Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Research Article
State of the Art on Cactus Additions in Alkaline Media as
Corrosion Inhibitors
Copyright 2012 A. A. Torres-Acosta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
This research in progress includes results on the corrosion performance of reinforcing steel in alkaline media when two dierent
dehydrated cacti (Opuntia ficus-indicaNopaland Aloe Vera) were used as additions in pH 12.5 and 13.3 solutions and in
concrete. The dehydrated cactus addition was mixed at dierent concentrations by either solution or cement mass (0.10%, 0.25%,
0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0%). Half-cell potentials and LPR measurements were performed at dierent time periods to characterize the
possible corrosion inhibiting eect of the cactus additions tested in such alkaline media. Results showed good corrosion inhibiting
eect of dehydrated Nopal on reinforcing steel, in all tested solutions, when chloride ions are present. Aloe Vera did show also
corrosion inhibiting improvements in some extent. The addition of such cactus led to an apparent formation of a denser and more
packed oxide/hydroxide surface layer on the steel surface that decreased corrosion activity. This oxide/hydroxide layer growth was
confirmed by microscopic evaluation of the metal surface layer performed at the end of the research program. The preliminary
findings suggest that adding Nopal at concentrations between 1% and 2%, by mass, might be suitable for durability enhancing
applications in alkaline media, especially in concrete structures.
solution (with pH of 13.2), and concrete specimens. All 2.4. Electrochemical Characterization. To characterize the
three alkaline medias were prepared with and without corrosion inhibiting eect of such natural additions on
natural organic addition (dehydrated Nopal or Aloe Vera). the steel rebar, half-cell potential and linear polarization
resistance (LPR) measurements were performed at dier-
ent time periods. Potential measurements in the solution
2.1. SCH Solution. The dehydrated Nopal addition was
cells were measured versus a saturated calomel electrode
mixed with SCH solutions at dierent percentages: 0.5,
(SCE) placed inside each cell. For concrete specimens, the
1.0, and 2.0% by solution weight. The electrochemical cell
measurements were performed using the activated titanium
included six 10 mm in diameter reinforcing bars (also known
IRE as the reference, and the values were converted into
as rebars). A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as
a known reference electrode scale such as a saturated cop-
a reference electrode. A stainless steel rod was introduced
per/copper sulfate (CSE) electrode. A Gamrys Reference 600
in the electrochemical cell during corrosion testing. During
potentiostat was used to measure the apparent polarization
experimentation, chlorides were added to the solution at
resistance (RP ) values of the rebar during all stages. The
a 0.04 M concentration after half-cell potential stabilization
potentiostat impressed potential was varied from the open
(21 days after rebar immersion).
circuit potential (OCP) in the cathodic direction, by an
amount of 20 mV with a scan rate of 0.05 mV/s. The RP value
2.2. SP Solution. In the SP solutions, the dehydrated Nopal of the rebar was estimated from the slope of the final portion
was added in percentages of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0% of the potential-current data, which normally was a straight
by solution weight. During experimentation, chlorides were line the last 10 mV of the scan.
added to both solution types at a 0.04 M concentration after
half-cell potential stabilization (60 days after rebar immer-
sion). The electrochemical cell included four reinforcing
3. Results
bars (10 mm in diameter). The same reference and counter 3.1. SCH and SP Solutions. Results to date show a good
electrodes as in SCH solutions were used during corrosion corrosion inhibiting eect of Nopal on reinforcing steel,
testing. in nominal 12,5 SCH and 13,2 ph SP solutions. Results
obtained from SCH solutions are based on the results
of a previous investigation performed by the authors [7]
2.3. Concrete. Ten 5 10 20 cm prisms were fabricated
and are shown in Figure 1. As observed from the half-cell
reinforced with two 10 mm in diameter reinforcing bars.
potential of the control rebar specimens, the values reached
The specimens included an activated titanium/titanium
passive potentials during the first hours, as compared
oxide internal reference electrode (IRE). Two prisms were
to the rebars immersed in Nopal-added solutions, which
fabricated without botanical additions (controls), four were
reached similar potential values after almost 20 days of
with Nopal additions (two prisms were fabricated with 1%
being immersed in such solutions. The arrows shown in
and two with 2%), and four with Aloe Vera additions
the same Figure 1 correspond to the time where chloride
(the same number and percentages as Nopal prisms). The
contamination was initiated by adding known amount of
concrete mixture properties are presented elsewhere [5]. To
NaCl to the electrochemical cell (see Figure 1). As observed
introduce in the concrete chloride contamination, wet-dry
from the same figure, after adding chlorides to the solution,
cycles procedure was implemented by partial immersion
no dierences were observed between the half-cell potential
of the concrete specimen in 3.5% chloride contaminated
values of neither control nor Nopal-added solutions.
solution (only one rebar was subjected to these wet-dry
Figure 2 shows the average polarization resistance (RP )
cycles). The wet stage lasted one week and the dry stage
measurements during the experimental stage (average of six
three weeks, giving ponding cycles of one month each. A
rebars). As observed from data in Figure 2, RP values increase
second set of twenty-four concrete prisms with the same
dimensions and embedded electrodes was fabricated to from average 40 k/cm2 for regular chloride-contaminated
corroborate results of the first set of specimens. In this case SCH solution, as compared with average 150 k/cm2 for
all the concrete prism was submerged in a 3.5% chloride Nopal-added, chloride-contaminated, SCH solutions. The
contaminated solution. The concrete mix used to fabricate results shown indicated that Nopal additions inhibit the
the specimens consisted of ordinary Portland cement (OPC, corrosion activity of reinforcing steel when chloride contam-
cement content 197 kg/m3 ), crushed dolomite as coarse ination is present.
aggregate (10 mm maximum nominal size), silica sand as Following the study, an additional surface visual survey
fine aggregate, and a w/c ratio of 0.50. A special mixture was performed to the rebars tested in these alkaline solutions
was prepared with puzzolanic cement (PPC, same content) as by checking the number of active zones present (pits) after
another control mixture, without Nopal additions. The addi- disassembling the electrochemical cells at the end of the
tion amounts were changed from the first set and included experimental stage. The results are shown in Figure 3. As
0.25%, 0.50%, and 1.0% by cement weight (%cw). Only observed from the results shown in Figure 3, a well-defined
Nopal additions were used for this second set of concrete trend was obtained where the Nopal additions acted as a pit
specimens. More details on the concrete mixture properties inhibitor. This supports the inhibiting action of Nopal in
and experimental procedure are presented elsewhere [6]. these kinds of chloride-contaminated solutions.
International Journal of Corrosion 3
0 6 0 6
Potential, E (V)
Potential, E (V)
0.2
NaCl (g L 1 )
4 0.2 4
NaCl (g L 1 )
0.4 2 0.4 2
0.6 0 0.6 0
0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150
Time (days) Time (days)
C1 C4 N051 N054
C2 C5 N052 N055
C3 C6 N053 N056
(a) Control (b) 0.5
0 6 0 6
Potential, E (V)
Potential, E (V)
0.2 0.2
NaCl (g L 1 )
4 4
NaCl (g L 1 )
0.4 2 0.4 2
0.6 0 0.6 0
0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150
Time (days) Time (days)
N101 N104 N201 N204
N102 N105 N202 N205
N103 N106 N203 N206
(c) 1.0 (d) 2.0
Figure 1: Half-cell potentials versus time of all SCH solution electrochemical cells [7].
3.2. SP Solution. Similar procedure as that for SCH solutions 3.3. Concrete. Results obtained from the first set of concrete
was followed for SP solution, with the only dierence prisms are based on the results of a previous investigation
that four rebars were used in each electrochemical cell, as performed by the authors [5]. Figure 6 shows the half-cell
compared to six rebars used in the SCH cells. Values of half- potentials as a function of time of typical measurements
cell potential for each rebar in each SP solution tested are obtained from no addition, 2% Nopal, 1% Nopal, 2% Aloe
shown in Figure 4. Vera, and 1% Aloe Vera concrete specimen. The data shown
Considering rebar corrosion activation when the half- in Figure 6 correspond to the potential values from the two
cell potential is more negative than 0,28 V versus SCE, the rebars from one concrete prism only: one rebar close to the
time where this value was reached was recorded (defined ponding pool and the other away from it. As a result one
as time of corrosion initiation, Ti ) for each one of the rebar presented active corrosion potential values, as chlorides
rebars in the electrochemical cell evaluated. A probabilistic reached this rebar depth, and the other rebar stayed passive
representation of such Ti values is shown in Figure 5, (potentials more positive than 0.35 V versus CSE).
where the lines represent the accumulative distribution of During the curing stage, the rebar average potentials were
Ti for each solution tested. A well defined trend is observed all similar ( 0.2 V versus CSE) regardless of concrete
from Figure 5, where the control rebars in the Nopal-free type (see Figure 6). At first stabilization stage the concrete
solution showed smaller Ti values (thicker line with black prisms were moved to a dryer environment from 95%
rhomboids). The rest values for Nopal-added solutions did RH in the curing chamber to 60% RH in laboratory
not present a defined trend as a function of the amount of environment. This gradual change from high to intermediate
added Nopal, but it is clear that the values of Ti increased as humidity changed the half-cell potential to more positive
compared to the ones for the control electrochemical cell. values ( +0.05 V versus CSE). During few minutes after
4 International Journal of Corrosion
10000 20
1000 15
NaCl concentration (g L 1 )
RP (kcm2 )
100 10
5
10 5
4
3
2
1
1
0 50 100 150
Time (days)
Control 1%
0.5% 2%
Figure 2: Average polarization resistance (RP ) values for all SCH electrochemical cells evaluated [7].
0.8
Cumulative fraction
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 5 10 15 20
Number of pits
Control 1%
0.5% 2%
Figure 3: Cumulative fraction of number of pits formed after the end of the experiment for all SCH electrochemical cells [7].
starting the first ponding, the rebar half-cell potential, closest increase in time Ti from about 3.5 days (in average) for the
to the ponding pool, decreased few mileivolts (0.05 V more control specimens (no additions) to almost 7 and 18 days
negative), as compared to the rebar away from the ponding (in average) after ponding started for Aloe Vera and Nopal
pool tha stayed in the same range of potential values. additions, respectively.
Based on ASTM C876 criterion where corrosion activity Since the concrete cover (2 cm) used is a high w/c ratio
of rebar in concrete might be initiated when the half-cell (0.7), the porosity of such concrete is high. Thus, the time
potential is 0.35 V, Figure 6 presents a threshold line of corrosion initiation is quite small as compared to other
which separates passive and active behavior of typical rebars investigations with 4 cm more dense cover concrete (low
in concrete. Thus, the time of corrosion initiation (or Ti ) is porosity with w/c < 0.4) where the activation took place after
estimated as the time when the half-cell potential value of the 3 to 5 months [8].
rebar is below such line. Table 1 lists the times of corrosion Figure 7 shows the average RP data (average of two)
initiation of all rebars closer to the ponding pool for each as a function of time for all mixtures tested. As observed
concrete cell. Based on the results obtained with this first in Figure 7, the average RP values for concrete without
set (average of two specimens only), there is an apparent additions in all stages were smaller than the average observed
International Journal of Corrosion 5
0 0
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
Potential, E (V)
Potential, E (V)
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.4
0.5 0.5
0.6 0.6
0.7 0.7
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (days) Time (days)
C1 C3 N010-1 N010-3
C2 C4 N010-2 N010-4
(a) Control (b) 0.10
0 0
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
Potential, E (V)
Potential, E (V)
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.4
0.5 0.5
0.6 0.6
0.7 0.7
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (days) Time (days)
N025-1 N025-3 N050-1 N050-3
N025-2 N025-4 N050-2 N050-4
(c) 0.25 (d) 0.50
0.8
Cumulative fraction
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Ti (days)
Control 0.5%
0.1% 1%
0.25% 2%
Figure 5: Cumulative fraction of the time of corrosion initiation (Ti ) for all SP electrochemical cells.
6 International Journal of Corrosion
0.2
Half-cell potential (V versus CSE)
Cement (control)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6 0.2
0.2
2% nopal 0.6
Half-cell potential (V versus CSE)
0 0.8
0 50 100 150 200
0.2 Time (days)
H1
0.4 H6
0.2
0.6 1% aloe vera
Half-cell potential (V versus CSE)
0
0.8
0 50 100 150 200 0.2
Time (days)
J3 0.4
J2
0.6
0.2
1% nopal
0.8
Half-cell potential (V versus CSE)
0.6
0.8
0 50 100 150 200
Time (days)
H9
K3
Figure 6: Half-cell potentials versus time of all concrete prisms tested. The arrow represents the time of corrosion initiation (or Ti ).
in concrete with additions. Special emphasis could be taken Based on the results obtained with these concrete prisms,
to the average data for 2% Nopal replacement concrete, a second set of specimens were fabricated with similar
where the RP estimate was high (2000 K-cm2 average) up geometry and number of electrodes embedded in the
to 140 days of testing time (after the 3rd wet cycle). This concrete (two steel rebars and one titanium IRE). Figure 8
will give smaller apparent corrosion rates of steel in chloride- shows the half-cell potentials as a function of time of
contaminated concrete when Nopal and Aloe Vera are added typical measurements obtained from no addition (OPC
to the concrete. only), 0.25% Nopal, 0.5% Nopal, and 1% Nopal concrete
International Journal of Corrosion 7
100000
1S
10000
2W 2D 3W
RP (kcm2 )
1000
2S
3D
100
10
1
50 100 150 200
Time (days)
Cement 2% aloe vera
2% nopal 1% aloe vera
1% nopal
Figure 7: Average polarization resistance (RP ) values versus time for all concrete electrochemical cells evaluated.
OPC 0.5N
0 0
Potential (V versus CSE)
0.2 0.2
0.4 0.4
0.6 0.6
0.8 0.8
0 100 200 300 400 0 100 200 300 400
Time (days) Time (days)
544A 542A 559A 565A
544 541 559 566A
542 541A 565 566
(a) (b)
0.25N 1N
0 0
Potential (V versus CSE)
Potential (V versus CSE)
0.2 0.2
0.4 0.4
0.6 0.6
0.8 0.8
0 100 200 300 400 0 100 200 300 400
Time (days) Time (days)
Figure 8: Half-cell potentials versus time of all second set of concrete specimens tested.
8 International Journal of Corrosion
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to Instituto Mexicano del
Transporte (Mexican Transportation Research Institute)
Queretaro, Mexico, for the financial support and research
scholarships provided to the Universidad Marista de Quere-
taro (Marist University of Queretaro) with Contract no.
IMT-QCC-33-03. The authors acknowledge Grupo Botanico
NAYEC, S.A. de C.V. and NOPALZIN S.A. de C.V. for
providing the tested products. Special thanks are due to
Jessica Herrera-Nunez Alejandro Perez-Gallardo, and Cesar
Celis-Mendoza, undergraduate students from the UNAM
(JHN) and Universidad Marista de Queretaro (APG, CCM),
for helping with the specimen preparation and monitoring.
The opinions and findings in this paper are those of the
authors and not necessarily those of the funding agencies.
References
[1] H. Ashassi-Sorkhabi, M. R. Majidi, and K. Seyyedi, Investi-
gation of inhibition eect of some amino acids against steel
corrosion in HCl solution, Applied Surface Science, vol. 225, no.
14, pp. 176185, 2004.
[2] A. Y. El-Etre, Inhibition of aluminum corrosion using Opuntia
extract, Corrosion Science, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 24852495, 2003.
[3] C. Saenz, E. Sepulveda, and B. Matsuhiro, Opuntia spp mu-
cilages: a functional component with industrial perspectives,
Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 275290, 2004.
[4] F. M. Goycoolea and A. Cardenas, Pectins from opuntia spp:
a short review, Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus
Development, vol. 5, pp. 1729, 2003.
[5] A. A. Torres-Acosta, M. Martnez-Madrid, D. C. Loveday, and
M. R. Silsbee, Nopal and aloe vera additions in concrete: elec-
trochemical behavior of the reinforcing steel, in Proceedings of
the Symposium New Developments in the Protection of Steel in
Concrete, no. 05269, Houston, Tex, USA, April 2005.
[6] A. A. Torres-Acosta, W. Martnez-Madrid, M. G. Lomeli-
Gonzalez, and A. Perez-Gallardo, Cactus-based additions as
corrosion inhibitor for reinforcing steel in concrete, Tech. Rep.
328, Instituto Mexicano del Transporte, Queretaro, Mexico,
2009.
[7] A. A. Torres-Acosta, Opuntia-Ficus-Indica (Nopal) mucilage
as a steel corrosion inhibitor in alkaline media, Journal of
Applied Electrochemistry, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 835841, 2007.
[8] N. S. Berke, M. P. Dallaire, M. C. Hicks, and R. J. Hoopes,
Corrosion of steel in cracked concrete, Corrosion, vol. 49, no.
11, pp. 934943, 1993.
Journal of International Journal of International Journal of Smart Materials Journal of
Nanotechnology
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Corrosion
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Polymer Science
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Composites
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Metallurgy
BioMed
Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Nanomaterials
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
Journal of Journal of
Materials
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Nanoparticles
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Nanomaterials
Journal of
Nanoscience
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Coatings
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Crystallography
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Ceramics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Textiles
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Volume 2014