Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
involve them in phosphine-catalyzed transformations ethanol and water, respectively. Dimethyl maleate was
under normal temperature or pressure are usually un- redistilled under reduced pressure immediately before
successful [911]. A number of methods have also been use; dimethyl fumarate was purified by recrystalliza-
developed to improve the rate of the MoritaBaylis tion from methanol. Acetic acid (ACS reagent) and
Hillman reaction using microwave [12] and ultra- PPh3 were used as received from Acros Organics.
sound [13] irradiation, Lewis acids [14,15], protic addi-
tives [16,17], ionic liquids [18], etc. Another promising
strategy is based on the concept of hydrogen bonding, Kinetic Studies
when substrates or catalysts are functionalized in a spe- Kinetics were carried out by a spectrophotometric
cific manner by proton-donor groups [1922]. These method under the pseudofirst-order condition with
groups are considered to stabilize the resulting zwit- respect to triphenylphosphine. The general method of
terion via intramolecular hydrogen bonding with the studying the reaction kinetics has been described in
carbonyl oxygen of the electron-withdrawing group of detail previously [25]. Reactions were monitored as a
the activated alkene and thus promote the reaction. To function of time at 310 nm (for dimethyl fumarate and
better understand the impact of such an interaction on trans-aconitic acid), at 300 nm (for dimethyl maleate
the reaction pathway, information about kinetic param- and cis-aconitic acid), and at 290 nm for all other
eters is very valuable. cases up to 80% conversion of PPh3 . Representative
The current work describes the effect of rate ac- examples of the kinetic methodology are given in the
celeration by neighboring group participation in the Supporting Information.
case of the reaction between triphenylphosphine and
unsaturated di- and tricarboxylic acidsmaleic and
cis-aconitic acids; the influence of initial geometry of RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
the acid on the reaction rate is also discussed. A pre-
requisite for this study was our earlier observation that On the basis of kinetic and theoretical studies, we previ-
maleic acid shows unexpectedly high reactivity in a ously proposed a mechanism for a reaction of tertiary
reaction with tertiary phosphines, being much more phosphines with unsaturated carboxylic acids in the
reactive than its trans-isomer, fumaric acid, and also medium of aprotic and protic solvents [2628] similar
the sterically unhindered acrylic acid [23]. Synthetic to that in Scheme 1.
aspects of these reactions have been studied in detail It involves the initial reversible addition of nucle-
previously [24]. To rationalize the unusual behavior ophilic tertiary phosphine to an activated = bond
of maleic acid, using spectrophotometry, we studied of the acid, to form a zwitterionic intermediate with
the kinetics of the triphenylphosphine reaction with an equilibrium constant K = k1 /k1 (k1 k1 ). The
dimethyl maleate and dimethyl fumarate, as well as next rate-determining step is concerted intermolecu-
with cis/trans-aconitic acids in acetic acid media, un- lar proton transfer from the protic solvent or second
der the pseudofirst-order condition with respect to molecule of unsaturated acid to the generated carban-
the phosphine. This investigation provides interesting ion center with a rate constant k2 . When acetic acid is
stereochemical information about the phosphonium used as a solvent, the reaction is first order in phos-
zwitterionic intermediates involved, as well as giving phine, unsaturated acid and acetic acid, third order
an example of the effect of anchimeric assistance in overall; thus, the rate is expressed by Eq. (1):
nucleophilic addition reactions.
Rate = Kk2 [PR3 ][unsaturated acid][AcOH]
= kIII [PR3 ][unsaturated acid][AcOH] (1)
EXPERIMENTAL
where kIII is the measured third-order rate constant.
Materials
We have also shown that this mechanism is gen-
cis/trans-Aconitic acids were obtained from Sigma eralizable to functional derivatives of unsaturated car-
Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland), whereas all other chem- boxylic acids (esters, amides, nitriles), when reactions
icals were from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). are carried out in the presence of a proton-donor source,
Both of the aconitic acids were purified by recrys- for example, in the medium of acetic acid [25]. The
tallization from acetonitrile. In the case of cis-aconitic proposed mechanism explains well the observed high
acid, heating was avoided to prevent thermal isomer- reaction sensitivity to substituent effects (see Table I).
ization into trans-aconitic acid. Maleic and fumaric For example, alkyl groups in the -position, as in
acids were purified by recrystallization from absolute the case of methacrylic and itaconic acids, destabilize
Scheme 1 Proposed mechanism for a reaction of tertiary phosphines with unsaturated carboxylic acids in aprotic and protic
solvents.
Table I Third-Order Rate Constants and Activation Parameters for the PPh3 Reaction with Unsaturated Carboxylic
Acids and Related Methyl Esters (30 C)
Ester
generated carbanion charge and reduce reaction rates the reaction center, which retards nucleophilic attack
by about 50 and 3 times, respectively, as compared by the phosphine. Tiglic acid, which has the methyl
with acrylic acid (see Table I). -Substituents, both group at both the - and -positions, exhibits very low
electron donor and acceptor, as in the case of cro- reactivity, which makes precise determination of the
tonic and fumaric acids, decrease the reaction rate (by rate constant for this acid complicated. However, the
about 215 and 3 times, respectively) due to screening of high reactivity of maleic acid cannot be understood by
taking into account only the electronic and steric ef- within a seven-membered ring, in which carbonyl oxy-
fects of its -carboxyl group. This indicates that an- gen of the -carboxyl group attached to carbanion cen-
other substituent effect drives the reaction and reduces ter acts as a proton acceptor and the -carboxyl group
its energy barrier. acts as a proton donor (Fig. 2, I).
One can attribute the difference in reactivities of fu- Previous kinetic studies showed that intermolecu-
maric and maleic acids to destabilization of the initial lar hydrogen bonding can greatly increase the reaction
state of the latter acid, caused by the thermodynami- rate, when anionic charge is involved in delocalization
cally less favorable cis-orientation of carboxyl groups within an eight-membered ring with a solventacetic
around the C=C bond. If both acids afforded the same acid (Fig. 2, II) [25]. For this reason, carboxylic acids
zwitterionic intermediate A in different conformations, are about 10 times more reactive than, for example,
which enables free rotation around the C C single related methyl esters, for which the possibility to form
bond (Scheme 2), the higher starting energy level of cyclic associates with acetic acid is lost (Fig. 2, III).
maleic acid would facilitate its interaction with the Evidently, a similar effect of rate acceleration can be
= =
phosphine (G2 > G1 ; see Fig. 1). achieved by means of intramolecular H bonding, as
However, this hypothesis still does not answer the observed for maleic acid. However, no installation of
question: Why is maleic acid even more reactive than a second carboxyl group to the molecule of unsatu-
unsubstituted acrylic acid? Moreover, comparison of rated acid results in a rate increase, as exemplified
relative reactivities of maleic and fumaric esters, as will by relatively low reactivity of fumaric acid. This im-
be discussed below, argues against the assumption that plies that rotation around the single C C bond in
the difference in reaction rates of cis/trans-isomers is generated zwitterions is not free, and the difference
determined exclusively by inequality in starting energy between the two intermediates is not conformational.
levels of unsaturated substrates. Restricted rotation around this bond can be attributed
Most likely, the unusual reactivity of maleic acid to an intramolecular electrostatic interaction between
comes from additional stabilization of the result- the phosphonium center and the carbonyl oxygen of
ing zwitterions, by an intramolecular hydrogen bond the carboxyl group participating in delocalization of
Figure 2 Stabilization of phosphonium zwitterions by I: intramolecular H bonding, II: intermolecular H bonding with acetic
acid within a cyclic complex, and III: intermolecular H bonding with acetic acid within an acyclic complex.
Scheme 4 Proposed difference between zwitterions generated from PPh3 and maleic/fumaric acids. (Both enantiomers for
each acid are shown.)
Figure 4 Spatial structures of phosphonium zwitterions generated from dimethyl maleate (E) and dimethyl fumarate (F).
must promote nucleophilic attack of the phosphine the ratio kIII (6)/kIII (7) = 25, rather similar to maleic
(i.e., increase the rate constant k1 ). This conclusion acid: kIII (4)/kIII (5) = 32 (see Table I). Taking itaconic
correlates with previous results [25] showing that elec- acid as a reference, inclusion of a cis-carboxyl group
trophilicity of the substrate is not the main factor gov- slightly improves the reaction rate (kIII (6)/kIII (3) =
erning the rate of quaternization. Such a situation be- 1.2), although the steric effect of a -substituent must
comes possible when the rate-determining step is pro- inhibit addition of phosphine, as observed for trans-
ton transfer, since if nucleophilic attack was the rate- aconitic and fumaric acids. Therefore, the effect of
determining step, the experimental rate constant would anchimeric assistance also takes place in cis-aconitic
depend only on the microscopic constant k1 . More acid; however, it is much weaker than for maleic acid,
rapid quaternization of PPh3 with dimethyl fumarate since kIII (4)/kIII (1) = 12. Most probably, the reason for
conflicts with the hypothesis that increased reactivity this should be sought from how intramolecular hydro-
of maleic acid arises from a higher starting energy level gen bonding within the initial structure of the cis-acid
of this acid, as mentioned above. favors or disfavors anchimeric assistance when phos-
Notably, itaconic acid is one more substrate in which phine attacks one of the carbon atoms of the C=C bond.
a second carboxyl group, similarly to fumaric acid, It is expected that a combination of two interrelated
does not lead to a rate increase. This follows from structural factors maximize the effect of acceleration:
the ratio kIII (3)/kIII (12) = 11, close enough to that for
acrylic and methacrylic acids (see Table I). Explanation
i) an s-cis-conformation of the C=C bond and the
for this fact can again be found from consideration of
C=O group participating in delocalization of
spatial structure of the generated zwitterion implying
carbanion charge, which makes possible an in-
the presence of a PO interaction.
tramolecular PO interaction;
The only possible intramolecular hydrogen bond
ii) the -carboxyl group acts as a proton acceptor,
here does not involve into an interaction as a proton
whereas the -carboxyl group acts as a proton
acceptor the carbonyl oxygen of the carboxyl group
donor, leading to additional delocalization of an-
attached to the carbanion center, and therefore does
ionic charge by means of hydrogen bonding.
not have an effect on the additional delocalization of
anionic charge (Fig. 5, I). In this case, stabilization of
the zwitterion by intermolecular hydrogen with acetic With consideration of these factors, attack of phos-
acid seems to be more preferable (Fig. 5, II). phine on the -carbon atom of maleic acid (path b)
The unusual reactivity of maleic acid encouraged is more preferable than -attack (path a), taking into
us to examine, whether the effect of anchimeric as- account equal steric hindrance of the - and -centers
sistance can be found in other substrates. With this (Scheme 7). According to X-ray data, cis-aconitic acid,
aim, we studied kinetics of PPh3 with tricarboxylic as well as maleic acid, is prone to form an intramolec-
cis/trans-isomeric aconitic acids in the medium of ular hydrogen bond between the two carboxyl groups
acetic acid. Again, cis-isomeric acid exhibited sig- attached to the C=C bond, as shown in Scheme 7,
nificantly higher reactivity than trans-isomeric acid, structure G [37].
Figure 5 Structures of the zwitterion derived from PPh3 and itaconic acid involving intramolecular (I) and intermolecular
(II) H-bonding.
Scheme 7 Influence of intramolecular hydrogen bonding in maleic and cis-aconitic acids on the readiness of PPh3 addition.
However, owing to the steric effect of the CH2 CO2 H the -carboxyl group a proton acceptor, and the -
group, attack toward the -carbon atom is strongly carboxyl group a proton donor (structure H, Scheme 7).
retarded (high reaction sensitivity to substituent ef- Evidently, the need of such isomerization within cis-
fects was discussed earlier), but attack on the -carbon aconitic acid (or the intermediate formed) decreases
atom violates both factors that can contribute to effi- the reaction rate and the effect of anchimeric assis-
cient stabilization of the generated zwitterion. To over- tance in comparison with maleic acid, in which an
come such unfavorable situation, reorganization of the intramolecular bond initially assists interaction with
intramolecular hydrogen bond is necessary to make tertiary phosphine.
22. Marinetti, A.; Voituriez, A. Synlett 2010, 174 30. Ohwada, T.; Tani, N. Sakamaki, Y.; Kabasawa, Y.; Otani,
194. Y.; Kawahata, M.; Yamaguchi, K. Proc Natl Acad Sci
23. Galkin, V. I.; Salin, A. V.; Bakhtiyarova, Y. V.; Sobanov, 2013, 110, 42064211.
A. A. Russ J Gen Chem 2009, 79, 919924. 31. Khong, S.N.; Kwon, O. Molecules 2012, 17, 5626
24. Galkin, V. I.; Bakhtiyarova, Y. V.; Sagdieva, R. I.; Galk- 5650.
ina, I. V.; Cherkasov, R. A. Heteroatom Chem 2006, 17, 32. Maiti, M.; Michielssens, S.; Dyubankova, N.; Maiti, M.;
557566, and references therein. Lescrinier, E.; Ceulemans, A.; Herdewijn, P. Chem Eur
25. Salin, A. V.; Fatkhutdinov, A. R.; Ilin, A. V.; Sotov, J 2012, 18, 857868.
E. I.; Sobanov, A. A.; Galkin, V. I.; James, B. R. J Phys 33. Fibriansah, G.; Gliubich, F. I.; Thunnissen, A.-M. W. H.
Org Chem 2013, 26, 675678. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 91649177.
26. Salin, A. V.; Sobanov, A. A.; Bakhtiyarova, Y. V.; 34. Liang, Y.; Liu, S.; Xia, Y.; Li, Y.; Yu, Z.-X. Chem Eur J
Khabibullin, A. A.; Galkin, V. I. Russ J Gen Chem 2010, 2008, 14, 43614373.
80, 17381742. 35. Krafft, M. E.; Haxell, T. F. N.; Seibert, K. A.; Abboud,
27. Salin, A. V.; Sobanov, A. A.; Bakhtiyarova, Y. V.; K. A. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128, 41744175.
Khabibullin, A. A.; Galkin, V. I. Russ J Gen Chem 2011, 36. Kumara Swamy, K. C.; Satish Kumar, N. Acc Chem
81, 824830. Res 2006, 39, 324333, and references therein.
28. Salin, A. V.; Aminova, R. M.; Galkin, V. I. Int J Quantum 37. Nagel, N.; Endruschat, U.; Bock, H. Acta Crystallogr,
Chem 2013, 113, 10861094. Sect C: Cryst Struct Commun 1996, 52, 29122915.
29. Mora, J. R.; Lezama, J.; Berroteran, N.; Cordova, T.; 38. Lohbeck, K.; Haferkorn, H.; Fuhrmann, W.; Fedtke,
Chuchani, G. Int J Quantum Chem 2012, 112, 3729 N. Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry;
3738. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2000; pp 145155.