Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305400540
CITATIONS READS
0 175
12 authors, including:
Joseph Dubois
GDF SUEZ
6 PUBLICATIONS 48 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Omar Abdalla on 19 July 2016.
** Tractebel Engineering
(Belgium)
3. METHODOLOGY
OETC and TE took as input the generation investments for 2030. This method enables to
expansion plan of OPWP but validated through a detect bottlenecks in the transmission system
capacity adequacy study that enough capacity is occurring for various operational situations selected
planned to supply the demand while respecting randomly throughout the whole year. These
planning criteria. calculations also enable to compute the total
expected un-served energy of the system, not only
The main planning criterion is the Loss of Load due to the generation but also due to the
Expectation (LOLE) and it was aligned on GCCIA transmission network.
requirement: LOLE of 24 h if OETC network is
isolated from GCC network and 5 h if OETC On basis of the bottlenecks identified several
network is interconnected. Results have shown that target structures of the transmission grid are built
generation capacity planned by OPWP covers by adding new transmission or transformation
adequately the demand up to 2025 and that some infrastructure and/or by changing the operation
additional capacity may be required after 2025 if switching structure of the network.
high scenario of demand forecast realizes.
This phase of the study is achieved on peak and
Also the capacity adequacy study analyzed the off peak situation. For this deterministic phase,
impact of the renewable energy on the generation security analysis, SCC evaluation, dynamic
expansion plan. A scenario of development of assessments are performed to ensure that all
renewable was considered with a target of 15% of proposed target structures meet the planning
renewable capacity by 2030. This capacity is criteria.
distributed among CSP, PV and wind and reaches a
total of 3 GW by 2030 as shown in Figure 4. Finally preferred target is selected on basis of
cost of investment and operational cost (mainly
The addition of renewable capacity allows losses)
substituting classic thermal capacity however the
ratio is not 1 for 1 due to intermittency of the 6.1 400kV Structure
renewable energy. For a constant LOLE, the
addition of 3 GW of renewable capacity allows By 2030, the power system of Oman will
substituting 800 MW of CCGT. present areas with significant excess of generation
capacity and other areas with high deficit of
6. 2030 TARGET STRUCTURE capacity, as shown in Figure 5. The reason is the
impossibility to locate major generation units close
As mentioned before the first stage of the TMP to load centers. Four areas will present excess
is the construction of the 2030 target structure. The above 1 GW: Shinas, Ibri, Mussanah and Sur.
combination of probabilistic and deterministic Three areas will have deficit of capacity above 1
models is used to propose the optimal structure. GW: Sohar, Muscat East and West.
The probabilistic approach is first used. It is As a direct consequence, flows above 1 GW are
performed by using the SCANNER tool [5]. The expected between the different areas. The level of
model uses the Monte Carlo method that enables to flows requires the construction of a 400kV network
analyze a very large number of operational among the areas.
situations selected randomly throughout the whole
year. The power system of OETC is simulated This network will rely on three main corridors
considering the existing and already foreseen as shown in Figure 6:
1) The coastal backbone, which is formed by a 6.2 Interconnection MIS Duqm Dhofar
double circuit 400kV OHL. This route will link
the northern areas, going from Muscat East area An 800 km, 400kV OHL is envisaged to
up to Mahdah area. It will pass by MIS- interconnect the main interconnected transmission
Mussanah, Sohar City and Shinas & SPS areas. system to Duqm Area and Dhofar System. The
The main purpose of the coastal backbone is to objective of this interconnection is first to improve
evacuate the power surplus of Shinas & SPS reliability of supply of Duqm that will be a major
and MIS-Mussanah areas to Muscat West and industrial site of Oman and Dhofar that is the main
East areas, which are important load demand city in the south of the country. Second by pooling
centres. It also enables to connect OETC the three generation systems, operational and
network to the GCCIA planned 400kV grid investment cost savings will be realised. As an
station at Mahdah and paves the way to a illustration figure, between 300 MW and 400 MW
possible interconnection to Iran; of installed capacity can be saved to keep the same
LOLE level. Third, this interconnection will allow
2) The inner-land backbone, which is formed by a increasing the level of penetration of renewable
double circuit 400kV OHL. This route will link energy in Dhofar and Duqm areas. Those areas
the southern areas, going from Nizwa area up to have high resources of renewable energy that
Ibri area. Its main goal is to evacuate the power cannot be fully exploited if the networks remain
surplus of Ibri area to Nizwa area; islanded.
3) The southern ring, which is composed of The interconnection will also bring new
OETCs planned 400kV structure for 2017, plus opportunities such as the development of coastal
one new double circuit 400kV OHL closing the investments between Duqm and Salalah or the
loop. This will result in a meshed 400kV interconnection of the OETC power system with
network that will increase the reliability of the Petroleum Development Oman power system.
supply of Muscat area.
In Muscat area, those measures could not limit the The Transmission Master Plan demonstrated that
short circuit currents to acceptable values, Therefore, capacitive shunt compensation does not solve the
OETC and TE opted to operate the 132kV network of voltage recovery problem, and thus recommended the
Muscat in pockets. A total of 6 pockets are proposed installation of Static VAR Compensators (SVC)s at
by 2030. Figure 7 shows the configuration of pockets identified 132kV locations.
in Muscat area. Each 132kV-pocket supplies a load
between 700 MW and 900 MW and is supplied by one The installation of SVCs is a good alternative to
or two 400/132kV or 220/132kV grid stations. Each generating units, as it does not increase the short-
pocket is connectable to neighbouring pocket to allow circuit current level. Nevertheless, the use of the SVCs
maintenance of main grid stations. With this pocket should be dedicated to dynamic voltage support, i.e.
arrangement, the SCC at all busbars are kept within the they shouldnt be used in healthy state in order to keep
GIS fault rating levels. sufficient margins.
8. DYNAMIC SECURITY ASSESSMENT The location and size of the SVCs has been
iteratively optimized in order to minimize the reactive
Dynamic security assessment of the 2030 structure requirements and respect the dynamic stability criteria.
has been conducted. The main conclusion was that A total of 640 MVAr of SVC will be required by 2030.
almost all short circuit fault simulation tests on 132kV,
220kV and 400kV transmission lines in Muscat area
Figure 7: Pocket operation in Muscat area.
p.u.
1.05
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.85
0.80
0.75
0.70
0.65
0.60
0.55
s
4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
[SPE0014 1@s0000 ] VOLTAGE AT NODE : Muttrah 132 kV Unit : p.u.
[SPE0014 1@s0000] VOLTAGE AT NODE : Hamriyah 132 kV Unit : p.u.
9. OPTIMAL POWER FLOW on the power plants, it can be seen from Figure 10 that
80% of power generating units have a reactive margin
All results presented in the transmission master plan above 40% after OPF while only 50% have the same
are based on operating points defined by an OPF level of reactive margin without the OPF.
module. OETC and TE demonstrated that the use of an
OPF for planning activities allow reducing investments 10. PHASING OF INVESTMENT
required by an optimal use of all control means. Indeed
the voltage profile on the network and the reactive The last stage of the TMP deals with the phasing of
margin on the power plants can be substantially the investments amongst the three intermediate years
improved by optimal use of tap changers, selected for this Master Plan (2018, 2020 and 2025).
compensation means, and voltage set point of The objective is to define for each intermediate year a
generating units as defined by an OPF. As a transmission system accommodating the generation
consequence, lower investment is required for voltage expansion, supplying the load demand and meeting the
support in the system. security criteria. The reinforcements proposed to solve
the identified limitations of the network and respect the
Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the gain of application of security criteria are selected from the target structures
the OPF on the 2017 situation. For a same total portfolio of reinforcements, in order to be in line with
generation of reactive power, the voltage profile is the long-term development scheme defined by the
optimised between 0.98 and 1.05 pu after the use of the 2030 target structure. Table 1 lists the distribution of
OPF while it was between 0.95 and 1.1 without OPF, the MTP estimated costs up to 2030.
as shown in Figure 9. Concerning the reactive margin
Voltage profile
1.1
1.05
Node voltage [pu]
0.95
0.9
105
113
121
129
137
145
153
161
169
177
185
193
201
209
217
225
1
9
17
25
33
41
49
57
65
73
81
89
97
Substations
Reactive Margin
1.2
1
Reactive production Q/Qmax
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35
-0.2
Generating units
Figure 10: Generation reactive power before and after application of OPF.