Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Transmittal /
Document Ref.
Bechtel-GENCORR-000324 Compliant : There is no non-compliance nor discrepancies in the submission
Transmittal / Compliant with Observations : There is neither non-compliances nor discrepancies in the submission but observations for
BD8- 100% FINAL DESIGN 1H2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
STATUS
improvements are identified for contractor's consideration.
CODE
Document Title
Compliant with Comments : There is neither fundamental non-compliances nor discrepancioes in the submission but comments are
Design and Drawings made that require the contractor's action
Document Type
Structures & Buildings Non-Compliant : There is one or more fundammental non-compliance/s or discrepancies in the submission that must be addressed.
Discipline(s) involved
Pkg Item No Document Description Area/ Independent Checking Engineer's Date Resp BACS's Response Response Current Status Comments
No Number Location Comments/Observations/Concerns Raised Person Date
8 1 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Equipment load consiered only 1kN , please provide justificaation! 27-08-17 -
000001_B, Item 5.2 REVIEW
8 2 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Ref STAAD Design, how you have defined effective length of members 27-08-17 -
000001_B REVIEW so that slender and bending compression taken care off.
8 3 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Please provide manual checks for each elements such as beams , 27-08-17 -
000001_B REVIEW columns designed by STAAD.
8 4 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Our design life is 100 years, please enhace wind load for 100 years. 27-08-17 -
000001_B REVIEW
8 5 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Please elaborate design moment calcs for wall design as per Wood 27-08-17 -
000001_B page 869 REVIEW Armer equation.
8 6 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Please provide calcs showing sufficiency for early and long term crack 27-08-17 -
000001_B REVIEW control for slab and wall ref C660
8 7 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Please justify spring K assuned for staad modelling and bearing capacity 27-08-17 -
000001_B page 869 REVIEW assumed.
8 8 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Please put a note on your assumptions and deviation from ER in your 27-08-17
000001_B REVIEW design note.
8 9 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Please confirm minimum reinforcement required in Wall 27-08-17
000001_B REVIEW
8 10 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Have consider differential settlement in your design, if not justify? 27-08-17
000001_B REVIEW
8 11 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Please provide overall stability check of the foot bridge. 27-08-17
000001_B REVIEW
8 12 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- 1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Please provide manual calculations for plate girder design! 27-08-17
8 13 M-BD6-1H2PR0-CBST-ECA- REVIEW
1H2 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOR ICE Please specify fire requirement and get reviewed by NFPA ICE 27-08-17
000001_B REVIEW