Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1
example, the AS18 has a significantly higher capacity
2 (285 eq/column), due primarily to its macroporous
6
substrate, in comparison to the AS17 (30 eq/column).
3
This higher capacity enables the AS18 to tolerate high-
ionic-strength matrices and have a larger linear working
0
range than the AS17. However, the separation of
0 5 10 15 20
Minutes stronger retained analytes, such as saccharin, result in
19343
extraordinarily long retention times on the higher-
Figure 1. Standard separation of anions in toothpaste on the capacity AS18 and are therefore best separated on the
IonPac AS18 column. lower-capacity AS17 column. For polyphosphates with
more than two phosphorus groups (i.e., tripolyphos-
phate, trimetaphosphate, etc.) the most appropriate
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
column is the IonPac AS11, as described in Application
Sodium fluoride is the most common form of
Notes 71 and 104.
fluoride found in toothpaste. The choice of fluoride
Although either column can be used for the analysis
compound is determined by its compatibility with other
of toothpaste, this application note primarily focuses on
ingredients.1 MFP is the source of fluoride in some
the AS18 column. Figure 1 shows a standard separation
brands of toothpaste. The MFP breaks down to fluoride
on the AS18 column of typical anions found in tooth-
and phosphate, and all three analytes can be easily
paste, including fluoride, chloride, MFP, sulfate,
determined by IC.7 In addition, pyrophosphate may be
benzoate, and phosphate. Table 2 shows the calibration
found in some toothpastes as a tartar control agent8 and
ranges and correlation coefficients for these analytes.
saccharin is often present as an artificial sweetener.
Correlation coefficients for the primary target analytes,
Although, both the IonPac AS18 (Method A) and AS17
fluoride and MFP, were 0.9998 and 0.9991, respectively.
(Method B) were found to be ideal for the separation of
Three different toothpastes were analyzed for the
the primary analytes in toothpaste (i.e., fluoride and
presence of both active ingredients, fluoride and MFP,
MFP), each column has certain advantages. For
and for inactive anionic ingredients.
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Minutes
19344
Toothpasteb Fluoride (%) Chloride (%) MFP (%) Sulfate (%) Benzoate (%) Phosphate (%)
a
Average concentrations were calculated from ten replicate injections (n = 10)
b
Method A experimental conditions
5 10
S S
11
1
1 5
2 2 4
8 6
3 4 6 9
3 78
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Minutes Minutes
19345 19346
Figure 3. Determination of anions in toothpaste B with the IonPac Figure 4. Determination of anions in toothpaste C with the
AS18 column. IonPac AS18 column.
Table 4. Retention Time and Peak Area Precision for Anions Found in Toothpaste
RT RSDb % Peak Area RSD % RT RSD % Peak Area RSD % RT RSD % Peak Area RSD %
a
Method A experimental conditions
b
The relative standard deviations (RSDs) were calculated from ten replicate injections (n = 10)
Application Note 156 5
CONCLUSION
Column: IonPac AG17, AS17, 4 mm
Eluent: 3 mM potassium hydroxide This application note demonstrates that IC with
from 05 min, 315 mM electrolytic eluent generation provides a convenient and
514 min, 1540 mM 1418 min
Temperature: 30 C reliable method for the simultaneous determination of
Flow Rate: 1.5 mL/min fluoride, MFP, and other anionic ingredients in various
Inj. Volume: 25 L
Detection: Suppressed conductivity, toothpastes. The results are comparable with values
ASRS ULTRA, 4 mm, reported in the literature. The electrolytic eluent genera-
AutoSuppression recycle mode
Sample Prep: 1 g diluted in 100 mL DI H20, filtered tor provides additional convenience and ease of use by
with 0.45-m filter
allowing the user to rapidly increasewith high fidel-
Peaks: 1. Fluoride itythe eluent concentration to elute more strongly
25 2. Chloride
3. Carbonate retained components, such as pyrophosphate. In addition,
6
4. MFP precision is significantly improved by generating the eluent
5. Sulfate
6. Phosphate on-line compared to manual eluent preparation.
7. Saccharin
8. Pyrophosphate
REFERENCES
1. McCoy, M. C & EN, 2001, April, 42.
S 4 2. Wang, P.; Li, S. F. Y.; Lee, H. K. J. Chromatogr., A
1997, 765, 353359.
3. Biemer, T. A.; Asral, N.; Sippy, A. J. Chromatogr., A
1997, 771, 355359.
4. Official Journal of the European Communities
1 7 1983, No. L 291, 3740.
2 3 5 8
5. Borissova, R.; Debouki, A.; Nikolov, T. Fresenius J.
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Anal. Chem.,1993, 347, 6366.
Minutes 6. Hattab, J. Dent. 1989, 17, 7783.
19347
7. Farcas, F.; Chaussadent, T.; Fiaud, C.; Mabille, I.
Figure 5. Separation of anions in toothpaste B with the IonPac Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 472, 3743.
AS17 column.
8. Murawski, D. J. Chromatogr., A 1991, 546,
351367.
Dionex Corporation Dionex Corporation Dionex U.S. Regional Offices Dionex International Subsidiaries
1228 Titan Way Salt Lake City Technical Center Sunnyvale, CA (408) 737-8522 Austria (01) 616 51 25 Belgium (03) 353 42 94 Canada (905) 844-9650 China (852) 2428 3282 Denmark 36 36 90 90
P.O. Box 3603 1515 West 2200 South, Suite A Westmont, IL (630) 789-3660 France 01 39 30 01 10 Germany 06126-991-0 Italy (06) 66 51 50 52 Japan (06) 6885-1213 The Netherlands (0161) 43 43 03
Sunnyvale, CA Salt Lake City, UT Houston, TX (281) 847-5652 Switzerland (062) 205 99 66 United Kingdom (01276) 691722
6
94088-3603 84119-1484 Atlanta, GA (770) 432-8100
(408) 737-0700 (801) 972-9292 Marlton, NJ (856) 596-06009 LPN 1548 PDF 09/16
2016 Dionex Corporation