Você está na página 1de 6

California Department of Education Document provided by

Special Education Division

Assessment, Evaluation and Support Unit Report Prepared on 05-24-2010

www.action-alameda-news.com
2008-09 District Level Special Education Annual Performance Report Measure for
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District

CDS Code 0161119 FMTA Region 3


District Name ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED General Education Enrollment, Grades 1-12 10271
District Type Unified Special Enrollment (Dec07), Ages 3-5 121
SELPA 0112, North Region Special Enrollment (Dec 07), Ages 6-22 971

Indicator 1 – Graduation: Percent of all exiting students in grade twelve, and exiting ungraded students eighteen and over, who
graduate from high school with a regular diploma. Students who do not graduate but continue in general education, who have died,
or dropped out of school are not included in the calculation.

Percent Graduated
Target This Year Target Met Action Required
with Diploma
74.5% 83.0% No Yes
Data Source: AYP Graduation Rate by Subgroup Data http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/aypdatafiles.asp

Indicator 2 – Dropout: Percent of all students in grades nine and higher, and ungraded students thirteen and over, who exit special
education by dropping out of school. This measure cannot be compared with dropout rates for students in general education,
because of differences in the calculation methodologies.

Percent Dropped Out Target This Year Target Met Action Required
1% <6.1% Yes No
Data Source: AYP Data http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/aypdatafiles.asp

Indicator 3 - Statewide Assessments: Academic achievement testing to meet the requirements of No Child Left Behind (NCLB).

A. Percent of districts meeting the State’s Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) participation and performance requirements.

Area Percent Target This Target Percent Proficient Target This Target Action
Participated Year Met or Advanced Year Met Required
English Language Arts 96% >95% Yes 36.5% >45% No Yes
Math 96% >95% Yes 34.0% >45.5% No Yes
ELA: The English Language Arts content area of the California Standards Tests (CST), California Modified Assessment (CMA),
California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), or California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) (students in grade 10).
Math: The Mathematics content area of the CST, CMA, CAPA, or CAHSEE (students in grade 10)
Data Source: AYP Data http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/aypdatafiles.asp

NOTE: ‘NA’ indicates that the district did not submit data for this Indicator or the item is not applicable. ‘NC’ indicates that the item was not
calculated due to the Indicator having a denominator of less than 100 for Indicator 3 or 20 for all other Indicators.
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District Report Page 1 of 6
California Department of Education
Special Education Division

Assessment, Evaluation and Support Unit Report Prepared on 05-24-2010

2008-09 District Level Special Education Annual Performance Report Measure for
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District

Indicator 4 - Suspension and Expulsion: Percent of all students ages three - twenty-two receiving special education that are
suspended or expelled for greater than 10 days in the school year
A. Overall: Percent of all students with disabilities in the local education agency (LEA) that were suspended or expelled for greater
than 10 days in a school year
B.
No. of Students with Total No. of Percent of Students with
Disabilities Suspended or Students with Disabilities Suspended or Target This
Target Met Action Required
Expelled for More than 10 Disabilities (Age 3- Expelled for More than 10 Year
days 22) days
6 1268 0.47% <1% Yes No
Data Source: June CASEMIS Submission for 0708 Items District of Accountability, Birth Date, SELPA, Student ID, and Discipline
Days

Indicator 5 - Least Restrictive Environment: the average amount of time students ages six - twenty-two receive their special
education or services in settings apart from their non-disabled peers:
A. Out regular class < 21%: Removed from regular class less than 21 percent of the day
B. Out regular class > 60%: Removed from regular class greater than 60 percent of the day
C. Separate facility: Students served 100% of the time in a facility that educates only students with disabilities.
Total No. of Percent of
Students Students in
No. of Students
receiving environment
Measure in the Target This Year Target Met Action Required
Special receiving
environment
Education (Age Special
6-22) Education
A. <21% 533 971 55% >62% No Yes
B. >60% 209 971 22% <18% No Yes
C. Separate
NA 971 4% <4.0% No Yes
Facility
Data Source: December CASEMIS Submission Items District of Accountability, Birth Date, Federal School Setting, and Percent of
Time in Regular Class

NOTE: ‘NA’ indicates that the district did not submit data for this Indicator or the item is not applicable. ‘NC’ indicates that the item was not
calculated due to the Indicator having a denominator of less than 100 for Indicator 3 or 20 for all other Indicators.
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District Report Page 2 of 6
California Department of Education
Special Education Division

Assessment, Evaluation and Support Unit Report Prepared on 05-24-2010

2008-09 District Level Special Education Annual Performance Report Measure for
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District

Indicator 7 – Preschool Assessments: This is a SELPA level calculation. Percent of preschool children aged 3 through 5 with
IEPs who demonstrate improved::
A. Positive social-emotional skills (including personal relationships)
B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy)
C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.

Outcome A Improved Total Percent


1. Substantially Increased 3 4 NC
2. Functioning within age expectations 8 10 NC
Outcome B Improved Total Percent
1. Substantially Increased 3 4 NC
2. Functioning within age expectations 8 10 NC
Outcome C Improved Total Percent
1. Substantially Increased 1 2 NC
2. Functioning within age expectations 8 10 NC

Data Source: SESR and VR

Indicator 8 - Parent Involvement: Percent of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools
facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Positive Involvement Percent Positive
Total Responses Target This Year Target Met Action Required
Responses Involvement
NA NA NC >82% NA NA
Data Source: SESR and VR

NOTE: ‘NA’ indicates that the district did not submit data for this Indicator or the item is not applicable. ‘NC’ indicates that the item was not
calculated due to the Indicator having a denominator of less than 100 for Indicator 3 or 20 for all other Indicators.
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District Report Page 3 of 6
California Department of Education
Special Education Division
Assessment, Evaluation and Support Unit Report Prepared on 05-24-2010

2008-09 District Level Special Education Annual Performance Report Measure for
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District

Indicator 9 - Disproportionality Overall: Percent of racial and ethnic disproportionality among students ages six - twenty-two which
may be due to policies, procedures, or practices.

2008-2009
African
American Indian Asian Hispanic White
American
General Ed 73 4431 1212 1243 3158
Special Ed 8 243 160 229 373
Percentage 10.96% 5.48% 13.20% 18.42% 11.81%
High Percent Low Percent Percent Difference Benchmark Met?
18.42% 5.48% 12.94% <11% N
Data Source: December CASEMIS Submission Items District of Accountability, Birth Date, Ethnicity, Students Residence Status and
Fall SSID update (CBEDS)

Indicator 10 - Disproportionality Disability: Percent of racial and ethnic disproportionality by disability among students ages six -
twenty-two which may be due to policies, procedures, or practices.
Students with Autism
African
American Indian Asian Hispanic White
American
District GE % 0.72% 43.80% 11.98% 12.29% 31.21%
District SE % 2.20% 42.86% 5.49% 9.89% 39.56%
Maximum E-formula
7.82% 85.41% 39.21% 39.82% 70.07%
value
Minimum E-formula
-6.38% 2.19% -15.25% -15.24% -7.64%
value
Under/Over
No No No No No
Represented
Students with Emotional Disturbance
District SE % 0.00% 7.35% 14.71% 32.35% 45.59%
Maximum E-formula
8.93% 91.93% 43.48% 44.13% 76.17%
value
Minimum E-formula
-7.49% -4.33% -19.52% -19.56% -13.74%
value
Under/Over
No No No No No
Represented
NOTE: ‘NA’ indicates that the district did not submit data for this Indicator or the item is not applicable. ‘NC’ indicates that the item was not
calculated due to the Indicator having a denominator of less than 100 for Indicator 3 or 20 for all other Indicators.
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District Report Page 4 of 6
California Department of Education
Special Education Division

Assessment, Evaluation and Support Unit Report Prepared on 05-24-2010

2008-09 District Level Special Education Annual Performance Report Measure for
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District

Students with Mental Retardation


District SE % 0.00% 39.24% 7.59% 29.11% 24.05%
Maximum E-formula
8.34% 88.45% 41.21% 41.83% 72.92%
value
Minimum E-formula
-6.90% -0.86% -17.25% -17.26% -10.49%
value
Under/Over
No No No No No
Represented
Students with Other Health Impairments
District SE % 0.00% 16.67% 6.94% 26.39% 50.00%
Maximum E-formula
8.70% 90.57% 42.60% 43.24% 74.90%
value
Minimum E-formula
-7.26% -2.98% -18.64% -18.66% -12.47%
value
Under/Over
No No No No No
Represented
Students with Speech or Language Impairments
District SE % 0.84% 37.97% 16.03% 14.77% 30.38%
Maximum E-formula
5.12% 69.58% 28.85% 29.35% 55.29%
value
Minimum E-formula
-3.68% 18.02% -4.89% -4.77% 7.14%
value
Under/Over
No No No No No
Represented
Students with Specific Learning Disabilities
District SE % 0.98% 11.52% 22.06% 28.92% 36.52%
Maximum E-formula
4.07% 63.45% 24.84% 25.29% 49.57%
value
Minimum E-formula
-2.63% 24.15% -0.88% -0.72% 12.86%
value
Under/Over
No UND No OVR No
Represented

Data Source: December CASEMIS Submission Items District of Accountability, Birth Date, Ethnicity, Disability, Student’s Residence
Status and Fall SSID update (CBEDS)

NOTE: ‘NA’ indicates that the district did not submit data for this Indicator or the item is not applicable. ‘NC’ indicates that the item was not
calculated due to the Indicator having a denominator of less than 100 for Indicator 3 or 20 for all other Indicators.
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District Report Page 5 of 6
California Department of Education
Special Education Division
Assessment, Evaluation and Support Unit Report Prepared on 05-24-2010

2008-09 District Level Special Education Annual Performance Report Measure for
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District

Indicator 11 - Eligibility Evaluation: Percent of children ages birth - twenty-two whose eligibility for special education was
determined within 60 days of receipt of parental consent for evaluation.
No. delayed but
No. Assessed within
No. of within state
60 days of receipt of Percent On
Students established Target Met Target
parental consent for time
Assessed time line (e.g.
evaluation
school breaks)
265 188 53 88.7% 100% No
Data Source: June CASEMIS Submission Items District of Accountability, Birth Date, Referral Date, Parental Consent, Initial
Evaluation Date, Plan Type and Last IEP Date
Calculation: Number of students assessed within 60 days / (students assessed – students delayed) * 100

Indicator 12 - Part C to Part B Transition: Percent of children ages birth - two in each SELPA receiving special education under
IDEA Part C who were referred for assessment for special education under IDEA Part B, found eligible under Part B, and had an IEP
developed before their third birthdays. This is a SELPA level calculation.
No. Children
On Parental
Referred from On Time Percent On Time
Time Consent Target Met Target
Part C by Their Ineligible Eligible
Eligible Refusal
3rd Birthday
85 4 61 6 81.3% 100% N
Data Source: June CASEMIS Submission Items SELPA_code, Birth Date, Referral Date, Parental Consent, Initial Evaluation Date,
Plan Type and Last IEP Date
Calculation: Students On Time Eligible / (Children Referred – On Time Ineligible – Parental Consent Refused) * 100

NOTE: ‘NA’ indicates that the district did not submit data for this Indicator or the item is not applicable. ‘NC’ indicates that the item was not
calculated due to the Indicator having a denominator of less than 100 for Indicator 3 or 20 for all other Indicators.
ALAMEDA CITY UNIFIED School District Report Page 6 of 6

Você também pode gostar