activism and the Internet, . Chicago: Lyceum Books.
Hill, K.A. and Hughes, J.E. () Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Lanham, MD:
Rowman and Littlefield.
Howard, P., Rainie, L. and Jones, S. () Days and nights on the Internet: the impact of a diffusing
technology. American Behavioral Scientist, , , .
Jimenez, M. () Public identity and coalition building process. The antiglobalization movement in Spain, paper
presented at the conference Transnational Processes and Social Movements (Bellagio, Italy).
Jordan, T. () Activism!: Direct Action. Hacktivism and the Future of Society. London: Reaktion Books.
Katz, J., Rice, R. and Aspden, P. () The Internet, : access, civic involvement, and social
interaction. American Behavioral Scientist, , , .
Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. () Activists beyond Borders, Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press.
Klein, N. () Fences and Windows. Dispatches From the Front Lines of the Globalization Debate. London:
Flamingo.
Koopmans, R. and Zimmermann, A. () Internet: A New Potential for European Political Communication?
Discussion Paper SP IV , Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforshung (WZB).
Lebert, J. () Wiring human rights activism: Amnesty International and the challenge of
information and communication technologies, in M. McCaughey and M.D. Ayers (eds.) Cyberactiv-
ism. Online Activism in Theory and Practice, . New York and London, Routledge.
Lipsky, M. () Protest and City Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.
Margolis, M. and Resnick, D. () Politics as Usual. The Cyberspace Revolution. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publication.
McChesney, R. W. () The Internet and U.S. communication policy-making in historical and
critical perspective. Journal of Communication, , , .
Mosca, L. () Transnational protest activists and the use of the Internet: hypothesis and evidences from research
on the European Social Forum, paper presented at the conference Transnational Processes and Social
Movements Bellagio, Italy.
Muller, C. () Online communities in a glocal context, paper presented at the rd International
Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, Maastricht.
Myers, D.J. () Social activism through computer networks, in O.V. Burton (ed.) Computing in the
Social Science and Humanities, . Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Neveau, E. () Sociologie des Mouvements Sociaux. Paris: La Decouverte & Syros.
Nie, N.H. () Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet. American Behavioral Scientist, ,
, .
Norris, P. () Digital Divide. Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
OBrien, R. () Social Change Activism and the Internet: Strategic Online Activities, online paper
(http://www.web.net/robrien/papers/netaction.html).
Park, E. () Net prot of the nonprots, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Pastor, J. () Que Son los Movimientos Antiglobalizacion. Barcelona: RBA libros.
Pizzorno, A. () Le Radici della Politica Assoluta. Milano: Feltrinelli.
Price, R. () Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines. International
Organization, , , .
Rucht, D. (a) The Quadruple A: Media strategies of protest movements since the , in W.
Van de Donk, B.D. Loader, P.G. Nixon and D. Rucht (eds.) New Media, Citizens and Social Movements.
New York and London: Routledge.
Donatella della Porta and Lorenzo Mosca
Rucht, D. (b) Media strategies and media resonance in transnational protest campaigns, paper presented at
the conference Transnational Processes and Social Movements Bellagio, Italy.
Salter, L. () Democracy, new social movements and the Internet: a Habermasian analysis, in M.
McCaughey and M.D. Ayers (eds.) Cyberactivism. Online Activism in Theory and Practice, . New
York and London: Routledge.
Smith, J. () Characteristics of the modern transnational social movement sector, in J. Smith, C.
Chatfield and R. Pagnucco (eds.) Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics. Solidarity Beyond the
State. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Sunstein, C. () Republic.com. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Stubbs, P. () Conict and Co-operation in the Virtual Community: eMail and the Wars of the Yugoslav
Succession. Sociological Research Online, , .
Tarrow, S. () Power in Movement, nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, S. () Global Movements, Complex Internationalism, and North-South Inequality, paper prepared
for presentation to the workshop on Contentious Politics, Columbia University.
Vanier, M. () Agir local, penser global: les citoyens face a la mondialisation. Mille et une nuits, no.
.
Vedres, B., Bruszt, L. and Stark, D. () Organizing Technologies: Genre Forms of Online Civic Association
in Eastern Europe, unpublished manuscript.
Vegh, S. () Classifying forms of online activism, in M. McCaughey and M.D. Ayers (eds.)
Cyberactivism. Online Activism in Theory and Practice, . New York and London: Routledge.
Vindrola, M., , Tematizzare il G. Il dibattito sul vertice di Genova nei media, unpublished thesis,
Universita degli studi di Torino.
Warkentin, C. () Reshaping World Politics. NGOs, the Internet and Global Civil Society. Lanham, MA:
Rowman & Littlefield.
Department of Political and Social Sciences
European University Institute
Badia Fiesolana
Via dei Roccettini
I- San Domenico di Fiesole, Florence, Italy
tel: ; fax:
e-mail: donatella.dellaporta@iue.it
DISPO Department of Political and Social Sciences
University of Florence
Via delle Pandette,
I- Florence, Italy
tel: ; fax:
e-mail: mosca@achille.det.unifi.it