10.

Analysis Foundation
It can be concluded that the soils are of the wrong graded sands, gravelly sands with few
packaged in a matrix of non-plastic silty sands, whose compactness intersperses because
of geological events broadly relief configuration is the plain type. The methodology
included research field through applicationsof the tests were carried out with direct
shear tests ASTM - D-3080, conducted in our laboratory Soil Mechanics and
Pavements;Agreeing with the recommendations of the National Building Code,Technical
Standard for Building E-050, floors and foundations in his No. table 22.5, have been
evaluated on the criteria and formulas established by Dr. Karl von Terzaghi and Peck, to
suit the type of foundation soil predominate along the way soils are mainly formed by
glacial fluvial deposits, moraine and Alluvial, which according to the Unified
Classification System (USCS), are formed by silty sands, clayey sand, clayey mixtures silty
sands of median compactness Identified SM-SC as {), also presents inorganic silty soils,
slightly sandy clay slimes plastics (ML) in some perforations may clayey soils observe
packed in a matrix of sand, silt and clay with gravels small medium medium plasticity
compactness (CL-ML), are as well inorganic clays of high plasticity clays free (CH), and
silty sands (SM) of medium compactness.
The angle values friction as comparative tables, ranges between 24 to 30 degrees,
corresponding to the first inorganic soils,clayey sand, mixtures toclayey renas packdas a
loamy sandy matrix clay (CL-ML),
Finally, these have different resistance values sphuerzo cutting.
10.1.Load capacity
To effect design calculating the permissible resistance attached froml ground, for
foundations and local failure runs according to the expression Terzaghi and Peck.

10.2. Depth of foundation

According to subsurface features described above, as well as the structure to be built, it
has been considered for analysis profundidad foundation Mnimto of (Df = 4.50 m.)
Measured from the level (terredo not Natural).

10.3. Tic poimentation.

According to the soil conditions encountered and observado field it is recommended to
use foundation Weaveto and conecttodto. Ptorto d effectseclculor It is evaluated as a
continuous foundation.

10.4. Capac calculationiCarrier dad.

A depth considered, shoes should supportrIt is about the dreamlnatural or whose
strength characteristics are determined from soil characteristics and enstoI of cdirect
Orte, Utilizndose parfor the purposes of calculor and of tocorErdoour evaluation report
the following results: For the predominant soils (CL-ML)