Objectives section, or any other name it has according to the
directions, is the face of your project. It is also the part open for emotive language, which will be discussed in Lesson Nine. Draft this section very carefully, as if you don't grab the attention from the very first page, it will be hard to do it later. You can make the first impression only once. It's a great idea to make the first sentence of this section and more complete version of the title so that the reader could understand clearly the connection between its parts. Besides, you repeat the key terms and make them more familiar to the reader. For example, if the table sounds as role of Fragilis Proteins in intracellular shuttles during cell activation, then the first sentence in the introduction could sound as, in this application we propose to test the hypothesis that the Fragilis proteins are molecular shuttles taking a set of protein modifiers from the intracellular compartment to the membrane after cellular activation. Try to relate your proposed aims to the preliminary studies. Use nouns and verbs that identify advancement and growth: for example, advance, broaden, build upon, emerge, extend, lead, or pursue. For instance, the proposed research builds upon the psychological classes identified in preliminary studies. Another point to make is present your proposed aims in emphatic font and in a vertical enumerated list so that reviewers can quickly identify them. Next, be precise and explicit when you formulate objectives of the research. Write literally Our specific objectives are enthuse such words as identify or determine or any other words from bloom chart. When we say precise, we mean there is one possible interpretation. For instance Despite the prevalence of this perceptual basis, there is little or no consensus about its occurrence or its significance for human vision. This objective can be interpreted in multiple ways. For example despite the prevalence of this perceptual basis, there is little or no consensus about whether it occurred Or what significance it has for human vision. To make it even more precise, it's better to rewrite it this way, so there is little or no consensus about how and why it occurs or what significance it has for human vision. Now it's clear what consensus is meant and what exactly the researcher wants to investigate. Don't hesitate to use clauses introduced by such links as whether, what, why, when, which, to what extent To make your objective more precise. Now let's consider three common problems in phrasing a clear research purpose statement. First, that is the level of research purpose is not identified. Or, the technical area of investigation is too general or too specific. And last, the verb is not a research purpose word. For example, our objective is to investigate subjects within chronic unilateral vestibular loss. The topic is too broad, it's not clear at all. So, make it more narrow The objective of our proposed research is to determine whether subjects with chronic unilateral vestibular loss have underlying postural asymmetries. Now let's discuss the background section. We consider the staff information as well as university information in lesson three. And it's great that you can prepare this part of the section well in advance, even before you start at crafting a particular proposal. And you will not have to spend precious time when you start approaching the deadline. Thus, the main bulk of work will be devoted to explaining what gap of knowledge you're going to fill. In this background section, you will provide review studies in fact that first one, are directly relevant to the topic. And relevant not only to the topic but your proposed objective and methods. You might have a temptation to put as much information about your field of studies as possible. But you should restrain yourself. Select the data you need exactly for this research. And check that it corresponds to the objective you set, and will justify the methods. Second, scientific information and in the background section should come primarily from published research or other researchers. Published materials are more trustworthy and are not subject to changes as online materials are. However it does not mean that using information from the internet is forbidden. By no means it's just a reminder that you should be picky about sources. Third, publications review should be up-to-date. It's an absolute must, as only this way you can learn what is happening in the field of study. You can compare your ideas to other researches and find your place in the network of science. It will also let you define an appropriate angle of the research or adjust your approach. Fourth, you should review status that help pinpoint both the significance and the novelty of the research. Background section is exactly the place for defining why your idea is innovative and urgent. Even though you have already stated the gap in knowledge in the aims or elect section, there should be a sound scientific proof provided. Make clear the connection between the findings you review and your study. How does your research logically continues other researches. Don't forget about citing. All citations from publications should be accompanied by proper references. And it is advisable to divide background section into sub sections, if not stated otherwise in the grand directions. Phrase headings to backgrounds of sections with key terms from the proposed research objective and method. You're welcome to use nouns with modifiers in the alpha numeric termasation\g scheme. Such as A.1 or A.1.2.
(Logic, Epistemology, And the Unity of Science 37) Hourya Benis-Sinaceur, Marco Panza, Gabriel Sandu (Auth.)-Functions and Generality of Logic_ Reflections on Dedekind's and Frege's Logicisms-Springer