Você está na página 1de 2

Industry expertise

March 2015

Defence class cover

Payment of hire:
is it a condition?
The Astra

shown that the charterer in question did not

The decision
intend to be bound by the contract any longer,
In 2013, the judge in The Astra1, Mr Justice thereby depriving the owner of substantially
Flaux, created controversy, interest and debate the whole benefit of the charterparty. This
by defining a charterers obligation to make often meant that an owner, especially under a
punctual hire payments under a time charter long-term time charter, had to await several
to be a condition of the contract. Prior to this missed hire instalments before establishing a
decision, the obligation to pay hire punctually case of repudiation. After The Astra decision,
under a time charter had only been considered the question of what constitutes a valid
as an innominate term. deduction instantly acquired new significance
as charterers recognised the repercussions
of being held in breach of a condition. Indeed,
A condition in a contract is defined as a breach of a contractual condition would entitle
promise or undertaking that is fundamental to the owner not only to terminate the charter,
the contract, any breach of which entitles the but also to claim damages for future loss of
innocent party to terminate the contract, in earnings.
addition to their right to damages.
It should be mentioned that all the comments
Conversely, a breach of an innominate term made by Mr Justice Flaux as to a charterers
gives the innocent party the right to terminate obligation to pay hire (in this case, under Clause
only if the breach is so serious that it deprives 5 of the NYPE charter) were made obiter i.e.
Olivia Furmston the innocent party of substantially the whole they are not binding on other courts. Therefore,
Legal Director benefit he was intended to obtain from the it remains to be seen whether this decision will
T: +44 20 3320 8858 contract. The innocent party may still recover
E: olivia.furmston@ctplc.com be followed, either at first instance or in the
damages for the breach, but may not have the English appeal courts. This leaves both owners
right to terminate. and charterers somewhat in shifting sands for
the time being. This is particularly worrying for
an owner, who in the meantime may be held to
What this means
have affirmed a charter if it does not terminate
Previously, in the case of non-payment of a and withdraw promptly following a single
single hire instalment, an owner could do no missed payment of hire. For this reason, any
more than withdraw his vessel (subject to acceptance by an owner of a late or partial hire
strict compliance with any anti-technicality instalment should be expressly made subject to
provision(s) in the charterparty) and claim any its reservation of rights, including its right not
unpaid hire up to and until that date. To claim to accept a late and/or partial payment in the
anything more, such as future lost earnings, future, and this should be made in writing.
LeRoy Lambert the owner needed to show that the charterer
President had repudiated the contract. It had to be
Regional Claims Director
T: +1 646 753 9020
E: leroy.lambert@ctplc.com Discover more
For details of our range of industry expertise visit www.standard-club.com
The Standard P&I Club
Industry expertise

Implications for the owner For further guidance on the principle of

From the perspective of the owner, there has equitable set-off, please see the clubs
been historic uncertainty as to what constitutes publication: Legitimate deductions from
a repudiatory breach of charterparty in respect charter hire. A charterer member should not
of missed hire instalment(s). If an owner hesitate to contact their usual club claims
operates his right to withdraw2 his ship against handler if ever in need of advice as to whether
a defaulting charterer too soon, in a falling a specific deduction from hire is permissible
market, this could mean the loss of a substantial under the subject charter.
damages claim for future loss of income at the
higher charterparty rate. Therefore, if correct
and followed in the future, The Astra decision The need for ongoing vigilance
significantly improves an owners position when
Until there has been a definitive judgment on
faced with a defaulting charterer, especially
these issues, the owners question of when to
in a falling market. To put it another way, if the
withdraw and the charterers question of what
charterer breaches his contractual condition
and when to deduct from hire remain unsettled
to pay hire punctually, as per The Astra, he has
and risky. The eventual effects of The Astra
repudiated the charter even if only one hire
could be radical and far-reaching. However, in
instalment is missed and a damages claim for
the short term, the situation is unclear. What is
future losses is crystallised without dispute.
certain is that parties should consider payment
of hire issues in a new way, perhaps seeking
Implications for the charterer more express contractual terms and with an eye
on their own protection.
From the perspective of the charterer,
assessing what constitutes a valid deduction
from charter hire must become more stringent
Defence cover is, by its very nature,
than ever. Making disputed deductions or late
discretionary in that the club must be satisfied
payments of hire would become high-risk
as to the merits and quantum of the claim
activities, exposing the charterer to the loss of
in question and the likelihood of achieving a
the ship from charter and a significant damages
successful outcome, if it is to lend support.
claim for the balance of the charterparty period.
With this in mind, it is advisable that charterers
Members requiring further information
(if acting outside an express contractual right
on this topic should direct their enquiries
to deduct) seek to agree the amount with
to either their usual contact at the club or
the owner before acting. Failing agreement,
to olivia.furmston@ctplc.com. The club
wishes to thank Charlotte Baly for her valued
contribution to this article.
pay the full hire punctually, but under protest
and with the express intention of recovery via
legal proceedings; or
pay the disputed sum into escrow, with the
owners agreement; or
if still determined to make the deduction
from hire, ensure they are entitled to do so as
per the principle of equitable set-off.

1. Kuwait Rocks Co v AMN Bulkcarriers Inc (The Astra) [2013] EWHC 865 (Comm).
This information is published on 2. The owner must always adhere to its own contractual requirements, such as any anti-technicality clauses within the
behalf of The Standard Club Ltd subject charterparty, to avoid being in breach of contract if/when it withdraws a ship.
by the managers London agents:

Charles Taylor & Co. Limited

Standard House, 1213 Essex Street,
London, WC2R 3AA, UK
The information and commentary herein are not intended to amount to legal ortechnical
Registered in England No. 2561548
advice to any person in general or about a specific case. Every effort is made to make them
Telephone: +44 20 3320 8888 accurate and up to date. However, no responsibility is assumed for their accuracy nor for the
Emergency mobile: +44 7932 113573 views or opinions expressed, nor for anyconsequence of or reliance on them. You are advised
Email: pandi.london@ctplc.com to seek specific legal or technical advice from your usual advisers about any specific matter.
Website: www.standard-club.com The Standard Club Ltd is regulated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority.