Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
and
The Mean Residence Time approach
1
Synonymous
2
Statistical Moments
Standard deviation
C t dt
n
n-order statistical moment t
0
t C t dt C t dt AUC
0
zero-order :
0 0
one-order : t C t dt AUMC
0 5
Statistical Moment Approach
6
The Mean Residence Time
7
Mean Residence Time
MRT = t1 + t2 + t3 +...tN
N
9
Mean Residence Time
Central
compartment recirculation
(measure) exchanges
C1 x t x N Cn x t x N
MRT = t1x tn x N
AUCTOT AUCTOT
12
Mean Residence Time
Principle of the method: (5)
C1 x t x N Cn x t x N
MRT = t1x tn x N
AUCTOT AUCTOT
ti x Ci x t t C(t) t AUMC
MRT = = =
AUCTOT C(t) t AUC
13
Mean Residence Time
AUMC
MRT
AUC
AUC C t dt
0
AUMC t C t dt
14
0
AUC = Area Under
the zero-order
moment Curve
AUMC
AUMC = Area
Under the first-
order Moment
AUC
Curve
Central
compartment
(measure)
2 exit sites
Statistical moments obtained from plasma concentration
inform only on molecules eliminated by the central
compartment
16
Computational methods
1. Linear trapezoidal
C
1
Ci Ci1
C
t
2
AUC i t i 1 Concentration
i 2
t
1
t
2
t i Ci t i1 Ci1
AUMC i i1
i
t t
2
Time
18
Computational methods
Area calculations by numerical integration
1. Linear trapezoidal
Disadvantages:
Assumes straight line between data points
If curve is steep, error may be large
Under or over estimation, depending on whether the
curve is ascending of descending
19
20
Computational methods
Area calculations by numerical integration
2. Log-linear trapezoidal
C
Ci Ci 1
1
C
t i t i1
2
Concentration
Ln Ci
AUC i
C i 1
t
1
t
2
Time
AUMC
21
Computational methods
Area calculations by numerical integration
Advantages: Disadvantages:
Hand calculator Produces large errors on
Very accurate for mono- an ascending curve, near
exponential the peak, or steeply
Very accurate in late time points declining polyexponential
where interval between points is curve
substantially increased
22
Computational methods
Extrapolation to infinity
C t dt
Clast Assumes log-
AUC t
la st
tla st
lz linear decline
n
Yi C0
AUC AUC
i 1 i
k10 1
MRT
k10
Yi n C0
AUMC 2 AUMC 2
i 1 i
k10
27
Fitting with a poly-exponential equation
Yi Y1 Y2
AUC AUC
li l1 l2
Yi Y1 Y2
AUMC AUMC
l 2
i l2
1 l22
28
Computational methods
Area
Non-compartmental analysis calculations
Trapezes
Fitting with a poly-exponential equation Area
Equation parameters : Yi, li calculations
1 2
k21
k10
k10 k12 X1
dX1
k 21 X 2
dt
dX 2
k12 X1 - k 21 X 2
dt 30
Analysis with a compartmental model
Example : Two-compartments model
K is the 2x2 matrix of the system of differential equations
describing the drug transfer between compartments
X1 X2
Dosing in 1 Dosing in 2
32
The Mean Residence Times
34
The Mean Absorption Time
Definition : mean time required for the drug to reach the central
compartment
EV IV
Ka
A 1 K10
F = 100%
dissolution absorption
solution
38
MRTcentral and MRTtissue
Entry
39
The Mean Transit Time
(MTT)
40
The Mean Transit Times (MTT)
Definition :
Average interval of time spent by a drug particle from its
entry into the compartment to its next exit
Average duration of one visit in the compartment
Computation :
The MTT in the central compartment can be calculated
for plasma concentrations after i.v.
41
The Mean Residence Number
(MRN)
42
The Mean Residence Number (MRN)
Definition :
Average number of times drug particles enter
into a compartment after their injection into the
kinetic system
Average number of visits in the compartment
MRT
For each compartment : MRN =
MTT
43
Stochastic interpretation of the drug
disposition in the body
Mean number
R+1 R
of visits
IV
Cldistribution
MRTC MRTT
(all the visits) R (for all the visits)
MTTC number MTTT
of cycles
(for a single visit) (for a single visit)
Clredistribution
Clelimination 44
Stochastic interpretation of the drug
disposition in the body
Computation : intravenous administration
MRTsystem = AUMC / AUC
MRTT
MTTT =
R
45
Interpretation of a Compartmental Model
Determinist vs stochastic
Digoxin
21.4 e-1.99t + 0.881 e-0.017t
Cld = 52 L/h
0.3 h MTTC : 0.5h MTTT : 10.5h
4.4
MRTC : 2.81h MRTT : 46h
41 h
Vc 34 L ClR = 52 L/h VT : 551 L
stochastic
Cl = 12 L/h
Determinist
1.56 h-1
Vc : 33.7 L VT : 551L MRTsystem = 48.8 h
0.095 h-1
0.338 h-1
46
t1/2 = 41 h
Interpretation of a Compartmental Model
Determinist vs stochastic
Gentamicin
y =5600 e-0.281t + 94.9 e-0.012t Cld = 0.65 L/h
t1/2 =3h MTTC : 4.65h MTTT : 64.5h
0.265
t1/2 =57h MRTC : 5.88h MRTT : 17.1h
Vc : 14 L ClR = 0.65 L/h VT : 40.8 L
stochastic
Cllimination = 2.39 L/h
Determinist
0.045 h-1
Vc : 14 L VT : 40.8L MRTsystem = 23 h
0.016 h-1
0.17 h-1
47
t1/2 = 57 h
48
49
50
51
The purpose of a PBPK model is to define the relationship between an
external measure of (administered) exposure/dose and an internal
measure of biologically effective) exposure /dose in (gy )p / both the
experimental animal and the human
52
Applications of PBPK Modeling
Chemical risk assessment
Drug development research and evaluation
Interpretation of human biomonitoring data
In vitro to in vivo extrapolation Invitro to in vivo
extrapolation
Evaluation of early -life susceptibility
53
How are PBPK Models Used
in Human Health Risk Assessment?
Assess the biological determinants that govern the kinetic behavior
Calculate tissue dose metrics for risk assessment calculations
Support extrapolation across dose-routes, between species, from high to low dose
levels, and over various dosing scenarios
Assess mechanisms of response (PD) based on their relationship with dose
metrics for target tissues
54
Applications of PBPK Models in Drug
Development Research and Evaluation
Integrate information from different studies Different routes of exposure
Different species Different dosing regimens