Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Review
Abstract: Plants store carbon predominantly as starch, and the metabolism of this polysaccharide is of importance to all
life. In the past ten years the processes of starch synthesis have been well studied, however only recently has the same amount
of attention been directed towards starch degradation, which previously had been focussed almost exclusively on degradation
in germinating cereal grains. Studies of the degradation of diurnal leaf starch have revealed a number of surprises, such
as the importance of starch phosphorylation in initiating degradation, and shown that starch degradation in leaves diers
signicantly from that in cereal grains. We have previously shown that plants contain three distinct -amylase families.
T-DNA knockouts of each -amylase family member in Arabidopsis had no eect on diurnal leaf starch degradation, raising
questions about the function of -amylases in leaves. Here we describe the known aspects of these three families and suggest
specic roles for each in carbohydrate metabolism.
Key words: Starch degradation, -amylase, subcellular localisation, cytosolic polysaccharide.
Abbreviations: GWD, glucan water dikinase; PWD, phosphoglucan water dikinase; DPE, disproportionating enzyme.
* Corresponding author
66 D. Stanley et al.
ment. However, granular starch is insoluble and nor- tivity has been detected in leaves of Arabidopsis (Lin
mally found only in plastids, and while other polymers et al., 1988), pea (Beers & Duke, 1988), and tobacco
containing glucose have been demonstrated in the cy- (Heitz et al., 1991).
tosol, plastid and extracellular matrix, these are either Crystal structures have been solved for two barley
soluble polyglycans or heteroglycans (Yang & Steup, isoforms (AMY1 and AMY2; Kadziola et al., 1994;
1990; Zeeman et al., 1998b; Fettke et al., 2004). - Robert et al., 2003), and dierences between these two
Amylases have previously been implicated in the break enzymes include dierent anities in binding to starch
down of diurnal starch; the Arabidopsis sex4 mutant granules, sensitivity to inhibitors, stability in acid, an-
displays a classic starch excess phenotype, and was ity for calcium ions, sensitivity to EDTA and substrate
shown to be decient in a plastidial -amylase activ- specicity (Rodenburg et al., 1994). At least 10 iso-
ity (Zeeman et al., 1998a), however the mutation that forms encoded by dierent genes have been identied
leads to this phenotype is not in the gene encoding the in rice (Ranjhan et al., 1991), with gene intron/exon
plastidial -amylase of Arabidopsis (Yu et al., 2005). structure preserved except for loss of the second of the
Knockouts of the other two -amylase gene families three introns in one subfamily (Huang et al., 1990). A
also did not show any impairment in the degradation fourth intron was identied in the family one gene of
of diurnal leaf starch. This suggests that what we have Arabidopsis (Stanley et al., 2002), which has not been
learnt from the cereal grains in plants and from bacte- seen in other family one -amylases. Monocotyledonous
rial -amylases in terms of function may not be rele- family one genes are expressed in dierent spatial and
vant in normal plastidial starch metabolism, and that temporal patterns, sometimes in response to hormones
-amylases may not be involved in diurnal leaf starch or metabolic signals (Yu et al., 1996; Sugimoto et al.,
degradation. It also suggests that we have much to learn 1998), and have been detected in leaves and owers as
about metabolism of glycan polymers in other plant cell well as grains (Jacobsen et al., 1986; Kaneko et al.,
compartments. It is therefore pertinent to dene what 2004). A number of regulatory elements and the tran-
we do know about each of these three -amylase gene scription factors that bind to them have been identied
families, and the next three sections will draw together (Hwang et al., 1998; Chen et al., 2002). Posttran-
what has been discovered about each family. scriptional regulation of protein synthesis, and varia-
tions in transcript stability have also been reported to
Family one -amylases modulate -amylase mRNA levels (Chan & Yu, 1998).
Family one -amylases from dicotyledons and
This family is characterised by having a predicted se- non-angiosperm plants are much less well under-
cretory signal peptide and all the well-characterised ce- stood. Gene orthologues have been isolated from Vigna
real grain -amylases fall within it (Stanley et al., mungo (Yamauchi & Minamikawa, 1990), Ipomoea
2002). The pivotal role of this family in degradation nil (Nakayama et al., 2002), Pinus taeda, apple, and
of starch in cereal grain endosperms is well established, Arabidopsis (Stanley et al., 2002). Arabidopsis has a
and indeed for many years these enzymes were assumed single family one -amylase gene and apple has two.
to represent all plant -amylases. Secretion of the en- I. nil is predicted to also have two, but information
zymes from the cells of the aleurone layers is well es- from other species is not available. Family one genes
tablished in cereal grains, and there is evidence that are expressed in developing and germinating seeds of V.
a similar process takes place in at least some dicotyle- mungo (Yamauchi et al., 1994) and I. nil (Nakajima
donous seeds (Beck & Ziegler, 1989; Nakajima et et al., 2004). In the latter, the mRNA level showed in-
al., 2004). Predicted secretory signal peptides for two creased expression in the seed coat following anthesis,
rice family one genes, Amy3 and Amy8, fused to GFP with treatment with gibberellins, and was also found
and GUS, respectively, and as part of the full length to be expressed in leaves, ower buds and stems. The
protein for Amy3, have recently been reported to lo- family one -amylase gene of Arabidopsis shows little
calise to both plastids and the cell wall in tobacco change in expression in leaves during the diurnal cycle
leaves, putting doubt on direct predictability of the (Smith et al., 2004). There is also evidence for appear-
-amylase presequences (Chen et al., 2004). In con- ance of a secreted -amylase in response to pathogen
trast, Chan et al. (1994) showed only secretion with attack - viral challenge in tobacco cell walls (Heitz et
GUS fusions to the same rice signal peptide (Amy8) al., 1991) and the hypersensitive response in Arabidop-
using cultured rice cells. When the predicted signal pep- sis (Monroe et al., 2003). In addition, public databases
tide of the Arabidopsis family one member was fused to (e.g. GenBank; Benson et al., 2004) contain ESTs from
GFP and expressed in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana ben- family one genes, derived from several species (includ-
thamiana, no evidence was found for either secretion ing grape, capsicum, potato, and Medicago truncatula)
or sequestration in the plastid (Stanley, 2004). The that have been challenged with diseases. The induced
contradictory results of these three studies suggest ei- -amylases could mobilise starch from the dead cells,
ther a problem with the secretion of fusion proteins in perhaps inhibiting pathogens by altering osmolarity in
transgenic plants, or genuine dierences in targeting of the environment, or by signalling neighbouring cells to
-amylases between species. Apoplastic -amylase ac- activate pathogen responses. ESTs and genes have also
68 D. Stanley et al.
been identied from stress treatments (Mesembryanthe- the onset of night (Smith et al., 2004). This suggests
mum crystallinum, sugar beet, and sugar cane), owers that the enzyme may be most active when the plas-
(poplar, cotton, Arabidopsis, and apple) and maturing tidial starch reserves of leaf cells are most depleted. In
or ripening fruit (banana, peach, mandarin, and apple). apple, the expression of a family two gene increased sig-
Unfortunately, except for the secreted -amylases nicantly when fruit were placed at 0.5 C, with maxi-
from cereal grains (Rodenburg et al., 1994; Svensson mal expression reached after 8 days (Wegrzyn et al.,
et al., 2002) and in vitro expression of the I. nil gene 2000). Public databases also contain many ESTs from
(Nakayama et al., 2002), there is little data on in vivo this family, including expression in meristems, storage
or in vitro activity or specicity of the enzymes from tissues, such as bulbs, tubers and fruit pericarps, ow-
this family, including ability to attack raw starch gran- ers and roots. ESTs were identied across a range of
ules. This is because in most instances enzyme activity species in response to interactive signals such as in-
has been measured on extracts that would include en- sect feeding, nodule symbiosis, oligogalacturonide treat-
zymes from all possible compartments, or the gene has ment, drought and low temperature.
not been expressed in vitro. Analysis of a family two -amylase from apple, ex-
pressed as recombinant protein in E. coli, shows that
Family two -amylases the enzyme is able to degrade soluble and insoluble
starch, is not aected by the presence of EDTA, and
This family is characterised by having no predicted tar- is more active at alkaline pH (7.79.2) than acidic pH
geting peptide and therefore is thought to localise to (Stanley, 2004). This contrasts strongly with the se-
the cytoplasm. Analysis of its gene structure suggested creted barley -amylases, which are most active at
that it was the closest of the three families to an an- acidic pH (Sgaard et al., 1993). Similar character-
cestral plant -amylase (Stanley et al., 2002). Both istics, including an alkaline pH optimum, were also
family two genes from apple have a single intron in the identied in an -amylase puried from potato tubers
5 UTR of the gene, and in one of the genes the intron (Witt & Sauter, 1996), although results suggested
undergoes alternate splicing using two possible accep- that this enzyme was at least partly localised to the
tor splice sites (Wegrzyn et al., 2000; Stanley et al., plastid.
2002). Comparison of cDNA and genomic sequences of
the family two gene of Arabidopsis, reveals that the 5 Family three -amylases
UTR intron is conserved in this species and spliced fol-
lowing transcription. Since protein targeting signals are Family three -amylases are characterised by a large
dicult to predict, the rst 37 amino acids of an apple N-terminal domain, typically 400-500 amino acids in
family two -amylase was fused to GFP and examined length (approximately doubling the size of the -
in transgenic Arabidopsis and N. benthamiana; the lo- amylase protein from 45 kDa to 90 kDa), which contains
calisation of the fusion protein was cytosolic, as pre- a predicted chloroplast transit peptide (Stanley et al.,
dicted (Stanley, 2004). Family two -amylases have 2002), and shares features with the N-terminal domain
been identied from monocotyledons, dicotyledons and of GWD proteins, such as predicted starch-binding mo-
gymnosperms (Stanley et al., 2002). tifs (Stanley, 2004, Yu et al., 2005). The transit pep-
The existence of a cytosolic -amylase raises a tide and N-terminal region of one of the two apple genes
question regarding potential substrates for the en- was able to direct GFP to the plastids of transformed
zyme. Many starch-degrading enzymes have cytosolic N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis (Stanley, 2004), and
isoforms, including starch phosphorylase, DPE, and - the Arabidopsis protein was shown to immunolocalise
amylase. Traditional thinking is that starch is synthe- to leaf chloroplasts (Yu et al., 2005). As with the other
sised only in the plastid, however, the cytosolic starch -amylase families, family three genes have been iden-
phosphorylase of Pisum sativum has been shown to in- tied in numerous plant species, including apple, Ara-
teract with a soluble, high molecular weight glycan that bidopsis, rice, kiwifruit, and loblolly pine (Stanley et
is present in the cytosol (Yang & Steup, 1990; Fet- al., 2002; Stanley, 2004).
tke et al., 2004). The glycan was divided into several The Arabidopsis family three -amylase gene un-
subfractions, each of which contains a high proportion dergoes diurnal regulation in leaves, showing maximal
of arabinogalactan-like linkages, plus some minor com- expression at the end of the light period and minimal
ponents, including -glucosyl linkages (Fettke et al., expression at the end of the dark period (Schaffer
2004). The role of this soluble heteroglycan in plant car- et al., 2001; Smith et al., 2004, Yu et al., 2005). This
bohydrate metabolism has not been determined, how- pattern of expression contrasts with starch concentra-
ever, it has been proposed that it may act as a buer be- tions in leaves, which reach a maximum at the end of
tween plastidial starch degradation and cytosolic hexose the light period and decrease during night. The same
phosphate metabolism (Chia et al., 2004). expression pattern was found for genes required for nor-
In Arabidopsis leaves, the family two -amylase mal starch degradation in Arabidopsis leaves, including
gene reaches maximal expression in the morning, dur- DPEs, GWD and PWD (Smith et al., 2004), strongly
ing the rst few hours of light, and drops again before suggesting a role for family three -amylases in diur-
Physiological functions and roles of plant -amylases 69
Enzyme activity
NIITTYLA, T., MESSERLI, G., TREVISAN, M., CHEN, J., SMITH, SVENSSON, B., JENSEN, M.T., MORI, H., BAK-JENSEN, K.S.,
A.M. & ZEEMAN, S.C. 2004. Science 303: 8789. BONSAGER, B., NIELSEN, P.K., KRAMHOFT, B., PRAETO-
RAL, J.P., DERELLE, E., FERRAZ, C., WATTEBLED, F., FARI- RIUS-IBBA, M., NOHR, J., JUGE, N., GREFFE, L., WILLIAM-
NAS, B., CORELLOU, F., BULEON, A., SLOMIANNY, M.C., SON, G. & DRIGUEZ, H. 2002. Biologia, Bratislava 57
DELVALLE, D., DHULST, C., ROMBAUTS, S., MOREAU, H. (Suppl. 11): 519.
& BALL, S. 2004. Plant Physiol. 136: 33333340. TETLOW, I.J., MORELL, M.K. & EMES, M.J. 2004. J. Exp. Bot.
RANJHAN, S., LITTS, J.C., FOOLAD, M.R. & RODRIGUEZ, R.L. 55: 21312145.
1991. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 481488. WEGRZYN, T., REILLY, K., CIPRIANI, G., MURPHY, P., NEW-
REIMANN, R., HIPPLER, M., MACHELETT, B. & APPENROTH, COMB, R., GARDNER, R. & MACRAE, E. 2000. Eur. J.
K.J. 2004. Plant Physiol. 135: 121128. Biochem. 267: 13131322.
RISTIC, Z. & ASHWORTH, E.N. 1993. Protoplasma 172: 111123. WITT, W. & SAUTER, J.J. 1996. J. Exp. Bot. 47: 17891795.
RITTE, G., LLOYD, J.R., ECKERMANN, N., ROTTMANN, A., YAMAUCHI, D. & MINAMIKAWA, T. 1990. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:
KOSSMANN, J. & STEUP, M. 2002. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 42504250.
USA 99: 716621897. YAMAUCHI, D., TAKEUCHI, H. & MINAMIKAWA, T. 1994. Plant
RITTE, G., LORBERTH, R. & STEUP, M. 2000. Plant J. 21: 387 Cell Physiol. 35: 705711.
391. YANG, Y. & STEUP, M. 1990. Plant Physiol. 94: 960969.
RITTE, G., SCHARF, A., ECKERMANN, N., HAEBEL, S. & STEUP, YU, S.M., LEE, Y.C., FANG, S.C., CHAN, M.T., HWA, S.F. & LIU,
M. 2004. Plant Physiol. 135: 20682077. L.F. 1996. Plant Mol. Biol. 30: 12771289.
ROBERT, X., HASER, R., GOTTSCHALK, T.E., RATAJCZAK, F., YU, T.S., KOFLER, H., HAUSLER, R.E., HILLE, D., FLUGGE,
DRIGUEZ, H., SVENSSON, B. & AGHAJARI, N. 2003. Struc- U.I., ZEEMAN, S.C., SMITH, A.M., KOSSMANN, J., LLOYD,
ture 11: 973984. J., RITTE, G., STEUP, M., LUE, W.L., CHEN, J.C. & WE-
RODENBURG, K.W., JUGE, N., GUO, X.J., SOGAARD, M., BER, A. 2001. Plant Cell 13: 19071918.
CHAIX, J.C. & SVENSSON, B. 1994. Eur. J. Biochem. 221: YU, T.S., ZEEMAN, S.C., THORNEYCROFT, D., FULTON, D.C.,
277284. DUNSTAN, H., LUE, W.L., HEGEMANN, B., TUNG, S.Y.,
SCHAFFER, R., LANDGRAF, J., ACCERBI, M., SIMON, V., LAR- UMEMOTO, T., CHAPPLE, A., TSAI, D.L., WANG, S.M.,
SON, M. & WISMAN, E. 2001. Plant Cell 13: 113123. SMITH, A.M., CHEN, J. & SMITH, S.M. 2005. J. Biol. Chem.
SCHEIDIG, A., FROHLICH, A., SCHULZE, S., LLOYD, J.R. & M413638200.
KOSSMANN, J. 2002. Plant J. 30: 581591. ZEEMAN, S.C., NORTHROP, F., SMITH, A.M. & REES, T. 1998a.
SMITH, S.M., FULTON, D.C., CHIA, T., THORNEYCROFT, D., Plant J. 15: 357365.
CHAPPLE, A., DUNSTAN, H., HYLTON, C., ZEEMAN, S.C. & ZEEMAN, S.C., SMITH, S.M. & SMITH, A.M. 2004a. New Phytol.
SMITH, A.M. 2004. Plant Physiol. 136: 26872699. 163: 247261.
SGAARD, M., KADZIOLA, A., HASER, R. & SVENSSON, B. 1993. ZEEMAN, S.C., THORNEYCROFT, D., SCHUPP, N., CHAPPLE, A.,
J Biol. Chem. 268: 2248022484. WECK, M., DUNSTAN, H., HALDIMANN, P., BECHTOLD, N.,
STANLEY, D. 2004. PhD Thesis, Department of Biochemistry, SMITH, A.M. & SMITH, S.M. 2004b. Plant Physiol. 135: 849
University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. 858.
STANLEY, D., FITZGERALD, A.M., FARNDEN, K.J.F. & MAC- ZEEMAN, S.C., UMEMOTO, T., LUE, W.L., AU-YEUNG, P., MAR-
RAE, E. A. 2002. Biologia, Bratislava 57 (Suppl. 11): 137 TIN, C., SMITH, A.M. & CHEN, J. 1998b. Plant Cell 10: 1699
148. 1711.
SUGIMOTO, N., TAKEDA, G., NAGATO, Y. & YAMAGUCHI, J. ZIEGLER, P. 1988. Plant Physiol. 86: 659666.
1998. Plant Cell Physiol. 39: 323333.
Received December 21, 2004
Accepted March 09, 2005