Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
on
SPACE COLONISATION
Submitted to
Last but not least, I would like to thank the ASET staff members and Amity
school of engineering, in general, for extending a helping hand at every juncture
of need.
I will work harder and will produce more good work in near
future.
A.Abhiram
Certificate by the faculty
guide
Space colonisation
Definition
Materials
Energy
Transportation
Communication
Life support
Planetary locations
Methodology
Discussion
Reference
Introduction
Myself A.Abhiram worked for nearly 3 months to complete this term paper. I
really very much happy to take this kind of topic.
Going in to this topic space colonisation which is like a myth before but not
now....many countries are putting their ideas on this topic.
"I don't think the human race will survive the next thousand years, unless we spread
into space. There are too many accidents that can befall life on a single planet. But I'm
an optimist. We will reach out to the stars."
If man can populate the universe to a density of just one person per cubic light year, then, over
the next 100 billion years, we can enjoy some 10-to-the-40th-power man-years. This is very
conservative. From energy considerations the universe may be able to support as many as 10-
to-the-60th man-years. We have used up about a trillion so far, leaving us over 9.99 x 10-to-
the-59th man-years of productivity and happiness.
The point to be emphasized here is that to outlaw fission reactors, or to find another
method of waste disposal that is 100.00% reliable, would ultimately cost the society more
money and resources than it'd take to set up a colony. With backup colonies elsewhere, we
can still use fission reactors and take chances with present (but still very highly reliable)
methods of waste disposal.
The radioactive waste disposal illustration of course also applies to the SST, genetic research,
mass vaccinations, etc. The overriding concern is that mankind is presently in the unfavorable
position of taking shortcuts, yet not having parallel backup civilizations to carry on, thus
almost insuring the death of the human race in the next 10 or 100 years.
SPACE COLONISATION
DEFINITTION:
Space colonisation is the concept of permanent autonomous (self-
sufficient) human habitation of locations outside Earth. It is a major theme in science fiction,
as well as a long-term goal of various national space programs.
While many people think of space colonies on the Moon or Mars, others argue that the first
colonies will be in orbit. Several design groups at NASA and elsewhere have examined
orbital colony feasibility. They have determined that there are ample quantities of all the
necessary materials on the Moon and Near Earth Asteroids, that solar energy is readily
available in very large quantities, and that no new scientific breakthroughs are necessary,
although a great deal of engineering would be required.
For the resources of space to be tapped safely, conveniently and with minimum drain on the
productive capabilities of the colonists and Earth, the peculiarities of the configuration of
space must be understood.
Gravitation gives a shape to apparently featureless space; it produces hills and valleys as
important to prospective settlers in space as any shape of earthly terrain was to terrestrial
settlers. In terms of the work that must be done to escape into space from its surface, each
massive body, such as the Earth and the Moon, sits at the bottom of a completely encircled
gravitational valley. The more massive the body, the deeper is this valley or well. The Earth's
well is 22 times deeper than that of the Moon. Matter can be more easily lifted into space
from the Moon than from the Earth, and this fact will be of considerable importance to
colonists in deciding from where to get their resources.
Of course, if a planet is nearby and is rich in resources, a colony might find the effort
justified. Consequently, the Earth could be an important source of material to a colony in its
vicinity, especially of the elements hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen that are not available in
sufficient amounts elsewhere near Earth.
Asteroids offer some interesting possibilities. They have very shallow gravitational wells;
some come closer to Earth than Mars; and some asteroids may contain appreciable amounts
of hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen as well as other useful minerals .Moving in well
determined orbits which could be reached relatively easily, the asteroids may become
exceptionally valuable resources, especially those that contain appreciable amounts of water
ice and carbonaceous chondrite.
• Transportation: This is the key to any space endeavor. Present launch costs are
very high, $2,000 to $ 14,000 per pound from Earth to Low Earth Orbit (LEO). To
settle space we need much better launch vehicles and must avoid serious damage to
the atmosphere from the thousands, perhaps millions, of launches required. One
possibility is airbreathing hypersonic air/spacecraft under development by NASA and
others.
• Communication:
• Life support:
Survival
Someday the Earth will become uninhabitable. Before then humanity must move off the
planet or become extinct. One potential near term disaster is collision with a large comet or
asteroid. Such a collision could kill billions of people. Large collisions have occured in the
past, destroying many species. Future collisions are inevitable, although we don't know when.
PLANETARY LOCATIONS
Among extraterrestrial bodies in our solar system, Mars is singular in that it possesses all the
raw materials required to support not only life, but a new branch of human civilization.
The Moon is also deficient in about half the metals of interest to industrial society (copper,
for example), as well as many other elements of interest such as sulfur and phosphorus. Mars
has every required element in abundance. Moreover, on Mars, as on Earth, hydrologic and
volcanic processes have occurred that are likely to have consolidated various elements into
local concentrations of high-grade mineral ore. Indeed, the geologic history of Mars has been
compared to that of Africa, with very optimistic inferences as to its mineral wealth implied as
a corollary. In contrast, the Moon has had virtually no history of water or volcanic action,
with the result that it is basically composed of trash rocks with very little differentiation into
ores that represent useful concentrations of anything interesting.
But the biggest problem with the Moon, as with all other airless planetary bodies and
proposed artificial free-space colonies, is that sunlight is not available in a form useful for
growing
crops. A single acre of plants on Earth requires four megawatts of sunlight power, a square
kilometer needs 1,000 MW. The entire world put together does not produce enough electrical
power to illuminate the farms of the state of Rhode Island, that agricultural giant.
But on Mars there is an atmosphere thick enough to protect crops grown on the surface from
solar flare. Therefore, thin-walled inflatable plastic greenhouses protected by unpressurized
UV-resistant hard-plastic shield domes can be used to rapidly create cropland on the surface.
There are a number of reasons that the Moon is the best place to start space colonization, but
the basis of most of them are its proximity to the Earth. Most of these stem from the cost of
access to the Moon. There are also important engineering, economic and political advantages
to starting colonization with the Moon. Before discussing the advantages of the Moon, let’s
analyze what a full-court press for Mars colonization looks like.
There are many supporting reasons to go to the Moon. Consider three categories of
justification: engineering, economics, and politics.
The Moon may make a Mars
colony feasible or desirable, thus
enabling three branches of
humanity.
Methodology
Space also offers riches: great resources of matter and energy. Their full extent
and how they might be used are not altogether clear today. It is likely that solar
energy collected in space, converted to electricity, and beamed to Earth would
be of great value. The manufacture of the satellite power stations to bring this
energy to Earth and of other commercial activities that use the abundant solar
energy, the high vacuum, and the weightlessness available in space, might bring
substantial returns to investors. It seems possible that the historic
industrialization of Earth might expand and go forward in space without the
unpleasant impacts on the Earth's environment that increasingly trouble
mankind. On the other hand, the potential of space must not detract from efforts
to conserve terrestrial resources and improve the quality of life on Earth.
On the basis of this 10-week study of the colonization of space there seems to
be no insurmountable problems to prevent humans from living in space.
However, there are problems, both many and large, but they can be solved with
technology available now or through future technical advances. The people of
Earth have both the knowledge and resources to colonize space.
It is the principal conclusion of the study group that the United States, possibly
in cooperation with other nations, should take specific steps toward that goal of
space colonisation.
Discussion
The Moon is a very interesting destination in its own right. Being closer to the Earth
creates engineering, economic, and political opportunities. The Moon may make a
Mars colony feasible or desirable, thus enabling three branches of humanity. A lunar
colony can use much more mass imported from Earth and more flexible and capable
engineering.
by Dwayne Day
Monday, May 18, 2009
Today it’s a little hard to grasp what the world was like in the pre-Internet age without
sounding like grandpa’s stories about having to walk ten miles to school, through raging
snowstorms, uphill, both ways. But there was a time when information was relatively scarce
and either you expended a great deal of effort to gather it, or you relied upon it
serendipitously finding you. Although I’ve never seen it mentioned anywhere, my suspicion
is that the first exposure many Americans had to the concept of colonies in space came in the
summer of 1976 when the July issue of National Geographic showed up in their mailboxes.
The issue contained an article by Isaac Asimov about life on a space colony 50 years in the
future.
Asimov’s article, “The Next Frontier?” and illustrated by Pierre Mion, was written as a first-
person account of a visit to an L-5 colony in the far-distant future of 2026. The account is
mostly description: the National Geographicreporter is met by the colony’s director George
Fenton, who shows him around and explains how everything works. Asimov experiences the
gradual onset of simulated gravity as he travels from the arrival hub down a spoke to the
colony’s rim. The colony is nearly 1,800 meters in diameter and houses 10,000 people.
Then of course there is the explanation of how all of this is possible. The manufacturing of
solar power stations to supply Earth is a major economic driver, but “old news” according to
Fenton. Instead, their newest industry is the growing of crystals and the manufacture of
microcomputer circuitry. But, Fenton adds, for a long time to come the primary activity of the
colonists will be building other colonies. Asimov adds that it will be a long time, if ever,
before the population of the colonies exceeds the population of Earth.
Lest anyone think that this article was “science fiction” (the editor placed that term in quotes,
somewhat in the same way that you put a dead fish in a trash bag), a footnote declares that in
only a month’s time NASA would publish a new report: “Space Colonization: A Design
Study”. Clearly, space colonies were a probable part of America’s future.
Yesterday’s tomorrows
One of the common knocks against science fiction stories is that they do a poor job of
predicting the future—critics gloated that the year 2001 came and went and there were no
spinning space stations, only terrorism and falling towers. Of course, the legitimate defense is
that science fiction writers are not trying to predict the future, only tell a story. But in the case
of Asimov’s National Geographicarticle, the famed author was trying to predict what looked
—in that heady bicentennial year—to be a realistic possible future only a few decades away.
The July 1976 issue also included an article titled “Five Noted Thinkers Explore the Future”:
interviews with experts, including Asimov, speculating about the turn of the century, only 25
years away. Their predictions were a mixed bag, but a common theme was a focus on the
future of the city, which many of them thought was good at a time when American cities
were in crisis. New York, after all, had nearly declared bankruptcy a year before.
Future’s past
Although he never said it in his interview or the article, Asimov was writing about the ideas
of an emerging American social movement. His article reflected the influences of people like
Gerard K. O’Neill (who is not mentioned) and the then-exciting concept that normal people
—construction workers, welders, farmers, rabbit-slaughterers—could soon live and work in
space. Pierre Mion’s illustrations of the colony show a gleaming city street that looks much
like a midwestern American city, where the dominant male fashion is the jumpsuit, and
women still wear miniskirts and denim short-shorts.
Within a very short time after Asimov’s article, O’Neill would publish The High Frontier, the
L-5 Society would gain more members, and the pro-space colonization idea would form into
a genuine movement.
Looking back over three decades to a time when this movement was just forming the most
glaring conclusion is that it never really caught on. It never transformed into a true mass
movement with broad appeal, millions of members, elected representatives in the
government, and a clear legislative, social and economic agenda. Why was that?
Looking back over three decades
to a time when this movement was
just forming the most glaring
conclusion is that it never really
caught on. Why was that?
Of course, many of the movement’s early members
will blame NASA. O’Neill’s space colony vision depended upon cheap spaceflight heralded
by the Space Shuttle, and we all know how that worked out. Certainly, once the shuttles
proved to be cranky and expensive, a lot of the public enthusiasm for space colonization
subsided. Some people stuck with it, and became bitter. Many simply gave up.
The space colonization movement was, at its most basic, a utopian movement. Like all
utopian movements, it had a short-term appeal that was more emotional than logical, and
depended upon people being susceptible to the vision that it promised. It didn’t make many
converts.
As the Sun expands, it will destroy Mercury, Venus and possibly the Earth.
Even if our planet is not completely destroyed by the aging sun, its
surface will become dry and inhospitably hot. The familiar and unique
aqueous conditions that have so rarely supported life and our own
evolution will no longer exist. Instead of a lush green, water soaked
world, planet earth will be a hostile, radiation baked, and lifeless
planet and the human race will face its greatest challenge of all time:
its continued survival in an alien universe.
Over the course of 150,000 years [The oldest Homo sapiens, Fossils push
human emergence back to 195,000 years ago, University of Utah Public
Relations, 16-Feb-2005 .
REFERNCE
The Case for Colonizing Mars
by Robert Zubrin
From Ad Astra July/August 1996
by Oscar Falconi
Colonies in Space
by T. A. Heppenheimer
http://hawking.org.uk/
http://www.thespacereview.com