Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Clarification
In this part, we will look at how Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghes alleged
instructions to the former Governor Arjun Mahendran to abolish the direct
placement system of issuing government securities would be counter to the
vision of establishing an independent Central Bank in the country.
Prime Minister Wickremesinghe, in his first economic policy statement
delivered in Parliament in November 2015, assured the nation that his
Government would introduce necessary legislation to enable the Central Bank
to function as an independent institution.
In V2025, he has gone further and promised to introduce necessary legislation
to facilitate the Central Bank to have inflation as its prime target without the
intervention of politicians.
The Central Bank is an independent institution for monetary policy and its
budget is within the existing laws. Hence, when he said that his Government
would make the bank independent, what was implied was that the bank would
be fully independent from political authorities like Germanys Bundesbank or
Englands Bank of England.
When the first promise was made, it was welcomed by the market. But no
action was taken within the last two years to put this wish into practice.
Was PM misinformed?
In his speech, Prime Minister
Wickremesinghe had said: Records confirm that private placements had
become a norm rather than an exception. In just one instance in 2013, Rs. 16
billion worth of five-year bonds were sold through auction at a yield of 10.9%
and thereafter Rs. 76 billion of the same bond were sold through private
placements at a higher yield of 11.42%. Who stood to benefit from such acts?
The answer is obvious.
It appears that the Prime Minister has been informed by Central Bank officials
that it was a crime to issue five-year bonds in 2013 at 11.42% through direct
sales. What the Prime Minister has not been informed about is that the
prevailing market rate for 8.0% - a five-year bond in January 2013 was much
higher at 11.63% and 11.45% in March 2013.
Now the former Governor Mahendran has revealed in his evidence on oath
before the commission that it was Prime Minister Wickremesinghe who had
advised him on 24 February 2015, three days before the controversial bond
issue, to do away with direct placements as a method of issuing government
securities (available at: http://www.ft.lk/front-page/Mahendran-mauled-by-
more-grilling/44-640821).
In terms of the existing laws, neither the Prime Minister nor the Finance
Minister can give directions to the Monetary Board which enjoys autonomy
with respect to policy making.
Monetary Board and not the Government which makes monetary policy
decisions
The section under reference says that in the event of a disagreement between
the two parties, every effort should be made to reach an agreement. This is
because any open battle between the Minister of Finance and the Monetary
Board will not augur well for the country in the eyes of the investors.
However, if an agreement cannot be reached, the relevant section empowers
the Minister of Finance to inform the Board that the government accepts
responsibility for the adoption by the Board of a policy in accordance with the
opinion of the government and direct that such a policy be adopted by the
Board.
When such a direction is given by the Minister, the Board shall carry out such
direction. Hence, the Prime Minister cannot give any direction to the Central
Bank under the law. Even if the Minister of Finance is to give any direction to
the Central Bank, it is presumed that he should first get the approval of the
Cabinet of Ministers headed by the President since he commits the Government
to take responsibility. Any other direction is illegal and, hence, the Monetary
Board is not bound to carry it out.
In the whole of the Central Banks history, there is only one occasion where the
Government of the day had invoked the powers it had got under section 116 (2)
of MLA. That happened in December 1959 when the Monetary Board decided to
increase its main interest rate on its short-term loans to commercial banks,
known as the bank rate, from 2.5% to 3% per annum.
The Government of the day under Prime Minister Wijayananda Dahanayake
was to run for an election the following year and it thought that the increase in
interest rates would jeopardise its chance of being re-elected. Hence, it directed
the Monetary Board to restore the interest rate to its previous level under
section 116(2) taking responsibility for its decision.
However, analysts later remarked in a lighter vein that the Government took
full responsibility for its direction since it was ousted from power with the
Prime Minister too losing his seat in the subsequent election.
The second and third instances took place from 2002-2004 when he was the
Prime Minister again and at that time A.S. Jayawardena was the Governor of
the Central Bank. On a paper submitted by the Minister of Finance, the Cabinet
had approved the appointment of a senior officer of the Central Bank to the
Ministry of Finance as economic advisor. Under MLA, Central Bank officers could
be released to other government bodies provided the consent of the officers
concerned had been obtained.
In this case, the officer concerned had not given his consent and therefore could
not be compelled to accept the appointment. Governor Jayawardena informed
the Ministry accordingly and the Government headed by Prime Minister
Wickremesinghe accepted it.
On the third occasion when there was a general election in 2004, the Opposition
had presented an election manifesto with a number of unmanageable goodies
to the people. Since the costs were enormous, it was beyond the financial
resources of the Government. The Cabinet then decided to direct the Central
Bank to examine the financial prudence of the manifesto in question and submit
a report. Governor Jayawardena informed the Prime Minister that it was not a
job of the Central Bank to examine the manifestoes of political parties. As
before, Prime Minister Wickremesinghe accepted Governor Jayawardenas
explanation.
Politicians love to control the Central Bank. But it is the responsibility of the
Governor and other senior officers of the bank to defend its independence.
(W.A. Wijewardena, a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka,
can be reached at waw1949@gmail.com)
Posted by Thavam