Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
)
MOHAN A. HARIHAR, )
)
Appellant )
) Case No. 17-1381
v. )
)
US BANK NA, et al )
)
Defendants/Appellees )
)
Disclosure Statement of the Plaintiff - The Plaintiff respectfully prefaces this REPLY with the
The gravity of serious legal issues addressed in this Appeal and in the RELATED complaint
against The United States,1 include (but are not limited to) evidenced allegations of TREASON
U.S.C. 1832 and is believed to impact matters of National Security. Therefore, copies of this
filed REPLY are sent via email, social media and/or certified mail to: The Executive Office of
1
The related complaint references HARIHAR v. THE UNITED STATES, Docket No. 17-cv-
11109.
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117212479 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2017 Entry ID: 6126428
the President (EOP), the US Inspector General - Michael Horowitz, US Attorney General -
Jeff Sessions, members of the US Senate and House of Representatives, the House
Judiciary Committee, and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). A copy will also be
these evidenced acts of misconduct (alleged). Parties are additionally informed for
documentation purposes, and out of the Appellants continued concerns for personal
safety/security.
After reviewing documents filed by Appellees/Defendants suggesting that this Court(s) should
WALLS, the Appellant Mohan A. Harihar respectfully disagrees. The content of the
opposition exemplifies yet another ACT of DESPERATION to avoid NOT ONLY civil
The United States. The Appellant therefore, necessarily files this REPLY based on the
following:
1. TREASON Claims Against Three (3) Federal Judges have been Clearly Evidenced
the SUA SPONTE RECUSAL of District Court Judge Allison Dale Burroughs. This
otherwise. There is NONE, nor can there be, as these evidenced claims are not only
These evidenced criminal claims of Treason are shown to have occurred WITHIN THE
COURTS OWN WALLS, and are considered some of the gravest criminal acts
In their opposition, Appellees/Defendants state that the Treason claims against referenced
officers of the Court are unfounded, however, they provide NO VALID ARGUMENT
to show how they could possibly have arrived at their conclusion(s). Conversely, the
Appellant has clearly articulated for the record EXACTLY how he arrived at his
evidenced conclusions.
Constitution:
Suggesting that there is no liability is simply FALSE. Their collective decision NOT TO
4. UNOPPOSED CLAIMS - The Appellant respectfully reminds the Court that aside from
UNOPPOSED Treason Claims against referenced officers of the Court, the evidenced 1.)
Misprision of Treason are added to the list of other criminal claims associated with this
litigation. The Appellant is fully aware that as a private citizen, he cannot enforce a
criminal statute. The Appellant has however, appropriately brought these EVIDENCED
CRIMINAL CLAIMS to the rightful attention of the Court, as well as to the attention
impact matters of National Security, and has certainly warranted the attention of
prosecuting authority, it will show cause to bring INCREMENTAL claims against The
a. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law;
6. Incremental Reasons for the Court to Assist with the Appointment of Counsel As
if the Court needed another VALID reason(s) to assist this Appellant with the
appointment of counsel, the increasing complexity of legal issues that must be addressed
The Court is respectfully reminded that JURISDICTION still remains an issue. Circuit
Judges - Torruella, Kayatta, Barron, Thompson, and Chief Justice Howard are considered
to have lost jurisdiction and are no longer allowed to rule in this litigation. Any attempt to
III.
Therefore, based on the clearly evidenced record supporting these criminal claims, a
DEMAND is respectfully made for the appropriate Federal prosecuting authority to timely come
forward with charges to match these evidenced claims. The Appellant also respectfully re-states
the DEMAND to correct past erred judgments and finally assist with the appointment of
counsel.
Finally, for documentation purposes, after sending a copy of this court document to the
President, the email from The White House confirming receipt is attached (See Attachment A).
If there is a question regarding ANY portion of this REPLY, the Appellant is happy to provide
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117212479 Page: 6 Date Filed: 10/18/2017 Entry ID: 6126428
additional supporting information upon request, in a separate hearing and with the presence of an
Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117212479 Page: 7 Date Filed: 10/18/2017 Entry ID: 6126428
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on October 18, 2017 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of
Court using the CM/ECF System, which will send notice of such filing to the following
registered CM/ECF users:
Jeffrey B. Loeb
David Glod
David E. Fialkow
Kevin Patrick Polansky
Matthew T. Murphy
Kurt R. McHugh
Jesse M. Boodoo
Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117212479 Page: 8 Date Filed: 10/18/2017 Entry ID: 6126428
Attachment A
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117212479 Page: 9 Date Filed: 10/18/2017 Entry ID: 6126428