Wilkinson C, McIlwaine G, Boulton-Jones C, Cole S.

Is a rising caesarean section rate

inevitable?
Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 4552.

1. Robson ms. Ckassification of caesarean sections. Fetal and maternal medicine review 2001;
12:1 23-39
2. Obswil hal.568
3. Mylonas i, friese k. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean indication. Dtsch arztebl int
2015; 112: 48995
4. Scarella a, chamy v, sepu lveda m, belizan jm. Medical audit using the ten group
classification system and its impact on the caesarean section rate. European journal of obstetrics
& gynecology and reproductive biology 2011; 154: 13640
5. Abha s, reema c. Recent way of evaluating caesarean birth. J obstet gynecol india 2009; 59(6)
: 547-51
6. Samba a* and mumuni k .a review of caesarean sections using the ten-group clasifiation
system (robson classification) in the korle-bu teaching hospital (kbth), accra, ghana. Gynecol
obstet (sunnyvale) 2016; 6: 1 - 6
7. Vagel jp et al. Use of the robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21
countries: a secondary analysis of two who multicountry surveys. Lancet glob health 2015; 3:
e26070
8 Robson MS, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate Commented [L1]: 8. Robson MS, Hartigan L, Murphy M.
caesarean section rate. Best practice & research clinical obstetrics and gynaecology 2013; 27: Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate
caesarean section rate. Best Practice & Research Clinical
297308 Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013; 27: 297308
9. Suryati t. Analisis lanjut data riskesdas 2010 persentase opeasi caesaria di indonesia melebihi
standard maksimal, apakah sesuai indikasi medis? Buletin penelitian sistem kesehatan 2012;
15(4): 331338
10. Panicker s, chitra tv. Analysis of caesarean delivery rates using ten group classification
system in a tertiary care hospital. Int j reprod contracept obstet gynecol. 2016; 5(9):3153-7

11 Tapia V, Betran AP, Gonzales GF. Caesarean section in peru: analysis of trendsusing the Commented [L2]: 11. Caesarean section in peru: analysis
robson classification system. Plos one 11(2): 1 18 of trendsusing the robson classification system

12 Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, et al. A systematic review of the robson classification Commented [L3]: 12. A systematic review of the Robson
for caesarean section: what works, doesnt work, and how to improve it. Plos one 2014; 9 (6): 1 classification for caesarean section: what works, doesnt
work, and how to improve it
10

13 Farine D, Toronto ON, Shepherd D, regina SK. Classification of caesarean section in canada: Commented [L4]: 13. Classification of caesarean section
the modified robson criteria. J obstet gynaecol can 2012;34(10):97679 in Canada: the modified robson criteria

14 Betrn AP, Gulmezoglu AM, Robson MS, et al. Who global survey on maternal and perinatal Commented [L5]: 14. WHO Global Survey on Maternal
health in latin america: classifying caesarean sections. Reproductive health 2009; 6: 1 18 and Perinatal Health in Latin
America: classifying caesarean sections
15 Chong C, Su LL, Biswas A. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the robson ten Commented [L6]: 15 Changing trends of cesarean
group classification in a tertiary teaching hospital. Nordic federation of societies of obstetrics and section births by the Robson Ten Group
Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital
gynecology 2012; 91: 14227

16 Costa ML, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, et al. Using a caesarean section classification system based Commented [L7]: 16 Using a Caesarean Section
on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice. Reproductive Classification System based on characteristics of the
population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice
health 2010, 7:13

17 Althabe F, Belizn JM. Caesarean section: the paradox. Lancet 2006; 368(9546): 1472-3 Commented [L8]: 17 Caesarean section: the paradox

18 Kazmi T, Saiseema S, Khan S. Analysis of caesarean section rate according to robsons 10

Commented [L9]: 18 Analysis of caesarean section rate
group classification Oman Medical Journal 2012; 27(5): 415-17 according to robsons 10 group classification

19 Koteshwara S, sujatha ms. Analysis of caesarean section rates using robsons ten group Commented [L10]: 19 Analysis of caesarean section rates
classification: the first step. Int j reprod contracept obstet gynecol. 2017; 6(8):3481-5 using Robsons ten group classification: the first step
Sowmya Koteshwara*, Sujatha M
20 Kementerian Kesehatan. Laporan nasional riset kesehatan dasar 2013 [internet]. Jakarta:
badan litbang kesehatan; 2013. Available from: http://www.litbang.depkes.go.id/sites/do Commented [L11]: 20 Kementerian Kesehatan. Laporan
Nasional Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2013
Wnload/rkd2013/laporanriskesdas2013.pdf [Internet]. Jakarta: Badan Litbang
Kesehatan; 2013. Available from:
21 Tanaka K, Mahomed K.The ten-group robson classification: a single centre approach http://www.litbang.depkes.go.id/sites/do
wnload/rkd2013/LaporanRiskesdas2013.
Identifying strategies to optimise caesarean section rates. Obstetrics and gynecology PDF
international 2017;5 : 1 5
Commented [L12]: 21 The Ten-Group Robson
22 Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Cambridge core 2001; 12 (1): 23 39 Classification: A Single Centre Approach
23 Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean indication. Dtsch arztebl int Identifying Strategies to Optimise Caesarean Section
Rates
2015; 112: 48995
Commented [L13]: 22 Classifcation of caesarean
24 Makhanya V. Utility of the robson ten group classification system to determine
sections
appropriateness of caesarean section at a
Rural regional hospital in kwazulu-natal, south africa. Samj 2015; 105 (4): 292-5
Commented [L14]: 23 Indications for and Risks of Elective
Cesarean Section
25 Suliman S, Somapillay P, Mcdonald AP, Pattinson RC. Factors associated with caesarean
section using the robson ten group classification system. Presented at the 29th priorities in Commented [L15]: 24 Utility of the Robson Ten Group
perinatal care conference, goudini spa, western cape, 9-12 march 2010. Classification System
to determine appropriateness of caesarean section at a
rural regional hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Commented [L16]: 25 Suliman S, Soma-Pillay P,

McDonald AP, Pattinson RC. Factors associated with
26 Torloni MR, betran AP, souza JP, et al. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic caesarean section
review. Plos one 2011; 6(1): 1 10 using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Presented at the 29th Priorities in Perinatal Care
Conference, Goudini Spa, Western Cape, 9-12 March 2010.

Commented [L17]: 26 Classifications for Cesarean

Section: A Systematic Review