Scribd Logo
Fazer o upload

Bem-vindo(a) ao Scribd!

  • Incident Report - Apparent Falsifications

    Enviado por

    Albertelli_Law
    19 visualizações13 páginas
    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BANKUNITED, as [purported] successor in interest to [SEIZED] BANKUNITED, FSB., Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: 09-6016-CA JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT, et al. NOTICE OF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED’S SEIZURE ___________________________________________________________________/ INCIDENT REPORT APPARENT FALSIFICATIONS NOTICE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT PURSUANT TO UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AND FLORIDA LAW “DISPOSITION” NOTICE PURSUANT TO CASE DOCKET, 08/12/2010 BANKRUPT BANK SEIZURE INFORMATION AND § 673.3011, FLA. STAT., EVIDENCE OF NO entitlement to enforce non-existent instrument, IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY DEMAND TO EXTINGUISH FRAUDULENT action FALSIFICATIONS APPARENT 1. Jennifer Franklin Prescott reports Case File demand and/or review in the Clerk of Court’s Office on August 12, 13, and 16, 2010. While the electronic Docket showed a. “disposition”; b. “complaint”; and c. “summons”, none could be ascertained and/or verified in the Naples Courthouse. DEMAND FOR CLARIFICATION & EVIDENCE 2. On Monday August 16, 2010, AM, Jennifer Franklin Prescott demanded to see evidence of: a. “disposition”; b. “complaint”; and c. “summons” in this fraudulent action. CLERK OF COURT ASSERTED UNAVAILABLE CASE FILE 3. The Clerk of Court asserted that the Case File was not available and in the Office of Defendant Judge Hugh D. Hayes. DEFENDANT JUDGE’S ASSISTANT ASSERTED MISTAKE 4. Defendant Hayes’ Judicial Assistant, Jan, stated to Jennifer Franklin Prescott that a. NO “disposition”; b. NO “complaint”; and c. NO “summons” appeared to be supported by the Case File. NO negotiable instrument UNDER GOVERNING CODE 5. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Article 3, governs Negotiable Instruments. Pursuant to § 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT, no “negotiable instrument” existed, and no promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money and interest existed in this fraudulent action. Bankrupt and seized Bankunited was unable to prove any right to enforce the admittedly non-existent purported “instrument”. Here, the Court may not enter judgment in favor of seized and bankrupt Bankunited. See UCC, Article 3. Here, the Court must enter judgment in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. WHEREFORE, Jennifer Franklin Prescott, who was not served and does not submit to any jurisdiction, moves this Court to declare the purported action fraudulent and a fraud on the Court, and enter judgment of dismissal in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. J. FRANKLIN PRESCOTT HOLDS FREE & CLEAR RECORD TITLE 6. Jennifer Franklin Prescott holds unencumbered record title to the subject protected homestead real property. See Collier County Public Records. PURPORTED “DISPOSITION” 7. The Case Docket stated “disposition”: The purported “disposition date” was “08/12/2010”. RULE 1.540 8. Rule 1.540(a), Fla.R.Civ.P., authorizes the court to correct mistakes in a judgment. Here, purported “disposition” appeared on the official Docket. Here there were no service, no hearing, and no due process. PURPORTED “SUMMONS” 9. Purportedly, a summons was issued, “ELSA JARERO”, who is not any known party to this fraudulent action. PURPORTED “COMPLAINT” 10. A “complaint” appeared on the Docket. Pursuant to Rule 1.190, Fla.R.Civ.P., the Court had never granted any leave. PURPORTED plaintiff HAD NO right to enforce FICTITIOUS note 11. BankUnited was not entitled to enforce a fictitious note. Here, BankUnited was not any holder of any note or mortgage at the time it filed suit or any time thereafter. It is elementary that to be a holder, one must be in possession of the instrument. See s. 673.3011, F.S. Here, BankUnited was not any proper party to file suit to foreclose a fictitious un-delivered lost and/or destroyed instrument. IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANY delivery 12. Under Florida law delivery is necessary to validate a negotiable instrument. A lost a

    Direitos autorais

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formatos disponíveis

    PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

    Você considera este documento útil?

    Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

    Denunciar este documento
    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BANKUNITED, as [purported] successor in interest to [SEIZED] BANKUNITED, FSB., Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: 09-6016-CA JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT, et al. NOTICE OF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED’S SEIZURE ___________________________________________________________________/ INCIDENT REPORT APPARENT FALSIFICATIONS NOTICE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT PURSUANT TO UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AND FLORIDA LAW “DISPOSITION” NOTICE PURSUANT TO CASE DOCKET, 08/12/2010 BANKRUPT BANK SEIZURE INFORMATION AND § 673.3011, FLA. STAT., EVIDENCE OF NO entitlement to enforce non-existent instrument, IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY DEMAND TO EXTINGUISH FRAUDULENT action FALSIFICATIONS APPARENT 1. Jennifer Franklin Prescott reports Case File demand and/or review in the Clerk of Court’s Office on August 12, 13, and 16, 2010. While the electronic Docket showed a. “disposition”; b. “complaint”; and c. “summons”, none could be ascertained and/or verified in the Naples Courthouse. DEMAND FOR CLARIFICATION & EVIDENCE 2. On Monday August 16, 2010, AM, Jennifer Franklin Prescott demanded to see evidence of: a. “disposition”; b. “complaint”; and c. “summons” in this fraudulent action. CLERK OF COURT ASSERTED UNAVAILABLE CASE FILE 3. The Clerk of Court asserted that the Case File was not available and in the Office of Defendant Judge Hugh D. Hayes. DEFENDANT JUDGE’S ASSISTANT ASSERTED MISTAKE 4. Defendant Hayes’ Judicial Assistant, Jan, stated to Jennifer Franklin Prescott that a. NO “disposition”; b. NO “complaint”; and c. NO “summons” appeared to be supported by the Case File. NO negotiable instrument UNDER GOVERNING CODE 5. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Article 3, governs Negotiable Instruments. Pursuant to § 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT, no “negotiable instrument” existed, and no promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money and interest existed in this fraudulent action. Bankrupt and seized Bankunited was unable to prove any right to enforce the admittedly non-existent purported “instrument”. Here, the Court may not enter judgment in favor of seized and bankrupt Bankunited. See UCC, Article 3. Here, the Court must enter judgment in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. WHEREFORE, Jennifer Franklin Prescott, who was not served and does not submit to any jurisdiction, moves this Court to declare the purported action fraudulent and a fraud on the Court, and enter judgment of dismissal in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. J. FRANKLIN PRESCOTT HOLDS FREE & CLEAR RECORD TITLE 6. Jennifer Franklin Prescott holds unencumbered record title to the subject protected homestead real property. See Collier County Public Records. PURPORTED “DISPOSITION” 7. The Case Docket stated “disposition”: The purported “disposition date” was “08/12/2010”. RULE 1.540 8. Rule 1.540(a), Fla.R.Civ.P., authorizes the court to correct mistakes in a judgment. Here, purported “disposition” appeared on the official Docket. Here there were no service, no hearing, and no due process. PURPORTED “SUMMONS” 9. Purportedly, a summons was issued, “ELSA JARERO”, who is not any known party to this fraudulent action. PURPORTED “COMPLAINT” 10. A “complaint” appeared on the Docket. Pursuant to Rule 1.190, Fla.R.Civ.P., the Court had never granted any leave. PURPORTED plaintiff HAD NO right to enforce FICTITIOUS note 11. BankUnited was not entitled to enforce a fictitious note. Here, BankUnited was not any holder of any note or mortgage at the time it filed suit or any time thereafter. It is elementary that to be a holder, one must be in possession of the instrument. See s. 673.3011, F.S. Here, BankUnited was not any proper party to file suit to foreclose a fictitious un-delivered lost and/or destroyed instrument. IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANY delivery 12. Under Florida law delivery is necessary to validate a negotiable instrument. A lost a

    Direitos autorais:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    19 visualizações13 páginas

    Incident Report - Apparent Falsifications

    Enviado por

    Albertelli_Law
    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BANKUNITED, as [purported] successor in interest to [SEIZED] BANKUNITED, FSB., Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: 09-6016-CA JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT, et al. NOTICE OF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED’S SEIZURE ___________________________________________________________________/ INCIDENT REPORT APPARENT FALSIFICATIONS NOTICE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT PURSUANT TO UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AND FLORIDA LAW “DISPOSITION” NOTICE PURSUANT TO CASE DOCKET, 08/12/2010 BANKRUPT BANK SEIZURE INFORMATION AND § 673.3011, FLA. STAT., EVIDENCE OF NO entitlement to enforce non-existent instrument, IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY DEMAND TO EXTINGUISH FRAUDULENT action FALSIFICATIONS APPARENT 1. Jennifer Franklin Prescott reports Case File demand and/or review in the Clerk of Court’s Office on August 12, 13, and 16, 2010. While the electronic Docket showed a. “disposition”; b. “complaint”; and c. “summons”, none could be ascertained and/or verified in the Naples Courthouse. DEMAND FOR CLARIFICATION & EVIDENCE 2. On Monday August 16, 2010, AM, Jennifer Franklin Prescott demanded to see evidence of: a. “disposition”; b. “complaint”; and c. “summons” in this fraudulent action. CLERK OF COURT ASSERTED UNAVAILABLE CASE FILE 3. The Clerk of Court asserted that the Case File was not available and in the Office of Defendant Judge Hugh D. Hayes. DEFENDANT JUDGE’S ASSISTANT ASSERTED MISTAKE 4. Defendant Hayes’ Judicial Assistant, Jan, stated to Jennifer Franklin Prescott that a. NO “disposition”; b. NO “complaint”; and c. NO “summons” appeared to be supported by the Case File. NO negotiable instrument UNDER GOVERNING CODE 5. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Article 3, governs Negotiable Instruments. Pursuant to § 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT, no “negotiable instrument” existed, and no promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money and interest existed in this fraudulent action. Bankrupt and seized Bankunited was unable to prove any right to enforce the admittedly non-existent purported “instrument”. Here, the Court may not enter judgment in favor of seized and bankrupt Bankunited. See UCC, Article 3. Here, the Court must enter judgment in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. WHEREFORE, Jennifer Franklin Prescott, who was not served and does not submit to any jurisdiction, moves this Court to declare the purported action fraudulent and a fraud on the Court, and enter judgment of dismissal in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. J. FRANKLIN PRESCOTT HOLDS FREE & CLEAR RECORD TITLE 6. Jennifer Franklin Prescott holds unencumbered record title to the subject protected homestead real property. See Collier County Public Records. PURPORTED “DISPOSITION” 7. The Case Docket stated “disposition”: The purported “disposition date” was “08/12/2010”. RULE 1.540 8. Rule 1.540(a), Fla.R.Civ.P., authorizes the court to correct mistakes in a judgment. Here, purported “disposition” appeared on the official Docket. Here there were no service, no hearing, and no due process. PURPORTED “SUMMONS” 9. Purportedly, a summons was issued, “ELSA JARERO”, who is not any known party to this fraudulent action. PURPORTED “COMPLAINT” 10. A “complaint” appeared on the Docket. Pursuant to Rule 1.190, Fla.R.Civ.P., the Court had never granted any leave. PURPORTED plaintiff HAD NO right to enforce FICTITIOUS note 11. BankUnited was not entitled to enforce a fictitious note. Here, BankUnited was not any holder of any note or mortgage at the time it filed suit or any time thereafter. It is elementary that to be a holder, one must be in possession of the instrument. See s. 673.3011, F.S. Here, BankUnited was not any proper party to file suit to foreclose a fictitious un-delivered lost and/or destroyed instrument. IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANY delivery 12. Under Florida law delivery is necessary to validate a negotiable instrument. A lost a

    Direitos autorais:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    de 13

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

    IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA

    BANKUNITED,
    as [purported] successor in interest to [SEIZED] BANKUNITED, FSB.,

    Plaintiff,

    vs. CASE NO.: 09-6016-CA

    JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT, et al.

    NOTICE OF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED’S SEIZURE


    ___________________________________________________________________/

    INCIDENT REPORT

    APPARENT FALSIFICATIONS NOTICE

    MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

    PURSUANT TO UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AND FLORIDA LAW

    “DISPOSITION” NOTICE PURSUANT TO CASE DOCKET, 08/12/2010

    BANKRUPT BANK SEIZURE INFORMATION AND § 673.3011, FLA. STAT.,

    EVIDENCE OF NO entitlement to enforce non-existent instrument, IN SUPPORT OF

    EMERGENCY DEMAND TO EXTINGUISH FRAUDULENT action

    FALSIFICATIONS APPARENT

    1. Jennifer Franklin Prescott reports Case File demand and/or review in the Clerk of Court’s

    Office on August 12, 13, and 16, 2010. While the electronic Docket showed

    a. “disposition”;
    b. “complaint”; and

    c. “summons”,

    none could be ascertained and/or verified in the Naples Courthouse.

    DEMAND FOR CLARIFICATION & EVIDENCE

    2. On Monday August 16, 2010, AM, Jennifer Franklin Prescott demanded to see evidence of:

    a. “disposition”;

    b. “complaint”; and

    c. “summons” in this fraudulent action.

    CLERK OF COURT ASSERTED UNAVAILABLE CASE FILE

    3. The Clerk of Court asserted that the Case File was not available and in the Office of

    Defendant Judge Hugh D. Hayes.

    DEFENDANT JUDGE’S ASSISTANT ASSERTED MISTAKE

    4. Defendant Hayes’ Judicial Assistant, Jan, stated to Jennifer Franklin Prescott that

    a. NO “disposition”;

    b. NO “complaint”; and

    c. NO “summons”

    appeared to be supported by the Case File.

    NO negotiable instrument UNDER GOVERNING CODE

    5. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Article 3, governs Negotiable Instruments.

    Pursuant to § 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT, no “negotiable instrument” existed,

    and no promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money and interest existed in this

    fraudulent action. Bankrupt and seized Bankunited was unable to prove any right to

    enforce the admittedly non-existent purported “instrument”. Here, the Court may not enter

    2
    judgment in favor of seized and bankrupt Bankunited. See UCC, Article 3. Here, the Court

    must enter judgment in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. WHEREFORE, Jennifer

    Franklin Prescott, who was not served and does not submit to any jurisdiction, moves this

    Court to declare the purported action fraudulent and a fraud on the Court, and enter

    judgment of dismissal in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott.

    J. FRANKLIN PRESCOTT HOLDS FREE & CLEAR RECORD TITLE

    6. Jennifer Franklin Prescott holds unencumbered record title to the subject protected

    homestead real property. See Collier County Public Records.

    PURPORTED “DISPOSITION”

    7. The Case Docket stated “disposition”:

    The purported “disposition date” was “08/12/2010”.

    RULE 1.540

    8. Rule 1.540(a), Fla.R.Civ.P., authorizes the court to correct mistakes in a judgment. Here,

    purported “disposition” appeared on the official Docket. Here there were no service, no

    hearing, and no due process.

    PURPORTED “SUMMONS”

    9. Purportedly, a summons was issued, “ELSA JARERO”, who is not any known party to this

    fraudulent action.

    3
    PURPORTED “COMPLAINT”

    10. A “complaint” appeared on the Docket.

    Pursuant to Rule 1.190, Fla.R.Civ.P., the Court had never granted any leave.

    PURPORTED plaintiff HAD NO right to enforce FICTITIOUS note

    11. BankUnited was not entitled to enforce a fictitious note. Here, BankUnited was not any

    holder of any note or mortgage at the time it filed suit or any time thereafter. It is

    elementary that to be a holder, one must be in possession of the instrument. See s. 673.3011,

    F.S. Here, BankUnited was not any proper party to file suit to foreclose a fictitious un-

    delivered lost and/or destroyed instrument.

    IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANY delivery

    12. Under Florida law delivery is necessary to validate a negotiable instrument. A lost and/or

    destroyed note or mortgage could not have possibly been delivered.

    IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANY reestablishment

    13. Here, the lost and/or destroyed note or mortgage could not have possibly been reestablished

    pursuant to Ch. 71, Fla. Stat.

    EMERGENCY AND THREAT OF FURTHER INJURY

    14. Known foreclosure fraud is an EMERGENCY. Further injury must be prevented.

    NO note – NO default

    15. The purported plaintiff did not own or hold any note. No obligation existed. No “default”

    could have possibly occurred. See also Uniform Commercial Code; Negotiable Instruments.

    UNKNOWN LOSS OR DESTRUCTION

    4
    16. The bankrupt and seized “plaintiff” bank asserted that any “promissory note and mortgage

    have been lost or destroyed and are not in the custody or control of Bankunited, and the time

    and manner of the loss or destruction is unknown.” In this Case, Bankunited could not have

    possibly reestablished any lost or destroyed note or mortgage.

    CAMNER KNEW THAT reestablishment WAS IMPOSSIBLE, CH. 71, FLA. STAT.

    17. In particular, Founder and Attorney Alfred Camner and his law firm knew that Bankunited

    could not have possibly reestablished any lost or destroyed note or mortgage.

    SEIZURE OF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED

    18. On Thursday, May 21, 2009, BankUnited, FSB, Coral Gables, FL was seized by the Office

    of Thrift Supervision (OTS), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

    was named Receiver. Said seizure stripped away the main asset that belonged to the holding

    company, BankUnited Financial Corp. Counsel Alfred Camner was the largest shareholder.

    19. The June 22 Report by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Inspector

    General (OIG) was critical of the bank’s management and Attorney and Founder Alfred

    Camner. See Counsel, Camner Lipsitz law firm.

    FAILURE & SEIZURE OF THE PURPORTED plaintiff

    20. BankUnited, FSB’s failure in May 2009 cost the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp’s insurance

    fund about $5.7 billion – the second most costly failure in FDIC history.

    NO instrument, and NO lien

    21. Here, there was neither any instrument nor any lien. No property was described.

    NO interest, and NO successor in interest

    22. Here, Bankunited, FSB, had no interest. Here, Bankunited was not and could not have

    possibly been any successor in interest. No sum was due to the plaintiff bankrupt bank.

    5
    NO rights and NO standing

    23. Here, Bankunited, just like Bankunited, FSB, had no rights and no standing.

    NO conditions precedent – FACIALLY FRIVOLOUS action

    24. Here, the conditions precedent to the institution of any foreclosure action did not occur and

    could not have possibly occurred. Here on its face, the sham action was frivolous.

    THE COURT KNEW THAT reestablishment WAS IMPOSSIBLE

    25. Here as a matter of law, “reestablishment” was impossible. Here, the falsified “promissory

    note and mortgage have been lost or destroyed and are not in the custody or control of

    Bankunited, and the time and manner of the loss or destruction is unknown.” See Ch. 71,

    Fla. Stat.

    26. Here, Jennifer Franklin’s record title was free and clear.

    PROTECTED HOMESTEAD PROPERTY

    27. Franklin Prescott’s property is protected homestead property.

    28. As a matter of law, any accounting under a prima facie non-existent note and mortgage was

    impossible. The prima facie non-meritorious demand for an accounting was fraudulent.

    29. Jennifer Franklin Prescott is not any “married woman”.

    30. Jennifer Franklin Prescott is not any defendant and was not served.

    31. Hugh D. Hayes is a named party Defendant. See Summons on file.

    WHEREFORE, Jennifer Franklin Prescott demands

    1. An Order declaring the purported action fraudulent and a fraud on the Court;

    2. An Order clarifying said purported “disposition”, “summons”, and “complaint”;

    3. An Order for judgment and dismissal in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott;

    4. An Order extinguishing the facially non-meritorious action;

    6
    5. An Order declaring the admitted lack of any record of any note or mortgage;

    6. An Order declaring any reestablishment of any note or mortgage impossible;

    7. An Order declaring the lack of any interest by Bankunited;

    8. An Order declaring the action without any merit under existing law;

    9. An Order enjoining any further fraud and harassment by Bankunited;

    10. An Order for sanctions and expenses against said seized and bankrupt bank and its

    dismissed and/or fired attorneys at Camner Lipsitz;

    11. An Order removing the fired judicial officers with the Camner Lipsitz firm from these

    proceedings, and striking their fraudulent pleadings, because they perpetrated record fraud

    and fraud on this Court.

    ________________________
    /s/Jennifer Franklin Prescott
    Victim of bankrupt Bankunited’s record fraud
    Victim of seized Bankunited founder Alfred Camner’s record fraud on this Court

    EXHIBIT: § 673.3011, FLA. STAT.

    F.D.I.C. FAILED BANK INFORMATION

    7
    8/14/2010 Public Inquiry

    Find it here...
    Site Search

    Home / Records Search / Court Records / Public Inquiry / Search Results - A LL / C ase - 112009C A0060160001XX

    Ne w Se a rch R e turn to C ase List

    Case Information Printer Friendly Version

    Style: BANKUNITED vs FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT, JENNIFER


    Uniform Case Number: 112009C A0060160001XX Filed: 07/09/2009
    Clerks Case Number: 0906016C A
    Court Type: C IR C UIT CIVIL Disposition Judge: HAYES, HUGH D
    Case Type: MO R TGAGE FO R ECLO SUR ES Disposed: 08/12/2010
    Judge: HAYES, HUGH D Reopen Reason:
    Case Status: DISPO SED Reopened:
    Next Court Date: Reopen Close:
    Last Docket Date: 08/12/2010 A ppealed:

    Parties Dockets Events Financials

    1 of 1 page s. Entrie s pe r page : 60

    Date Text All Entries


    07/09/2009 C A48/R EAL PR O PER TY MO R TGAGE FO R EC LO SUR E (PR E 2010) (FILING)
    07/09/2009 C IVIL C O VER SHEET
    07/09/2009 C O MPLAINT
    07/09/2009 NO TIC E O F LIS PENDENS
    07/09/2009 PAID $10.00 PER ISSUANC E O F SUMMO NS $40.00
    07/09/2009 R EAL PR O PER TY VALUATIO N SHEET
    07/10/2009 SUMMO NS ISSUED
    JENNIFER FR ANKLIN PR ESC O TT/ W ALTER P R ESC O TT/ JO HN DO E/ MAR Y DO E/
    PLAC ED IN SO UTH FLO R IDA PR O C ESS SER VER S BIN
    09/03/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS MAR Y DO E
    10/14/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F LO ST O R IGINAL SUMMO NS JO HN DO E
    10/14/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS JO HN DO E
    12/21/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS W ALTER PR ESC O TT
    12/21/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT
    02/22/2010 NO TIC E O F APP EAR ANC E
    AS C O -CO UNSEL BY ER IN M R O SE Q UINN O N BEHALF O F PLT
    04/06/2010 ALIAS SUMMO NS ISSUED
    JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT/W ALTER PR ESC O TT/P LAC ED IN PR O VEST LLC BIN
    05/20/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS JENNIFER FR ANKLIN PR ESC O TT
    05/20/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS W ALTER PR ESC O TT
    06/15/2010 C O RR ESPO NDENCE FR O M C O UNSEL TO C LERK
    06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F C O NSTR UC TIVE SER VIC E AS TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT
    06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F C O NSTR UC TIVE SER VIC E AS TO JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT
    06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F C O NSTR UC TIVE SER VIC E
    AS TO ANY AND ALL UNKNO W N PAR TIES C LAIMING
    06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT
    06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-P R ESC O TT

    apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC… 1/2
    8/14/2010 Public Inquiry
    06/15/2010 C O RR ESPO NDENCE FR O M C O UNSEL TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW
    06/17/2010 LETTER TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW
    06/17/2010 NO TIC E O F AC TIO N
    TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT & ANY AND ALL UNKNO W N
    PAR TIES C LAIMING
    06/17/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F MAILING MAILED 6/18/10
    06/18/2010 C O NFIR MATIO N O F EMAIL R EC EIVED BY GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW
    07/07/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F PUBLIC ATIO N
    NO TIC E O F AC TIO N TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT/ANSW ER
    W ITHIN 30 DAYS O F FIRST PUBLIC ATIO N 6/25/10
    07/09/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT
    07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E MO TIO N TO DISMISS
    07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT /PR O SE
    07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO ENJO IN / BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT -P RO SE
    07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E
    O F PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D & MO TIO N TO DISMISS
    BY DEFENDANT
    07/23/2010 MO TIO N FO R C LAR IFIC ATIO N O F C O UNSEL
    07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS
    07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO C LAR IFY ALLEGED PLAINTIFFS PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D FR AUD
    08/10/2010 C O MPLAINT
    08/12/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS PR O SE JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT
    08/12/2010 BANKR UPTC Y BANKUNITED
    08/12/2010 C A48/R EAL PR O PER TY MO R TGAGE FO R EC LO SUR E (PR E 2010) (DISPO SITIO N)
    08/12/2010 SUMMO NS ISSUED ELSA JAR ER O / PUT IN SO UTH FLO R IDA PR O C ESS BIN

    W e dne sday night is re gular m a inte nance tim e on our se rve rs; as a re sult brie f o utage s m ay o ccur.
    W e apologize in advance for any inconve nie nce.

    Home | Site Map | Search | Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | FA Qs | Contact Us


    This we bsite is m aintaine d by The C ollie r C ounty C le rk of the C ircuit C ourt. Unde r Flo rida law, e m ail
    addre sse s are public re co rds. If you do not want your e m a il addre ss re le ase d in re sponse to a public
    re cords re que st, do not se nd e m ail to this e ntity. Inste ad, co ntact this office by phone or in writing.

    apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC… 2/2
    8/13/2010 Public Inquiry

    Find it here...
    Site Search

    Home / Records Search / Court Records / Public Inquiry / Search Results - A LL / C ase - 112009C A0060160001XX

    Ne w Se a rch R e turn to C ase List

    Case Information Printer Friendly Version

    Style: BANKUNITED vs FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT, JENNIFER


    Uniform Case Number: 112009C A0060160001XX Filed: 07/09/2009
    Clerks Case Number: 0906016C A
    Court Type: C IR C UIT CIVIL Disposition Judge:
    Case Type: MO R TGAGE FO R ECLO SUR ES Disposed:
    Judge: HAYES, HUGH D Reopen Reason:
    Case Status: O PEN Reopened:
    Next Court Date: Reopen Close:
    Last Docket Date: 08/12/2010 A ppealed:

    Parties Dockets Events Financials

    2 of 2 page s. Entrie s pe r page : 20

    Date Text All Entries


    06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-P R ESC O TT
    06/15/2010 C O RR ESPO NDENCE FR O M C O UNSEL TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW
    06/17/2010 LETTER TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW
    06/17/2010 NO TIC E O F AC TIO N
    TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT & ANY AND ALL UNKNO W N
    PAR TIES C LAIMING
    06/17/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F MAILING MAILED 6/18/10
    06/18/2010 C O NFIR MATIO N O F EMAIL R EC EIVED BY GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW
    07/07/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F PUBLIC ATIO N
    NO TIC E O F AC TIO N TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT/ANSW ER
    W ITHIN 30 DAYS O F FIRST PUBLIC ATIO N 6/25/10
    07/09/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT
    07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E MO TIO N TO DISMISS
    07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT /PR O SE
    07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO ENJO IN / BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT -P RO SE
    07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E
    O F PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D & MO TIO N TO DISMISS
    BY DEFENDANT
    07/23/2010 MO TIO N FO R C LAR IFIC ATIO N O F C O UNSEL
    07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS
    07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO C LAR IFY ALLEGED PLAINTIFFS PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D FR AUD
    08/10/2010 C O MPLAINT
    08/12/2010 SUMMO NS ISSUED ELSA JAR ER O / PUT IN SO UTH FLO R IDA PR O C ESS BIN

    W e dne sday night is re gular m a inte nance tim e on our se rve rs; as a re sult brie f o utage s m ay o ccur.
    W e apologize in advance for any inconve nie nce.

    Home | Site Map | Search | Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | FA Qs | Contact Us


    This we bsite is m aintaine d by The C ollie r C ounty C le rk of the C ircuit C ourt. Unde r Flo rida law, e m ail

    apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC… 1/2
    8/13/2010 Public Inquiry
    addre sse s are public re co rds. If you do not want your e m a il addre ss re le ase d in re sponse to a public
    re cords re que st, do not se nd e m ail to this e ntity. Inste ad, co ntact this office by phone or in writing.

    apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC… 2/2
    8/17/2010 Public Inquiry

    Find it here...
    Site Search

    Home / Records Search / Court Records / Public Inquiry / Search Results - A LL / C ase - 112009C A0060160001XX

    Ne w Se a rch R e turn to C ase List

    Case Information Printer Friendly Version

    Style: BANKUNITED vs FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT, JENNIFER


    Uniform Case Number: 112009C A0060160001XX Filed: 07/09/2009
    Clerks Case Number: 0906016C A
    Court Type: C IR C UIT CIVIL Disposition Judge: HAYES, HUGH D
    Case Type: MO R TGAGE FO R ECLO SUR ES Disposed: 08/12/2010
    Judge: HAYES, HUGH D Reopen Reason:
    Case Status: DISPO SED Reopened:
    Next Court Date: Reopen Close:
    Last Docket Date: 08/12/2010 A ppealed:

    Parties Dockets Events Financials

    2 of 2 page s. Entrie s pe r page : 20

    Date Text All Entries


    06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT
    06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-P R ESC O TT
    06/15/2010 C O RR ESPO NDENCE FR O M C O UNSEL TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW
    06/17/2010 LETTER TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW
    06/17/2010 NO TIC E O F AC TIO N
    TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT & ANY AND ALL UNKNO W N
    PAR TIES C LAIMING
    06/17/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F MAILING MAILED 6/18/10
    06/18/2010 C O NFIR MATIO N O F EMAIL R EC EIVED BY GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW
    07/07/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F PUBLIC ATIO N
    NO TIC E O F AC TIO N TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT/ANSW ER
    W ITHIN 30 DAYS O F FIRST PUBLIC ATIO N 6/25/10
    07/09/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT
    07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E MO TIO N TO DISMISS
    07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT /PR O SE
    07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO ENJO IN / BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT -P RO SE
    07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E
    O F PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D & MO TIO N TO DISMISS
    BY DEFENDANT
    07/23/2010 MO TIO N FO R C LAR IFIC ATIO N O F C O UNSEL
    07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS
    07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO C LAR IFY ALLEGED PLAINTIFFS PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D FR AUD
    08/12/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS PR O SE JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT
    08/12/2010 BANKR UPTC Y BANKUNITED
    08/12/2010 C A48/R EAL PR O PER TY MO R TGAGE FO R EC LO SUR E (PR E 2010) (DISPO SITIO N)

    W e dne sday night is re gular m a inte nance tim e on our se rve rs; as a re sult brie f o utage s m ay o ccur.
    W e apolo gize in advance for any inconve nie nce .

    apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC… 1/2
    8/17/2010 p g
    Public
    y
    Inquiry
    Home | Site Map | Search | Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | FA Qs | Contact Us
    This we bsite is m aintaine d by The C ollie r C ounty C le rk of the C ircuit C ourt. Unde r Flo rida law, e m ail
    addre sse s are public re co rds. If you do not want your e m a il addre ss re le ase d in re sponse to a public
    re cords re que st, do not se nd e m ail to this e ntity. Inste ad, co ntact this office by phone or in writing.

    apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC… 2/2

    Você também pode gostar