Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
LOCAL 320
November 2017 Edition Volume XX - Issue #4
Page 2
LOCAL 320 PRESIDENTS REPORT
By Sami Gabriel
Page 3
Local 320 Community Townhall Meeting!
Tuesday, January 22, 2018
7:00 - 8:30 p.m.
MNSU Mankato
Wissink Hall Room 289
321 Maywood Avenue, Mankato, MN 56001
Free Parking at Lot 16 - Gold
Teamsters Local 320 will host a town hall meeting for its members to address issues important
to them in their community and to share their perspectives. Local 320 leadership will promote
a conversation between Teamster members and local community leaders to discuss issues
that matter to working Minnesotans.
All members of Teamsters Local 320 are welcome to join the discussion!
Page 4
LOCAL 320 RECORDING SECRETARYS REPORT
In what can only be described as a rebuke to Gov. Jim Kabell addresses Local 320 stewards and discusses the right to
Eric Greitens and the conservative Legislature, this work battle in Missouri.
move leaves the anti-worker initiative in limbo until
the November 2018 election when the citizens of Mis-
souri will make the final decision on right to work.
Page 5
SUCCESS IN ST. PAUL
REPUBLISHED FROM THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
At Minnesotas St. Paul Public Schools, 300 workers work hard each day feeding 39,000 kids. Its not an easy
job, but these nutrition service workers love what they do. Many have memorized thousands of kids names
and which kids have which food allergy. Its a population where 72 percent of the kids are eligible for free or
reduced-rate lunches and some receive three free meals a day to ensure they get enough to eat.
The nutrition service workers work tirelessly to provide nutritious meals to the children of St. Paul, in some
cases the only meals the kids get all day, yet they are among the lowest paid workers in the school district. We
knew we had to fight for a fair agreement that would raise the standard for everyone, said Brian Aldes, Secre-
tary Treasurer of Local 320.
The St. Paul community rallied to support the workers who feed their children. Workers and community mem-
bers came out to school board meetings, and the St. Paul teachers and teaching assistants showed strong
support as well.
We fought long and hard to get a fair contract, said Erin George, a 13-year nutrition service worker. Weve
always been on the bottomthe District felt it could step on us, but we finally stood our ground. We deserve
respect and to be treated fairly. It was amazing to see the support we got from the teachers, teaching assistants
and so many community members. We now know that when we stick together and keep fighting, we can win.
After months of pressure, it came down to a very late-night mediation session and the workers prevailed.
St. Paul nutrition service workers will receive annual raises and step increases every year of the contract, and
by 2019 everyone is guaranteed to be paid at least $15 per hour. They also won their fight to keep retired work-
ers medical coverage. The nutrition service workers ratified their contract in a 92 percent vote on October 26.
This is a historic achievement for workers not just in St. Paul, but throughout the United States. The fight for
living wages is galvanizing workers and communities like never before, and the Teamsters Union is proud to be
leading the way! Aldes said. Were going to build on this victory and continue to organize. We lined our con-
tract up with the teaching assistants, and in two years it wont just be 300 Teamsters negotiating their contract;
itll be 1,000 Teamsters!
Page 6
LEGAL UPDATE
BY PAULA JOHNSTON, LOCAL 320 GENERAL COUNSEL
The First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or pro-
hibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The right to free speech is
not absolute, however.
By virtue of their employment by the government, public employees have certain limitations on speech. In order
for their speech to be protected by the First Amendment, two criteria must be met.
A person must be speaking as a citizen in order for First Amendment protections to apply. Speech made pursu-
ant to the persons duties as a public employee is not protected. For example, if a prosecutor writes a memo-
randum recommending the dismissal of a case due to the mishandling of evidence, the memorandum is speech
made in the course of her regular duties as a prosecutor i.e., evaluating the merits of a case for trial. Such
speech is not protected by the First Amendment.
Matters of public concern, rather than those of only personal interest, may be protected so long as the person
is speaking as a citizen and not an employee. Matters of public concern is broadly defined, but the easiest
example is speech regarding the President of the United States (unless the speech is threatening).
Even if both criteria are met, a public employer may still limit speech, but only to the extent necessary to ensure
that its operation runs smoothly and efficiently. The court will apply a balancing test in determining whether the
interests of the employee, speaking as a citizen on a matter of public concern, outweighs that of the employers
interest in promoting the efficiency of the public services that it provides.
Page 7