Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
According to the environmental changes that have increased, the need to implement a
comprehensive plan for dealing with these changes feels. The food industry is an industry that the
environment with fast-paced changes surround it .several models have been designed for strategic
planning. This article is related to use of freeman model using SWOT matrix and the priority of strategies
in a company of food industry with the metaphoric name of ABC Company. So at first, the view and
mission of company and its long-term and short-term goal are expressed. Then inaddition to analysis of
external environment of company, this environment is divided into ten parts. Then the major and minor
factors of considered industry using AHP in freeman model are privileged. After the SWOT analysis and
the determination of strategies, according to freeman model, the impact of each strategy on different
groups of freeman in company is determined and has priority base on the resulting scores.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The word strategy is taken of the Greek root of strategema meaning the army leader that
composed of stratos meaning army and ago meaning leader. This word initially used in military matters
and has entered in business and management issues in the second half of the twentieth century.
According to Mintzberg definition, strategy consists of the understanding of different dimensions of
industry structure and the foundations of competition (Mintzberg, 1992). Several models have been
designed for strategic planning such as Philips, SWOT, freeman, Space, Porter, and Bryson. In this study
the freeman models is used with SWOT matrix (Mintzberg 1992; Hussey 1998; Buller 1988; Dyson 2004).
FREEMAN MODEL
The freeman model is based on the effect of the strategy choose on the company beneficiary. In
this model, the expectations and demands of individuals and the groups inside and outside the
organization is considered. The approach that has been selectedin the freeman model is coordinated the
effectiveness of organization with satisfaction of beneficiary. In this model ,first all of beneficiary is
identified and the appropriate strategies is selected in order to ensure they are satisfied.According to
freeman ,the stability and the success of an organization is depended on the satisfaction of people and the
key groups associated with the organization (Buller 1988). Generally the theorists have identified eight
groups of beneficiary in organization that include:
1. The stockholder and the main owners that consider the benefit and credit of organization.
2. The managers and the staff of organization that seek the salaries, benefits, job promotion and job
satisfaction.
1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran (Corresponding author)
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran. morteza1362@gmail.com
CONCLUSION
In this study with implanting the stakeholder model and hierarchical analysis, main and sub-
criteria in a food industry are scored and are recognized as SWOT. In this applied hierarchal process,
main criteria are considered as criteria and subs as hierarchal factors. At the end of the six strategies, the
export strategy is the first priority, some steps of implanting the strategies is discussed.
REFERENCES
Mintzberg, H, "Five Ps for Strategy" in The Strategy Process, pp 12-19, H Mintzberg and JB Quinn eds.,
1992, Prentice-Hall International Editions, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
Hussey, D, Strategic management to strategic change, Strategic management (Fourth Edition), Chapter
30, 1998, 599-602.
Buller P.F, For successful strategic change: Blend OD practices with strategic managements.
Organizational Dynamics, 16(3), 1988.
Glaister K.W. & Falshaw J.R., Strategic Planning: Still Going Strong?, Long Range Planning, Vol.32, Issue
1, March 1999, PP. 107-116.
Dyson R.G., Strategic development and SWOT analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.
152, Issue 3, Feb. 2004, PP. 631-640.
Gao C.Y. & Peng D.H., Consolidating SWOT analysis with nonhomogeneous uncertain preference information,
Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 24, Issue 6, Aug. 2011, PP. 796-808.
Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ho, W., 2008. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - a literature review. European
Journal of Operational Research 186, 211228.
Bentez J., Delgado-Galvn X., Gutirrez J.A., & Izquierdo, J., Balancing consistency and expert judgment in
AHP, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2011.
Table 1: Freeman's four factors and determining the type of sub-factors using AHP.
Experience 0.051 S
Manageri 0.129
al Predicting power 0.129 O
Flexible 0.064 S
Technical 0.074 properties
High Technology 0.007 W
Repair and 0.004 T
Maintenance System
Human resource 0.113 O
skills
Low cost 0.067 S
Competiti 0.549 products
ve Wide number of 0.549 O
agents
Connections in 0.319 O
related organizations
Development 0.089 S
Export tax 0.248 O
Financial 0.248 benefits
Access to capital 0.024 W
when needed
Low cost material 0.004 T