Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Downloaded on April 22,2010 at 14:46:55 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2
-I
90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180
Y (degrees)
-
Pig. 3 F u n k n t a l impedance of the GCSC as a function of the blocking
angle
ductor switches. This blocking angle y is measured from the
zero crossing of the line current. Fig. 2 shows typical current
Fig. 2 -Typical voltage and current waveforms of the GCSC and voltage waveforms for the GCSC of Fig. 1, for a given
than the TCSC, utilizes a smaller capacitor, does not need any blocking angle y. It is assumed that the transmission line cur-
reactor and, differently from the TCSC, does not have an in- tent, i,is sinusoidal. In order to avoid dc voltage components
trinsic internal resonance. For these reasons, the GCSC may in the series capacitor, during normal operation, the blocking
be a better solution in most situations where controlled series angle y should be greater than 90" and smaller than 180'.
compensation is required. One potentially interesting applica- Fig. 3 shows the relation between the fundamental imped-
tion of the GCSC is in the retrofitting of existing fixed series ance of the GCSC and the blocking angle y. A blocking angle
capacitors, making them FACTS devices. Another FACTS of 90" means that the capacitor is fully inserted in the circuit,
devices developed for series compensation is the SSSC (Static that is, the fundamental impedance is 1 p.u and the switches
Synchronous Series Compensator) which is based on voltage are turned off completely. On the other hand, if the blocking
source converters .[2]. This device presents high flexibility angle is 180",the switches are on full conduction, bypassing
level but has a much higher cost involved due to the complex- the capacitor, meaning a zero impedance. So, a continuous
ity of the converters. variation of the equivalent series capacitance of the GCSC is
This paper presents the GCSC, its main components, prin- achievable in the range of 90" < y < 180".
ciple of operation, typical waveforms and main applications. Referring again to Fig. 2, one can see that the voltage
An important issue discussed in this paper is the duality of the waveform in the capacitor is non-sinusoidal. Fig. 4 shows the
GCSC with the well-known TCR,largely used in static com- main harmonic components of the voltage waveforms as a
pensation. Some rating comparisons with the TCSC are pre- function of the blocking angle y. The voltages are in per-unit
sented, showing that the GCSC may have several advantages values of the capacitor maximum voltage. As the voltage in
over the TCSC. Technological problems and possible trends the GCSC is lower than the system voltage, depending on the
relating to the development of high-voltage and high-current compensation level, the harmonics will be proportionally
self-commutated valves ate also discussed. Results of ATP lower, in percent values, when converted to the system basis.
digital simulations are presented, showing time-responses of
the GCSC and proving its effectiveness in controlling power B. Prospective Applications
ffow through a meshed transmission system. The GCSC could be typically used in applications where a
TCSC is used today, mainly in the control of power flow and
11. GATECONTROLLED SERIES CAPACITOR damping of power oscillations. The GCSC may operate with
,
an open Ioop configuration, where it would simply control its
A. Principle of Operalion reactance, or in closed loop, controlling power flow or current
From Fig. 1, one can see that if the self-cornmutated in the line, or maintaining a constant compensation voltage
switches turn off, the capacitor is inserted in the circuit, com- [2]. Power Oscillation Damping schemes may also be easily
pensating the line inductance. When the switches are turned Hannonlcs In like GCSC
0.2, I
on, the capacitor is bypassed, canceling the compensation ef-
fect. The switches start to conduct only when their anode-
cathode voltage tends to become positive, exactly when the
capacitor voltage vc is zero. The line current i of the con- ow
trolled power line flows altemately through the switches and
the series capacitor. U1
The level of series compensation is given by the funda- 4 2
mental component of the capacitor voltage VC. This level may 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180
Y (&grreS)
be varied by controlling the blocking angle y of the semicon-
Fig.4 - Harmonic voltages in the GCSC as a function of the blocking angle y.
982
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Downloaded on April 22,2010 at 14:46:55 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
3
the fmt equipment in most situations where controllable series ctmn 183
~ringalgleNdeim=)
compensation is needed (see Section III). As research on the Fig. 5- Typical impedance characteristicof the TCSC.
GCSC is still under way, it is possible that a break-even MVA
rating is found, above which the TCSC will be more advanta- function of the firing angle a. The region where operation is
geous due to possible valves and protection requirements of allowed is shaded. The resonance is also shown in this figure.
the GCSC. The authors foreseen that the GCSC should also be , ,Z and Z, are the maximum and minimum values of the
impedance of the TCSC operating in the capacitive region.
a very interesting alternative for retrofitting fixed series ca-
pacitor installations, making them FACTS devices. Z, corresponds to the capacitive reactance oniy, that is, at
this point the thyristors do not conduct and the reactor is not
HI. DUALITY wml TZIE THYRISTOR CONTROLLED REACTOR present. , Z
, corresponds to the value of equivalent imped-
ance of the capacitor and the thyristor controlled reactor for
One interesting feature of the GCSC is that its operation is the minimum fuing angle ami,,. This angle is limited in order
exactly the dual of the well-known thyristor Controlled reactor to avoid the potentially dangerous operation near the parallel
( E R ) [2][3], used for shunt compensation, usually with a
resonance region.
fKed capacitor in parallel. In fact, one may easily observe that For the GCSC, the minimum reactance is equal to zero.
the voltage waveform o f the GCSC shown in Fig. 2 is similar
The maximum reactance, which corresponds to the capacitor
to current waveforms of the TCR (e.g., see [2] and [3]). Table
reactance, should be equal to Zmx of the TCSC to obtain the
1 shows a comparison between the dual characteristics of both
same maximum compensation level. The relationship between
equipment. The duality can easily be extended to the valves
[7],making it easier to understand the requisites of a GCSC capacitances of both devices is the following:
valve. Considering that the TCR is the dual of the GCSC and CCLX - 2"
that the former is a longtime adopted solution for controlled (1)
CTCX zm,
shunt compensation, one may conclude that the GCSC is the
natural solution for controlled series compensation.
Moreover, the same steady-state voltage is applied to both
the TCSC and GCSC capacitors. As for the current, it is al-
CHARACTERlSTlCS OF THE GCSC AND THE TCR
TABLE1 -DUAL ways higher in the TCSC than in the GCSC [XI, as the paral-
Gate Controlled Series Capacitor I Thyristor CothUed Reactor lel-connected TCR needs to boost the capacitor current in or-
D Semiconductor switches in S&condu& in
switches der to increase the capacitor voltage.
parallel witb a capacitor series with a reactor Besides needing a larger capacitor, the TCSC will also
L Series connected to transmis- Shunt connected to transmis- need a reactor that should be rated for the same current of the
sion lines sion lines valve. As a general conclusion, the GCSC needs less passive
ISupplied by a current source Supplied by a voltage source components, as its capacitor is much smaller, with lower cur-
ISwitches control amount of Switches control amount of rent rating, and it does not need any reactor at all.
current in the caDacitor voltage in the reactor The valve currents in the TCSC are always higher for de-
e Voltage controlled by switches' Current controlledby switches' vices where the relation between the maximum and minimum
blocking angle m g ansle impedance is greater than 2, what happens in most of the ex-
ISwitches 6re and block with Switches fire and block witb istent installations throughout the world [2][8]. On the other
zero voltage zero current hand, the GCSC valves should be rated for a voltage slightly
higher [XI.
B. Example ofcomparison the BruziIiun North-South Inter-
~
983
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Downloaded on April 22,2010 at 14:46:55 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
4
-
Fig. 6 GCSC connected to a current source
17KlD1
15WO
, , , , I
06 08 I 1.2 14 16 ia
damping power swings. time ( 5 )
For rating purposes, it was assumed that the GCSC should Pig.8 - Open loop responses of the GCSC and TCSC with low levels of com-
have the same maximum reactance and nominal Mvar of the pensation, varying f"35% to 45% at 800 ms, and back to 35% at 1.3s
TCSC. Also, it was assumed that the GCSC operates at the
same continuous effective reactance of the TCSC. It should be v. RE-SULTSOF DIGITAL fhdlLATIONS
pointed out that, although both devices have the same function
in the power system, they are quite different. For this reason, A. Time Responses
other designing strategies are possible for the GCSC, but it is The GCSC can rapidly vary its reactance, whenever its
beyond the scope of this paper to find an optimal designing blocking angle signal is varied. To demonstrate that, a simple
strategy. Table 2 Summarizes the basic characteristics of the system was modeled in the ATP simulation package, consist-
existing TCSC and a GCSC proposed to substitute it. ing of a GCSC fed by a current source, as shown in Fig. 6.
TABLE 2 -EXISTENT TcsC A N D PROFQSED wsc RATINGS FOR %AZIUAN The GCSC has a maximum reactance of 26.5 R. Initially, the
NORTH-SOUTH INTERCONNECTION
self-commutated switches are operating with a blocking angle
Parameter TCSC I ccsc j of 120". At Zooms, the compensation level is decreased by
Capacitor Reactance 13.27 i2 39.81R increasing the blocking angle to 150'. Then, at Moms, the
Capacitance 200 p 66.6 pF compensation level is returned to the initial value. The result
Max. Reactance 39.81 Q 39.81Q of the simulation is shown in Fig. 7.
Dynamic Control Range 13.27- 39.81 Cl 0 - 39.81 R The topology shown in Fig. 6, although very simple, is in-
Max. Fundamental Voltage 59.7 kV 59.7kV
teresting to analyze the dynamic behavior of the equipment, as
Max. RMS Voltage 60.3 kV 59.7kV
Max. RMS Capacitor Current 5025 A 1500 A
the only other element in the network is an ideal current
Max. Reactor Current (rms) 3735 A no reactor source. The same topology is used in the ATP to test both the
Max. Valve Current (rms) 3735 A 1500 A GCSC and TCSC of Table 2. The current source now has an
Mm.Voltage of the Valves 51.34I 59.73/ rms magnitude of 1500 A. In the fust simulation, each equip-
(rindpeak) 74.41kV 84.47 kV ment is compensating at low level (35% of X-). Next, the
compensation increases to 45% and decreases again to 35%.
Fig. 8 shows the fundamental voltage response of each
equipment to this input. Both equipment have similar open
loop responses at this level of compensation.
Another simulation was performed, with higher levels of
1.5
(kv)
1
0.5
4.5
0
-1
-1.5 0
E
0.1
)-I200
0.2
Time ( 5 )
I.
0.3
FI 50'
r
0.4
[ FI20'
t
=z
%?ow
40000
06 08 1 12
tune (SI
14 16
Fig 9 - Open loop responses of the GCSC and TCSC w~thhgh levefs of
IB
Fig.7 -
Time response of a GCSC connected to a current source compensation, varymg from 80% to 90% at BOO ms,and back to 80% at 13 s
984
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Downloaded on April 22,2010 at 14:46:55 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5
' Fig, 10 -Equivalent 500 kV and 765 LV Sy&m of the South of Brazil.
series compensation. Now the blocking angle is varied fiom power flows in both lines before and &er the increment of
80% to 90% and back to 80%, in a pattern similar to that of compensation by the GCSC. It i s clear that the device could
the previous simulation. The results are in Fig. 9. It is clear quickly establish power flow equilibrium between both lines.
that the TCSC is much slower than the GCSC at high levels of This test shows, in fact, that the GCSC can be used to control
compensation, i. e., with high currents af capacitor and reac- power flow at different levels, which can be chosen by the
tor. On the other hand, the open loop response of the GCSC system operator. Fig. 12 shows the voltage in the GCSC be-
does not differ too much from that shown in Fig. 8, with low fore and after the step in the compensation of Line 2.
level of series compensation.
VI. HIGH POWER SELF-COMMLJTATED VALVES: SOME
B. Power Flow Scheduling in a Meshed Network
,"OLOGlCAL T"Ds
Zn order to show the capability of the GCSC to control
The design of a reliable high power self-commutated
power flows, an ATP simulation of a meshed transmission
switch is of paramount importance for the development and
system was performed. The system, shown in Fig. 10, is an
manufacturing of a GCSC for an EHV transmission line. A
equivalent of part of the 500 kV and 750 kV South-Southeast
typical GCSC would he a multi-module equipment. Each
Brazilian Network. Transmission lines 1 and 2, both in
module might be designed to be a small GCSC cell, compris-
500 kV, form a loop-flow: PI in Line 1 is 50% higher than the
ing a relatively low voltage switch valve or even a single pair
P2 in Line 2. A GCSC, capable of compensate up to 80% of
of high power switches. Several GCSC cells could be con-
series reactance, is operating with about half of its capacity.
nected in series to form larger multi-module GCSC. The self-
The GCSC increases its compensation to the maximum,
commutated switch could be the GTO or, most likely, a more
thus boosting the power flow through line 2 and establishing
modern semiconductor device, like the IGCT. The switch has
the balance between the usage of both lines. Fig. 11 shows the
to be of the symmetrical type, in order to block reverse volt-
2000 I
I
j
. . .. I
l_._._.l_l_-..
F1400
E 50
5 l2O0
g o
::I
g 1000
400
03
,
04
- 05 06 07
; -50
time 6)
Fig I 1 - Power flows through Lines I and 2. after campensailon of Line 2
increases from 43%to 80% of the senes reactance
1 d
985
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Downloaded on April 22,2010 at 14:46:55 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
6
986
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Downloaded on April 22,2010 at 14:46:55 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.