Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ZTE University
Contents
Link budget
Coverage target Maximum path loss allowed
Coverage radius
Coverage scale
Propagation model
Path loss
Path loss Body loss
UE power
ENodeB
PA sensitivity
Estimate scale
Simulate planning
Are
No requirements
met?
Yes
Output a planning
report
Coverage-related input
Target areas to be covered
Rate requirements for the
edge of an eNodeB Coverage-related output
Degree of indoor coverage
resulted from obstacle Cell radius
Link budget
penetration Existing site reuse
RF planning
Shadow fading margin ENodeB quantity
Network information
Existing network information
LTE frequency bands
Maximum bandwidth of an
LTE system
DL cell radius
2 DL cell edge rate is
UL cell edge rate
specified
Cell edge
Cell radius
rate required Number of RBs assigned
Receiver sensitivity
Interference Other
MAPL
margin parameters
Cell radius
MCS
25
MCS-RB relation
20
15
MCS 3 10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
512 Kbps
RB number
ZTE Corporation. All rights reserved
LTE-FDD UL TBS
TBS Table
MCS Table
ZTE Corporation. All rights reserved
LTE-FDD UL TBS and MCS
512 Kbps
10 RB
MCS 3
25
MCS-RB relation
20
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
512 Kbps
64 kbps 128 kbps 256 kbps 384 kbps 512 kbps 1024 kbps
RB 2 4 6 8 10 18
MCS 2 1 3 3 3 4
SNR target (1 2) dB 0.3 2.28 2.38 1.63 1.79 1.19
SNR target (1 4) dB 4.6 6.1 6.18 5.46 5.6 4.96
Receiver sensitivity
Current cell signal
SNR
Noise figure
Noise power
Noise
Receiver sensitivity
UL interference margin
Noise
Method 1
Method 2 Method 3
Method 2
Method 3
Link-level
simulation
Signal loss
through feed lines and connectors
connector
1/2 in
Jumper
jumper
Signal loss is related
to feed line length
Loss < 0.5 dB
7/8 in
Feed line
Fiber
Assume that:
7/8in feed line: 50 m
1/2in feed line: 6 m + 4 connectors
700 MHz: 2 dB
2.6 GHz: 4 dB
( E m E0 ) 2
1
p ( Em ) e 2 2
1 1 E E0
Pcov_cell _ border P( Em E0 ) erf ( m )
2 2 2 Em: value measured
2
x E0: average value
e
t 2
Where erf ( x) dt : standard variance
t 0 Em-E0: shadow fading margin
U ( ) 2 a exp
1 2ab 1
2
1 ab
b 2 b
2
10 m log( e)
a b
2 2
Shadow standard
10 dB 8 dB 7 dB 6 dB
deviation
Regional coverage 90 95 90 95 90 95 90
95%
probability % % % % % % %
Edge coverage 87.7 77. 86. 75. 84. 73. 83. 70.
probability % 7% 2% 1% 9% 3% 9% 9%
Shadow fading 11.7 7.7 8.7 5.4 7.2 4.3 5.9 3.3
margin dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB
Standard variance for a dense urban area, general urban area, and general suburb: 8 dB
Standard variance for a rural area and highway: 6 dB
Handoff gain
Penetration loss
and body loss
Penetration loss
Radio Environment Penetration loss (dB)
Dense urban areadeep
20
indoor coverage
Urban areaindoor coverage 17
Suburbindoor coverage 14
Rural areain cars 8
Body loss
VoIP service: 3 dB
Data service: 0 dB
6
7
8
9
1
0
1
MAPL = 12 1 2 + 3 4 + 5 6 + 7 8 9 10 + 11 1
1
Propagation model 2
Cost231-Hata (1.52.6GHz)
Cost231-Hata
Okumura-Hata
38.8167N
38.8000N
38.8000N
38.7833N
RxPower AtCellEdge
SINR AtCellEdge
Interferen c AtCellEdge NoisePower
Rx PowerServing Site
Define: G
Rx Power
All
Adjacent Site
RxPower AtCellEdge
SINR AtCellEdge
RxPower AtCellEdge / G AtCellEdge NoisePower
RxPower AtCellEdge
SINR AtCellEdge
RxPower AtCellEdge / G AtCellEdge NoisePower
G AtCellEdge
Unachievable SINR SINR AtCellEdge
X%
Cell edge SINR (dB)
Power increase
cannot result in
performance
Improvement.
SINR (dB)
Cell edge
Cell radius
rate required
Cell radius
Cell edge
rate
Cell radius
Edge rate
required
MIMO configuration
Same as those of UL
Assume that :
Neighboring cell power load: 50% Dense-urban-area cell radius (km)
Cell edge G factor: 3 dB
100 RB
MCS 5
Cell radius