45 visualizações

Enviado por teachopensource

- 01-28-14 mini unit iii lesson plan
- odonnell kelsey module4
- 18 quadratic equations
- Quadratic s
- 18 Quadratic Equations
- digital unit plan template
- AL2_CT09_QuadraticEquations
- Solve x^(2)+2x-12=0 Tiger Algebra Solver
- lesson plan 1
- sabrinamonserate solving quadratic equations lesson plan draft
- Solving Quadratic Equation
- completing the square final draft 7 e lesson planning model enrique salcido
- Cap 08
- Quadratic Equations
- Completing the Square
- Math Digital Unit Plan
- Lesson Plan in Mathematics 9
- midtermreviewquestions
- Quadratic Equation Theory
- Capítulo 101

Você está na página 1de 8

May 19, 2010

Abstract

Contents

1 Definition 2

2 Algebraically 2

2.1 Polynomial representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2.2 Solving for x . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2.2.1 Factorizing the equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2.2.2 Using the quadratic formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

3 Graphically 5

3.1 Representation of a quadratic equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

3.2 Completing the square . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

3.3 Completing the square – the lazy way . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

3.4 Graphical properties of the parabola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1

1 Definition

The so-called quadratic equation is a widely used mathematical concept. It is immensely powerful

in a range of areas, from the flight time of a bird to advanced projectile motion, and is easy to use

when understood. Due to its notoriety, many tools have been designed to facilitate the analysis

of the quadratic equation.

2 Algebraically

2.1 Polynomial representation

Mathematically speaking, a quadratic equation is a polynomial equation of degree two. That is,

all quadratic equations can be defined by three parameters a, b, c ∈ R, with a 6= 0, as follows :

ax2 + bx + c = 0

One recurring question about quadratic equations is how to actually solve them. There are two

ways of solving a quadratic equation :

. Factorize the quadratic equation

. Use the quadratic formula

The first method does not always work (we will see why), while the second is general and will

succeed in solving the equation for any values of a, b and c (even those which yield an equation

that doesn’t have real solutions). This list does not include “completing the square” as it is

essentially the same as using the quadratic formula.

When facing the polynomial ax2 + bx + c = 0, it is desirable to be able to “break” the left hand

side into more tractable (easier) parts that multiply together to give the original expression.

This is because since the right hand side is zero, and that multiplication has a special property

regarding zeroes, it is possible to treat each little part independently to solve the equation. For

instance, consider x2 + 2x − 3 = 0. This factorizes as (x − 1)(x + 3) = 0, and this can be checked

by expanding. Now, this expression means – again because the right hand side is zero, otherwise

it fails – that either x − 1 = 0, either x + 3 = 0, which gives the two solutions to the equation,

x = 1 and x = −3.

Now, is there a general way to factorize quadratic equations ? The answer is no. Not only

there are infinitely many equations that can’t be factorized using only integer or fractions, or

even in real numbers, but factorization in general is believed to be a hard problem that cannot

be done instantly. Hopefully there are some tricks that can be carried out for quadratic equation

factorization to be easier. We can distinguish two cases : when a = 1, and where a 6= 1. Let us

analyze the first case, so we have the equation :

x2 + bx + c = 0

2

How can we factorize this ? Remember what we want is something in the form (x−m)(x−n) = 0.

Maybe it would be better to expand this instead of factorizing the original equation :

(x − m)(x − n) = 0

2

x − (m + n)x + mn = 0

Comparing this with our original equation, we see that b = −(m + n) and c = mn. The smart

among you might wonder, these two equations can be simultaneously solved so why bother ? Yes,

but solving them requires to solve another quadratic equation, which is what we are actually

trying to do. So the only alternative is to basically guess and check. Once you found two

numbers m, n that multiply together to give c, and add together to give b, then you know that

x2 + bx + c = (x − m)(x − n). Then, the solutions to the equation are simply :

x=m and x=n

Doing this a lot, you will soon be able to mentally factorize most quadratic equations quickly.

Now what if a 6= 1 ? This is harder, because we have to factorize the full equation :

ax2 + bx + c = 0

We now want something else, in the form (px − m)(qx − n) = 0 (the coefficients in front of

the x are necessary to obtain ax2 ). So let’s expand this :

(px − m)(qx − n) = 0

2

pqx − x(pn + qm) + mn = 0

Now you need to find two numbers that multiply to a, two other numbers that multiply to c,

and check that those four numbers satisfy pn + qm = b. This is not the most optimized method,

but better ones will not be dwelled upon in this paper as the quadratic formula is much more

useful and simple to use.

As to conclude on factorizing quadratic equations, bear in mind that there are some equations

that simply cannot be solved this way – typically, you won’t be able to find two numbers that

multiply to c and add to b for instance, because these just don’t exist.

So what do we do when we hopelessly realize our equation can’t be factorized using the previous

method (or are too lazy to bother trying) ? We use a formula called the quadratic formula, which

quickly gives the two solutions for x. Without further ado :

√

−b ± b2 − 4ac

If ax2 + bx + c = 0, then x =

2a

There are a couple of issues with this formula, though. At some point you are surely going

to get a “Math error” on your calculator, and this is because the value of b2 − 4ac will be

negative, and the square root of a negative number doesn’t exist. To avoid this, mathematicians

have designed a new tool, called the discriminant, which actually is the quantity b2 − 4ac. It

establishes a relationship between the number of real solutions a quadratic solution has, and the

value of the discriminant, as follows :

< 0 No real solutions

∆ = b2 − 4ac = 0 One real solution

> 0 Two real solutions

3

We may add another line : if ∆ is a perfect square, the solutions will be rational (the proof

is left as an exercise to the reader). For more explanation on why this is (apart from the fact

that taking the square root of a negative real number is not possible, and that ∆ = 0 yields a

repeated root), you can read though the proof in the “Graphical” section. It does not require

knowledge on how to derive the quadratic formula.

Anyway, this formula always works (it can be used to find complex roots, which you will

probably find about soon) and is easy to use, apart that it is easy to make a sign error, especially

in the discriminant. This is handy, and this is how it was discovered (follow the steps) :

ax2 + bx + c = 0

b c

x2 + x + = 0

a a

2 2

b b b c

x2 + x + − + =0

a 2a 2a a

2 2

b b c

x+ = −

2a 2a a

s 2

b b c

x+ =± −

2a 2a a

r

b b2 − 4ac

x+ =±

2a 4a2

√

b b2 − 4ac

x+ =± √

2a 4a2

√

−b ± b2 − 4ac

x=

2a

faster to use the quadratic formula. Note that a factorization of the quadratic equation can be

trivially derived from this formula. Indeed :

√ ! √ !

2 −b − b2 − 4ac −b + b2 − 4ac

ax + bx + c = x − x− =0

2a 2a

4

3 Graphically

3.1 Representation of a quadratic equation

Graphically, by plotting the values of y(x) = ax2 + bx + c against x, all quadratic equations

always take the shape of a parabola. This is due to the squared x value : x2 is not proportional

to x, so the graph cannot possibly be a line. As x2 = (−x)2 , the shape of the curve will be

symmetrical. And, to finish, x2 will increase faster than x for |x| > 1, therefore leading to an

ever-increasing slope. The three parameters a, b and c give information on how the parabola will

look like. For instance, if a > 0, then the parabola will go down, then up, much like this :

Here the parabola is defined by a = 1, b = 1, and c = 1. When a < 0, then the parabola will

be reversed : it will go up, then down. This is commonly called the direction of the parabola,

and is solely parameterized by a (b and c are not involved in the direction nor the slope of the

parabola). Also, the absolute value of a gives information on the slope of the parabola : greater

means steeper. As an illustration of this statement, the following graphs were plotted together :

5

The red parabola is defined by a = 2, the blue one by a = 1 and the green one by a = 0.5.

Note how the slope of the parabola gets steeper as a increases. This is also valid for negative

values of a : the slope will be identical, the parabola will simply be reversed.

There is a problem, though : the values of b and c are not of much use when considering the

graphical representation of a quadratic equation. This is why another tool exists, which is called

the vertex form. It is another equation which is, while being equivalent to the original quadratic

equation, much more intuitive when looking at parabolas, and takes the general form of :

y = a(x − h)2 + k

In this case, a still gives information on the direction and slope of the parabola (actually, it is

identical to the a of the first equation), h gives the horizontal displacement of the parabola, and

k gives the vertical displacement of the parabola. Indeed, if the graph of any quadratic equation

is compared to the “basic” equation y = x2 , one can see that it is not that much different : the

only difference resides in the slope and direction of the parabola and the position of the vertex.

With the new equation, the vertex is simply located at the point (h, k). For instance, using the

equation y = (x − 2)2 + 1 with a = 1, h = 2, k = 1, we graph this :

As expected, the vertex of the parabola does lie at the point (2, 1). But what do we do when

the quadratic is not given in vertex form ? We will have to transform the given equation,

y = ax2 + bx + c, into vertex form y = a(x − h)2 + k. This is a fairly simple process, often called

completing the square. The goal of this algebraic manipulation is to arrange terms in such a way

that one is left with a square expression involving x, and a “leftover” that will become k. For

instance, say we want to convert y = 3x2 + 6x − 1 to vertex form. First, write the equation :

y = 3x2 + 6x − 1

y 1

= x2 + 2x −

3 3

Remember the identity (m + n)2 = m2 + 2mn + n2 ? This is the one which will allow us to

achieve this process. Here, if we assume that m = x, we know that n = 1 (because we see

6

that 2mn = 2x), which nearly fits the original equation. Indeed, the identity requires that we

have n2 = 12 = 1 at the end, but we have −1 3 . So how can we do ? We can simply state that

−1 4

3 = 1 − 3 . This may seem very pointless at first, but it allows us to complete the square :

y 4

= x2 + 2x + 1 −

3 3

Now, using the identity on all but the last term :

y 4

= (x + 1)2 −

3 3

Then, multiply everything by a = 3 :

y = 3(x + 1)2 − 4

And we have the vertex form of the equation, giving us all the precious information we needed

about this parabola (which remains exactly the same thoughout the process). By the way, setting

m = x is necessary because vertex form does not allow any coefficient directly in front of the x.

There is a way to define h and k with regard to b and c, to go even faster. Indeed, consider the

quadratic equation y = ax2 + bx + c. Much like previously, we divide everything by a :

y b c

= x2 + x +

a a a

b b

Then, as before, ax = 2mn, and since m = x, we must have n = 2a . So we do as follows :

2 2

y b b b c

= x2 + x + − +

a a 2a 2a a

This might feel like cheating but it is a valid way of doing it . . . Now that we have our square :

2 2

y b b c

= x+ − +

a 2a 2a a

2

b2

y b 4ac

= x+ − 2

+ 2

a 2a 4a 4a

2

b2 − 4ac

y b

= x+ −

a 2a 4a2

2

b2 − 4ac

b

y =a x+ −

2a 4a

7

This is the vertex form. So, we can conclude by giving the relationships :

−b b2 − 4ac

h= and k=−

2a 4a

Note that you can spot the discriminant of the equation here – and more importantly, you can

finally see why it actually succeeds in telling us the number of real roots the equation has. Let

∆ = b2 − 4ac, and assume that a is positive, then if ∆ = 0, k = 0, so the equation becomes

y = a(x − h)2 which must only touch the x-axis in one x value. If ∆ > 0, then a(x − h)2 is

∆

positive and − 4a is negative, so the equation will have negative values (the parabola will cross

∆

the x-axis in two distinct points). Finally, if ∆ < 0, then a(x − h)2 is still positive but − 4a

becomes positive, so their sum will remain positive, therefore the parabola will never touch the

x-axis (and thus no real solutions). If a is negative, a similar argument can be used, with minor

modifications. This leads to the same conclusion found using direct algebra :

< 0 No real solutions : parabola does not touch the x-axis

∆ = b2 − 4ac = 0 One real solution : parabola is tangent to x-axis

> 0 Two real solutions : parabola does cross the x-axis

- 01-28-14 mini unit iii lesson planEnviado porapi-235085986
- odonnell kelsey module4Enviado porapi-315580041
- 18 quadratic equationsEnviado porapi-259236539
- Quadratic sEnviado porAnubast
- 18 Quadratic EquationsEnviado porAna Marie Besa Battung
- digital unit plan templateEnviado porapi-250623097
- AL2_CT09_QuadraticEquationsEnviado porLolengCarandang
- Solve x^(2)+2x-12=0 Tiger Algebra SolverEnviado porBayu Aji S
- lesson plan 1Enviado porapi-309386338
- sabrinamonserate solving quadratic equations lesson plan draftEnviado porapi-356643695
- Solving Quadratic EquationEnviado porMarites Balmas
- completing the square final draft 7 e lesson planning model enrique salcidoEnviado porapi-223631380
- Cap 08Enviado porapi-27420559
- Quadratic EquationsEnviado porErwani Kamaruddin
- Completing the SquareEnviado porBaroxx Diaz
- Math Digital Unit PlanEnviado porMarizsa Verdin
- Lesson Plan in Mathematics 9Enviado porLeonelyn Lecera
- midtermreviewquestionsEnviado porapi-438357152
- Quadratic Equation TheoryEnviado porMritunjay Kumar
- Capítulo 101Enviado porJosé Campos
- quadratics- allie chazenEnviado porapi-221860675
- Quadratic EqnEnviado porRamsoonder Sooresh
- Chapter 2- Quadratic EquationsEnviado porApes Core
- quadratic unitEnviado porapi-250717764
- unit 8 graphing solving quadraticsEnviado porapi-310051256
- quadraticequationsnotebookEnviado porapi-438357152
- Algebra Tutorial-quadratic FormulaEnviado porDr Srinivasan Nenmeli -K
- calculicious capstone es ie chazen - google docsEnviado porapi-267016167
- Module 2 - Quadratic EquationsEnviado porDexter Lacson Orario
- ferrara post-reading lepEnviado porapi-341224874

- APCalculusAB20062007integrals_quizEnviado porteachopensource
- apcalcbcquizfourEnviado porteachopensource
- APCalcABQuizFiveEnviado porteachopensource
- APCalculusBCExamFall2007Enviado porteachopensource
- ap calculus ab integrationEnviado porteachopensource
- AP Statistics Quiz 5Enviado porteachopensource
- APCalcBCQuizTwoEnviado porteachopensource
- APCalcBCQuizOneEnviado porteachopensource
- ap calculus bc: seriesEnviado porteachopensource
- apcalcabquizfourEnviado porteachopensource
- ap calculus ab quiz 3Enviado porteachopensource
- AP Calculus BC IntegrationEnviado porteachopensource
- Equations of Lines and Planes | Class Notes | iLearnmath.netEnviado porteachopensource
- ap calculus bc: polar coordinatesEnviado porteachopensource
- Work and Mixing ProblemsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 3 | 2010 - 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 1 | 2010 - 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 6 | 2010 - 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 4 | 2010 - 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 2 | 2010 - 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- APStatsQuiz2 | ilearnmath.netEnviado porteachopensource
- APStatsQuizOne.Enviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 11 | 2010- 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- TI‐84/89 USB CONNECTION TO PC | www.ilearnmath.netEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 10 | 2010- 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 15 | 2010- 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 9 | 2010- 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 5 | 2010- 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 7 | 2010- 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource
- Fiesta 8 | 2010- 2011 | AP CALCULUS | SolutionsEnviado porteachopensource

- Analytic Geometry HandoutsEnviado porkreuxtempest
- Algebra II Unit 1 Planning.docxEnviado porAdam Ladj
- Antennas Kennedy Pages 279 287Enviado porShah Nirmesh
- 00037836Enviado porPradeep Samuel
- Mathematical Physics 1_2_ae.pdfEnviado porviano morais
- quadratic-transformationsEnviado porapi-297405956
- Sydney Boys 2012 2U Prelim Yearly.pdfEnviado porYe Zhang
- V1 D7 APFIS 051 Camera ReadyEnviado porAbderrahmane Said
- Renewable Energy - Solar Electrical Energy SystemsEnviado porGhenoiu Paul
- archimedes of syracuseEnviado porapi-240974857
- Ecuaciones-Cuadráticas-y-Funciones-Cuadráticas---of---Álgebra-I---Edición-Española_ch_v1_s1.pdfEnviado porJose Francisco Horna Gonzalez
- How to Draw a Hyperbolic ParaboloidEnviado porAndy Cho
- capturing heatEnviado porcagedraptor
- kin_ENGEnviado porLakshya
- Solar Food Dryer ReportEnviado porannamalai
- Historical SupplyEnviado porAnnatalie Bautista
- Maths 2 - Class XIIEnviado porSunil Nahata
- ParabolaEnviado porShubhamWagh
- Roda FrogsEnviado porwakomasei
- Solar Photochemistry TechnologyEnviado porplainstyle
- 20132014 Ct s01e012 Codeforces Trainings Season 1 Episode 12 EnEnviado porGonKil
- Conics LectureEnviado porLJ Asencion Cacot
- Manual Tambahan GeogebraEnviado porpatricius327
- Fermat 2Enviado poracomilla
- Maine Math Meet5_2010-2014Enviado porbiswajit_kar1
- AIEEE 2008 Question Paper With SolutionsEnviado porbbttrryy
- Paraboloidal Reflector Antenna (Autosaved)Enviado porAbdou Gaye
- Mathematical Modeling of Synthetic CurvesEnviado porakshat_agha
- MATHS 3Enviado porGadde Gopala Krishna
- Tema1_HIM.pdfEnviado porjoshan899