2 visualizações

Enviado por Gaddam Padmaja Reddy

HEP

- The Horizontal Pre-Support in Tunnels-Chen
- 141021 GTL SoftSoils Bandung FindingSuitableModel
- 1077-1082 Amsiejus Dirgeliene Et Al
- roclab1-rocdata4
- Shear Faillure Drillwork
- Holtz Advance
- 2012
- Lab 6 Direct Shear
- AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE UPWARD AND LATERAL SOIL-PIPELINE INTERACTION IN SAND USING FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD*
- Triaxial Shear Test
- 1974 - Matsuoka Nakai
- Theory of Plasticity
- 6.Paper for Chapter 6_JPE_Hindawi2013_864981_Review of Sand Production Models.pdf
- Journal of Constructional Steel Research Volume 34 Issue 2-3 1995 [Doi 10.1016%2F0143-974x%2894%2900029-h] T.S. Kruger; B.W.J. Van Rensburg; G.M. Du Plessis -- Non-linear Analysis of Structural Steel
- Bbm Shear Strength
- Applications of Burzynski hypothesis of material effort for isotropic solids; T. Fras, R.B. Pecherski, MECHANICS & CONTROL, 29, No 2, 45-50, 2010
- PDF Online
- _be5c2ce48e2cefb05939966067c45e7e_MOM-III---Module-30
- Geotechnical Engineering Design Criteria
- 1-s2.0-S0266352X1400233X-main

Você está na página 1de 11

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281807529

Chambers for Tehri HEP in India

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1887.2803

CITATION READS

1 101

3 authors, including:

SMEC India Pvt, Ltd. AECOM ASIA

7 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS 4 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

All content following this page was uploaded by Tushar Bhandari on 22 September 2015.

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

in India

T. Bhandari

SMEC India Pvt. Ltd., India

M. Kastner & . Casass

SMEC International Pty. Ltd., India

ABSTRACT

Tehri Hydroelectric Project is located on the bank of river Bhagirathi in the state of Uttarakhand,

India. The 2400-MW project is comprised of Tehri dam and Tehri hydro power project (HPP -

1000-MW) Stage-I, Koteshwar HEP (400-MW) and Tehri Pumped Storage Project (PSP - 1000-

MW). As a part of the Tehri PSP, two surge shafts are proposed to be constructed downstream of

the power house along the tail race tunnels (TRT). The arrangement consists of surge shafts with

surge chambers at the top of each shaft and is located in poor geology with rock cover of 390-m.

The chambers were resized from the originally planned 28-m span to 18.5-m span due to poor

geological conditions which called for a transition in excavation from an 18.5-m chamber invert

to a 19.44-m diameter circular surge shaft.

This paper presents a three-dimensional FDM analysis carried out to assess the stability of the

excavations that include two chambers (18.5-m wide, 16.4-m high, 27-m long), a link tunnel

(12.5-m x 13.5-m x 33-m) to connect the chambers, and two circular shafts of 19.44-m diameter.

The geology in the chambers was classified in two groups: Sheared Phyllite (SP) and Thinly

Bedded Phyllite Quartzitic (PQT). To account for the different behavior of the two types of rock

mass, two different material models were selected for the analysis. The weaker rock SP was

modelled with the classical Mohr-Coulomb model while PQT was modelled with a strain

softening ubiquitous model (also based on Mohr-Coulomb) that considers strength anisotropy

resulting from the presence of a family of strongly pronounced discontinuities (bedding /

schistosity) and a strain-dependent post-peak softening.

The sequence of excavation was also modelled in the analysis considering heading and benching

and support installation after each round of excavation with a round length of 2-3 meters. A

system of rock bolts and shotcrete was designed as the support system and further pre-

reinforcement in form of fore-poling was recommended in zones of poor quality rock mass as

additional support measure. Results of the analysis are presented in the form of stress and

displacement plots and displacement histories for nine monitoring sections each with five

monitoring points.

1 INTRODUCTION

Underground excavations usually consist of different shapes, varying from circular shapes in tunnels to

complex shape excavations in hydroelectric projects. Excavations cause a new distribution of the in-situ

stresses resulting in deformation of the opening. The stress distribution around the underground opening and

resulting deformations are important to analyze. The stability of excavation and the design of a suitable

support system is determined by this stress-deformation analysis. The downstream underground surge

chambers for Tehri PSP have been designed to facilitate construction of the two surge shafts and installation

and operation of the TRT gates. A three dimensional view of the project layout is shown in Figure 1.

357

1

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

Geological information of the area is available through already excavated access adits and exploratory drifts.

The proposed size of the chambers (18.5-m wide) and shaft (19.4-m dia.) necessitates a 9-m long transition

from a rectangular chamber floor to a full circle of 19.44-m diameter.

Being located in poor rock conditions and due to their peculiar geometry, a three dimensional stress

analysis was carried out to study the stability of the excavation and analyze support requirements. Simulation

of the proposed excavation sequence was also done taking into account each round of excavation. A

systematic monitoring system was incorporated in the model to facilitate calibration of the model during

construction stage based on actual measured deformations.

16.4 m

18.5 m

CHAMBE

R

TRANSITION

9m

PORTION

19.44 m

CIRCULAR

SHAFT

2 GEOLOGICAL SETTING

The Tehri PSP site is situated within the Lesser Himalaya that lies tectonically between the Main Central

Thrust and the Main Boundary Thrust. The intermediate North Almora Thrust runs within 20-km of the PSP

site and the Srinagar Thrust 5-km north of it. The rock units are part of the low grade metamorphics that have

been thrusted, folded and deformed over at least two stages. The lithological units at the Tehri site were

classified by the Geological Survey of India during the dam and HPP design and construction stage. The same

lithological units also prevail for the present pumped storage project.

The nomenclature of lithological units is based on variable proportions of quartzite and phyllite. They

include PQM (phyllitic quartzite - massive), PQT (phyllitic quartzite - thinly bedded), QP (quartzitic phyllite

alterations) and SP (sheared phyllite). In the main construction area, the attitude of the primary schistosity is

often close to the stratification. The average attitudes for stratification are reported as dip direction of N195-

240 with dip angle of 45-65 and for schistosity, dip direction of N160-180 and dip angle of 30-42.

Based on the detailed 3D geological logging (on scale 1:100) of the excavation of adits carried out in the

chamber area and exploratory drill holes, a 3D geological model was developed and incorporated in the

358

2

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

numerical model using reasonable approximations. The area was divided into two major geological zones

comprising of different litho-units as shown in Figure 2. One zone designated as PQT+QP primarily

consists of thinly bedded phyllitic quartzite with presence of some bands of quartzitic phyllite. Another zone

designated as QP+SP, known to be the weakest rock mass in the area, consists of a combination of

quartzitic phyllite and sheared phyllite.

Apart from the lithological distribution, the area also consists of a family of discontinuities which have

been thoroughly mapped and documented for the project. The discontinuity data was obtained from 3D

geological logs of the excavated adit and is summarized in Table 1. The main difference between the

representation of the geological features in the numerical model and actual ground conditions as derived from

the geological logs arise from the fact that all geological features are assumed to be continuous in the model.

Joint Set Avg. Dip Amount Avg. Dip Direction

(o) (o)

J1 50 195

J2 40 150

J3 57 25

J4 65 295

3 NUMERICAL MODELLING

Stability analysis of large underground excavations primarily involves analysis for wedge stability and stress-

deformation behavior. To analyze the stress-deformation behavior of excavations, a number of numerical

methods are available including Boundary Element Method, BEM (Venturini, 1983), Finite Element

Method, FEM (Bathe, 1982) and Finite Difference Method, FDM (Cundall, 1976). While all these methods

use the solution for equations of equilibrium, strain compatibility and constitutive relationships for a material

for prescribed boundary conditions, they differ in their basic formulation and solution approach. For the

analysis of the proposed caverns and shafts in the Tehri PSP, a three-dimensional numerical model based on

FDM was chosen, using the FLAC3D program from Itasca. This program was chosen because it offers an

explicit, Lagrangian calculation scheme and mixed-discretization zoning technique which ensures that the

359

3

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

failure and post-failure deformations are modeled very accurately. Also, because no matrices are formed, large

three-dimensional calculations can be run without excessive computer memory requirements (Itasca, 2006).

In numerical modelling of underground/surface excavations it is seen that frequently not much emphasis is

given on the anisotropy of rock mass. Due to lack of data for defining the anisotropic nature of rock mass, the

designers sometimes make an approximation that the ground being excavated can be represented as an

isotropic continuum. However, this approximation often needs fine tuning, especially while analyzing

excavations in geologically complex rock masses. Depending on the distribution of discontinuities in the rock,

a rock mass may or may not behave as a continuum and depending on the structural features of the ground it

may or may not have isotropic properties. After various discussions and recommendations by many experts on

the subject, the presented model is based on the expected behavior of different geological zones as per the

available geological information.

The PQT+QP rock mass is expected to show significant anisotropy in strength resulting from the

presence of a family of strongly pronounced discontinuities (bedding / schistosity) and is therefore modelled

with the strain softening ubiquitous joint model of FLAC3D. Application of this constitutive model has shown

that the assignment of ubiquitous joint orientations at the zone level (from a known joint orientation

distribution) results in realistic rock mass behavior response and yields properties that are consistent with

empirical techniques (Sainsbury et al., 2008; Clark, 2006). This model accounts for the presence of an

orientation of weakness in a classical Mohr-Coulomb model. The criterion for failure on the plane, whose

orientation is given, consists of a composite Mohr-Coulomb envelope with tension cutoff. The position of a

stress point on the later envelope is controlled by a non-associated flow rule for shear failure, and an

associated rule for tension failure. In this numerical model, general failure is first detected, and relevant plastic

corrections are applied, as in the classical Mohr-Coulomb model. The new stresses are then analyzed for

failure on the weak plane, and updated accordingly. This constitutive model is used to represent

laminated/foliated materials that exhibit material hardening or softening. The concept of softening used in the

model is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3(a) shows a typical stress()-strain() curve for material softening

behavior and Figures 3(b) and 3(c) show cohesion (c) and friction () softening as a function of plastic shear

strain (ps).

peak peak

c

yield c

(MPa) (o)

residual residual

c

ps ps

elastic plastic

= =

(a) Stress-strain curve (b) Cohesion softening (c) Friction softening

Figure 3: Constitutive relationship for the strain softening model used for PQT+QP

For the QP+SP rock mass, where the joint density results in an almost isotropic continuum, the classical

Mohr-Coulomb model is used. As suggested by Hoek (2001), based on analysis of the progressive failure of

very poor quality rock masses surrounding tunnels, the post-failure characteristics of the rock in such cases are

adequately represented by assuming that it behaves perfectly plastically. This means that it continues to

deform at a constant stress level and that no volume change is associated with this ongoing failure. Therefore

the QP+SP rock mass was modelled as a material with elastic-perfectly plastic behavior and zero dilation.

360

4

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

The two geological zones are represented by the two constitutive models discussed above. Both these models

require Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters to define the strength envelope for the rock mass. The properties

detailed in Table 2 were adopted for the analyses. These strength properties were estimated by fitting a linear

Mohr-Coulomb envelope to a non-linear Hoek-Brown curve for a confining stress interval of 0 to 9.45-MPa

(corresponding to 350-m rock cover). The Hoek-Brown curve was determined using the Geological Strength

Index approach (Hoek et al. 1995). To define the strain softening behaviour for the PQT+QP rock mass, the

shear strength parameters were defined as a function of plastic shear strain. A residual cohesion of 0.2-MPa

and a residual friction angle of 33o were considered for this purpose to define the residual state of the rock

mass which is achieved at 1% plastic shear strain.

The vertical in-situ stress was considered to be lithostatic (based on the weight of the rock above) and the

horizontal in-situ stress was calculated based on hydro-fracturing tests conducted at nearby locations for the

same project. Accordingly, the major and minor horizontal to vertical principal stress ratios were considered

as 1.2 and 0.9 respectively, with the major principal stress aligned along N229o.

Rock mass

Rock Category Parameter Unit PQT+QP PQT+QP QP+SP

(matrix) (weak plane) (isotropic)

GSImean - 45 25 30

mi - 10 10 10

UCS (MPa) 45 25 25

Intact Rock

Poissons Ratio, - 0.25 0.25 0.25

Bulk Density, (kN/m3) 27 27 27

Overburden Depth, d (m) 350 350 350

Rock mass Disturbance Factor, D - 0 0 0

Elastic Modulus, Em (GPa) 4.0 4.0 3.0

Mohr- Cohesion, cpeak (MPa) 1.1 0.6 0.7

No Blast

Coloumb Friction Angle, peak (Deg.) 37 26 28

Damage

Hoek- mbpeak - 1.403 0.690 0.820

Brown speak - 0.0022 0.0002 0.0004

Rock mass Disturbance Factor, D - 0.3 0.3 0.3

Elastic Modulus, Em (GPa) 4.0 4.0 3.0

Blast Mohr- Cohesion, cpeak (MPa) 1.0 0.5 0.6

Damage Coloumb Friction Angle, peak (Deg.) 34 22 24

Zone Hoek- mbpeak - 0.992 0.428 0.528

Brown speak - 0.0011 0.0001 0.0002

Excavation of underground openings causes the redistribution of the stress field of adjacent rock,

displacements and plastic zones. The goal of a numerical analysis is to assess the effect of the subjectively

controllable factors (sequence of excavation and support installation) to reduce the disturbance induced in

adjacent rock. It is now fairly well known that stepwise excavation and support installation can slow down the

process of ground stress redistribution and thereby reduce the disturbance caused in adjacent rock. A

significant advantage of 3D stress analysis over 2D stress analysis is that the effect of excavation face and

tunnel advance on the stability of the excavation can be studied with reasonable accuracy. Another benefit of

3D numerical calculations is the incorporation of the support installation sequence. However, these

advantages of 3D calculations are rarely exploited.

In the present analysis, the process of excavation and support installation was simulated with reasonable

detail. The model simulates each round of excavation followed by installation of shotcrete and rock bolts. This

feature does not only eliminate the need for any assumptions on stress-relaxation normally considered in

numerical models to take into account the effect of the excavation face, but also minimizes the shock (in form

of large unbalanced forces) to the numerical solution procedure since the path-dependence of the solution is

important.

361

5

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

The round lengths considered in the analysis are 3-m for rock mass type PQT+QP and 2-m for QP+SP.

Support was installed after excavation of each round followed by excavation of the next round and so on. The

sequence of various stages of excavation is shown in Table 3 and Figure 4.

Stage Excavation

Stage-I Excavation of access tunnel

Stage-II Heading for chamber-3

Stage-III Heading for link tunnel

Stage-IV Heading for chamber-4

Stage-V, VI, VII Benching for chamber-3, link tunnel and chamber-4

Stage-VIII, IX Excavation of surge shaft-3 and surge shaft-4

The support system modelled in the analysis consists of a system of grouted rock bolts with a tensile

capacity of 350-kN and shotcrete with a compressive strength of 30-MPa. Rock bolts are modelled as cable

elements with 10 segments per cable and shotcrete as shell elements. Depending on the geology of the area,

different density of rock bolts and thickness of shotcrete was modelled as shown in Figure 5 and detailed in

Table 4.

362

6

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

Component Geological Zone Rock bolts in crown Rock bolts in walls Shotcrete

thickness

Chamber-4 QP+SP 8-m long @ 1-m c/c 10-m long @ 1-m c/c 300-mm

Chamber-3 PQT+QP 6-m long @ 1.5-m c/c 8-m long @ 1.5-m c/c 200-mm

Link tunnel QP+SP 8-m long @ 1-m c/c 10-m long @ 1-m c/c 300-mm

Link tunnel PQT+QP 6-m long @ 1.5-m c/c 8-m long @ 1.5-m c/c 150-mm

Transition for shaft-4 QP+SP 8-m long @ 1.5-m c/c 200-mm

Transition for shaft-3 PQT+QP 6-m long @ 1-m c/c 200-mm

Surge shaft-4 PQT+QP 6-m long @ 1-m c/c 150-mm

Surge shaft-3 PQT+QP/QP+SP 8-m long @ 1.5-m c/c 150-mm

The results of the analysis were interpreted in terms of absolute displacements, principal stresses,

displacement histories (trend of displacements with the progress of excavation) and yielded elements after

complete excavation. A three-dimensional view of the displacement contours on excavation boundaries is

shown in Figure 6. The deformed shape of the contours is presented in Figure 6 by exaggerating the

deformation to ten times the actual value. It can be seen from the figure that the displacement contours

correspond with the geological setting of the area. Maximum deformations are predicted in chamber-4 (red

color in Fig. 6) at the location where a transition is proposed to connect the chamber with a larger diameter

vertical surge shaft. The geological setting at the location of maximum deformation corresponds to QP+SP

rock mass (Fig. 2).

An important factor often considered to decide the length of rock bolts required to support underground

excavations is the extent of the plastic zone. FLAC3D uses different plasticity indicators to define the state of

each element with respect to the stress history it has been subjected to during the calculations. Various

combinations of these plasticity indicators are combined and indicated as Yield (shear/tension) in Figure 7.

The yielded elements are shown in cyan color and rest of the elements in white. The yield state of cable

elements used to model rock bolts is also shown in Figure 7 with black lines for bolts in their elastic state and

red lines for bolts yielded in tension. The length and tensile capacity of the rock bolts is so selected that most

of the rock bolts cross the yielded zone and the forces in the bolts remain in the elastic limit defined by the

tensile yield load, which is 350-kN.

363

7

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

The displacement histories are very important elements to assist stage wise analysis of displacements and

to assess the stability of the excavation. Displacement histories can also be used during the construction stage

to calibrate numerical models with monitoring results as the excavation progresses on site. To study the trend

of displacements with the progress of excavation, a 5-point monitoring system was considered for nine

sections, distributed along the length of different components as shown in Figure 8. A typical interpretation of

the displacement histories is shown in Figure 9 that includes displacement of 5 monitoring points at section

42. The corresponding major and minor principal stresses for section 42 are shown in Figure 10.

364

8

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

Figure 10: Major principal stress (left, Pa) and minor principal stress (right, Pa) for section-42

4 CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional numerical model has been prepared to assess the stability of proposed excavations for

downstream surge shaft chambers of Tehri PSP. Geological variations have been accounted for by modelling

two different geological zones with two different material models. Stresses and the resulting plastic zones

have been studied to estimate the support requirements for the proposed excavations. The trend of

displacements with progress of excavation is studied to establish stability of excavation. From the analysis it is

seen that the maximum total deformation occurs in components located in the weaker geological zone

QP+SP especially in chamber-4 at the location where a transition is proposed to connect the chamber with a

larger diameter vertical surge shaft. The excavation of vertical shaft also adds to the displacement observed in

chamber walls at that particular location. The maximum radial strain (defined as the ratio of displacement in

one wall and half-span of opening) is about 1.7% at this location.

365

9

IOM3 Hong Kong Branch Underground Design and Construction Conference 2015

Strain values below 1% typically show few support problems. Although the displacements result, in places,

in more than 1% strain, it is seen that the displacements show a stabilizing trend with the progress of

excavation suggesting no instability/collapse in the openings. The fact that strain limits can go beyond 1% for

caverns without resulting in instabilities is also corroborated by Amberg (2012).

Monitoring points and sections are specified in the analysis to facilitate calibration of the model with

progress of excavation on site. The same sections are proposed for instrumentation for fair comparison of

predicted and measured values of displacements. Simulation of each round of excavation in the numerical

model ensures that a realistic support installation sequence is modelled and will also enable calibration of the

model at any stage of excavation. Calibration of the model will include updating geology for any significant

variation observed during excavation and re-assessment of rock mass parameters based on the difference in

predicted and observed deformations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge the help and inputs provided by THDCIL (Tehri Hydro Development Corporation

India Ltd.) and EDF (lectricit de France) in geological assessment and planning of different components.

Site inputs from HCC (Hindustan Construction Company) and technical discussions with Prof. K.G. Sharma

(Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi) were also useful in deciding the methodology for modelling.

REFERENCES

Amberg F. 2012. Rock Mechanical Aspects during the Design Stage of Large Caverns. In Proc. Swiss Tunnel

Congress, Lucerne, 13 June 2012.

Bathe, K. J. 1982. Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis. Prentice-Hall.

Clark, I. 2006. Simulation of rock mass strength using ubiquitous joints. In R. Hart & P. Verona (ed.)

Numerical Modelling in Geomechanics, Proc. 4th International FLAC Symposium, Minneapolis, May

2006. Itasca.

Cundall, P. A. 1976. Explicit finite difference methods in geomechanics. In C.S. Desai (eds), Proc. ASCE

Engineering Federation Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Virginia, June 1976. ASCE

Hoek, E. 2001. Rock mass properties for underground mines. In W.A. Hustrulid (ed.), Underground mining

methods: engineering fundamentals and international case studies. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and

Exploration (SME), Littleton, Colorado.

Hoek, E., Kaiser, P.K. & Bawden, W.F. 1995. Strength of rock and rock masses. In Support of underground

excavations in hard rock (pp. 91-106). CRC Press. Balkema, Rotterdam.

Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2006) FLAC3D Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions, Ver.

3.1, Users Manual. Minneapolis, Itasca.

Sainsbury, B., Pierce, M. & Mas Ivars, D. 2008. Simulation of rock mass strength anisotropy and scale effects

using a Ubiquitous Joint Rock Mass (UJRM) model. Proc. First International FLAC / DEM Symposium on

Numerical Modelling, Minneapolis, 2527 August 2008. Itasca.

Venturini, W. S. 1983. Boundary element method in geomechanics. Springer.

366

10

View publication stats

- The Horizontal Pre-Support in Tunnels-ChenEnviado porjohndim
- 141021 GTL SoftSoils Bandung FindingSuitableModelEnviado porlimara65
- 1077-1082 Amsiejus Dirgeliene Et AlEnviado porMarshita Ramlee
- roclab1-rocdata4Enviado porj_mustain
- Shear Faillure DrillworkEnviado porMikhail López
- Holtz AdvanceEnviado porUmed Abd-alsatar
- 2012Enviado porNazurudin Ahamed
- Lab 6 Direct ShearEnviado porAlison Gilbert
- AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE UPWARD AND LATERAL SOIL-PIPELINE INTERACTION IN SAND USING FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD*Enviado porMukil Dev
- Triaxial Shear TestEnviado porMike Samuel
- 1974 - Matsuoka NakaiEnviado porMohdHilmyNaim
- Theory of PlasticityEnviado porGoutham Burra
- 6.Paper for Chapter 6_JPE_Hindawi2013_864981_Review of Sand Production Models.pdfEnviado porEren Võ
- Journal of Constructional Steel Research Volume 34 Issue 2-3 1995 [Doi 10.1016%2F0143-974x%2894%2900029-h] T.S. Kruger; B.W.J. Van Rensburg; G.M. Du Plessis -- Non-linear Analysis of Structural SteelEnviado poralfonso
- Bbm Shear StrengthEnviado porAla Thajil
- Applications of Burzynski hypothesis of material effort for isotropic solids; T. Fras, R.B. Pecherski, MECHANICS & CONTROL, 29, No 2, 45-50, 2010Enviado porRyszard B. Pecherski
- PDF OnlineEnviado porJonnyb10255
- _be5c2ce48e2cefb05939966067c45e7e_MOM-III---Module-30Enviado porHatnusen
- Geotechnical Engineering Design CriteriaEnviado porNadia Pristie Pranitawijaya
- 1-s2.0-S0266352X1400233X-mainEnviado porIbnu Riswan
- Journal_Analysis and Simulation of MPV Dashboard Using ABAQUSEnviado poridham87
- Computational Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Slabs Subjected to Impact LoadsEnviado porVijaya Kumar Manikandan
- kozetmechanika_sziklamunkak_3eaEnviado porSam Jandali
- Htd Dim Ht As1252Enviado porppaabbllooalvarez
- Shearbox TestEnviado porTutor_KL
- Influence of Different Stress Conditions on Behaviour of Rockfill MaterialsEnviado porSella Adinda Sesar
- Effect of Lead Rubber Bearing Characteristics on tEnviado porvignesh
- fredlund1978.pdfEnviado porAlexNowakLaFlor
- NOE0415380416%2Ech077.pdfEnviado porUmed Abd-alsatar
- CIE626-Project Phase 1_Fall 2013Enviado porponjove

- 127316323-Thrust-Block-Calculation.pdfEnviado porRaju Shrestha
- Chapter 2 When is a Rock Engineering Design AcceptableEnviado porKarinto Suárez
- Chapter04Enviado porCleme Moscoso
- grillage foundation.pdfEnviado porUtsav Koshti
- Blasting Damage in RockEnviado porMarco Olivier
- Hand Book on Seismic Retrofit of BuildingsEnviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- Unlined Tunnel Thesis 17-4-18Enviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- Guide to Fire Safety Design for Caverns 1994Enviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- Guide to Fire Safety Design for Caverns 1994Enviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- Chapter 8/19 of Rock EngineeringEnviado porHakan_KURU
- Pankaj Agrawal and Manish ShriKhandeEnviado porPankaj Munjal
- Chapter 7/19 of Rock EngineeringEnviado porHakan_KURU
- Chapter01Enviado porCleme Moscoso
- Circular Slab Estimation of SteelEnviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- 300 Solved Problems in Geotechnical EngineeringEnviado pormote34
- Szunyogh_1Enviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- Chapter 13/19 of Rock EngineeringEnviado porHakan_KURU
- Blasting Damage in RockEnviado porMarco Olivier
- Tunnel CollapseEnviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- 14830_FULLTEXT.pdfEnviado porbufalote
- Park & Paulay1.pdfEnviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- 16 Sommer - BaugrubenEnviado porgerardo manuel canto barrera
- Welded Steel PenstockEnviado porIfnu Setyadi
- Chapter 8/19 of Rock EngineeringEnviado porHakan_KURU
- Chapter 15/19 of Rock EngineeringEnviado porHakan_KURU
- Chapter 4 PART 1Enviado porFetene Nigussie
- Park & Paulay3.pdfEnviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- Kaneshiro Jon Korbin Greg Boulder TunnelEnviado porEdgar Chuquipiondo Vargas
- 4.10)ARCH SHAPED SELF SUPPORTING TRUSSLESS ROOF SPECIFICATIONS.pdfEnviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy
- Park & Paulay 2.pdfEnviado porGaddam Padmaja Reddy

- CE6306_QBEnviado porAbhishek Kumbalur
- CasingTables_2008Enviado porTimothy Popik
- 1-s2.0-S187770581300622X-mainEnviado porGrzesiekG
- On Bottom StabilityEnviado porhariharanoilgas
- Shear-Transfer Strength of Reinforced ConcreteEnviado porPremasiri Karunarathna
- 104-s49 Strength, Stiffness, And Cyclic Deformation CapacityEnviado porAmr Kemal
- Assessment of Nakamura Methodology for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction PotentialEnviado porPedro Torres
- Raft FoundationEnviado porDayo Idowu
- Effects of Slaking on the Engineering Behavior of Clay ShalesEnviado pormbotts
- Yield Point FinalEnviado porHamayoun Murtaza
- Dual Phase SteelsEnviado porPathan Shamsheerkhan
- Cyclic Triaxial Test ProcedureEnviado porabraham
- Composite Steel Girder DesignEnviado porNithesh Sham
- Soil Properties of Fort Union Clay ShaleEnviado porAnonymous GnfGTw
- Rammed Earth ConstructionEnviado porraeggaeman
- Efect of BrazierEnviado porAngiesGarcia
- Astm c393 Testing FixtureEnviado porThales Favoretto Pozzer
- API Casing Steel GradesEnviado pormahdiscribd
- CE F313 Foundation Engineering Handout_ 2015_16 (1)Enviado porAbhijeet Roy
- Bolted Moment ConnectionEnviado porHugo Ezequiel
- Nonlinear Static Pushover Analysis for Shear Wall Structures in SAP2000 ProgramEnviado porHalim Mamani
- 4211r_99.pdfEnviado porJose R Birmighan S
- Guidelines - Strain Gauge 3Enviado porthanhnghiakdd
- Design of Steel BeamsEnviado porronaldnyirenda2230
- 40207_appaEnviado porsupriyo1970
- sa.pdfEnviado pordhruv
- CE4202_GRPNO6Enviado porJulius Tolentino
- GATE Structural Analysis & Mechanics BookEnviado porMims12
- Basf snap_fits.pdfEnviado porkfarav
- ACI435.pdfEnviado porVasanthapragash Nadarajha