Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
9745
Any person under investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be informed
of his right to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel preferably of his own
choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he must be provided with one. These
rights cannot be waived except in writing and in the presence of counsel.
(2) No torture, force, violence, threat, intimidation, or any other means which vitiate the free
will shall be used against any person under investigation for the commission of an offense.
Secret detention places, solitary, incommunicado, or other similar forms of detention are
prohibited.
(3) Any confession or admission obtained in violation of this or Section 17 hereof shall be
inadmissible in evidence against him.
(4) The law shall provide for penal and civil sanctions for violations of this section as well as
compensation to and rehabilitation of victims of torture or similar practices, and their families.
PURPOSE
To value the dignity of every human person and guarantee full respect for human rights;
To ensure that the human rights of all persons, including suspects, detainees and prisoners are
respected at all times; and that no person placed under investigation or held in custody of
any person in authority or, agent of a person authority shall be subjected to physical,
psychological or mental harm, force, violence, threat or intimidation or any act that impairs
his/her free wi11 or in any manner demeans or degrades human dignity;
DEFINITIONS
"Torture" refers to an act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is
intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him/her or a third
person information or a confession; punishing him/her for an act he/she or a third person has
committed or is suspected of having committed; or intimidating or coercing him/her or a third
person; or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is
inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent of a person in authority or agent of a
person in authority.
It does not include the lawful use of proportionate force inherent or incidental in administering
lawful sanctions
It is distinct from other acts of violence inflicted by a private individual on another - such as
parental abuse, intimate-partner violence, riots, rally dispersal, inter-personal assaults, physical
injuries, and other acts of violence.
ELEMENTS
2. For the purpose of obtaining from him/her or a third person information or a confession
3. Such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent of a person
in authority or agent of a person in authority.
ACTS OF TORTURE
(2) Threatening a person(s) or his/fher relative(s) with (8) Causing the torture sessions to be witnessed by the
bodily harm, execution or other wrongful acts; person's family, relatives or any third party;
Torture as a crime shall not absorb or shall not be absorbed by any other crime or felony
committed as a consequence, or as a means in the conduct or commission thereof.
Torture shall be treated as a separate and independent criminal act whose penalties shall be
imposable without prejudice to any other criminal liability provided for by domestic and
international laws.
In order not to depreciate the crime of torture, persons who have committed any act of torture shall
not benefit from any special amnesty law or similar measures that will have the effect of exempting
them from any criminal proceedings and sanctions
A person in authority or their agents, such as law enforcers, custodial personnel, jail officers,
military, and other members of the security forces.
Members of paramilitary forces, barangay tanods, and co-detainees may also be liable for torture if
they committed the acts under the authority of public officials.
PRINCIPAL
2. Any superior military, police or law enforcement officer or senior government official who
issued an order to any lower ranking personnel to commit torture for whatever
purpose shall be held equally liable as principals.
3. The immediate commanding officer of the unit concerned of the AFP or the immediate
senior public official of the PNP and other law enforcement agencies shall be held liable
as a principal to the crime of torture or other cruel or inhuman and degrading treatment or
punishment for any act or omission, or negligence committed by him/her that shall
have led, assisted, abetted or allowed, whether directly or indirectly, the commission
thereof by his/her subordinates.
i.e. If he/she has knowledge of or should have known that acts of torture or other
cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment shall be committed, is being
committed, or has been committed by his/her subordinates others within his/her area
of responsibility and, despite such knowledge, he/she did not take preventive or
corrective action
If he/she has the authority to prevent or investigate allegations of torture or other
cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment but failed to prevent or investigate
allegations of such act, whether deliberately or due to negligence shall also be liable as
principals
ACCESORY
Any public officer or employee shall be liable as an accessory if he/she has knowledge that
torture or other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment is being committed
and without having participated therein, either as principal or accomplice, takes part subsequent to
its commission in any of the following manner:
(a) By themselves profiting from or assisting the offender to profit from the effects of the act
of torture or other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment;
(b) By concealing the act of torture or other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or
punishment and/or destroying the effects or instruments thereof in order to prevent its
discovery; or
(c) By harboring, concealing or assisting m the escape of the principal/s in the act of torture
or other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment: Provided, That the accessory acts
are done with the abuse of the official's public functions.
A victim of torture shall have the following rights in the institution of a criminal complaint for
torture:
(a) To have a prompt and an impartial investigation by the CHR and by agencies of
government concerned such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Public Attorney's
Office (PAO), the PNP, the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) and the AFP.
A prompt investigation shall mean a maximum period of sixty (60) working days from
the time a complaint for torture is filed within which an investigation report and/or resolution
shall be completed and made available. An appeal whenever available shall be resolved within the
same period prescribed herein,
(b) To have sufficient government protection against all forms of harassment; threat and/or
intimidation as a consequence of the filing of said complaint or the presentation of evidence
therefor. In which case, the State through its appropriate agencies shall afford security in order to
ensure his/her safety and all other persons involved in the investigation and prosecution such as, but
not limited to, his/her lawyer, witnesses and relatives; and
(c) To be accorded sufficient protection in the manner by which he/she testifies and
presents evidence in any fora in order to avoid further trauma.
The CHR and the PAO shall render legal assistance in the investigation and monitoring
and/or filing of the complaint for a person who suffers torture and other cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment or punishment, or for any interested party thereto.
The victim or interested party may also seek legal assistance from the Barangay Human Rights
Action Center (BRRAC) nearest him/her as well as from human rights nongovernment
organizations (NGOs). i.e Amnesty International
Any person who has suffered torture shall have the right to claim for compensation as provided for
under Republic Act No. 7309: Provided, That in no case shall compensation be any lower than
Ten thousand pesos (P10,000.00). Victims of torture shall also have the right to claim for
compensation from such other financial relief programs that may be made available to him/her
under existing law and rules and regulations
REHABILITATION PROGRAM
The CPRTV aims to facilitate a reconciliation of the offender, the offended and the community; and
provide a reassurance to the offender that he/ she can be reintegrated into the society after
acknowledging accountability and fulfilling the sanction that goes with it
Jerryme Corre was visiting a relative in Pampanga province in January 2012 when 10 armed
plain-clothed officers arrested him and took him to a police camp where he was electrocuted,
punched and threatened with death. The police accused him of being involved in drug-related
crimes, of robbing and killing a foreigner and of killing a police officer, all of which he
strongly denied.
Police officer Jerick Dee Jimenez was sentenced on 29 March to a maximum of two years
and one month imprisonment by a court in Pampanga, north of the capital Manila, having been
convicted of torture. He must also pay Jerryme Corre damages amounting to 100,000 pesos (USD
$2,173). Another police officer faces the same charges but remains at large.
This is the first time anyone has been convicted for torture in a Philippines court under the
Anti-Torture Act.
1. Lack of awareness among on-the-ground personnel of the human rights law requirements in
police procedure and operations;
2. Perception within the police force that human rights are a hindrance to solving real
social problems such as criminality;
3. Lack of appreciation for each step in the criminal procedure, including little
understanding of human rights and the rule of law as social values;
1. Lack of adequate information provided to torture victims and their families regarding
their rights under the law and the options available to them to lodge a complaint. Most of
the accountability mechanisms are either unknown to victims or their families or are not
easily accessible.
2. Many feared that the police officers who tortured them will know who and where they are.
As well as fears for their own safety, torture survivors often fear reprisals against their
families if they speak out about what happened to them. Or that it may only cause delays
and complicate the progress of the criminal cases they are facing. Many do not have
confidence that, as suspected or convicted criminals, they would have recourse to justice
within the Philippine criminal justice system.
3. Lengthy and unclear process
4. Inadequate witness protection program. In cases where a victim or his/her family
decides to file a complaint first with the CHR, they will have to wait for an endorsement
from the CHR to the DOJ for provisional admission of the victims into the DOJs witness
protection programme. Interviews with torture victims and their families have shown that
this process could take months, and sometimes more than a year, although CHR officials
told Amnesty International they now have an agreement with the DOJ to expedite the
process. While the CHR also has its own witness and victim protection programme, the lack
of sufficient funds prevents it from effectively offering protection to complainants and
witnesses.
BAR EXAM QUESTIONS
X, a police officer, placed a hood on the head of W, a suspected drug pusher, and watched as Y
and Z, police trainees, beat up and tortured W to get his confession. X is liable as