Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) is a procedure 1.1 Pillars of TPM
that intends to build the accessibility of existing equipment
subsequently diminishing the requirement for assist capital There are three ultimate goal of TPM: zero defects, zero
venture. Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) is an accident and zero breakdowns. TPM has been imagined as a
arrangement which focuses on add up to association of complete assembling procedure to enhance gear profitability.
everybody from top administration to all employee to TPM implementation requires a long haul sense of duty
actualize a far reaching maintenance program for all regarding accomplish the advantages of enhanced OEE
equipment for the duration of its life. This arrangement brings through training, management support and teamwork. The
about most extreme adequacy of equipment, tidier, slick and essential practices of TPM are often called the pillar or
clean work place and ethically supported representatives. The elements of TPM.
aim is to decide execution elements and qualities in industrial
associations and recognizing the viability of 5S
implementation and Kobetsu Kaizen (TPM Pillar) on
organizational performance as well. The consequences of this
exploration got from a relative estimation of organizational
performance before and after 5S implementation.
1.INTRODUCTION
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2987
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
1.3 Overall Equipment Effectiveness Shift Time (General):8 hours = 480 min.
Planned Downtime: 70 min. Running
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) is the key metric of Time Loss: 35 min
Total Productive Manufacturing (TPW).OEE monitors the Output: 150
actual performance of a tool relative to its performance Nos. Rejection: 8 Nos.
capabilities under optimal manufacturing conditions. OEE
looks at the entire manufacturing environment measuring, Running Time = Shift Time Planned down Time
not only the equipment availability, but also, the production =480-70
efficiency while the equipment is available to run product, as =410 min.
well as the efficiency misfortune that outcomes from scrap,
revamp, and yield misfortunes. The OEE is probably t h e m o Operating time = Running Time Running Time Loss
s t important tool in the TPM improvement program. OEE is = 410 - 35 min.
simple and practical = 375 min.
OEE = (A) * (PE) * (RQ) Availability = (Operating Time / Running Time) x 100
Where = (375/410) x 100
A=Availability, PE=Performance Efficiency and RQ=Rate of =91.46 %
Quality
Machine Speed (No. of components/ min) = 0.50
OEE before TPM Implementation
Expected Output = Machine Speed x Operating Time
Shift Time (General): 8 hours = 480 min. = 0.50 x 375
Planned Downtime: 70 min. Running =187.5Nos.
Time Loss: 55
Min. Output: 120 Performance / Efficiency = (Output/ Expected output) x 100
Nos. Rejection: 18 = (150 / 187.5) x 100
Nos. = 80 %
Running Time = Shift Time Planned down Time
= 480 -70 Quality = (Good Piece / Total Piece) x 100
= 410 min. = (142 /150) x 100
= 94.67 %
Operating time = Running Time Running Time Loss
= 410-55 OEE = Availability x Performance / Efficiency x Quality
= 355 min. = (.9146 X.80 X .9467) X 100
= 69.27 %
Availability = (Operating Time / Running Time) x 100
= (355 / 410) x 100 From the above calculation it is clear that OEE of the
= 86.59 % machine have been improved with approximately 19 %. i.e.
Machine Speed (No. of components/ min) = 0 .50 from 49.76 % to 69.27 %.
Expected Output = Machine Speed x Operating Time
= 0.50 x 355
= 177.5 Nos.
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2988
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
and addresses?
Do the shelves have Categor
Item
signboards showing y
7 Indicator
which items go where? Subtota
s
1 2 l
Quantity Are the maximum and
8 Indicator minimum allowable 9
s quantities indicated? 2
Demarcat Are white lines or other
ion of markers used to clearly
walkway indicate walkways and
9 s and in storage areas?
-process
Fig -3: Comparison of OEE before and after 5S & TPM inventor
y areas 2
Are jigs and tools
2. CASE STUDY Jigs and arranged more rationally
10
tools to facilities picking them
2.1 About Company up and returning them? 2
Sub Total 1 8
Score 2 3
Check 3 checki maintenance?
1S No. Description
item 0 1 2 3 4 ng
Materials Does the Cleani Is there a person
or inventory or in ng responsible for overseeing
1
process respo lening operations?
4
inventory nsibili
1
included and ties
parts
unneeded Habitu Do operators habitually
materials or 1 al sweep floors and wipe
parts? 2 2
5 cleanli equipment without being
Are there any ness told?
unused Sub Total
Machines 1 6 3
machines or
2 or Category
other
equipment Subtotal
equipment
around? 1 . Table -4: 4s before Implementation
Are there any
Jigs,tools unused Jigs, N Score
3 9 4 Check
or dies tools or dies or o Description
similar around? 2 S item 0 1 2 3 4
.
Is it obvious Impro Are improvement memos
which items vemen regularly being
Visual 1
4 have been t generated? 2
control 6
marked as memo
unnecessary? 2 s
Has Impro Are improvement ideas
1 Category
SORT
Sub Total 1 8
6 Indicator storage areas marked
s with location indicators
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2989
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Are tools and parts being Demarcat Are white lines or other
Tools
2 Category ion of markers used to clearly
and stored correctly? 2
2 Subtotal walkway indicate walkways and
parts
9 s and in storage areas? 3
Stock Are stock controls being -process
2
control adhered to? 3 10 inventory
3
s areas
2 Proced Are procedures up-to- date Are jigs and tools
2
4 ure and regularly reviewed? arranged more
Activit Are activity boards up-to- 1 Jigs and
2 rationally to facilities 4
y date and regularly 2 0 tools
SUSTANE
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2990
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Table -10: 5s after Implementation I would like to express my gratitude to the many people who
have assisted me during the course of this research. The
N Score support extended by the Geeta Engineering College, Panipat
5 Check
S
o
item
Description authorities is highly appreciated and acknowledged with due
. 0 1 2 3 4
respect Authors and Affiliations.
Is everyone adequately
2 Trainin trained in standard 2
1 g procedure? REFERENCES
Are tools and parts being Cate
2
Tools
stored correctly? gory [1] Moubray,J.(2003), Twenty-first century maintenance
and
2
parts
3 Subt organization: Part I The asset management model,
otal
Stock Are stock controls being
Maintenance Technology, Applied Technology Publications,
2
3
control adhered to? 3 14 Barrington, IL.
s
2 Proced Are procedures up-to- date
4 ure and regularly reviewed? 3 [2] Johnson, P. and Lesshammar, M., (1999), Evaluation
2 Activity Are activity boards up-to- and improvement of manufacturing performance
SUSTANE
5 boards date and regularly reviewed? measurement systemsthe role of OEE, International
Sub Total 1
2
2 Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 19,
No.1, pp 55-78.
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2991