Você está na página 1de 1

INSURANCE: Reinsurance - 01

Basil Maguigad
PHILAM vs. AUDITOR GENERAL The Court held in the negative stating that for an
G.R. No. L-19255, January 18, 1968|SANCHEZ, J., exemption to come into play, there must be a
reinsurance policy or, as in the reinsurance treaty
FACTS provided, a "reinsurance cession" which may be
automatic or facultative.
On January 1, 1950, Philippine American Life Insurance There should not be any misapprehension as to the
Company [Philamlife], a domestic life insurance distinction between a reinsurance treaty, on the one
corporation, and American International Reinsurance hand, and a reinsurance policy or a reinsurance
Company [Airco] of Pembroke, Bermuda, a corporation cession, on the other.
organized under the laws of the Republic of Panama,
entered into an agreement reinsurance treaty which . A reinsurance policy is thus a contract of indemnity one
provides in its paragraph 1, Article I, the following: insurer makes with another to protect the first insurer from
a risk it has already assumed. . . . In contradistinction a
Art. I. On and after the 1st day of January 1950, the reinsurance treaty is merely an agreement between two
Ceding Company [Philamlife] agrees to reinsure insurance companies whereby one agrees to cede and the
with AIRCO the entire first excess of such life other to accept reinsurance business pursuant to provisions
insurance on the lives of persons as may be written specified in the treaty. The practice of issuing policies by
by the Ceding Company under direct application insurance companies includes, among other things, the
over and above its maximum limit of retention for issuance of reinsurance policies on standard risks and also
life insurance, and AIRCO binds itself, subject to the on substandard risks under special arrangements.
terms and provisions of this agreement, to accept The lumping of the different agreements under a
such reinsurances on the same terms and for an contract has resulted in the term known to the insurance
amount not exceeding its maximum limit for world as "treaties." Such a treaty is, in fact, an agreement
automatic acceptance of life reinsurance. . . . between insurance companies to cover the different
situations described. Reinsurance treaties and
By the third paragraph of the same Article I, it is also reinsurance policies are not synonymous. Treaties are
stipulated that even though Philamlife "is already on a risk contracts for insurance; reinsurance policies or cessions
for its maximum retention under policies previously issued, . . . are contracts of insurance.
when new policies are applied for and issued
[Philamlife] can cede automatically any amount, within the Although the reinsurance treaty precedes the Margin
limits . . . specified, on the same terms on which it would be Law by over nine years nothing in that treaty obligates
willing to accept the risk for its own account, if it did not PHILAM to remit to AIRCO a fixed, certain, and
already have its limit of retention." obligatory sum by way of reinsurance premiums.

No question ever arose with respect to the remittances All that the reinsurance treaty provides on this point is
made by Philamlife to Airco before July 16, 1959, the that PHILAM "agrees to reinsure."
date of approval of the Margin Law. The treaty speaks of a probability; not a reality.
Subsequently, the Central Bank of the Philippines PHILAMs obligation to remit reinsurance premiums
collected the sum of P268,747.48 as foreign becomes fixed and definite upon the execution of
exchange margin on Philamlife remittances to Airco the reinsurance cession. Because, for every life
made subsequent to July 16, 1959. insurance policy surrendered to AIRCO, PHILAM
agrees to pay premium.
PHILAM then filed with the CB a claim for refund for the
same amount arguing that the reinsurance premiums It is only after a reinsurance cession is made that
remitted were paid on January 1950 and is therefore payment of reinsurance premium may be exacted, as it
exempt from the 25% foreign exchange margin fee. is only after PHILAM seeks to remit that reinsurance
The Acting legal counsel of the Monetary board premium that the obligation to pay the margin fee
resolved that reinsurance contracts entered into arises.
and approved by the Central Bank before July 17,
1959 are exempt from the payment of the 25%
foreign exchange margin, even if remittances
thereof are made after July 17, 1959.

Still the Auditor of the CB denied PHILAMs claim for


refund and reconsideration was denied, hence the
petition.

ISSUE(S)

Whether or not PHILAMs claim was covered by the


exemption (NO)

RULING

Você também pode gostar