Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
SURFACE ROUGHNESS
• Hashish [2,5] indicated that the milling of aluminium alloy with 180_m (80#) garnet grit resulted in a
surface roughness of 20_m, whilst milling with 100_m (150#) grit resulted in a surface roughness of only
13 _m. Li et al. [7] also suggested that the use of smaller grit reduced the surface roughness (Ra) value.
• They demonstrated that at impingement angles of 90◦ the surface roughness is at a maximum value for
most materials and decreases as the impingement angle decreases.
• Surface roughness is also material dependent. Under fixed milling conditions, Li et al. [7] observed a
surface roughness (Ra) value of 4.0 _m on an aluminium alloy, whereas that developed in a titanium alloy
was only 3.0 _m.
• The traverse speed of the jet over the workpiece also has a strong influence on its surface finish. Ojmertz
[9] has shown that low traverse speeds result in an irregular surface morphology of the milled area but that
despite this, lower surface roughness values are observed.
SURFACE WAVINESS
• He also demonstrated that surface waviness improves significantly (i.e. is reduced) by increase of traverse
speed up to 0.01ms−1 (600mmmin−1) but that further increases in traverse speed yield only small
improvements. However, Hashish [5] suggested that the traverse speed must exceed a higher critical value
(0.016ms−1 (960mmmin−1)) to achieve surface uniformity (i.e. a low surface waviness).
MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE
• Traverse speed also affects the volumetric material removal rate. Hashish [1,5] found that the material
removal rate in the milling of aluminium alloy was approximately constant for jet traverse speeds between
0.5 and 5ms−1. Ojmertz [9] also reported a constant volumetric removal rate for a lower range of traverse
speeds between 0.005ms−1 (300mmmin−1) and 0.26ms−1 (1560mmmin−1). However, he demonstrated
that lower traverse speeds resulted in significantly increased material removal rates but also resulted in high
surface waviness. He concluded that the high traverse speeds required for controlling the depth and
waviness resulted in low volumetric removal rates.
• The grit size also affects the material removal rate. Hashish [1] suggests that the volumetric removal rate is
independent of grit size for larger grits, but then decreases as the grit size falls to 100_mand below.
Fig. 1 shows the effect of traverse speed on material removal rate for the two grit sizes. It can be seen that material
removal rate (Ed) for both grit sizes is high at the lowest traverse speed examined and decreases rapidly with
increasing traverse speed.
Fig. 3 shows the effect of jet–workpiece traverse speed on the surfacewaviness of the kerf for the two grit sizes. It
can be seen that an increase in traverse speed results in a reduction in surface waviness for both grit sizes, with the
reduction being most significant for the larger grit (Fig. 3a). It can also be seen that at all traverse speeds, the surface
waviness is greater with the larger grit than with the smaller grit.
Fig. 7 shows the effect of traverse speed on the surface roughness of the bottom of the kerf, with single jet passes in
the case of linear milling and twenty passes of the jet for the rotary milling. It can be seen that increasing the
traverse speed results in an increase in kerf roughness.
Fig. 8 shows the development of depth of cut with multiple passes of the nozzle across the workpiece with both
large and small grit sizes at two traverse speeds. It can be seen that in all cases, the cumulative depth of cut
increased linearly with number of passes. In a similar manner to Fig. 1, it can be seen that the material removal rate
is always higher with the larger grit size and is significantly higher at the lower traverse speed.
Fig. 9 shows the development of surface waviness with multiple passes of the nozzle across the workpiece at two
traverse speeds with both large (Fig. 9a) and small (Fig. 9b) grit sizes. It can be seen that there is a general increase
in waviness with number of passes and thus with depth of cut. For both grit sizes, the waviness is significantly
higher at the lower traverse speeds.
Fig. 10 shows the development of surface roughness with multiple passes of the nozzle across the workpiece at two
traverse speeds with both large (Fig. 10a) and small (Fig. 10b) grit sizes. For both sizes of grit, the surface roughness
does not change significantly with number of passes and thus with depth of cut. The surface roughness is not
strongly dependent on traverse speed; however, the roughness developed with the 180_m (80#) grit is around 5_m
whereas that developed with the 75_m (200#) grit is round 3.5_m.
• It has been shown that the traverse speed, grit size and number of passes of the jet all
influence changes in the way that the material is removed in the AJW milling of titanium,
and that in selecting parameters, some compromise must be made, primarily between
maximization of material removal rate and minimization of surface waviness.
• At low jet traverse speeds, the jet cuts primarily on the leading edge of the kerf and is
then channelled along the slot to produce a directional morphology; this results in high
material removal rates but also in high surface waviness.
• Surface waviness is observed to increase significantly with number of passes of the jet at
lower traverse speed, while the surface roughness is independent of number of passes.
• High traverse speeds result in lower material removal rates as material is removed
primarily by high angle impingement. Here, little directionality in the surface
morphology is observed on the bottom of the kerf; the surface roughness is higher, but
there is a significant reduction in the surface waviness compared to milling at low
traverse speed.
• For the two grit sizes examined, the material removal rate, surface roughness and surface
waviness was lower for smaller grit. However, when cuts were made to the same depth
with the two grit sizes, the differences in waviness for the two sizes was less at the higher
traverse speeds than at the lower traverse speeds. The smaller grit size gave a surface
waviness value between 55 and 70% of that of the larger grit.
A study of taper angles and material removal
rates of drilled holes in the abrasive water jet
machining process
(1) The material removal increases with the increase in S-O-D, up to certain limit and further
increase in the S-O-D beyond the limit results in decrease of the material removal.
(2) The material removal was found to be more in presence of chemically active liquids such as
acetone and phosphoric acid rather than plain water in the slurry.
(3) The material removal was identified to be the highest in the case of a slurry mixed with
polymer (polyacrylamide) rather than other two chemical environments used in the experiments.
(4) The slurry with a polymer combination shows a continuous increase in material removal with
a variation in the chemical concentration.
(5) The chemical concentration was observed to be having an influence over the taper of the
holes produced. The hole taper in case of polymer combination showed almost nil taper.
Abrasive jet polishing on SKD61 mold steel using
SiC coated with Wax
The results show that the use of wax-coated abrasive particles reduces the polishing time and achieves an
improved surface finish.
Fig. 6(b) shows that irrespective of the amount of machining oil added to the pure water-solvent, the material
removal rate is significantly lower than that achieved using pure water only. This suggests that the addition of
machining oil reduces the cutting force applied to the workpiece surface by the abrasive particles. This is beneficial
from a polishing point of view since it not only reduces the depth of the scratches produced on the workpiece
surface during the blasting process, but also delays the onset of the surface hardening effect with the result that an
improved surface quality can be obtained.