2

3
4
5
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT,

Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-CEH-TGW

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;

KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;
RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;
RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUE
ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;
JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,
Defendants.

NOTICE OF JUDICIAL CRIME & CORRUPTION

INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,
FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION,
AND FORGED AND VOID judgments and orders
____________________________________________________________________________/

MOTION TO RESTRAIN UNLAWFUL OBSTRUCTION OF SATISFACTION OF

FINAL $24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT AND MANDATE, DOC. # 365, BY
ORGANIZED CRIMINALS K. M. WILKINSON, J. N. PETERSON, AND D. M. OWEN

PUBLIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL CRIME & REAPPOINTMENT COMMENTS

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL
ATTN.: Sheryl L. Loesch, Clerk of Corrupt Court
U.S. Courthouse, Orlando, FL 32801-0210

http://www.scribd.com/doc/36481246/Stop-Judicial-Crime-Stop-Reappointment-of-S-
Polster-Chappell

STOP JUDICIAL CRIME – STOP REAPPOINTMENT OF S. POLSTER CHAPPELL!

6
ERRONEOUS & MISLEADING INSTRUCTIONS BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

1. Erroneously, the Clerk of the U.S. District Court, Defendant Drew Heathcoat, U.S.

Courthouse, Fort Myers, FL, instructed Plaintiffs Dr. Busse and Franklin Prescott to satisfy

the $24.30 final mandate and money judgment, Doc. # 365, by paying the Clerk of the

U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, Defendant John Ley, Atlanta, Georgia.

FORT MYERS POLICE CASE 2010-0128399

2. Reporting Police Officer Aaron Olson, Fort Myers Police Department, Case Number

2010-0128399, purportedly also contacted the Clerk of U.S. District Court and U.S. Legal

Counsel in response to Plaintiffs’ 08/24/2010 crime and fraud report.

3. After communications with Federal Agents, said Police Officer Olson, again met with

Plaintiffs Dr. Busse and Franklin Prescott at the Federal Courthouse in Fort Myers, FL, on

08/25/2010. U.S. Agents reportedly gave Officer Olson the same erroneous information,

which he shared:

a. Plaintiff Dr. Jorg Busse was to pay the U.S. Circuit Clerk in Atlanta, GA;
b. Plaintiff(s) may file a motion with the Court.

LEE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE

4. Officers and witnesses T. Ward, T. Falde, and Fenske, Lee County Sheriff’s Office, are

sworn to protect the lives and property of all those living in and passing through Lee

County, Florida. Here, Plaintiffs’ riparian Gulf-front Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, is to be protected

from organized Government crime and corruption. Under Florida Statutes, the Sheriff is

to be the keeper of the peace.

HOW ORGANIZED GOVERNMENT CRIME & CORRUPTION WORKED

5. However here in exchange for Defendants’ bribes, the Federal Courts had

a. “Suspended the rules” [anarchy], Doc. # 435;

7
 b. “Discarded” Dr. Busse’s documents, Id.;
c. Fraudulently pretended “frivolity”, Id.; and
d. Fixed Case 2:2007-cv-00228, which is presently again under appeal.

6. Here for all reasonable and practical purposes,

a. Courts rendered any satisfaction impossible;

b. Obstructed justice and court access;
c. Extended said extortion of Lot 15A;
d. Extended coercion that Plaintiffs “refrain from prosecution and shut up”.

DESTRUCTION & ALTERATION OF DR. BUSSE’S FILINGS, DOC. # 435

7. Said 11th Circuit Clerk “discarded” any and all “documents” by Dr. Jorg Busse, Doc. #

435, 2:2007-cv-00228, 2008-13170-BB for criminal purposes of unlawful foreclosure

and/or execution proceedings.

RECORD RACKETEERING & EXTORTION SCHEME

8. The publicly recorded racketeering, extortion, and fraud scheme deliberately deprived

Plaintiff Dr. Jorg Busse of any opportunity of justice and redemption of the $24.30 final

mandate issued in June 2009. U.S.A. Ex Rel et al. v. U.S.A. et al.

PATTERN & POLICY OF GOVERNMENT EXTORTION & FRAUD SINCE 1969

9. In Government scheme after scheme, Defendant Officials conspired to extort money

and Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, by, e.g.,

a. Perjury;
b. Fake “resolution”, “O.R. 569/875”, “1969” [see www.LeeClerk.org];
c. Fake “instruments”;
d. Fake “land parcels”;
e. Fake “July 29, 2009, judgment”.

OBSTRUCTION OF ATTEMPTS TO PAY APPELLEE UNDER THE RULES

10. However, pursuant to the Rules and said Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th

Circuit

8
 a. The $24.30 “for copies”, Bill of Costs under FRAP 39, “are payable directly to
Appellee Ken Wilkinson”.

11. For criminal purposes of extorting money and Plaintiffs’ Lot 15A, Cayo Costa,

Defendants Kenneth M. Wilkinson and Jack Neil Peterson had previously conspired to

a. Obstruct satisfaction of the final $24.30 money judgment under Rule 39;
b. Concoct an “outstanding judgment”;
c. Fabricate a “lien”;
d. Falsify a “plat” and altered “boundaries”.

On Wednesday, August 25, 2010, PM, Plaintiffs Dr. Jorg Busse and Jennifer Franklin

Prescott appeared at the Office of the Attorney for Defendant Appellee Kenneth M.

Wilkinson, U.S.A. Ex Rel et al. v. U.S.A. et al. Here, the U.S. Case Docket, 2:2007-cv-

00228 [presiding Judges: Defendants John E. Steele, S. Polster Chappell] showed the

following Attorney for Defendant Appellee Crooked Lee County Official Kenneth M.

Wilkinson:

JACK NEIL PETERSON, ASSISTANT, FLORIDA BAR # 0832774

Lee County Attorney's Office
2115 Second St
PO Box 398
Ft Myers, FL 33902
239/533-2236
Fax: 239/485-2118
Email: peterj@leegov.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Said Def. Jack Neil Peterson is supervised by Def. Lee County Attorney David M. Owen.

WITNESSED CRIMES BY DEF. LEE COUNTY ATTORNEY, 08/25/2010

12. On Wednesday, August 25, 2010, three Officers of the Lee County Sheriff’s

Office witnessed the crimes of David M. Owen, Esq., Lee County Attorney, 2115 Second

ST, 6th Floor, Fort Myers, Florida, 33901. For criminal and illegal purposes of, e.g.,

extortion, racketeering, retaliation, fraud, fraudulent concealment, obstruction of

9
justice, deliberate deprivations of the right to own Lot 15A, S-T-R-A-P 12-44-20-01-

00015.015A, PB 3 PG 25 (1912), Defendant David M. Owen

a. Declined satisfaction of the $24.30 by Appellant Dr. Jorg Busse with intent to
extort;
b. Denied Plaintiff Dr. Busse the fundamental right to redeem said $24.30;
c. Demanded that “law enforcement escort Plaintiffs from the building”;
d. Deceptively demanded payment to the U.S. Appellate Court, violative of the
Rules;
e. Threatened to “force sale” of Plaintiffs’ Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, to satisfy said
$24.30;
f. Threatened execution of a non-existent “lien”;
g. Fraudulently concealed the illegality and nullity of forged “land parcels”
 “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”
 “07-44-20-01-00001.0000”
h. Fraudulently concealed perjury by Defendant Jack Neil Peterson;
i. Falsely alleged “harassment” by Plaintiffs Franklin Prescott and Dr. Busse

$24.30 BILL OF COSTS, DOC. # 365, 2:2007-CV-00228, BUSSE v. LEE COUNTY

13. On 03/17/2009, “Attorney for Appellee Ken Wilkinson”, Crooked Lee County

Property Appraiser, signed the “Bill of Costs”, Doc. # 365, 06/15/2009, Final Mandate and

Money Judgment in the amount of $24.30, Case 2:2007-cv-00228, BUSSE et al. v. LEE

COUNTY, FLORIDA, et al.

$24.30 BILL OF COSTS, FED. R. APP. P. 39

14. The Deputy Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit had

signed said $24.30 Bill of Costs, Fed. R. App. P. 39, on June 11, 2009, Appeal No. 08-

13170, Doc. 365.

15. Said U.S. Court of Appeals had allowed $24.30 “for copies” under said Rule 39:

(c) Costs of Copies. Each court of appeals must, by local rule, fix the maximum
rate for taxing the cost of producing necessary copies of a brief or appendix, or
copies of records authorized by Rule 30(f). The rate must not exceed that
generally charged for such work in the area where the clerk’s office is located
and should encourage economical methods of copying.

ON THE PUBLIC RECORD DEF. WILKINSON FORGED “land parcels”

10
 16. Def. Wilkinson had forged “Lee County” fake “land parcels”

a. “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”; and
b. “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”.

Here, Defendant Appellee Wilkinson’s said falsified “land parcels” could not be found on

the 1912 Plat of Survey of the private undedicated residential Cayo Costa Subdivision in Lee

County Plat Book 3, Page 25.

CONSPIRACY TO EXTORT MONEY AND LOT 15A, 12-44-20-01-00015.015A

17. Defendants Kenneth M. Wilkinson, David M. Owen, and Jack Neil Peterson

conspired with other Government Officials and Defendants to extort money and Plaintiffs’

riparian property, Lot 15A, under publicly recorded fraudulent pretenses of, e.g.,

a. A fake “July 29, 2009, judgment”, Doc. ## 386, 432;

b. A non-existent “lien”;
c. A forged “writ of execution”, Doc. ## 425, 424, 2:2007-cv-00228 (under appeal);
d. A fake “resolution 569/875”;

18. Def. Jack Neil Peterson perjured himself when under oath, Peterson

fraudulently asserted

a. A non-existent “July 29, 2009, judgment”;

b. A forged “writ of execution”, Doc. ## 425, 424, 2:2007-cv-00228 (under appeal);
c. A non-existent “rule 38 motion”;
d. Falsified “$5,000 attorney fees”.

BRIBERY & ORGANIZED JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

19. Lee County Defendants bribed U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell. Said

judicial Defendant Chappell accepted Defendants’ bribes and fraudulently concealed said

publicly recorded fabrications of fictitious “land parcels”, Doc. ## 282, 288, Case No.

2:2007-cv-00228.

POLSTER CHAPPEL CONSPIRED WITH DEF. WILKINSON TO CONCOCT “writ”

11
20. In exchange for Defendants’ bribes, Defendant Chappell conspired with

Defendant Lee County Property Appraiser Kenneth M. Wilkinson to fabricate a “writ of

execution”, Doc. # 425, Case 2:2007-cv-oo228 (under appeal), in the record absence of

any “$5,048.60 judgment”.

“This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson as the
Lee County Property Appraiser’s Motion for Issuance of a Writ of Execution (Doc.
#386) filed on November 30, 2009.”

See Doc. # 424, 02/01/2010, p. 1, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

POLSTER CHAPPEL FALSIFIED referral to District Court by District Court

21. Idiotically, Defendant Crooked U.S. Magistrate Polster Chappell falsified a

“referral” to the District Court by the District Court:

“On August 22, 2008, the Defendant filed a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to the
Eleventh Circuit Rule 27-4. The Motion was referred to this Court by the District
Court on January 26, 2009. The Motion is now ripe for the Court’s review.” Id.

Here, nothing was “referred” and nothing was “ripe for the Court’s review”, see Docket.

POLSTER CHAPPELL FALSIFIED “rule 38” or “frivolous appeal” motion

“On July 28, 2009, the Eleventh Circuit issued a Judgment awarding Wilkinson
$5,000.00 in attorney’s fees and double costs in the amount of $48.60, as sanctions
for Busse’s pursuit of a frivolous appeal. The Judgment to date remains
outstanding.” Id.

22. Here, Def. Crooked Magistrate Polster Chappell fabricated

a. “$5,000 in attorney’s fees”;
b. A fake “outstanding judgment”;
c. A “frivolous appeal”, Doc. # 365, 2:2007-cv-00228 (under appea).

Here, Def. Corrupt Chappell concealed that Def. Appellee Appraiser K. M. Wilkinson

d. NEVER raised the issue of a “frivolous appeal”, Rule 38, Fed.R.App.P., Doc. #
365;
e. NEVER incurred any actual and necessary attorney’s fees;
f. NEVER filed the fictitious “rule 38 motion” “on August 22, 2008”.

12
 DEFENDANT POLSTER CHAPPELL FALSIFIED “recordation”

23. Def. Crooked Chappell conspired to concoct judgment:

“A certified copy of the Judgment was recorded in the Public Records of Lee County,
Florida at Instrument No. 2009000309384 and serves as a lien against the property.”

Here, Def. Chappell fraudulently concealed and conspired to conceal that

a. NO “judgment” had existed; and
b. NO “lien” existed, Ch. 55, Florida Statutes.

24. For bribes, Def. Crooked Chappell concocted and conspired to concoct
entitlement:
“As such, the Defendant Wilkinson is entitled to tax against the property and the [fake]
Writ of Execution is due to be granted.”
25. Here for Defendants’ bribes, Def. Chappell fraudulently “granted” said “writ”,
Doc. ## 424, 425, Case 2:2007-cv-00228. Chappell conspired with the Defendant Clerk to
issue the forged “writ”. Said Def. Clerk and Def. Chappell knew and concealed that
a. The recording of mandates and judgments was exclusively the Clerk’s
responsibility;
b. NO “$5,048.60 judgment” had ever been recorded as the mandate, Docket
2:2007-cv-00228;
c. NO judgment could have been possibly outstanding;
d. NO judgment could have possibly become a lien under § 55.10, Fla. Stat.;
e. Said fake writ was a prima facie racketeering and extortion scheme, U.S.A. Ex
Rel. et al. v. U.S.A.

26. Here furthermore, Def. Chappell knew and concealed that

a. Said fake writ was never signed by any judge;
b. The fake writ was never served;
c. The fake writ had no valid address;

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20