Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Characterisation to Control
Blast-induced Vibrations
E Hamdi1 and A Karrech2
ABSTRACT
The uncertainty of geomaterials properties is commonly encountered in resource engineering
applications, especially in mining engineering where the rock mass texture, joints, fractures and
damage zones can impose the mining method and operation cycles. In the present research work,
we focus on the elastic properties of rock masses. We use stochastic numerical simulation of
fractured rock masses to estimate their Young moduli. The procedure starts with field mapping
campaigns which are conducted to evaluate the locations, dip angles, strike and trace lengths
of pre-existing fractures. We develop statistical law parameters of the natural fracture network
to represent the weakness patterns. In addition, we use HLA-Dissim, a recently developed and
validated Matlab program, to simulate the propagation of monochromatic longitudinal waves and
derive the equivalent elastic modulus of fractured rock masses. Such procedure applies within a
simulation domain, which is greater than an Elementary Representative Volume.
At a second stage, we conduct finite element simulations to validate the previous approach.
Thematrix and the actual fractures zones are reproduced in the model to mimic the natural set-up.
Theblock is excited on particular positions and its response is evaluated on predefined spots. Real field
rock fracture mapping data and monitored single-hole blast induced vibrations are used to validate
the theoretical and numerical approaches discussed herein. Comparison between the simulated and
measured vibration records shows a great agreement which confirms that the proposed methodology
has a full potential to predict and optimise multihole/multidelay blast-induced vibrations.
INTRODUCTION
The vibration environment associated with rock fragmentation also of high relevance, although they are limited to simple
or excavation by blasting has become of increasing interest, rock geometries
especially in regions where construction activities become numerical approaches based on precise description of
significant. In these blasting operations, a lot of attention is random discontinuity distribution and their mechanical
required in order to design more efficiently the blast to keep behaviour (Pouya and Ghoreychi, 2001; Min and
vibrations below the thresholds imposed by the regulations Jing, 2003; Chalhoub and Pouya, 2006) are gaining
both in terms of amplitudes and dominant frequencies. momentum nowadays with the increasing development
This concern leads naturally to an increasing interest on wave of computational techniques.
propagation within fractured rock masses. Homogenisation, Empirical approaches allow connecting the deformation
the theory that predicts the overall behaviour of materials modulus of the rock mass to structural parameters such as rock
based on local heterogeneities and/or discontinuities, can quality density (RQD) (Deere et al, 1967; Coon and Merritt,
play a key role in describing fractured rock masses as it 1970; Gardner, 1987; Zhang and Einstein, 2004) or rock masses
replaces natural rock media with equivalent homogeneous classification systems such as the Rock Mass Rating (RMR)
domains that obey the principles of continuum mechanics. (Bieniawski, 1973), the Q factor (Barton, Bandis and Bakhtar,
In this context, different methodologies were proposed by 1985) or the geological strength index (Hoek, Wood and Shah,
previous researchers: 1992). RQD is still widely used to estimate the fractured rock
empirical approaches such as the isotropic strength mass deformation modulus in spite of its dependence on
criterion of Hoek and Brown (1980) and the geomechanical space directions. Table 1 presents several relations which
classifications of Bieniawski (1973) and Barton, Lien and were proposed by previous researchers to relate the ratio
Lunde (1974) are widely used between the fractured rock mass Youngs modulus Em and
analytical approaches (Amadei and Goodman, 1981; the intact rock matrix Youngs modulus Er to some other
Bekaert and Maghous, 1996; Frard, 2000; Atta, 2004) are structural and mechanical parameters. In particular, Amadei
1. Associate Professor, Universit de Tunis El Manar Ecole Nationale dIngnieurs de Tunis, LR14ES03-Ingnierie Gotechnique, BP 37 Le Belvdre, Tunis 1002, Tunisia.
Email: essaieb.hamdi@enit.rnu.tn
2. Associate Professor, School of Civil and ResourceEngineering, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009. Email: ali.karrech@uwa.edu.au
11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROCK FRAGMENTATION BY BLASTING / SYDNEY, NSW, 2426 AUGUST 2015 89
E HAMDI AND A KARRECH
90 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROCK FRAGMENTATION BY BLASTING / SYDNEY, NSW, 2426 AUGUST 2015
A METHODOLOGY FOR ROCK MASS CHARACTERISATION TO CONTROL BLAST-INDUCED VIBRATIONS
E f _1 + Vf i Ef
Kn = and Kt =
t f `1 - Vf j`1 - 2Vf j t f 2 _1 + Vf i
where:
tf is the thickness of a given fault zone
Ef is the Youngs modulus
Vf is the Poissons ratio
The subscripts n and t refer to the normal and tangential
directions. In the context of the current study, Kn is
varied between 5 GPa m-1 and 25 GPa m-1, and the Poisons
FIG 2 Clustering procedure for discontinuity set 1: (A) azimuth and ratio is set to 0.25. The densities of the intact matrix and the
(B) dip angle; and discontinuity set 2: (C) azimuth and (D) dip angle. faults are respectively 2650 kg m-3 and 2100 kg m-3 respectively.
11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROCK FRAGMENTATION BY BLASTING / SYDNEY, NSW, 2426 AUGUST 2015 91
E HAMDI AND A KARRECH
TABLE 2
Best fitted theoretical laws for the two identified sets.
A A
V = | AB | / dt .
FIG 3 Histograms for the geometrical parameters of the two identified sets. The existence of fractures, their distributions and mechanical
properties alter the overall properties of rock masses and
Figure 5 illustrates the workflow of the current study. subsequently the wave velocity within the considered block.
Figure 5a and 5b show respectively the fracture distribution Our simulations confirm this behaviour and reveal that the
as obtained by Python and the discretised domain. stiffness of fractures affects the response of the fractured
Figure 5c shows the response of the block at the position medium. Figure 6 shows that the wave velocity increases
A = (xmax, 0.5ymax, zmax) due to an applied displacement of with respect to the normal fracture stiffnesses. The obtained
10-2sin(100t) at the position B = (0, 0.5ymax, zmax). results are of a fair agreement with those obtained by Gasmi,
Hamdi and Bouden Romdhane (2014) as the velocities are
Upon application of the sinusoidal displacement at a
of the same order of magnitude and the increasing trend is
pointA (see Figure 5), mechanical waves travel outward with reproduced. The slight discrepancies are due to the fact that
a speed of the order of: the current model is three-dimensional while those obtained
by Gasmi, Hamdi and Bouden Romdhane (2014) are quasi-
Em t m one-dimensional. We believe that the current model is more
reliable as it mimics the actual field configuration more
where: faithfully.
Em and mare the overall Young modulus and density Figure 7 depicts the propagation of stress from pointA, both
respectively within the matrix and the fracture zones, for the particular case
92 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROCK FRAGMENTATION BY BLASTING / SYDNEY, NSW, 2426 AUGUST 2015
A METHODOLOGY FOR ROCK MASS CHARACTERISATION TO CONTROL BLAST-INDUCED VIBRATIONS
TABLE 3
Statistical analysis of rock quality designation (RQD) and specific length parameters.
A B
FIG 5 Workflow and output of the numerical model: (A) distribution of fractures as produced using Python; (B) mesh of the geological
domain the discontinuous lines indicate the dip directions; (C) the vertical displacement at the point B (shown in Figure 5a).
of Kn = 10 GPa m-1. It can be seen that initially the stresses micro-structure considerations. It was shown that pre-existing
are concentrated in the vicinity of the point of application of fracture networks influence the delay of wave propagation. In
the load (ie the imposed displacement at pointA). At around addition, it was shown that the propagation of displacement
t = 7.15 ms, the stresses reach the point B of the block and through the fracture networks induces the development of
induces an increase of the stresses especially at the tips of the stress waves as well, which may affect the strength of the local
fractures. It was noticed that the stresses fluctuate considerably fractures.
but they are correlated with the obtained displacement, which The current model extends previous contributions, which
means that they are governed by the same propagation speeds investigate the effects of local fractures on the overall
that are obtained for displacement waves. behaviour of rock masses using one-dimensional approaches.
The three-dimensional nature of the current analysis offers a
CONCLUSION more reliable methodology to track the response of fractured
The present paper investigates the influence of the existence materials as it mimics real world geomaterials structures more
of fractures, their distribution and material properties on the faithfully. Future work will investigate not only the delays
response of natural rock masses. In particular, it focuses on and attenuation of mechanical waves but also their progress
the evaluation of overall material properties based on local in case of excessive stress fields.
11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROCK FRAGMENTATION BY BLASTING / SYDNEY, NSW, 2426 AUGUST 2015 93
E HAMDI AND A KARRECH
B
FIG 6 Variation of the wave velocity with respect
to the normal stiffness of fractures.
REFERENCES
Amadei, B and Goodman, R E, 1981. A 3-D constitutive relation for
fractured rock masses, in Proceedings International Symposium on
Mechanical Behavior of Structured Media (ed: A P S Selvadurai),
Ottawa, part B: pp 249268 (Elsevier: New York).
Amadei, B W and Savage, Z, 1993. Effect of joints on rock mass
strength and deformability, in Comprehensive Rock Engineering
Principle, Practice and Projects (ed: J A Hudson), vol 1, pp 331365
(Oxford: Pergamon Press).
Atta, 2004. Analyse par homognisation lastoplastique des
ouvrages en milieux fractures (Elasto-plastic homogenization
analysis of structures in jointed rock media), PhD thesis, Ecole
Nationale des Ponts et Chausses, Paris. C
Barton, N, 2000. TBM Tunneling in Jointed and Faulted Rock, 173 p
(Balkema: Rotterdam).
Barton, N, Bandis, S and Bakhtar, K, 1985. Strength, deformation and
conductivity coupling of rock joints, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci and
Geomech Abstr Vol, 22(3):121140.
Barton, N, Lien, R and Lunde, J, 1974. Engineering classification of
Rock Masses for the Design Support, Rock Mechanics, 6:189236.
Bekaert, A and Maghous, S, 1996. Three dimensional yield strength
properties of jointed rock mass as homogenized medium,
Mechanic of Cohesive Frictional Materials, 1:124.
Bieniawski, Z T, 1973. Engineering classification of jointed rock
masses, Trans S Afr Instn Civ Engrs, 15(12):335344.
Chalhoub, M and Pouya, A, 2006. A geometrical approach to estimate
the mechanical REV of a fractured rock mass, in Proceedings First
Euro Mediterranean in Advances on Geomaterials and Structures, D
pp663670 (Inderscience Enterprises: Hammamet).
Chen, J P, Xiao, S F and Wang, Q, 1995. Three Dimensional Network
Modeling of Stochastic Fractures (Northeast Normal University
Press: Changchun).
Coon, R F and Merritt, A H, 1970. Predicting in situ modulus of
deformation using rock quality indices, in Determination of the In
Situ Modulus of Deformation of Rock, ASTM STP 477, Philadelphia,
pp 154173.
Deere, D U, Hendron, A J, Patton, F D and Cording, E J, 1967. Design
of surface and near surface construction in rock, in Proceedings
Eighth US Symposium on Rock Mechanics Failure and Breakage
of Rock Network, pp 237302 (American Institute of Mining,
Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers: New York).
Esmaieli, K, Hadjigeorgiou, J and Grenon, M, 2010. Estimating
geometrical and mechanical REV based on synthetic rock mass FIG 7 Von Mises stress contours depicting the propagation
models at Brunswick Mine, Int J Rock Mech Min, 47:915926. of stresses within the matrix (A, B) and the fractures (C, D) at
Fisher, R A, 1953. Dispersion on a sphere, Proc R Soc A, 217:295305. two different instants 0.8 ms (A, C) and 7.15 ms (B, D).
94 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROCK FRAGMENTATION BY BLASTING / SYDNEY, NSW, 2426 AUGUST 2015
A METHODOLOGY FOR ROCK MASS CHARACTERISATION TO CONTROL BLAST-INDUCED VIBRATIONS
Frard, J, 2000. Analyse de la stabilit des massifs rocheux fracturs Kayabasi, A, Gokceoglu, C and Ercanoglu, M, 2003. Estimating the
par une mthode dhomognisation (Jointed rock mass stability deformation modulus of rock masses: a comparative study, Int J
analysis by homogenization techniques), PhD thesis, Ecole Rock Mech Min Sci, 40:5563.
Nationale des Ponts et Chausses, Paris.
Kulhawy, F H, 1978. Geomechanical model for rock foundation
Gardner, W S, 1987. Design of drilled piers in the Atlantic Piedmont, settlement, ASCE, 104(GT2):211227.
in Foundations and Excavations in Decomposed Rock of the Piedmont
Min, K B and Jing, L, 2003. Numerical determination of the equivalent
Province (ed: R E Smith), GSP ASCE, No 9, pp 6286.
elastic compliance tensor for fractured rock masses using the
Gasmi, H, Hamdi, E, Bouden Romdhane, N, 2014. Numerical distinct element method, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 40(6):795816.
homogenization of jointed rock masses using wave propagation
Pouya, A and Ghoreychi, M, 2001. Determination of rock mass
simulation, Rock Mech Rock Eng, 47(4):13931409.
strength properties by homogenization, Int J Numer Anal Meth
Geymonat, G, Krasucki, F and Lenci, S, 1999. Mathematical analysis Geomech, 25:12851303.
of a bonded joint with a soft thin adhesive, Mathematics and
Priest, S D, 1993. Discontinuity Analysis for Rock Engineering, 473 p
Mechanics of Solids, 4:201255.
(Chapman and Hall: London).
Hoek, E and Brown, E T, 1980. Empirical strength criterion
Wang, S L, Chen, J P and Shi, B F, 2004. Verification of random 3-D
for rock masses, J Geotech Engng Div Am Soc Civ Engrs,
fractures network models of rock mass, J EngGeol, 12:177181.
106(GT9):10131035.
Zhang, L and Einstein, H H, 2004. Using RQD to estimate the
Hoek, E, Carranza-Torres, C and Corkum, B, 2002. HoekBrown
deformation modulus of rock masses, Int J Rock Mech and Min Sci,
failure criterion, 2002 edition, in Proceedings Fifth North American
41:337341.
Rock Mechanics Symposium, Toronto, pp 267273 (University of
Toronto Press: Toronto). Zhang, W, Chen, J P, Liu, C, Huang, R, Li, M and Zhang, Y, 2012.
Determination of geometrical and structural representative
Hoek, E, and Diederichs, M S, 2006. Empirical estimation of rock mass
volume elements at the Baihetan Dam Site, Rock Mech Rock Eng,
modulus, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci and Geomech Abstr, 43:203215.
45:409419.
Hoek, E, Wood, D and Shah, S, 1992. A modified HoekBrown
Zhou, C B and Yu, S D, 1999. Representative elementary volume REV
criterion for jointed rock masses, in Proceedings Rock Mechanics
a fundamental problem for selecting the mechanical parameters
Symposium (ed: J A Hudson), International Society of Rock
of jointed rock mass, J EngGeol, 7:332336.
Mechanics, pp 209214 (British Geotechnical Society: London).
11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROCK FRAGMENTATION BY BLASTING / SYDNEY, NSW, 2426 AUGUST 2015 95