Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
MICHELLE P. LIN, UMIT EKSIOGLU, RAGHU C. MUDUMBAI, MARK A. SLABAUGH, AND PHILIP P. CHEN
PURPOSE: To examine the development and manage- chemical burns, including pH and concentration of the
ment of glaucoma in patients with ocular chemical burns. chemical, duration of exposure, corneal stromal whitening,
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. and the extent of limbal ischemia.79 However, few studies
METHODS: SETTING: University of Washington Eye have examined glaucoma after ocular chemical burns. The
Clinics. PATIENT POPULATION: Twenty-nine eyes (18 pa- purpose of this study is to investigate the risk of, and risk
tients) with ocular chemical burns seen between 1997 and factors for, development of glaucoma after ocular exposure to
2010 with a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. OBSERVA- acid and alkali chemical agents and the outcomes of man-
TION PROCEDURE: Eyes were graded using the Roper-Hall agement for glaucoma in these cases.
scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term use of glaucoma
medications (3 months or more) and need for glaucoma
surgery.
RESULTS: The mean age was 45 17 years, with a mean
METHODS
follow-up of 75 47 months (median, 66 months). WE REVIEWED PATIENTS SEEN BETWEEN 1997 AND 2010 AT
Roper-Hall grade III or IV eyes (n 20) had significantly the Eye Clinics of the University of Washington (Univer-
higher intraocular pressure at presentation (35.9 vs 16.4 sity of Washington Medical Center and Harborview Med-
mm Hg; P .001) and over follow-up were more likely to ical Center). Patients were identified by International
require long-term glaucoma medications (P .003) or to Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition, code search for
undergo glaucoma surgery (P .016) than Roper-Hall ocular burns (940.0 through 940.5). Patients with ocular
grade I or II eyes. Thirteen eyes (12 Roper-Hall grade III or chemical burns with at least 3 months of follow-up were
IV) underwent glaucoma surgery. Eight eyes underwent included in the study. Although glaucoma usually is
glaucoma tube implant surgery; 4 required at least 1 assessed though evaluation of the optic nerve and visual
revision. Seven eyes underwent diode laser cyclophotoco- field, because of the type of injury and the resulting poor
agulation; 4 required repeat treatment. Most (89%) eyes corneal clarity, most patients did not have optic nerve
had controlled intraocular pressure at the last follow-up. findings recorded or visual field testing performed during
However, 76% of eyes with visual acuity of 20/200 or follow-up. Therefore, we defined glaucoma as intraocular
worse at initial evaluation did not have improved vision at pressure (IOP) of more than 21 mm Hg and requiring
the last follow-up. treatment during management of ocular chemical burns.
CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with Roper-Hall grade III or IV Clinical data collected included type of chemical burn,
ocular chemical burns were more likely to have glaucoma ocular pH, demographic data (age, sex, race), visual acuity,
and to require surgery for it. Outcomes of glaucoma IOP, glaucoma medications, and examination findings and
management generally were good, although tube implant procedures performed at presentation and over follow-up.
surgeries often had complications requiring revision. Long-term medication use was defined as use of glaucoma
(Am J Ophthalmol 2012;154:481 485. 2012 by medications at or beyond 3 months after injury.
Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) Roper-Hall classification9 was used, in some cases retro-
spectively, to grade the severity of the burns. In brief,
C
HEMICAL BURNS CONSTITUTE BETWEEN 8% AND 18% Roper-Hall grade I burns indicate corneal epithelial damage
of ocular trauma. Most victims are young males without limbal ischemia. Grade II burns indicate corneal haze
between the ages of 16 and 45 years.13 Injuries are with iris details visible and less than one third limbal
often work related, and nearly 90% of injuries occur as a result ischemia. Grade III burns indicate total epithelial loss, stro-
of accidents.4,5 Alkali burns are more common than acid mal haze with iris details obscured, and one third to one half
burns and are more severe.6 Many prognostic factors have limbal ischemia. Grade IV burns indicate dense stromal haze
been examined in evaluating visual recovery after ocular with the iris and pupil obscured, and more than one half
limbal ischemia. Eyes also were stratified into 2 groups based
Accepted for publication Mar 21, 2012. on presenting visual acuity: Snellen acuity of better than
From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington
School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. 20/200 and Snellen acuity of 20/200 or worse. Data were
Umit Eksioglu is currently practicing at Department of Ophthalmol- entered into a spreadsheet (SPSS software version 16.0 for
ogy, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Mac; SPSS, Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Statistical analysis
Inquiries to Philip P. Chen, Department of Ophthalmology, University
of Washington, Box 359608, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104- was performed with chi-square and Fisher exact testing and
2499; e-mail: pchen@u.washington.edu independent-samples, 2-tail t test.
TABLE 1. Initial and Final Visual Acuity and Intraocular Pressure, Glaucoma Medication Use, and Glaucoma Surgery Performed in 29 Eyes with Ocular Chemical Burns
No. of Months to
Eye Age Type of Follow-up Roper-Hall Initial Visual Initial IOP Final Visual Final IOP IOP Medications First Glaucoma Corneal Surgery
No. (years) Burn (months) Grade Acuity (mm Hg) Acuity (mm Hg) ( 3 months) Glaucoma Surgery Type Surgery Type
CF counting fingers; CPC transscleral cyclophotocoagulation; ECP endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation; HM hand movements; IOP intraocular pressure; KPro Boston
SEPTEMBER
keratoprosthesis (type I or II); LP light perception; N/A not applicable; NLP no light perception; NR not recorded; PKP penetrating keratoplasty.
a
Suspected methamphetamine manufacture.
2012
Roper-Hall classification resulted in 5 eyes (17.2%) with grade
TABLE 2. Clinical Findings during Follow-up in Eyes with I ocular chemical burns, 4 eyes (13.8%) with grade II ocular
Ocular Chemical Burns (n 29) chemical burns, 9 eyes (31.0%) with grade III ocular chemical
burns, and 11 eyes (37.9%) with grade IV ocular chemical burns.
Roper-Hall Roper-Hall
Findings Grade I/II Grade III/IV P Value
One eye (3.4%) was enucleated after 10 days because of
endophthalmitis after corneal perforation and was not included
Age (years) 54 20 41 14 .153a
in the analysis of glaucoma development or treatment.
Follow-up (mos) 73 33 75 53 .895a
Higher Roper-Hall grade was associated significantly with
Chemical: alkali/acid 7/2 17/3 .633b
initial visual acuity of 20/200 or worse. Higher Roper-Hall
(eyes)
Eyes requiring glaucoma
grade also was associated with worse initial visual acuity (P
medication .016, analysis of variance), but not with higher initial IOP
Initial 1/9 (11%) 18/20 (90%) .001b (P .055, analysis of variance), unless Roper-Hall grade III
Long term 2/9 (22%) 16/19 (84%) .003b and IV eyes were combined and compared with Roper-Hall
No. of long-term 0.4 1.0 1.8 1.4 .018a grade I and II eyes (P .001; Table 2). Higher Roper-Hall
medications grade also was associated significantly with any glaucoma med-
Glaucoma surgery (eyes) 1/9 (11%) 12/19 (63%) .016b ication use (P .001), long-term glaucoma medication use (P
Other surgery (eyes) 1/9 (11%) 17/20 (85%) .001b .010), need for any ophthalmic surgery (P .003), and visual
Visual acuity
acuity of 20/200 or worse at final visit (P .020). Most eyes that
Initial
required long-term glaucoma medication use had elevated IOP
logMAR 0.46 0.34 1.90 1.18 .001a
20/200 (eyes) 7/9 (77%) 2/19 (11%) .001b
by the first week after injury (15/18 eyes; 83%).
Final
A comparison of eyes with alkali versus acid burns showed
logMAR 0.61 0.96 2.49 1.72 .001a that among eyes with alkali burns, 16 (70%) of 23 and 11 (48%)
20/200 7/9 (77%) 5/19 (26%) .014b of 23 required long-term glaucoma medication and surgery,
Intraocular pressure respectively, which was not significantly different than the 2
(mm Hg) (40%) of 5 eyes with acid burns that required both long-term
Initial 17.1 7.3 35.6 18.8 .001a glaucoma medications and glaucoma surgery (P .315). Final
Final 16.2 5.0 14.5 9.2 .601a visual acuity was 20/200 or worse in 15 (63%) of 24 eyes with
alkali burns and in 2 (40%) of 5 eyes with acid burns.
logMAR logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution.
a
Thirteen eyes (46% of all eyes; 5/9 Roper-Hall grade III and
Independent sample t test, 2 tailed.
b 7/10 Roper-Hall grade IV) required glaucoma surgery for IOP
Fisher exact test, 2 tailed.
control; all were treated medically for glaucoma before any type
of glaucoma surgery. Eyes with Roper-Hall grade III or IV ocular
chemical burns were significantly more likely to need long-term
RESULTS glaucoma medications (P .003) and glaucoma surgery (P
.016) compared with eyes with Roper-Hall grade I or II ocular
TWENTY-NINE EYES (18 PATIENTS) WITH OCULAR CHEMI- chemical burns (Table 2). Four eyes underwent glaucoma surgery
cal burns were identified and met inclusion criteria (Table at the same time as penetrating keratoplasty or Boston kerato-
1). The mean patient age was 45.4 16.7 years (range, 19 prosthesis surgery, and 3 eyes underwent glaucoma surgery after
to 77 years), and mean follow-up was 75 47 months such procedures. Three eyes underwent glaucoma surgery before
(median, 66 months; range, 10 to 157 months). Most penetrating keratoplasty, and 3 eyes that underwent glaucoma
patients were male (15/18; 83%) and white (15/18; 83%). surgery had no corneal transplantation procedures performed.
Twenty-four eyes (83%) had alkali burns with a mean pH The Kaplan-Meier estimate for need for glaucoma surgery was
of 9.38, whereas 5 eyes (17%) had acid burns. Among eyes 58.6% (95% confidence interval, 34.0% to 83.2%) at 3 years for
with alkali burns, 68% (15/22) had visual acuity of 20/200 Roper-Hall grade III and IV eyes, which was significantly worse
or worse, compared with 60% (3/5) in eyes with acid burns. (P .002, log-rank test) than that for Roper-Hall grade I and II
In 2 eyes (7%) with alkali burns, the initial visual acuity eyes (0%).
was unknown because the patient was intubated at the Eight eyes (28%) underwent glaucoma drainage tube implant
time of initial evaluation. In 1 eye (3.4%), the initial surgery (5 Baerveldt procedures, 2 Ahmed procedures, and 1
visual acuity was no light perception because of prior unknown procedure). Four (3 Baerveldt procedures and 1
damage from long-standing angle-recession glaucoma, Ahmed procedure) required revision surgery during follow-up: 1
which was well controlled with medications before the had the tube tied off because of hypotony in an eye that had not
chemical injury; this eye was not included in evaluation of had prior cyclodestruction; 1 underwent 2 revisions for tube
visual acuity during follow-up. Four eyes (14%; all with corneal contact, with eventual tube placement in the pars plana
initial visual acuity of 20/200 or worse; 2 patients) were after pars plana vitrectomy; 1 required 4 revisions, 2 for tube
injured in accidents involving suspected methamphet- blockage and 2 for tube exposure; and 1 required implant
amine manufacture. removal, with subsequent cyclocryotherapy treatment. One
ALL AUTHORS HAVE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED THE ICMJE FORM FOR DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF
interest and none were reported. Publication of this article was supported in part by an unrestricted departmental grant from Research to Prevent
Blindness, Inc, New York, New York, and by the University of Washington Glaucoma Research Fund, Seattle, Washington, including an unrestricted
research grant from Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California. Involved in study design and conduct (R.C.M., P.P.C.); data collection (M.P.L., U.E., M.A.S.,
P.P.C.); data management and analysis (P.P.C.); data interpretation (R.C.M., M.A.S., P.P.C.); and preparation, review, or approval of manuscript
(M.P.L., U.E., R.C.M., M.A.S., P.P.C.). The Human Subjects Division of the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, approved this
retrospective review of patient data.
REFERENCES 13. Hughes WF. Alkali burns of the eye: review of the literature
and summary of present knowledge. Arch Ophthalmol 1946;
1. Liggett PE, Pince KJ, Barlow W, Ragen M, Ryan SJ. Ocular 35(4):423 449.
trauma in an urban population. Review of 1132 cases. 14. Kuckelkorn R, Kottek A, Reim M. [Intraocular complica-
Ophthalmology 1990;97(5):581584. tions after severe chemical burns-incidence and sur-
2. Macewen CJ. Eye injuries: a prospective survey of 5671 cases. gical treatment.] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1994;205(2):
Br J Ophthalmol 1989;73(11):888 894. 86 92.
3. Zagelbaum BM, Tostanoski JR, Kerner DJ, Hersh PS. Urban 15. Tsai JH, Derby E, Holland EJ, Khatana AK. Incidence and
eye trauma. A one-year prospective study. Ophthalmology prevalence of glaucoma in severe ocular surface disease.
1993;100(6):851 856. Cornea 2006;25(5):530 532.
4. Morgan SJ. Chemical burns of the eye: causes and manage- 16. Pfister RR, Friend J, Dohlman CH. The anterior segment of
ment. Br J Ophthalmol 1987;71(11):854 857. rabbits after alkali burn. Arch Ophthalmol 1971;86(2):189
5. Kuckelkorn R, Luft I, Kottek AA, Schrage NF, Makropoulos 193.
W, Reim M. [Chemical and thermal eye burns in the 17. Paterson CA, Pfister RR. Intraocular pressure changes after
residential area of RWTH Aachen. Analysis of accidents in alkali burns. Arch Ophthalmol 1974;91(3):211218.
1 year using a new automated documentation of findings]. 18. Greenlee EC, Kwon YH. Graft failure: III. Glaucoma esca-
Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993;203(1):34 42.
lation after penetrating keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol 2008;
6. Wagoner, MD. Chemical injuries of the eye: current con-
28(3):191207.
cepts in pathophysiology and therapy. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;
19. Netland PA, Terada H, Dohlman CH. Glaucoma associated
41(4):275313.
with keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology 1998;105(4):751757.
7. Paterson CA, Pfister RR, Levinson RA. Aqueous humor pH
20. Cade F, Grosskreutz CL, Tauber A, Dohlman CH. Glaucoma
change after experimental alkali burns. Am J Ophthalmol
1975;79(3):414 419. in eyes with severe chemical burn, before and after kerato-
8. Hughes WF. Alkali burns of the eye: clinical and pathologic prosthesis. Cornea 2011;30(12):13221327.
course. Arch Ophthalmol 1946;36(8):189 214. 21. Kuckelkorn R, Keller GK, Redbrake C. [Glaucoma after
9. Roper-Hall MJ. Thermal and chemical burns. Trans Ophthal- extremely severe chemical and thermal eye burns. Surgical
mol Soc U K 1965;85:631 653. possibilities]. Ophthalmologe 2001;98(12):1149 1156.
10. Fish R, Davidson RS. Management of ocular thermal and 22. Li JY, Greiner MA, Brandt JD, Lim MC, Mannis MJ.
chemical injuries, including amniotic membrane therapy. Long-term complications associated with glaucoma drainage
Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010;21(4):317321. devices and Boston keratoprosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;
11. Gicquel JJ. Management of ocular surface chemical burns. 152(2):209 218.
Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95(2):159 161. 23. Rivier D, Paula JS, Kim E, Dohlman CH, Grosskreutz CL.
12. Highman VN. Early rise in intraocular pressure after ammo- Glaucoma and keratoprosthesis surgery: role of adjunctive
nia burns. Br Med J 1969;1(5640):359 360. cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma 2009;18(4):321324.