Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00236.x
October 2011, Vol. 37, No. 4, 479490
In this article, dreams are seen as stories within a self-narrative. Dream stories, like all other
stories, are told in an eort to make sense of experiences. Here, dream content is linked to
current concerns, some aspects of which are not given voice in waking. Dreams depict
restricting themes but also openings in self-narratives. Several examples are provided of how
dreams can be linked to early, middle, and late therapy phases associated with recognizing,
challenging, revising, and maintaining a revising stance. It is further suggested that dream
stories can be used to trace, facilitate, and evaluate the process of reconstructing self-
narratives. Finally, a number of therapeutic interventions are briey presented to facilitate the
work of narrative-informed family therapists working with individuals, families, and groups.
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Father: Well-dreams are bits and pieces of the stuff of which we are made . . . Or
something like it.
Athena Androutsopoulou, PhD, is a clinical psychologist and psychotherapist in private practice (www.
androutsopoulou.gr). She is also co-director and supervisor at the Training and Research Institute for Systemic
Psychotherapy (www.logopsychis.gr).
Address correspondence to Dr. Athena Androutsopoulou, Patision 130, GR-112 57, Greece; E-mail: athena@
androutsopoulou.gr
Dream Language
The language of dreams is personal and dream interpretation should make sense to the
dreamer herself. It is possible, however, to interpret or, in Kramers (1991, 1993) term, to
translate a dream without the contribution of the dreamer, although this work is not a sub-
stitute for the collaborative work needed in therapy. Dream translation is possible because
the language of the dream is not just personal but also collective, in the sense that personal lin-
guistic codes reect wider social codes or extrinsic structures (States, 1994).
According to Lako (1993), most dream symbolism makes use of the everyday idioms and
metaphor system. Bateson (2000) writes that when a metaphor is being used in waking, it is
marked by the insertion of the words as if or like, but in dreaming (as in art) there are no
markers to indicate to the conscious mind that the message material is metaphoric (p. 140).
Kilroe (2000b) points out that our linguistic minds create dream puns all based on homonymy
(a word substitutes another with the same sound) or polysemy (one meaning of a word substi-
tutes another meaning of the same word), and this way, they can represent abstract thoughts in
a concrete form.
DREAMS IN THERAPY
THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS
The therapist approaches dream stories with no preconceptions about the meaning of met-
aphors, but from the basis that dream content is linked to current concerns, some aspects of
which are not given voice in waking. Dream content depicts restricting themes but also open-
ings in self-narratives. The metaphorical language of dreams makes the personal meaning and
implications of such themes more obvious to both clients and therapists.
Dream material comes up spontaneously in a therapy session and is discussed as any other
story, with the therapists input limited to questioning and making tentative suggestions. Partic-
ularly relevant for the process of working with dream stories is the blueprint of the therapeutic
encounter provided by Sluzki (1992), describing a session process as episodes of framing the
encounter, eliciting and enacting the dominant stories (restricting themes), favoring alter-
native stories or relations between stories, and enhancing the new stories and anchoring the
new stories. I see these episodes as micro-phases within a session, as opposed to the psycho-
therapy macro-phases described above.
CONCLUSION
In the mind of most family therapists, dream work is mostly associated with modern indi-
vidualistic approaches to therapy, especially psychoanalytic. However, story-generating methods
and techniques are not modern or postmodern per se. Efran and Clareld (1992) have criticized
attempts to consider certain methods as only appropriate for therapists who wish their work
to be informed by constructionist ideas. Providing a coherent narrative framework for story-
generating methods and technique allows family therapists to combine an interest in narrative
with favorite ways of working. In this article, dream stories are seen as part of self-narratives
and as aiming to make sense of personal experiences. Interpretation is best understood as
tentative eorts for meaning-making of the dream story.
Dream telling is a safe way of expressing concerns and accompanying emotions that are
left unnoticed and or warded off in waking. Dream stories are approached with no preconcep-
tions regarding the meaning of metaphors, but with the aim to help the dreamer link dreams to
current concerns and generate ideas on which aspects of his waking experience are not given
voice in waking.
In general, dream reports are used to supplement an ongoing therapeutic dialogue aiming
to recognize, challenge, and revise restricting themes. Recognizing themes is usually easier and
more creative when working with dream stories and metaphors. Therapists can link dreams
with therapy phases to pinpoint progress and to help clients monitor with them how self-narra-
tives are gradually being reconstructed. Narrative-informed family therapists working with
groups can recruit group members as audiences to help generate alternative stories and vali-
date new ones. Those working mostly with families can work with dreams in family sessions.
Family members share dreams and notice common themes in their dreams (how they may be
alike). They give each other permission to express dangerous emotions through the safety of
dream telling. The way that family members metaphorically depict their relationship in their
dreams provides valuable material. Finally, dreams reect not only the ways that persons relate
to their social groups, but also the way that different parts within them relate to each other in
waking.
Andersen, S. M., & Miranda, R. (2000). Transference: How past relationships emerge in the present. The Psy-
chologist, 13, 608609.
Anderson, H. (1999). Reimagining family therapy: Reections on Minuchins invisible family. Journal of Marital
and Family Therapy, 25, 18.
Andrews, J., Clark, D. J., & Zinker, J. C. (1988). Accessing transgenerational themes through dreamwork. Jour-
nal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14, 1527.
Androutsopoulou, A. (2001a). The self-characterization as narrative tool: Applications in therapy with individuals
and families. Family Process, 40, 7994.
Androutsopoulou, A. (2001b). Fiction as an aid to therapy: A narrative and family rationale for practice. Journal
of Family Therapy, 23, 278295.
Androutsopoulou, A. (2005a). The innocent language of our dreams. Athens: Hellinika Grammata [in Greek].
Androutsopoulou, A. (2005b). Themes in nested stories: A case in family-oriented synthetic therapy. Journal of
Systemic Therapies, 24, 4359.
Androutsopoulou, A., Thanopoulou, J., Economou, E., & Bati, S. (2004). Forming criteria for assessing the
coherence of clients life stories: A narrative study. Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 383405.
Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution and episte-
mology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boss, M. (1958). The analysis of dreams. New York: Philosophical Library.
Boss, M. (1978). I dreamt last night. . . . New York: Gardner Press.
Buchholz, M. B. (1990). Using dreams in family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 12, 387396.
Butler, M. H., & Bird, M. H. (2000). Narrative and interactional process for preventing harmful struggle in ther-
apy: An integrative empirical model. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 123142.
Cariola, L. A. (2008). A structural and functional analysis of dream narratives. Dreaming, 18, 1626.
Craig, E., & Walsh, S. J. (1993). Phenomenological challenges for the clinical use of dreams. In G. Delaney (Ed.),
New directions in dream interpretation (pp. 103154). Albany: State University of New York.
Cushway, D., & Sewell, R. (1992). Counselling with dreams and nightmares. London: Sage.
Deslauriers, D., & Cordts, J. (1995). Dreams and current concerns: A narrative co-constitutive approach. Dream-
ing, 5, 247265.
Domho, G. W. (1999). Drawing theoretical implications from descriptive empirical ndings on dream content.
Dreaming, 9, 201210.
Domho, G. W. (2003). The scientic study of dreams. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Eakin, P. J. (1992). Touching the world: Reference in autobiography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Efran, J. S., & Clareld, L. E. (1992). Constructionist therapy: Sense and nonsense. In S. McNamee & K. J. Ger-
gen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 200217). London: Sage.
Feixas, G., Cunillera, C., & Mateu, C. (1990). Dream analysis in a systemic therapy case: A constructivist
approach. Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 9, 5565.
Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni-
versity Press.
Hardy, B. (1968). Towards a poetics of ction: An approach through narrative. Novel, 2, 514.
Hill, C. E. (Ed.). (2004). Dream work in therapy: Facilitating exploration, insight and action. Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Homan, L. (2002). Family therapy: An intimate history. New York: Norton.
Jung, C. G. (1970). Structure and dynamics of the psyche. (Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 8). Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Kaplan, J., Saayman, G. S., & Faber, P. A. (1981). An investigation of the use of the nocturnal dream
reports as diagnostic indices in the assessment of family problem solving. Journal of Family Therapy, 3,
227242.
Kilroe, P. A. (2000a). The dream as text, the dream as narrative. Dreaming, 10, 125137.
Kilroe, P. A. (2000b). The dream pun: What is a play on words without words? Dreaming, 10, 193209.
Knudson, R. M., Adame, A. L., & Finocan, G. M. (2006). Signicant dreams: Repositioning the self-narrative.
Dreaming, 16, 215222.
Kramer, M. (1991). Dream translation: A non associative method for understanding the dream. Dreaming, 1,
147159.
Kramer, M. (1993). Dream translation. In G. Delaney (Ed.), New directions in dream interpretation (pp. 155194).
Albany: State University of New York.
Labov, W., & Waletsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.),
Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 1244). Seattle, WA: American Ethnological Society University of
Washington Press.