Silverman, 2005 Reliability in qualitative research can be understood in several ways, namely by

obtaining detailed records of the tertranskip in the form of documents and the use of
coding.

Joope (2000) showed the Reliability of measurement and adherence to the size used. Reliability
testing is usually performed through the replication as done to the odd or even-numbered
rounds measurements or in a parallel form.

Susan Stainback (1998) Reliability is related to the degree of consistency and stability data or
findings. A data reliability said when two or more research with the same object produces
the same data.

According to Fraenkel (1993) Reliability is the consistency of the score, and the stability data
from an instrument of research.

Conclusion: Reliability is the degree of consistency and stability data from research instrument

The extent to which measurement, given repeatedly, remain the same.

The stability of the measurement over time.

Similarity measurement in a given period

Understanding Validity

Joppe (2000)

Validity in the quantitative research a research truly measure what will be measured and
how the truth of the research results. In other words, the validity of the research instrument
accuracy shows to reach the target of such research.

Gibbs, 2007

Qualitative validity is an attempt the examination of the accuracy of the study results by
applying specific procedures.

Creswell (2010)

Qualitative validity is the examination of the accuracy of the study results by applying certain
prosedurprosedur.

Conclusion
 validity is the examination of the accuracy of the study results by applying specific
procedures and declared valid if the data reported in accordance with that '.

Types of types of Validity (Johnson, (1997) & Sugiono (2010)

Descriptive validity refers to the accuracy that is based on real facts reported researchers.

Interpretive validity that is obtained based on the viewpoint of, thought, purpose and the
experience understood and reported by researchers.

The validity of teoritikal that is based on how much a theory or explanation of teoritikal
obtained through research so trustworthy and accountable

Internal validity is the extent to which the results of a research study are not biased or the
degree of accuracy of design research with the results achieved.

External validity that is related to the degree of accuracy whether the design research can be
generalized and can be applied on a population where the sample was taken.

Types of Validity (Neuman, 2007

Face validity

Is the validity of the most easy to achieve and most basic type of face validity is the validity
of the

Content Validity

The validity of this deals with the conceptual definition that contains ideas and concepts can
be represented in a measurement.

The Validity Of The Criteria

The validity criteria using some standard or criteria for invalid constructs indicated
accurately.

The strategy of the validity of the Data (Creswell, 2003)

Take advantage of the relatively long field or location research, researchers are expected to
understand more deeply the phenomenon researched and can convey in detail about the
location and the people who build the credibility of the results narrative research
 Triangulation of data sources with different checking evidence derived from such sources and
use them to build up justification themes coherently.

Do the interview with fellow researcher (peer debriefing) to improve the accuracy of the study
results.

Present information "different" or "negative" (negative or discrepant information) which can

provide resistance on certain themes

Clarify the possible bias brought researchers into the research. By doing self-reflection to the
possibility of the appearance of bias in the study, researchers will be able to create an open
and honest narrative that will be perceived by the reader.

Apply member checking to know the accuracy of the study results.

Create a description of the rich and dense (rich and thick description) about the research
results.

Invite an auditor (external auditor) to review the overall research project

Eight strategies are cited from Creswell (2003) as above, researchers in this study will not
use them all to menvaliditas the data researchers. Researchers will only use one of the
mentriangulasi strategy (triangulate). This is because:

This strategy is easily affordable for the use of researchers.

Practically, this method more readily practiced for this data is menvaliditas

Triangulation

Triangulation is a method used by researchers to check and improve the validity of the
research by analyzing the research questions from a variety of perspectives.

(Guion, Diehl and Mc Donald, (2011)

Types Of Triangulation

Triangulation methods

Done by comparing the information or data by way of the berdeda. As it known, in

qualitative research researchers using the method obervasi, interviews, and surveys. To
 obtain reliable information and the description of the particular information intact,
researchers could use the free interview method and structured interview.

Triangulation between researchers

Done by using more than one person in the collection and analysis of data. This technique
resembles enriching knowledge of recognized information dug from the subject of the
research.

Triangulation of data sources

Is digging the truth certain informai through a variety of methods and sources of data
acquisition. For example, other than through interviews and observation, the researcher can
use the observations involved, written document, arsif, historical documents, records,
official records or private writings and drawings or photographs.

Theory triangulation.

The final results of the qualitative research in the form of an outline of the information or
the thesis statement. The information is further compared with the perspective of the
theory of televan to avoid biased individual researchers over the findings or conclusions that
are generated.

Tests of validity and Reliability

The credibility

The concept of validity in qualitative research that is often used is credibility.

The credibility of being an important when questioning the quality of the results of a qualitative
study

A qualitative research results is said to have a high credibility lies in the success of the study in
achieving its goal, namely to explore issues or describe settings, processes, social groups or
patterns compound/complex interactions.

Transferbilitas

The credibility that is the extent to which the findings of a study conducted on a particular
group can be applied on this group
 Transferbilitas in qualitative research is said to be high if the If the readers get an overview and
a clear understanding of research reports (context and focus of research), research results, it
can be said to have transfermabilitas a high,

Dependabilitas

Dependabilitas is the term reliability in quantitative research.

The concept of dependabilitas is often a consideration in judging the scholarship of a

qualitative research findings.

A high level of dependabilitas in qualitative research can be obtained by performing a data

analysis terstuktur and attempt to interpret the results properly

Konfirmabilitas

Konfirmabilitas is a process of examination criteria i.e. way or step researchers confirm over
the results of his findings

Konfirmabilitas in identikan with brought in research if the results of quantitative findings can
be confirmed and presented widely

Konfirmabilitas qualitative research in is the concept of intersubyektivitas or the concept of

transparency, i.e. the willingness of researchers to publicly disclose the process and
elements of his research so as to allow other researchers do an assessment of research
results