Scribd Logo
Fazer o upload

Bem-vindo(a) ao Scribd!

  • Integrator Comparison Summary

    Enviado por

    Yuchen Xu
    18 visualizações3 páginas
    integrator comparison template

    Direitos autorais

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formatos disponíveis

    XLS, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

    Você considera este documento útil?

    Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

    Denunciar este documento
    integrator comparison template

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato XLS, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    18 visualizações3 páginas

    Integrator Comparison Summary

    Enviado por

    Yuchen Xu
    integrator comparison template

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato XLS, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    de 3

    Integrator comparison table

    Evaluation Score Points Evaluation Score Points Req Scoring


    Criteria Weight Max Min
    Integrator 1 Integrator 2 65% 1 2 3 4 5

    Consulting capability
    Presence in China 3 1999 5 15 2001 3 9 15 3 1Y 2Y 3Y 4Y 5Y
    Number of customers 5 14 2 10 25 4 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 30
    Own methodology 4 Yes 5 20 Yes 5 20 20 4 No X X X Yes
    Best similar experience 4 Schneider Electrics 3 12 Shanghai Electric 3 12 20 4
    SD consultants 2 4 2 4 17 4 8 10 2 0 5 10 15 20
    MM consultants 2 4 2 4 23 5 10 10 2 0 5 10 15 20
    PP consultants 2 4 2 4 16 4 8 10 2 0 5 10 15 20
    PS consultants 2 0 1 2 4 2 4 10 2 0 5 10 15 20
    FI consultants 2 4 2 4 18 5 10 10 2 0 5 10 15 20
    CO consultants 2 4 2 4 15 4 8 10 2 0 5 10 15 20
    BW consultants 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 0 5 10 15 20
    ABAP 1 2 1 1 8 3 3 5 1 0 5 10 15 20
    BASIS 1 2 1 1 5 2 2 5 1 0 5 10 15 20
    Total X 25 X X 107 X X X X X X X X X
    Average Rate 100% 6.3 Rate 100% 8.8 11.9 2.4 8.6
    Display 53% 74% 100% 20% 65%

    Outsourcing capability
    Presence in China 2 2002 2 4 2002 2 4 10 2 1Y 2Y 3Y 4Y 5Y
    Number of customers 3 5 2 6 6 2 6 15 3 1 5 10 15 20
    Best similar experience 4 Akzo-nobel 3 12 BMW 3 12 20 4
    Power security 5 Yes 5 25 Yes 5 25 25 5 No X X X Yes
    Fire security 3 Yes 5 15 Yes 5 15 15 3 No X X X Yes
    Disaster recovery plan 5 Yes 5 25 Yes 5 25 25 5 No X X X Yes
    Double location archive 3 Yes 5 15 Yes 5 15 15 3 No X X X Yes
    Average Rate 100% 14.6 Rate 100% 14.6 17.9 3.6 12.9
    Display 82% 82% 100% 20% 65%

    Leverage and influence


    Exisiting contracts 1 FCI 3 3 None 1 1 5 1
    Average Rate 100% 3.0 Rate 100% 1.0 5.0 1.0 3.6
    Display 60% 20% 100% 20% 65%

    Implementation price
    Average manday cost (EUR) X 397.41 X X 462.54 X X X X X X X X X
    Total cost (EUR) 5 349,721.00 3 15 335,340.00 4 20 25 5 400 375 350 325 300
    Business tax X Added X X Included X X X X X X X X X
    Out of pocket X Estimated (13%) X X Included (8%) X X X X X X X X X
    Quotation currency X RMB X X USD (8.28) X X X X X X X X X
    Average Rate 100% 15.0 Rate 100% 20.0 25.0 5.0 18.0
    Display 60% 80% 100% 20% 65%

    Outsourcing price
    Initial setup - 2 servers (EUR) X 34,650.00 X X 12,000.00 X X X X X X X X X
    Initial setup - network (EUR) X 5,208.00 X X Included X X X X X X X X X
    Initial setup - migration (EUR) X Not estimated X X 6,044.00 X X X X X X X X X
    Hosting & Support (EUR/month) 5 5,828.00 2 10 3,722.00 4 20 25 5 7K 6K 5K 4K 3K
    Business tax X Added X X Included X X X X X X X X X
    Quotation currency X RMB X X USD (8.28) X X X X X X X X X
    Average Rate 100% 10.0 Rate 100% 20.0 25.0 5.0 18.0
    Display 40% 80% 100% 20% 65%

    Resources
    Project Management X 176 X X 85 X X X X X X X X X
    SD X 132 X X 120 X X X X X X X X X
    MM X 132 X X 60 X X X X X X X X X
    PP X 132 X X 60 X X X X X X X X X
    PS X 132 X X 120 X X X X X X X X X
    FI X 88 X X 120 X X X X X X X X X
    CO X 88 X X 120 X X X X X X X X X
    ABAP X 0 X X Time & Material X X X X X X X X X
    BASIS X 0 X X 40 X X X X X X X X X
    Total man days 4 880 4 16 725 3 12 20 4 500 600 700 800 900
    Balance 5 X 2 10 X 4 20 25 5
    Average man / day X 6.8 X X 5.6 X X X X X X X X X
    Average Rate 100% 13.0 Rate 100% 16.0 22.5 4.5 16.2
    Display 58% 71% 100% 20% 65%

    Schedule
    Project Preparation X 1 X X 2 X X X X X X X X X
    Business Blueprint X 3 X X 8 X X X X X X X X X
    Realization X 14 X X 8 X X X X X X X X X
    Final preparation X 4 X X 6 X X X X X X X X X
    1st Go live & support X 4 X X 2 X X X X X X X X X
    Project Duration X 26 X X 26 X X X X X X X X X
    Balance 4 X 3 12 X 5 20 20 4
    Average user involvement X 70% X X 70% X X X X X X X X X
    Average Rate 100% 12.0 Rate 100% 20.0 20.0 4.0 14.4
    Display 60% 100% 100% 20% 65%
    Risks
    External resources 4 Atos Origin Asia 2 8 None 5 20 20 4
    Resources turnover / number 4 High 2 8 Medium 4 16 20 4 X X X X X
    Worldwide template experience 3 Low 2 6 Average 3 9 15 3 X X X X X
    Proposal scope precision 2 Average 3 6 Medium 4 8 10 2 X X X X X
    Proposal assumptions 1 No 1 1 Yes 5 5 5 1 X X X X X
    Average Rate 100% 5.8 Rate 100% 11.6 14.0 2.8 10.1
    Display 41% 83% 100% 20% 65%

    Total score
    Real 57% 74% 100% 20% 65%
    Integrator 1 Integrator 2

    Consulting capability

    Leverage and influence Implementation price

    Outsourcing price Resources

    Outsourcing capability Schedule

    Risks

    Você também pode gostar