Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Dual-phase steels (DP steels) consist of ferrite and a dispersed hard martensitic second phase in the form of
islands. Usually they are low-carbon low-alloy materials with 10-40 vol.% hard martensite or martensite-
austenite particles embedded in a ductile ferrite matrix. As they combine high strength and good formability at
low production costs they are widely used for automotive applications. Sometimes the martensite regions tend
to percolate or appear in the form of elongated bands which is not desirable. Increasing the volume fraction of
the hard second phase martensite generally increases the strength but sometimes reduces ductility.
Interaction between recrystallization and phase transformation during intercritical annealing in a cold-
rolled dual-phase steel: A cellular automaton model
Interaction between recrystallization and phase transformation during intercritical annealing in a cold-rolled
dual-phase steel: A cellular automaton model
Acta Materialia 61 (2013) 5504-5517
Acta-Materialia-2013-recrystallization a[...]
PDF-Dokument [966.7 KB]
High resolution in situ mapping of microstrain and microstructure evolution reveals damage resistance
criteria in dual phase steels
Acta Materialia 96 (2015) 399
High resolution in situ mapping of microstrain and microstructure evolution reveals damage resistance criteria
in dual phase steels
D. Yan, C C Tasan, D Raabe
Acta Materialia 96 (2015) 399 Yan Tasan [...]
PDF-Dokument [1.7 MB]
Acta Materialia 96 (2015) 399
High resolution in situ mapping of microstrain and microstructure evolution reveals damage resistance criteria in dual phase steels D.
Yan, C C Tasan, D Raabe
The drive toward improved combinations of high strength and ductilitymotivates the design of novel
alloys with complex, multi-phase micro-/nano-structures. Many of the recently introduced alloys demonstrate
this microstructural complexity, containing multiple phases of different composition, crystallography,
morphology, dispersion, stability and size.
Examples are ultrafine-grained ferritic-martensitic dual-phase (DP) steel [1],
alpha/gamma transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) steel [2], Triplex steel [3], TRIP-maraging
steel [4], beta/alpha two phase titanium alloys [5] and a/X magnesium alloys [6].
Such alloys present a composite-like micro-mechanical response, which in turn enables tuning optimal
combinations of strength and ductility by adjusting the phase fractions as well their individual
properties, interfaces and morphology.
However, incorporating phases of high mechanical contrast promotes the risk of micro-cracking at spots of
high stress and/or strain mismatch. This in turn may cause early mechanical softening, or even catastrophic
failure. Due to these reasons, damage evolution has been intensively studied in recent years
especially in DP steels [713]. Most common damage sites in DP steels are the martensite/ferrite interfaces
(M/F) or martensite island interiors (M) [9]. However, there are different views on exactly how these
mechanisms nucleate and interact with each other. Kang et al. [10] and Avramovic et al. [7] both reported that
the early-stage damage incidents are initiated inside M prior to percolative plastic instability, while other
damage mechanisms are activated following such mesoscale localization phenomena. However, Avramovic et
al. [7] also noted that M/F damage incidents play a more critical role for the overall properties. Maire et al.
observed a more balanced damage activity of M/F and M [11]. Recently, Hoefnagels et al. have carried out an
extensive analysis through quantitative characterization of the influence of the starting microstructure, strain
path and strain level on the resulting damage mechanisms [9]. The obtained experimental and simulation
results were explained in terms of a hypothesis that
proposes that the two mechanisms are intrinsically coupled, i.e., the M/F damage incidents are typically
initiated by M cracking. These contradicting views arise from the insufficient resolution in the analysis of
deformation and damage at the same position, with respect to their strong heterogeneity at microstructure-
scale [8,12,13]. Thus, it is required to introduce novel analysis methods, which make use of advanced high
resolution probing techniques of micro-mechanical processes during deformation.
We systematically study microstructures and micromechanics of multi-phase alloys that undergo
morphological and crystallographic changes upon deformation, corresponding to the associated microstructural
strain fields. The multiple length and time scales involved therein create immense complexity, especially when
microstructural damage mechanisms are also activated. An understanding of the relationship between
microstructure and damage initiation can often not be achieved by post-mortem microstructural
characterization alone. Here, we present a novel multi-probe analysis approach. It couples various scanning
electron microscopy methods to microscopic-digital image correlation (u-DIC), to overcome various
challenges associated with concurrent mapping of the deforming microstructure along with the associated
microstrain fields. For this purpose a contrast- and resolution-optimized l-DIC patterning method and a
selective pattern/microstructure imaging strategy were developed. They jointly enable imaging of
(i) microstructure-independent pattern maps and (ii) pattern-independent microstructure maps. We apply this
approach here to the study of damage nucleation in ferrite/martensite dual-phase (DP) steel. The analyses
provide four specific design guidelines for developing damage-resistant DP steels.
In dual-phase (DP) steels, inherited microstructures and elemental distributions affect the kinetics
and morphology of phase transformation phenomena and the mechanical properties of the final material. In
order to study the inheritance process, we selected two model materials with the same average DP steel
composition but with different initial microstructures, created by coiling at different temperatures after hot
rolling. These samples were submitted to a DP-steel heat treatment consisting of a short isothermal annealing
in the pure austenite region and a quenching process. The evolution of microstructure,
chemical composition and mechanical properties (hardness) during this treatment was investigated. The initial
samples had a bainiticmartensitic (B + M) microstructure for the material coiled at lower temperature and a
ferriticpearlitic (P + F) microstructure for that coiled at higher temperature. The
P + F microstructure had a much more inhomogeneous distribution of substitutional elements (in particular of
Mn) and of carbon. After complete heat treatment, both materials showed a typical DP microstructure
(martensite islands embedded in ferrite) but the P + F material showed lower hardness compared to
the B + M material. It was found that the inhomogeneous elemental distribution prevailed in the P + F material.
The inheritance process was studied by combining measurements of the elemental distribution by Wavelength-
Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDX), simulations of the evolution of the elemental composition via the
DICTRA (diffusion-controlled reactions) computer programme, dilatometry to observe the
kinetics of phase transformation, and observation and quantification of the microstructures by Electron
Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) measurements. For the P + F material it was found that the ac transformation
during annealing is slowed down in regions of lower Mn content and is therefore not completed. During the
subsequent cooling the incompletely autenitized material does not require ferrite nucleation and the ca
transformation starts at relative high temperatures. For B + M, in contrast, nucleation of ferrite is needed and
the transformation starts at lower temperatures. As a result the B + M mate-
rial develops a higher martensite content as well as a higher density of geometrically necessary dislocations
(GNDs). It is speculated that for the B + M material the ca transformation occurs through a bainitic (i.e. partly
displacive) process while the transformation at higher temperatures in the P + F material proceeds exclusively
in a diffusive way.
Strain localization and damage in dual phase steels investigated by coupled in-situ deformation
experiments and crystal plasticity simulations
Ferriticmartensitic dual phase (DP) steels deform spatially in a highly heterogeneous
manner, i.e. with strong strain and stress partitioning at the micro-scale. Such heterogeneity in local strain
evolution leads in turn to a spatially heterogeneous damage distribution, and thus, plays an important role in
the process of damage inheritance and fracture. To understand and improve DP steels, it is important to
identify connections between the observed strain and damage heterogeneity and the underlying
microstructural parameters, e.g. ferrite grain size, martensite distribution, martensite fraction, etc. In this work
we pursue this aim by conducting in-situ deformation experiments on two different DP steel grades, employing
two different microscopic-digital image correlation (lDIC) techniq
Int Journ Plast 2014 Tasan Roters Diehl [...]
PDF-Dokument [1.9 MB]
International Journal of
Plasticity 63 (2014) 198: Microstructures of (a) DP600 and (b) DP800 grades; see overview in: Tasan et al: Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.
2015. volume 45: pages 391-431
Tasan et al. Acta Materialia 81 (2014) 386: ICME on DP steels: Integrated experimentalsimulation
analysis of stress and strain partitioning in multiphase alloys
Acta Materialia 81 (2014) 386-400
Integrated experimentalsimulation analysis of stress and strain partitioning in multiphase alloys
C.C. Tasan, M. Diehl, D. Yan, C. Zambaldi, P. Shanthraj, F. Roters, D. Raabe
Tasan et al Acta Materialia vol 91 2014 [...]
PDF-Dokument [3.4 MB]
Acta Materialia 81 (2014) 386-400
Integrated experimentalsimulation analysis of stress and strain partitioning in multiphase alloys C.C. Tasan, M. Diehl, D. Yan, C.
Zambaldi, P. Shanthraj, F. Roters, D. Raabe; see overview in: Tasan et al: Annu. Rev. Mat
The mechanical response of multiphase alloys, specifically of dual phase steels (DP steels), is governed by
the microscopic strain and stress partitioning behavior among microstructural constituents. However, due
to limitations in the characterization of the partitioning that takes place at the submicron scale, microstructure
optimization of such alloys is typically based on evaluating the averaged response, referring to, for example,
macroscopic stress-strain curves. Here, a novel experimentalnumerical methodology is introduced to
strengthen the integrated understanding of the microstructureand mechanical properties of these alloys,
enabling joint analyses of deformation-induced evolution of the microstructure, and the strain and stress
distribution therein, down to submicron resolution. From the experiments, deformation-induced evolution of
(i) the microstructure, and (ii) the local strain distribution are concurrently captured, employing in situ
secondary electron imaging and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) (for the former), and microscopic-
digital image correlation (for the latter). From the simulations,
local strain as well as stress distributions are revealed, through 2-D full-field crystal plasticity (CP) simulations
conducted with an advanced spectral solver suitable for heterogeneous materials. The simulated model is
designed directly from the initial EBSD measurements, and the phase properties are obtained by additional
inverse CP simulations of nanoindentation experiments carried out on the original microstructure. The
experiments and simulations demonstrate good correlation in the proof-of-principle study conducted here on a
martensiteferrite dual-phase steel, and deviations are discussed in terms of limitations of the techniques
involved. Overall, the presented integrated computational materials engineering approach provides a vast
amount of well-correlated structural and mechanical data that enhance our understanding as well as the design
capabilities of multiphase alloys.
Acta Materialia 81
(2014) 386-400 Integrated experimentalsimulation analysis of stress and strain partitioning in multiphase alloys C.C. Tasan, M.
Diehl, D. Yan, C. Zambaldi, P. Shanthraj, F. Roters, D. Raabe
Orientation gradients and geometrically necessary dislocations in ultrafine grained dualphase steels
studied by 2D and 3D EBSD
Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 2738-2746
Mater_Science_Engin_A 527 (2010) 2738.pd[...]
PDF-Dokument [2.2 MB]
We study orientation gradients and geometrically necessary dislocations(GNDs) in two ultrafine
grained dualphase steels with different martensiteparticle size and volume fraction (24 vol.% and 38 vol.%).
The steel with higher martensite fraction has a lower elastic limit, a higher yield strength and a higher
tensile strength. These effects are attributed to the higher second phase fraction and the
inhomogeneous transformation strain accommodation in ferrite. The latter assumption is analyzed using
highresolution electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). We quantify orientation gradients, pattern
quality and GND density variations at ferriteferrite and ferritemartensite interfaces. Using 3D EBSD,
additional information is obtained about the effect of grain volume and of martensite distribution on strain
accommodation. Two methods are demonstrated to calculate the GND density from the EBSD data based on
the kernel average misorientation measure and on the dislocation density tensor, respectively. The
overall GND density is shown to increase with increasing total martensite fraction, decreasing grain volume,
and increasing martensite fraction in the vicinity of ferrite.
A number of key observation can be extracted form this project. These are:
Three low-carbon dual-phase steels with nearly constant martensite fraction around 30 vol.% martensite and
different ferrite grain sizes (1.2, 2.4 and 12.4 lm) were produced by applying hot deformation and large-strain
warm deformation
at different deformation temperatures, followed by intercritical annealing. Their deformation and
fracture mechanisms were studied based on tensile test data and microstructure observations. The BH
response was investigated for the UFG steel. Grain refinement leads to an increase in both yield strength and
tensile strength following a linear relationship of the HallPetch type. Uniform elongation and total elongation
are hardly affected. The initial strainhardening rate and the reduction in area increase as the grain size
decreases. The increase in the initial strain-hardening rate due to grain refinement is attributed to early
dislocation interactions, the high number of dislocation sources and the back stresses exerted by (i) martensite
islands and (ii) very small ferrite grains below 1 um3. Aging at 170 C (bake-hardening) of the UFG steel leads
to a strong increase in yield strength and a small decrease in tensile strength. Ductility is enhanced in terms of
uniform and total elongation. Reduction in area is improved by 22% (from 15.3% to 37.5%). These effects are
attributed to dislocation locking, relaxation of internal stresses, reduction in supersaturated interstitial
carbon content in ferrite and tempering effects in martensite. Grain refinement leads to plastic constraints in
the ferrite matrix, which is reflected by homogeneous planar slip-band arrays. Strain localization in CG ferrite
is
accomplished by wavy slip bands. The wavy slip mode leads to pronounced lattice rotations and early
formation of a substructure in CG ferrite, whereas the planar slip mode provokes less lattice rotations. The
plastic constraints in FG and UFG ferrite force martensite to deform plastically earlier during tensile
straining, whereas strain localization and subgrain formation are impeded.
The increase in strength at improved ductility due to grain refinement is attributed to the combined effect
of strengthened ferrite and enhanced toughness of martensite. This leads to less severe stress/strain
partitioning and
better interface cohesion. Grain refinement promotes ductile fracture mechanisms. Besides the beneficial
effects of less excess strain in ferrite
and less excess stress in martensite, the formation of martensite cracks and cleavage fracture in ferrite is
suppressed in the FG and UFG steels due to the small size, the more homogeneous distribution and the more
spherical shape of martensite islands.
Microstructure Control during Fabrication of Ultrafine Grained Dual-phase Steel: Characterization and
Effect of Intercritical Annealing Parameters
ISIJ International, Vol. 52 (2012), No. 5, pp. 874-883
ISIJ International Vol 52 (2012) 874 ult[...]
PDF-Dokument [514.4 KB]
An ultrafine grained (UFG) ferrite/cementite steel was subjected to intercritical annealing in order to obtain
an UFG ferrite/martensite dual-phase (DP) steel. The intercritical annealing parameters, namely, holding
temperature and time, heating rate, and cooling rate were varied independently by applying
dilatometer experiments. Microstructure characterization was performed using scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) and high-resolution electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). An EBSD data post-
processing routine is proposed that allows precise distinction between the ferrite and the martensite phase.
The sensitivity of the microstructure to the different annealing conditions is identified. As in conventional
DP steels, the martensite fraction and the ferrite grain size increase with intercritical annealing time and
temperature. Furthermore, the variations of the microstructure are explained in terms of the changes in phase
transformation kinetics due to grain refinement and the manganese enrichment in cementite during
warm deformation.
ISIJ International, Vol. 52 (2012), No.
5, pp. 874: Microstructure Control during Fabrication of Ultrafine Grained Dual-phase Steel; see overview in: Tasan et al: Annu. Rev.
Mater. Res. 2015. volume 45: pages 391-431
Dual-phase (DP) steels consisting of a soft ferrite matrix and typically 5-30 vol.-% of hard
martensite particles combine high strength with good formability and weldability. Therefore, they are
widely used for automotive applications [1]. Since their development three decades ago, the microstructure-
property relationships have been extensively studied [2]. In view of the increasing demands for occupant safety
and fuel efficiency, furtherstrengthening of DP steels without a loss in ductility is required. Grain refinement
is a promising method to achieve this aim [3-7]. In recent years, a variety of new processing routes has been
developed to produce ultrafine grained (UFG) low carbon steels with a ferrite grain size of 1 m and below
[8]. UFG DP steels have been produced by applying a two-step processing route consisting of 1) a deformation
treatment to produce UFG ferrite and finely dispersed cementite or pearlite and 2) a short intercritical annealing
in the ferrite/austenite two-phase field followed by quenching to transform all austenite into martensite. Grain
refinement in step 1) was achieved by severe plastic deformation [5] or advanced thermomechanical
processing routes [6,7,9]. It was consistently found that yield strength and tensile strength are increased
due to grain refinement, whereas uniform and total elongation are less affected. The strain hardening rate
was found to increase with decreasing grain size [5] which is in contrast to the observation of the very
restricted strain hardening rate in UFG low carbon ferrite/cementite steels [10]. As the number of investigations
is very limited, further research is necessary to understand the mechanical response of DP steels to ferrite
grain sizes close to or below 1 m. The aim of the present study is to shed new light on the deformation and
fracture mechanisms in a CG, FG and an UFG DP steel. In conjunction with tensile data, the microstructure
evolution during deformation and the fracture mechanisms were studied by using SEM and high-resolution
EBSD.
Here in this project large strain warm deformation at different temperatures and subsequent intercritical
annealing has been applied to obtain fine grained (FG, 2.4 m) and ultrafine grained (UFG, 1.2 m)
ferrite/martensite dual-phase (DP)
steels. Their mechanical properties were tested under tensile conditions and compared to a hot deformed
coarse grained (CG, 12.4 m) counterpart. Both yield strength and tensile strength follow a Hall-Petch type
linear relationship,
whereas uniform elongation and total elongation are hardly affected by grain refinement. The initial strain
hardening rate as well as the reduction in area increase with decreasing grain size. The deformation and
fracture behavior of the steels were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with
electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Slip band evolution was studied by multistep tensile tests. The
increase in strength at improved ductility is explained with the enhanced martensite plasticity as a result of
plastic constraints in UFG ferrite and the delayed formation of voids and martensite particle cracks due to the
more homogeneous distribution and more spherical shape of UFG martensite particles.
DP steel microstructure; see overview in: Tasan et al: Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2015.
volume 45: pages 391-431
Owing to a favorable combination of high strength and good formability, dual-phase (DP) steels are currently
receiving high interest in the automotive industry for low energy consumption vehicle design through weight
reduction [16]. The microstructure of DP steel is characterized by hard martensite islands dispersed in a soft
and ductile ferrite matrix [7]. To generate DP microstructures, a continuous annealing process that includes
reheating of a cold-rolled ferrite/pearlite microstructure followed by intercritical annealing is implemented to
form an austenite/ ferrite mixture, which after final quenching results in a DP microstructure [8]. During this
process, microstructure formation is determined by a number of interacting metallurgical phenomena, of which
ferrite recrystallization, austenite formation and carbon diffusion are the most important. What makes the
prediction of DP microstructures challenging is the fact that these phenomena may proceed consecutively or
simultaneously, i.e. complex local interactions between the metallurgical diffusion and transformation
phenomena occur. The nonlinear character of the phenomena involved minor changes in these interactions,
and this may have a profound influence on the resulting microstructure. On the other hand, from a
theoretical point of view, it is also an essential challenge to quantitatively understand and evaluate the
interdependence and competition between these two metallurgical processes. In earlier studies, such potential
interactions between recrystallization and phase transformation have been reported to occur for various
intercritically annealed steels on materials that had been initially cold rolled [911]. Yang et al. [9] observed
austenite nucleation both on grain boundaries of unrecrystallized ferrite and at the interfaces between
recrystallized and unrecrystallized grains. This work revealed an influence of ferrite recrystallization on the
formation and distribution of austenite. Huang et al. [10] systematically investigated the effect of the initial
heating rate on austenite formation and ferrite recrystallization
in two steels with chemical compositions that are typically used for DP and transformation-induced plasticity
(TRIP) steels. They suggested that there was a strong interaction between ferrite recrystallization and
austenite formation, which could affect the kinetics of austenite formation as well as its spatial distribution.
Their findings were recently verified by Azizi-Alizamini et al. [11] in a plain low-carbon steel, including a similar
morphology shift from randomly distributed to a banded structure of austenite when increasing the initial
heating rate. Despite these important findings and their potential practical relevance, further investigations of
such interaction phenomena as well as their potential effect on the final microstructure and properties of the
steels annealed in the intercritical region are still required. More specifically, the interaction between the two
metallurgical processes may cause property variations and makes it difficult to identify the relation between
direct thermal processing settings and the final product properties. However, the approach of integrated
microstructural simulation that includes all relevant metallurgical processes is ideally suited to provide the
desired insight for this problem, which hence enables us to conduct quantitative microstructure design for
optimal properties. With the recent development of mesoscale microstructure-based transformation models
[12], e.g. the cellular automaton (CA), the Monte Carlo (MC) and the phase field (PF), simulations can now
provide deeper insight into the mechanism and morphological complexity of both the phase transformation and
recrystallization in steels [13,14]. Numerical modeling is thus emerging as an alternative tool to investigate the
interaction mechanism of recrystallization and phase transformation in DP steels. Recently, Rudnizki et al. [15]
developed a PF model to describe the austenite formation from a ferritepearlite aggregate during the
annealing of a cold-rolled DP steel. However, their simulation started from an already recrystallized
microstructure. Hence, the approach did not consider the interaction between recrystallization and phase
transformation. Bos et al. [16,17] presented an integrated three-dimensional (3-D) CA model to describe the
through-process microstructure evolution during the entire processing of DP steels. In their model, simulation
of concurrent ferrite recrystallization and austenite formation was involved. However, their interest was placed
on the model development [16] and its usage on a study of the influence of individual transformation processes
on the final DP microstructure [17], whereas the interaction between recrystallization and phase transformation
was not addressed. Okuda et al. [18] performed an MC simulation to examine the competition between
recrystallization and transformation in several DP microstructures. However, their model did not involve
detailed thermodynamic
criteria of either recrystallization or phase transformation. In this work, we present a modified two-dimensional
(2-D) CA model to investigate the competition between ferrite recrystallization and austenitic
transformationduring the intercritical annealing of cold-rolled DP steels. In this model, discrete microstructural
constituents either in recrystallization or in phase transformation are depicted through involving relevant
thermodynamic criteria (stored deformation energy, chemical transformation driving force, etc.) and kinetic
effects (grain boundary mobility, carbon diffusion, etc.), so that a detailed microstructural insight into the mutual
interactions between these various metallurgical processes can be obtained. This model also enables us to
study the influence of initial heating rate and annealing temperature on subsequent isothermal transformation
kinetics and the associated microstructure evolution.
More specific, here the concurrent ferrite recrystallization and austenitic transformation during intercritical
annealing of cold-rolled DP steels is investigated by cellular automaton (CA) modeling. The simulations
provide insight into the microstructural phenomena that result from the interaction of primary recrystallization
and phase transformation. We find that the interaction between ferrite recrystallization and aus-tenite formation
affects not only the transformation kinetics but also the morphology and spatial distribution of the austenite.
From this we can interpret experimental data of the observed temperature-dependent hardness and its
dependence on the two metallurgical processes. The influence of the initial heating rate on subsequent
isothermal transformation kinetics and the microstructure evolution is also obtained by the model.
Ferriticmartensitic dual phase (DP) steels are finding multiple applications in the automotive industry. There
is, therefore, a permanent interest in further optimization of their microstructure aiming at lower energy
consumption in sheet metal forming operations, higher energy absorption during crash loading conditions, etc.
(Rashid, 1981; Llewellyn and Hillis, 1996; Calcagnotto et al., 2012; Bouaziz et al., 2013). Even when presence
of other phases such as retained austenite or bainite are not taken into account, the micromechanical behavior
of the composite-like dual phase microstructure of DP steels is rather complex (Tekoglu and Pardoen, 2010,
Tekog
Raabe et al presentation dual phase stee[...]
PDF-Dokument [11.7 MB]
Experimental and numerical study on geometrically necessary dislocations and non-homogeneous
mechanical properties of the ferrite phase in dual phase steels
Acta Materialia 59 (2011) 4387-4394
Experimental and numerical study on geometrically necessary dislocations and non-homogeneous mechanical
properties of the ferrite phase in dual phase steels
J. Kadkhodapour, S. Schmauder, D. Raabe, S. Ziaei-Rad, U. Weber, M. Calcagnotto
Acta Materialia 59 (2011) 4387-4394 dual[...]
PDF-Dokument [620.1 KB]
Acta Materialia 59 (2011) 4387-4394 Experimental and numerical study on geometrically necessary dislocations and non-
homogeneous mechanical properties of the ferrite phase in dual phase steels J. Kadkhodapour et al.;
Motivation for the development of dual phase steels:
Present day industrial applications of sheet metal forming require materials with high plastic deformation
potential and high strength. This goal is not easy to achieve, because usually an increase in the mechanical
characteristics of the sheet involves a reduction in its workability, in terms of ductility, drawability, and
formability. Despite these considerations, dual phase steels have good formabil-
ity with relatively high strength; in particular they have shown good ductility, continuous yielding followed
by rapid work hardening, a low yield to tensile strain ratio and non-aging behavior at ambient
temperature. Dual phase steels are low carbon micro-alloyed steels, characterized by a ferritic multiphase
structure in which martensite is dispersed. They have a purely ferrite matrix and about 530% martensite
dispersed in patches as a second phase. They behave like composite materials in which the ferrite matrix
ensures good cold formability,
while the martensite is the strengthening element. The correct proportions of the two phases allows a low
yielding stress, a high elongation value and a smooth flowstress curve with a high strain hardening coefficient
[1,2].
Hochfeste Sthle mit verbesserter Duktilitt Potentiale fr den Leichtbau High-strength steels with
improved ductility - potentials for lightweight engineering
Keynote Lecture, D. Raabe, Stahldialog, 06. Nov 2014, Congress Center Dsseldorf (CCD), Hochfeste Sthle
mit verbesserter Duktilitt Potentiale fr den Leichtbau
High-strength steels with improved ductility - potentials for lightweight engineering
Lecture Stahltag dual phase steel 2014.p[...]
PDF-Dokument [3.3 MB]