Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
P eter H erman
Georgetown University
ph274@georgetown.edu
A bstra ct
Robert Kirkmans popular horror comic The Walking Dead offers the basisfo r
a constructive Buddhist reading o f the identification o f the body w ith the au
thentic self By applying both traditional Buddhist readings o f charnel ground
meditations and theorist Julia Kristevas understanding o f abjection, this
article argues that the comic can be read in a socially progressive mode, destabiliz
ing the identification ofauthentic personhood w ith specific and particular bodies.
Keywords
Buddhism, Comic Books, Zombies, Theology, Body Image.
1. This article was originally presented at the American Academy o f Religions annual
meeting in 2013, in the Religion and Science Fiction group. I would like to express
my gratitude both to the conveners of that session for its inclusion, and to Edward
Bailey for his excellent and most welcome editorial suggestions which have brought
it to this point.
Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2014, Office 415, The Workstation, 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, SI 2BX
434 Peter Herman
This article proposes that (1) there are resources within Buddhism to
counter this tendency, and that (2) Robert Kirkmans comic book series
The Walking Dead can be read through a Buddhist lens, to accomplish a
positive subversion of body-centric thinking in popular Western society.
The intent is not to cast Kirkman as a crypto-Buddhist. He writes his
stories as stories, of course, and not asjataka tales or sutras. The contention
here is that it is possible to engage in a constructive reading of these horror
comics for a socially progressive purpose by appealing to classical Buddhist
texts and forming a new hermeneutic.
This article will draw on three primary Buddhist texts: the Satipatthana
Sutta, Buddhaghosas Visudhimagga or Path o f Purification, and Santidevas
Guide to the Bodhisattva Way o f Life. It will also make an appeal to Julia
Kristevas notion of abjection, to help explain in some degree the contin
ued fascination with the revenant both in religion and in society.2
The Walking Dead as horror comic
First, though, a brief precis of the comics. Rick Grimes, a sherriffs deputy
in Kentucky, is shot in an attempt to apprehend an escaped prisoner. He
wakes up from a coma a month later in a deserted hospital. He has no idea
what has happened and goes to seek help. W hat he finds are revenants
human in appearance, but decaying rapidly and feeding on the flesh of
the living. As he attempts to find his wife and son, he meets with chaos,
destruction, and the apparent end of civilization. Serendipity intervenes,
however, and he does indeed reunite with his family, albeit only for a time.3
The story progresses for a while along the (somewhat expected) paths of
the survival horror sub-genre. People turn into zombies/revenants. Ten
sions over scarce resources escalate. The survivors whom we are following
2. This concept will be explored later in the current article. As a quick definition,
abjection or abject in this sense have nothing to do with the standard English
idiomatic usage of extreme or severe (e.g. abject poverty). Rather, in Kristevas
usage, it refers to a psychological paradox in which an object is detested or feared, yet
held close.
3. It is worth noting at this point that the term zombie is not generally used in The Walking
Dead. Tire figure of the zombie was originally one which appeared in literature about
and folklore from African diasporic religious traditions (e.g. the films White Zombie
or The Serpent and the Rainbow). The contemporary idea of the zombie comes from
George Romeros 1968 film Night of the Living Dead. Romero himself referred to the
animated corpses in his films as ghouls.The second film in Romeros Living Dead series,
domestically titled Dawn of the Dead, was known internationally as Zombi. It is likely that
this translation has played a large part in the conflation of zombies and ghouls.
This particular sutta (Skt. sutra) has the Buddha giving his monks
instructions in mindfulness. During their discussion of viewing the body
as body, he offers the following advice:
Again, monks, a monk considers this body as though he were looking at a
body left in a charnel ground, one, two, or three days dead, bloated, livid,
and festering:.. .a monk considers this body as though he were looking at a
body left in a charnel ground, eaten by crows, hawks, vultures, dogs, jackals,
or other animals...a monk considers this body as though he were looking
at a body left in a charnel ground, a skeleton with flesh and blood, held
together with sinews...a skeleton with no flesh but smeared with blood
and held together with sinews...a skeleton without flesh or blood, held
together with sinews...disconnected bones scattered around, a hand-bone
here, a foot-bone here, a leg-bone here, a rib-bone here, a hip-bone here, a
back-bone here, the skull here.. .white bones looking like shells.. .piled-up
bones, more than a year old.. .rotten crumbling bones: This body is of the
same nature, of the same constitution, it has not got beyond this.
(Gethin 2008,141)
This gives us a more intense description of what it might mean to dwell
in the charnel ground. We are rather explicitly told of the sights, smells,
and sounds.
Again, the intention here, is not simply to develop revulsion, as we might
understand it, but to develop non-attachment. Revulsion implies the neg
ative pole of attachment: the thing that is horrible, still has meaning and
reality. By examining more closely the bodys decomposition, we can see
that it already is the rotten crumbling bones left over from the hawks,
vultures, dogs, jackals, or other animals. If it is not now in such a state,
only the passage of time stands between its health and its decay. It is, as
the Buddha taught, in the very nature of all things that are composed, to
decompose.
It is worthwhile at this point to recall that sutras are often used as medi
tation guides. Therefore, the repeated visualizations of the quotation above
may indeed be intended as a kind of mental performance. As we recite
these phrases, we imagine these sights. We imagine our own bodies decay
ing in such a fashion. We imagine ourselves as the dead. In this way, we do
not need to undertake the charnel-ground dwellers practice, physically:
we have a mental construction of the charnel ground will suffice for our
spiritual attainments.
Let us visit one final Buddhist text before returning to The Walking Dead
(by way of Julia Kristeva). Our last Buddhist text does not specifically deal
with the charnel ground. Rather, it presumes the readers familiarity with
such imagery and pushes forward to a vivid application o f charnel ground
meditation and imagery.
Guide to the Bodhisattvas Way o f Life: W e are the W alking D ead
In view o f the notion o f the body in these Buddhist texts, w hat comes from
Indian sage Santideva is not surprising: we look at the body and see beauty,
but the destiny o f the body is to decay. The Bodhicaryavatara, or Guide to
the Bodhisattva Way o f Life, deals w ith the perfection of Buddhist practice.
As such it is more of an instruction manual than the Visuddhimagga, but,
like Buddhaghosas work, it is not said to be authored by the Buddha.
D uring the eighth chapter, on the perfection o f meditation, Santideva
chastises his reader for the readers lust after physical pleasure and beauty:
She is nothing but bones, indifferent and impersonal. Why do you not
resort to emancipation, fully embracing it to your hearts content? / Either
you have seen that bashfully lowered face before as being lifted up with
effort, or you have not seen it as it was covered by a veil. / Now, that face
is revealed by vultures as if they are unable to bear your anxiousness. Look
at it! Why are you fleeing away now? / Jealous one, why do you not protect
what was guarded from the glances of others, as it is being eaten now? /
Seeing this mass of flesh being eaten by vultures and others, should you
worship othersfood with wreaths of flowers, sandalwood paste, and orna
ments? [...] You had this passion for it even when it was covered, so why
do you dislike it when it is uncovered? If you have no use for it, why do you
caress it when covered? (Santideva 1997,94-95)
However gruesome the description, the passage underscores what has
been said above. The body is not to be venerated in itself: what it is, is (or
soon enough will be) the food o f carrion-eaters. The ridiculousness o f our
attachm ent to the body is simply highlighted when discussed in terms of
a lovers veil being lifted by vultures.
Again, however, it must be remembered that puritanical revulsion at sen
sual life is not the intended result o f this analysis. The result is intended
to be a clear understanding that the body per se is not considered to have
intrinsic existence, being a mere composite of many aggregates. The nature
o f the composed is to decompose. Therefore, if we put our selves into our
bodies, we become carrion. As we do not wish this to be the case, we must
agree that the body is not the locus of the self as such.
This will become crucial, as we return to the notion o f the horror comic,
albeit through a compound lens o f Buddhist categories and post-Lacanian
literary theory and psychoanalysis.
work. Even worse than this, however, is the fact that we have doubled our
investment in the body. It is not any body which can be the locus o f the
self, after all. It must be a particular body. It must have a particular shape
and size, skin tone, color o f hair or eye, muscle tone, etc.
Space prohibits a full exposition of the varied ways in which the beauty
myth has been deployed as means o f social control, and the reactions and
resistances to it. For it is too im portant a subject to relegate to a footnote,
yet it is pressingly necessary to this discussion. The difficulty, ironically, with
so many o f the forms of resistance to this type o f social control is that they
seek to invert, rather than subvert, the paradigm or myth that is deemed to
be oppressive. W e seek to answer those who would denigrate the selves
that are enfleshed in the bodies o f the less thanwhether that less is
aesthetic, or based on physical ability, skin tone, or the type and number
o f genitalia, etc with the argument that we are all as much as the next.
This side o f the argument is still participating in the very structures it seeks
to critique. Selfhood, in this case, can indeed be attained, when, and if,
ever, all bodies are acceptable: but it is still based on the body.
These Buddhist texts reveal a different way forward. They show us an
understanding o f the person which is not dependent on a self equated
indeed, equivocatedwith a body. They show us that it is in the nature o f
the body, to decay. So, if the body is the locus of the self, let alone if the two
are identical, then it becomes the nature of the self also to decay. As we do
not wish to assent to this notion, we end up seeking selfhood elsewhere.
These texts, however, come from a context in which the natural pro
cess o f death was not managed in the same fashion as we currently do in
the West. W e do not have recourse to a charnel ground: many o f us may
never have seen a single corpse. (Even if we have seen one, it may have
been chemically preserved and painted in order to appear as lifelike as pos
sible.) Yet, through the lens o f Kirkmans dark fantasy o f social collapse
and destruction, we just might find a new way to conceive o f the body
(albeit that this new way is very old indeed). So, lacking a physical char
nel ground, we m ight turn instead to one constructed in a world o f pulp
horror. In this way, we can read The Walking Dead as a meditation on the
bodys decay and, by doing so, seek to subvert the narrative which tells us
that the perfect body is the locus o f the authentic self.
References
Buddhaghosa, Bhadantacariya. 1976. The Path o f Purification (Visuddhimagga).
Translated by Bhikku Nyanamoli. San Francisco, CA: Shambhala.
Gethin, Rupert. 2008. Sayings o f the Buddha: N ew Translations from the Pali
Nikayas. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kirkman, Robert. 2008. Letter Hacks. The Walking Dead 54: 27.
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers o f Horror: A n Essay on Abjection. Translated by Leon
S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.