Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A THESIS
BY
Steve Weeks for hanging with me until the end. This isnt possible without you.
Julia Robinson and Robert Adams for advice and much appreciated guidance throughout
the project.
Linda Bryant
Mike Christenson
Marc Swackhamer
Terry Rafferty
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii
LIST OF FIGURES iv
LIST OF FIGURES v
THESIS OVERVIEW 1
SITE 4
PROGRAM 15
CONCLUSION 41
ii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
2 Jeff Robinson 2
3 Neighborhood children 2
4 Site Map 5
5 Cedar-Riverside Plaza 5
6 Site Context 6
20 Ralph Rapson 11
21 Process Models 20
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
22 Edge Energized 21
33 Encroachment 24
34 Relief, Retreat 25
36 Brion Cemetery 26
37 Brion Cemetery 26
FIGURE
46 Final Plan 34
48 West Elevation 35
49 Final Model 36
50 Final Model 36
53 Spatial Intensity 38
54 Spatial Intensity 38
v
thesis overview
1
THESIS OVERVIEW
The Cedar-Riverside-West Bank neighborhood has always been known for its diverse
2
My thesis project will be to design an urban
2
Center is suburban in that it fails to engage the community by using the suburban model
of buffer parking between the sidewalk and the building. The design of the Brian Coyle
is such that it has no real connection or reflection of the community. I would even go fur-
ther to state that one could take this community center and place it in virtually any park in
the city and it would fit. I am proposing a more urban solution that identifies directly
with the community at hand and that resonates the identity and character of the communi-
ty. An urban community center that is a designator of space and ideals and not merely an
object building in the park as is the Brian Community Center. There are many inherent
social and transit components associated with this site which will profoundly affect the
design of an urban community center. These are some of the propositions that must be
the community while at the same time being responsive to its urban context.
Designing an applicable architecture that serves the community, given the com-
In addition to being a designer, I have a vested interest in the project because I am a for-
mer resident of Riverside Plaza. As a user of this site I understand patterns of movement
in the community and have a strong emotional connection to the immediate community.
3
site
4
SITE
The urban context in which the site is housed is one of the many exciting aspects of the
project. The site is perched above the intersection of 35W and Washington Avenue
15th Avenue S. that runs along the east end of the site separating it from Cedar Riverside
Plaza. Located directly the east is the Cedar-Riverside housing complex. Existing struc-
tures on the site include the Brian Coyle Community Center, parking for the community
center, a swimming pool, basketball and tennis courts, a warming house for the pool, and
Cedar-Riverside Plaza
immigrants who worked in the lumber and flour mills along the Mississippi River. The
population peaked at twenty thousand in 1910, but as the milling industry declined so
5
Washington Avenue Brian Coyle Community Center
SITE
Currie Park
6
did the neighborhood. With the construction of I-35W and I-94, the neighborhood was
cut off from the rest of the city. In 1934 a city planning department concluded that next
to the Sumner Field area, Cedar-Riverside was in worse physical shape than any other
neighborhood in Minneapolis.
With Congress passing the 1968 Title IV New Community Legislation which provid-
were optimistic and ambitious reinforced by this statement they released at the time:
and racial groups will eventually move together and mix in Cedar-Riverside. The
imaginative use of the arts and quality human services is a practical demonstra-
tion of how rich and poor, young and old, might be brought together. Cedar-Riv-
erside will offer more than shelter, it will offer satisfaction to the individual who
contributes to the sense of life and vitality of the community and feels proud that
Rapsons Master Plan was extensive in scope. It was made up of five neighborhoods
connected by a trolley system and skyways. Four of the five neighborhoods were dedi-
cated to mixed income housing and the fifth was a community service center called The
Community Centrum. The Centrum was to contain a motor hotel, conference facilities,
7
Aerial Photo of Site
9
Southeast View of Brian Coyle Community Center
8
10
View of Downtown Looking West View Looking Down Proposed LRT Route
12 13
View across the street from the Community View of Site Looking West
Center 14 15
9
11
10
office, retail and commercial space, a community area, a performing arts facility, hous-
ing and parking. Had this master plan been constructed it would have contained 12,500
dwelling units, 1,500,000 square feet of commercial space and 56 acres of land desig-
The kit was comprised of elements such as panels, balcony Ralph Rapson 20
railings, sunscreens and awnings.
Since it welcomed its first guest in April of 1973, the complex has slowly deteriorated
due to lack of upkeep and maintenance. I had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Ralph
Rapson about Riverside Plaza and the Cedar-Riverside neighborhood. Initially, the
economic composition of the complex was to be a mix of student housing, market rate
housing and subsidized housing. But when the government stepped in, they made it
50% subsidized housing, a move that Mr. Rapson feels contributed to the deterioration
of the complex. It isnt that he necessarily believes that subsidized housing is a bad, but
it doesnt contribute to the balance of economic diversity he hoped for in the original
The surrounding neighborhood has taken an economic downturn in the last few years.
Many specialty shops, restaurants and other businesses have moved out of the neighbor-
hood, and just recently historic Dania Hall burned down. With many of the businesses
moving out, the neighborhood funded Cedarfest hasnt happened for the last two years
and there is a strong possibility that it might not happen this year as well. Cedarfest was
11
a festival that the community took pride in and came out in full force to support. The
lack of the festival, I feel has left a hole in the character of the community. Along these
lines, Mr. Rapson feels that the University of Minnesotas Carlson School and its in-
house dining components have hurt and closed many of the local restaurants.
Behind Riverside Plaza (to the west) is a series of one and two story poorly main-
tained buildings. Mr. Rapson sites that the property in which the buildings are sited are
owned by Riverside Plaza. The small buildings and businesses obtained permits in a
legal loophole and are engaged with Riverside Plaza and the city of Minneapolis in a
legal war. Mr. Rapson hopes that the owners of Riverside Plaza and the city prevail and
develop the land into low-rise affordable housing. According to Mr. Rapson, Riverside
The Brian Coyle Community Center is actually the inspiration for the body of work I am
embarking on. Ive always felt that the community center never fit the community and
that it felt out of place in the urban context it is currently housed in.
On January 31, 2001 I conducted an interview with Linda Bryant Director of the Brian
Coyle Community Center. Like myself, Linda Bryant has and still does live in the Cedar
Riverside neighborhood. She has lived in the community for 17 years and was heavily
involved in the planning of the Coyle Community Center. The Community Center is 7
years old and according to Bryant, they outgrew the building after two years.
There are many classes and programs that take place at the Community Center. Forty
percent of all programs are for educational purposes. Some of these programs include af-
ter school tutoring programs, GED classes, the Food Shelf, computer classes and English
As Second Language classes. In addition to these programs there several affiliate pro-
grams such as Americor housed in the Brian Coyle Community Center. After school tu-
toring takes place from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. and 4 to 6 p.m. The building was initially spon-
sored by the Pillsbury Corporation and the land and building are rented from the City of
12
Minneapolis at $1 a year. There is approximately 31 adjunct staff mostly compromised
of people from the Minneapolis Urban League and the Minneapolis Public School Dis-
trict. Sixty percent of the community centers budget is dedicated to staff. In addition
to the regular paid staff there are over 70 volunteers that work at the center throughout
the year helping with special events. Linda Bryant estimates that nearly 1,000 people
per day use the community center and that number naturally increases in the summer.
Bryant and I had an insightful conversation about the needs and issues of the com-
munity center and of the community as a whole. The Cedar Riverside neighborhood
diverse neighborhood, it has recently within the last couple of years seen a boom in the
and culture of the community through the architecture. After discussing the ever chang-
ing nature of the Cedar-Riverside neighborhood, this reflection of culture might not be
so evident in the exterior shell of the building, but rather within the interior components
of the building. Space within the community center was a major concern of Bryants.
Many community organizations lease space from the community center and there is not
the organizations, rooms must be shared which means that many of the paid staff of the
community centers often share office desk and are even housed in closets turned office
space. If she could have it her way Bryant stated that she would like more educational
facilities and programs to be added to the center. Her wish list included:
13
Art Room
Dance Studio
4 Mulit-Purpose Rooms
Library
The Park Board Community Caf would be owned by the Minneapolis Park Board and
they would lease the space from the community center. Bryant thought this would be a
nice way to have an informal retail component within the center. The proximity of the
basketball courts to the freeway is particularly troubling to her though there is a fence that
Bryant is also concerned about the Light Rail Transit and the intrusive nature it will
have on the site. She feels that the greenspace is an important component of the com-
munity center. Like myself, she questions the basic fundamentals of the LRT and whom
it is meant to serve. One question we posed in our conversation was, How does the LRT
This conversation only reinforced the notions of the community center not fitting physical
and spiritual needs of the community and that an urban solution for an urban community
center is needed.
14
program
15
Program
There are only two parks located in the Cedar-Riverside-West Bank neighborhood,
Currie Park (the site) and Murphy Square which is located in the far east corner of the
neighborhood. One of the things that make this site so interesting is the way in which
it exists in the urban context. It exists as a spatial relief to the density of Riverside Pla-
za. It is an urban oasis. The open greenspace of the site starkly contrast the concrete
density of Riverside Plaza and the unrelenting I-35W. It is a physical and mental relief,
and the proof is in the number of people that come to the site to gather, recreate,
socialize and celebrate. The program for the urban community center is a collection of
parts of sorts. It is pragmatic and functional on one hand and on the other it is based
16
Program for an Urban Community-Education Center
Art Room
Dance Studio
Small Theater
Computer Room
Library
Directors Office
Common Area/ Reception Area This space will be the knuckle or the fulcrum
of the building. This space should read as a place of arrival, a hub in the journey,
the main gathering space, a gallery space and most importantly should be one the
Reflection/ Retreat Room Thinking along the lines of oasis there should be a
room that is not about transition, but of dormancy, contemplation and rest. This
is a community where many people are social and political refugees. This would
Caf This component of the building serves the purpose of energizing the gath-
ering aspect of place. This space is something that can be directly accessible from
17
Designing an Urban
Community Center
18
Design Overview
I felt it was important for the building to resonate the identity, character and energy of
from countries around the world. When you stand in Currie park on any given sum-
mer day, you can feel the energy of the community within the park. There are people
gathering, children playing basketball, soccer and football and tennis. It is truly the
There were several main guiding principles in the design of the new community cen-
ter. Of course there was program, but there was also the idea that the new community
center should, in spirit represent and reflect energies of the animated oasis in which it
will sit in. A series of study models were developed to help understand the massing of
the program elements and guide design principles. The series of study models reflect
the five design principles and how they apply to the development of the new Urban
1. Energized Edge
2. Encroachment
3. Relief/ Retreat
19
PROCESS MODELS
edge energized
encroachment
relief/ retreat
21
animated space/
active components
engaging activities/
animated space
20
Edge Energized
existing community
to directly engage
most of the community activity or energy takes place. As the highlighted study model
suggest, I am proposing to create an edge or building faade that opens up to the park
physically and physiologically. This edge would be transparent in nature so that the peo-
ple in the park could see activities and events taking place in the community center and
vice versa. Along this energized edge would be program components like multi-purpose
activity rooms and the community caf. Along the exterior is a walkway which is an ex-
tension of the pedestrian corridor (formerly 5th street) that runs through Riverside Plaza.
the community is
through the Ce-
dar-Riverside Plaza
Pedestrian Corridor Connection to Site
right-of-way which
23
was at one time 5th street. I identified this axis as one of significance that could become
an armature of the experience of arriving at the site, circulating within the site and build-
If a cross section were taken from the park through the building, one would be able to see
how the edge of the building becomes blurred with the park and its activities. In the park
there would be people gathering and playing. The Seabird Island School is a precedent
21
I looked to for an energized edge along the
edges.
ture to the Sant Juan Bautista Museum in Seabird Islands Energized Edge
24
Ishinomaki City, Miyagi Japan. This is a
26 27
22
28
29 28
Approaching Site from East View of Right-of-Way Looking back
through Right-of-Way East
31 32
View of Site Looking West after View of Site from Currie Park Look-
exiting Right-Of-Way ing West
23
Encroachment
Encroachment
is a term used to
describe a certain
tectonic expression
Im seeking in the
building. There is
a theme beginning 33
to build in the design of the urban community center of blurred lines and interactive ele-
ments with park and building. Encroachment is about bringing this theme deeper into the
building. Instead of creating a clean layout of columns, I though it might be a bit more
interesting to let the columns be exposed and canted. The idea of canted columns is that
while they encroach on internal circulation space, they at the same time engergize what
might be a rather sterile corridor and also begin to create pockets of gathering between
wall and the columns. There is also the idea that the exposed beams are an expression of
bringing the outside to the inside. While at this time it is not certain if the building will
be a two story space, I am certain that there will be a two story tectonic expression of
encroachment.
Encroachment is how the form of the building is beginning to take shape. The ener-
gized edge and the more solid aspect of the building (the gym is represented as three
walls north of the columns in the model) collide with each other, further blurring delin-
24
Relief/ Retreat
to an early program
notion of creating
a reflection/ retreat
retreat room sketches). And as the concept of an outdoor room evolved, so did the notion
of the use of the room itself. This space evolved from an architecturally ideal space to
something that was a bit more pragmatic and that could actually be something that could
be used as a breakout space for community center activities. A recessed space is show in
this model as working idea. This recessed space however, makes the relief room feel like
a plaza or stage where occupants might feel like fish in a fish bowl being leered upon. A
that lead and bring you to various points of resolution and sym-
the design because like the Brion Cemetery the Urban Commu-
In addition to exploring the notion of relief/ retreat, this model Brion Cemetery 36
offices face 15th Avenue South. The gym and the office are the
the south side of the building is the grouping of the caf which
directly face the park and the multi-purpose rooms. The spaces
are glass and transparent and run along the entire south side/
park faade. The second floor of the south side is the library to
the west and classrooms to the east. The exterior skin of these
spaces want to be metallic and light to compliment the open- Brion Cemetery 37
ness of the south faade and also contrast the solids of the gym and one story office space
to the north and east respectively. The wedge shaped earth wall at the west end of the site
is a space delineator that separates the park from the retreat/relief space. It is a deliberate
shift in philosophy and materials from the glassy/ transparent south faade of the build-
26
Earth Wedge Space Delination 38
27
Early Plan Scheme - Arriving at Relief/ Retreat Space 39
28
Early Plan Scheme - Relationships and Adjacenies 40
29
Elevation Study Sketches 41
30
Animated Space/
Active Compo-
nents
I have been in
many community
many of these spaces was the contradiction between the essence of the program of a com-
munity center with the actual design of the building. Community centers are extraordi-
nary hubs of energy and program. When you walk through the doors of most community
centers you hear and see the program. Children talking and laughing, people gathering,
classes in session, teaching, learning, growing, etc. I wanted to bring the passion of the
program into the actual architecture of the spaces. This model of Animated Space/ Active
columns support
unparallel struc-
intensity to the
building. The
two-story spine of
31
has columns and beams flying everywhere. Children play, light dances and bounces
through and off the unbalanced off-rhythmic unbalanced structure. Animated space is
about letting the playful nature of the program of the urban community center guide the
design of the space. Animation isnt static, it isnt regulated to a linear system. Anima-
tion is playful, its fun, its dramatic and sometimes over the top and unjustified! When
I walk in an animated space, I dont want to see white hallways and systematic lighting,
I want to see, hear and feel the space. Strawberry Vale school by Patkau Architects is the
definition of spatial intensity. Canted structure breaks down corridors and in turn creates
32
Engaging Ac-
tivities/ Animated
Space
ing activities in
conjunction with
45
animated space.
This model takes the notions of gathering and spatial animation and allows these ideas
to encroach into the design of the program spaces. The animated structure erodes away
the skin of the walls and creates pockets of gathering spaces throughout the building.
Catwalks connect the library on the second floor at the end of the building to the gym
across the animated corridor. There is really no programmed space in the building that is
not visually or acoustically separated from anyone. This study brings all of the previous
studies together in what eventually becomes the design and layout of the building.
Plan
The final plan drawing of the building is a combination of the first floor and the second
floor plan. It is combined because I see the building as one place of active compo-
nents and interactive spaces. The second floor is only a name sake because the expe-
rience of the building isnt regulated to a floor by floor experience; it is a total spatial
experience. If you enter the building via the front entrance, you will see canted off-
rythmic columns, catwalks, a solid to the north in the gym, a glass dance studio at the
western end of the building and half height/ partial walls of the multipurpose rooms
to the south with a glimpses of Currie Park through the multipurpose rooms.
33
2 1
(4)
8 10 11
7
(5)
6 9
23 23
23 23
12 15
17
14 (16)
(18)
(13) 20
19
21
Final Plan
22
48
West Elevation
49
Final Model
50
36
Final Model Aerial Shot - Integration of the five design principles 51
52
Final Model View From Currie Park
37
Spatial Intensity
38 54
19
56
39
57
Section Model - Spatial Intensity
40
Conclusion
Community is a special thing. Many people live in neighborhoods but are not a part of
a community. This is what makes this neighborhood so special. A strong urban com-
munity deserves a community center that has a strong presence and evokes the identity
with the community at and resonates the identity and character of the community. This
community will continue to evolve and change as it has over the years as will the space
41
Notes
1. An interview with Linda Bryant director of the Brian Coyle Community Center
42
Bibliography
Carter, Brian (1994) Patkau Architects: Selected Projects 1983-1993: Vancouver: Tuns
Press
Hession, Jane King (1999) Ralph Rapson Sixty Years of Modern Design. Afton: Af-
Crippa, Maria Antonietta (1986) Carlo Scarpa : Theory, Design, Projects. Cambridge:
43