Topsoil Stripping Method Statement

G.
Scarfo & Son
Topsoil Stripping/ Bund Relocation Method Statement
This topsoil stripping method statement and bund relocation method statement has been
produced to meet the requirements of planning permission 049617, conditions 9, 11, 12 and
21 granted on 28th March 2013.
Condition 9 states:
Prior to the construction of the permitted screen bund on the eastern boundary, a
method statement for stripping and storage of soils, including stockpile locations shall be
submitted to the Local Planning Authority for written approval. Soil stripping, movement
and storage shall be carried out in accordance with the approved scheme.
Condition 11 states:
Prior to the relocation of the existing screen bund on eastern boundary, a method
statement detailing how the bund will be moved shall be submitted to the local planning
authority for written approval. The relocation of the existing bund and placement of
materials shall be carried out in accordance with the approved scheme.
Prior to the relocation of the existing screen bund on the eastern boundary materials
contained within the existing bund shall be samples and tested, and results of testing shall
be submitted to the Local Planning Authority. Should the tests indicate that the material is
harmful or hazardous, appropriate remedial action shall be taken, and a method statement
shall be agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority prior to its relocation.
Prior to the construction of the permitted screen bund on the eastern boundary of
the site, an arboricultural method statement , including root protection measures shall be
submitted for written approval to the Local Planning Authority. . Works shall be carried out
in accordance with the subsequently approved aboricultural method statement.
Page 1 of 6
G. Scarfo & Son
Methodology
Drawing number GS/14/A (Appendix 1) shows the location of the existing screening mound
on the site and the area to be stripped of topsoil.
It is proposed to strip the topsoil as shown in Drawing GS/14/A. The topsoil will be stripped
to the east and north of the working area and will be undertaken first. It is believed that
topsoil in this area is poor and shallow in depth (<150mm).
Topsoil will be stripped using an excavator and dumper and placed in a temporary bund
running parallel with the hedge line on the eastern part of the bund and in a temporary
bund in the northern part of the bund. This stockpile will provide the benefit of meeting the
exclusion zone requirements of 2 metres as per the recommendations of the arboricultural
method statement (Appendix 2). The temporary topsoil bund will be formed using an
excavator in to steep sides to ensure surface run off from rain fall, the bund surface will be
compacted using the bucket of the excavator to prevent ingress of rain fall and
deterioration of the topsoil. Topsoil stripping will take place in accordance with condition 10
of planning permission 049617.
Once the topsoil has been stripped it is proposed to move the existing bund on to the bare
ground using an excavator and dumper or tipper wagon. It is proposed to work the northern
area of the eastern bund first to achieve the permitted formation levels and will be restored
fist. This will act as a screening bund for works on the southern part of the eastern bund
which is where the majority of work will be undertaken. The soil from the existing bund was
sampled on 20th June 2013 in 3 spots equating to approximately 50 metre centres. A full
analytical contamination suite was undertaken by Alcontrol Laboratories (Appendix 3).
A review of the analysis shows that there were no asbestos fibres detected. Analysis was
compared with the thresholds in Kelly Indices and ICRCL. This showed that there was no
contamination apart from Location 3 for lead which had a value of 550 mg/kg. When
comparing this against the Kelly Indices, values of 500 to 1000 would be regarded as
showing slight contamination. When comparing and using ICRCL a threshold of 500 mg/kg is
in use for soil used in domestic gardens, however a threshold of 2000 mg/kg is permissible
for parks, playing fields and opens space, which is the intended after use. Also the material
from the eastern bund will not be the surface layer as this will be topsoil.
Page 2 of 6
G. Scarfo & Son
Once final levels have been reached in the eastern bund then the topsoil will be placed back
on top of the overburden to provide the growing media for planting. Care will be taken
during the placement of topsoil to ensure that the structural integrity of the topsoil is not
lost. The topsoil will be placed using an excavator and possibly dumper. It is intended that
most of the topsoil be placed using an excavator pulling the topsoil back up the slope from
the temporary bund running parallel to the hedge line. Any shortfalls in topsoil due to the
creation of a profile with a larger surface area will be made up using topsoil produced on
site.
Planting of the final topsoil layer will take place in accordance with planning condition with
conditions 18 and 19 of permission 049617.
Page 3 of 6
Appendix 1
Drawing GS/14/A
98.283
SL5
98.010
97.532 92.448mAOD
96.685
97.803
95.855
97.146 94.901
91.4m
STN 93.993
SS
92.943
Direction of top soil stripping
96.201
Stripped top soil to be stored in a temporary bund
96.050
95.450 which will also act as a barrier to protect root systems
E xisi
t ng 94.273
S cr
95.167
93.040
ee
STN n ing 91.849
M
95.254
o u
94.153
95.332 nd 91.673
Northern flank to be worked and
(t o
be 92.820
restored first to create screening mound
95.204
95.216
046 re
lo
3.939
93.691 ca 90.664
t
STN
SSed
91.465
)
92.028 STN
Plant access to
91.915
eastern bund 89.708
91.064
90.561
92.163
88.756
91.931 89.705
Exis
89.164 0 10 20 30 40 50
91.809
Metres
itng
97.249
97.373 87.578
87.891
Scr
95.710
95.931
95.715 88.307 Direction of top soil stripping
Stripped top soil to be stored in a temporary bund
een
95.830
88.023
96.548
which will also act as a barrier to protect root systems
in g
96.186 95.593
96.026 87.016
96.882
Mo
95.771 87.149
95.904 87.305
95.768
und
96.068 97.237 95.462
96.111 86.978
97.362
92.174 95.673
95.760 97.176
(t o
97.363 86.824
95.610 97.326
STN
SS 86.957
be
86.586
95.551 86.535 Sourthern flank to be worked and
restored last
relo
95.076 95.825
99.610
95.109 86.551
99.651 STN 95.226 86.412
c
SS 94.424
86.890
ate
STN
99.373 93.316 86.649
86.438
d
90.930 90.933 86.443
)
Rev Revision Note Date
99.309 87.237
86.218
99.223
99.042
EP Screening Bund Relocation Proposal
98.614
Plant access to eastern bund G. Scarfo & Son
4W Environmental Limited Date: 12th August 2013
98.791 89.746 Office 26
98.582 94.387 Red Hill House Tel: 07764 894499
Hope Street Fax: 01244 661750
Chester
94.158 CH4 8BU Email: Martin.Womack@4wenvironmental.co.uk
94.276 90.102 Scale Sheet
89.808 Drawing Number: GS/14/A
93.477 90.009 1:500 A3
Appendix 2
Arboricultural Method Statement Oakwood Ecology

Arboricultural method statement for landscaping
works at Old Bridge Inn, Padeswood, CH7 4JD
Oakwood Ecology
by Simon Cope BSc, MSc, MCIEEM

Ecological and Arboricultural Consultant
For: G. Scarfo & Son

Old Bridge Inn
Station Lane
Padeswood
Flintshire
CH7 4JD
June, 2013
Oakwood Ecology, Bwlch-y-garnedd, Meifod, Powys, SY22 6DR.

Tel. 01938 500136 Mob: 07772 768461 eMail: simon.cope2@btinternet.com
For G. Scarfo & Son Arboricultural Method Statement for Old Bridge Inn
Contents
1 Introduction................................................................................ 2
1.1 Site overview ..................................................................................... 2
1.2 Authors qualifications ........................................................................ 4
2 Arboricultural implications assessment ...................................... 5
3 Arboricultural method statement ............................................... 6

3.1 General arboricultural recommendations ........................................... 6
3.2 Measures for the protection of retained trees .................................... 6
4 Schedule of work ........................................................................ 9
5 References .................................................................................. 9
Appendix 1: Photographs ...................................................................... 10
Oakwood Ecology 1
1 Introduction
1.1 Site overview
1.1.1 This arboricultural method statement has been prepared in response to a condition
on a planning permission granted by Flintshire County Council for the construction of
a waste transfer building at Old Bridge Inn, Padeswood Lake Road, Padeswood,
Mold, CH7 4JD. (Condition no. 21 on planning application reference no. 049617). It
specifically concerns the protection of trees during the regrading of a slope that will
provide a visual screen when viewed from the east (see the study area of this report
outlined in Figure 1), and is devised in accordance with the guidance given in
BS5837:2012.
1.1.2 No detailed arboricultural survey is available, so a site visit was carried out by Simon
Cope on the 20th of June, 2013, to enable an assessment of the status of the trees. As
a result of this assessment, the trees currently standing within the affected area of
the site have been classified into four groups (see Figure 1):
Group 1 - Naturally-regenerated, native broadleaf species that are scattered across the
eastern slope of the existing bund and some areas immediately adjacent to it.
These include Goat and Grey Willow (Salix caprea and S. cinerea), Hawthorn
(Crataegus monogyna), Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) and naturalised Wild
Plum (Prunus domestica).
Group 2 - Exotic species that have been planted, comprising a group of four Scots Pines
(Pinus sylvestris) at the northern end of the bund.
Group 3 - A long-established hedgerow along the eastern boundary of the site, made up
of native broadleaved shrubs and trees, including Blackthorn (Prunus spinosa),
Hawthorn, Elder (Sambucus nigra), Hazel (Corylus avellana) and Wych Elm
(Ulmus glabra).
Group 4 - Two Downy Birches (Betula pubescens), situated near the south-eastern
corner of the study area. These are mature specimens which make a
moderately significant contribution to the landscape and wildlife value of the
site.
Oakwood Ecology 2
Group 2
Group 3
Group 1
Group 4
Figure 1. The existing topography of the site, with the approximate study area shaded red.
1.1.3 A restoration and aftercare scheme has been prepared (Creative Landscape, 2011),
and this outlines the proposed eventual planting scheme for the site. The relevant
area of the restoration masterplan is shown in Figure 2.
Oakwood Ecology 3
Figure 2. Post-restoration configuration (taken from Creative Landscape, 2011).
1.2 Authors qualifications
1.2.1 Since gaining a Distinction in the Royal Forestry Society Certificate in Arboriculture in
2000, I have provided arboricultural consultancy for a wide range of professional and
domestic clients. I am an associate member of the Arboricultural Association, and
follow their best practice guidelines in all aspects of my profession.
1.2.2 I am also a highly-trained ecologist and my knowledge and experience of British

wildlife, including holding licences for statutorily protected species, along with my
considerable experience as a working arborist (since 1998), significantly enhance my
ability to provide well-informed, practical arboricultural advice.
Oakwood Ecology 4
2 Arboricultural implications assessment
2.1 The trees in Groups 1 and 2 are of relatively small stature and low amenity and/or
wildlife value (BS5837 Category C). If the proposed groundworks are carried out as
planned, it will not be possible to preserve these trees, so no specific tree protection
measures are described for them in this report (although the general arboricultural
recommendations do apply).
2.2 The restoration and aftercare scheme report has proposed a strip of woodland
planting along the top of the re-graded bund, and this planting would constitute
suitable compensation for the loss of the Group 1 and 2 trees. The report also
includes details of the intended species composition and other specifications for
successful establishment, although the owner has expressed a preference for not
planting large species such as Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur), Ash (Fraxinus
excelsior), Scots pine and Norway Spruce (Picea abies) which would be acceptable
from an arboricultural point of view.
2.3 The Group 3 hedgerow has not been trimmed with a flail and has been allowed to
grow to a fairly mature state. As such, and given the context of the surrounding
landscape, it is judged to have moderate quality in terms of amenity and wildlife
value (BS5837 Categories B2 and B3).
2.4 In order to preserve the integrity of this hedgerow, it will be necessary to establish a
Construction Exclusion Zone (CEZ) around it. The size of this CEZ is based on the size
of the Root Protection Areas (RPAs) of the plants that make up the hedge, which in
turn is based on their measured stem diameters, in accordance with guidance given
in BS5837:2012.
2.5 It is not clear whether the Downy Birches in Group 4 will be affected by the
proposed groundworks. They have been classed as Category B trees and have
therefore been included in the CEZ as a precaution.
Oakwood Ecology 5
3 Arboricultural method statement
3.1 General arboricultural recommendations
All tree surgery should be carried out to BS3998:2010 by suitably qualified and
experienced personnel.
All nesting birds and their nests are legally protected from harm or disturbance. This
means either that all potentially damaging works to trees that may harbour nesting
birds should be postponed until after the nesting season (March to August inclusive),
or a suitably qualified ecologist should survey the area before works commence to
confirm that no nesting birds are present.
No access facilitation pruning is necessary.
3.2 Measures for the protection of retained trees
3.2.1 If possible, exclude all site traffic (vehicular and pedestrian) and works from the
Construction Exclusion Zone (CEZ) shown on the Tree Protection Plan in Figure 3.
The exact dimensions of the CEZ are given in Table 1. This exclusion can be achieved
by the erection of barriers, which should be fit for purpose and maintained upright
and complete, e.g., chestnut paling supported by fencing stakes of an appropriate
size and spacing. The CEZ should not be used to stockpile materials and store
machinery during the development.
Stem diameter RPA radius CEZ dimensions
2.0m wide strip from

Hedgerow <150mm 1.80m
edge of canopy
5.40m from centre
Birch trees <450mm 5.40m
of base of stems
Table 1. Dimensions of the CEZ.
3.2.2 If the passage of some site traffic over the CEZ cannot be avoided, ground protection
should be installed as follows: i) pedestrian traffic - a single thickness of scaffold
planks on top of a compressible layer laid onto a geotextile, and; ii) vehicular traffic -
the ground protection should be formulated by a suitably qualified person using a
no-dig design to accommodate the likely loading, e.g., CellWeb (http://www.
geosyn.co.uk /products/cellweb-trees.asp?product_id=21) or Treeguard
(http://www.civilsandlintels.co.uk/Products/Geotechnical-Ground-Engineering/
Treeguard/). Where the new access would cover more than 20% of the relevant RPA,
or be wider than 3m within the CEZ, it should be constructed so as to allow moisture
infiltration and gaseous diffusion.
Oakwood Ecology 6
3.2.3 Ground levels should not be lowered within the CEZ. If levels must be raised, the fill
should be a granular material that does not inhibit vertical gaseous diffusion.
3.2.4 New impermeable surfaces within the CEZ should be restricted to a maximum width
of 3m and situated tangentially to one side of a tree only, or confined to an area no
greater than 20% of the relevant RPA, whichever is the smaller.
3.2.5 Excess water in the CEZ should be avoided. The adjacent landscaping works,
although outside the CEZ, should promote drainage away from the trees to prevent
ponding and water-logging.
3.2.6 Use no-dig, trenchless excavation techniques for the installation of underground
services within the RPA where possible. As a last-resort alternative to machine-cut
trenches, hand-dig a trench along the shortest distance across the relevant RPA.
3.2.7 Any excavations which have to be undertaken within the CEZ should be carried out
carefully by hand or by using an air-spade, avoiding damage to the protective bark
covering larger roots. While exposed, these roots should be wrapped in dry, clean
hessian sacking. Any roots smaller than 25mm diameter may be pruned back,
preferably to a side branch, using a sharp cutting tool such as secateurs, loppers or a
handsaw.
3.2.8 Roots larger than 25mm should only be severed following consultation with an
arboriculturist. Prior to backfilling, any hessian wrapping should be removed, and
retained roots should be surrounded by sharp sand (not builders sand) before soil or
other material is replaced. This material should be free of contaminants and other
foreign objects potentially injurious to tree roots.
Oakwood Ecology 7
Figure 3. Tree Protection Plan showing the approximate layout of the CEZ in red (exact
dimensions are given in Table 1).
Oakwood Ecology 8
4 Schedule of work
4.1 No set dates are included in the following schedule, but the order of events should
be adhered to, as follows:
1. Installation of tree protection measures;
2. Tree removal;
3. Major ground-works;
4. Final landscaping and the establishment of the new plantings;
5. Removal of tree protection measures.
5 References
BS5837:2012 Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction Recommendations.

British Standards Ltd.
Creative Landscape (2011) Proposed restoration and aftercare scheme in respect of the
existing south-western spoil mound and the proposed eastern boundary screen mound
on land at Old Bridge Inn, Padeswood, Flintshire. Unpublished report.
Oakwood Ecology 9
Appendix 1
Photographs
Oakwood Ecology 10
Photo 1. Group 1 scattered scrub that has naturally regenerated on the eastern slope of the
existing bund.
Photo 2. Group 2 four young Scots Pines planted at the northern end of the existing bund.
Oakwood Ecology 11
Photo 3. Group 3 the hedgerow that will be protected by the establishment of a

Construction Exclusion Zone.
Photo 4. Group 4 the canopy of two Downy Birches that have also been included in the CEZ.
Oakwood Ecology 12
Appendix 3
Alcontrol Soil Analysis Existing Bund

Unit 7-8 Hawarden Business Park
Manor Road (off Manor Lane)
Hawarden
Deeside
CH5 3US
Tel: (01244) 528700
Fax: (01244) 528701
email: mkt@alcontrol.com
Website: www.alcontrol.com
4W Environmental Ltd
Unit 26 Redhill House
Hope Street
Saltney
Chester
CH4 8BU
Attention: Martin Womack
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date: 08 July 2013

Customer: H_4WENV_CHE
Sample Delivery Group (SDG): 130621-132
Your Reference:
Location: Padeswood
Report No: 232214
We received 3 samples on Thursday June 20, 2013 and 3 of these samples were scheduled for analysis which was
completed on Monday July 08, 2013. Accredited laboratory tests are defined within the report, but opinions, interpretations
and on-site data expressed herein are outside the scope of ISO 17025 accreditation.
Should this report require incorporation into client reports, it must be used in its entirety and not simply with the data
sections alone.
All chemical testing (unless subcontracted) is performed at ALcontrol Hawarden Laboratories.
Approved By:
Sonia McWhan
Operations Manager
Alcontrol Laboratories is a trading division of ALcontrol UK Limited

Registered Office: Units 7 & 8 Hawarden Business Park, Manor Road, Hawarden, Deeside, CH5 3US. Registered in England and Wales No.
Page 1 of 10
Validated
SDG: 130621-132 Location: Padeswood Order Number:
Job: H_4WENV_CHE-4 Customer: 4W Environmental Ltd Report Number: 232214
Client Reference: Attention: Martin Womack Superseded Report:
Received Sample Overview

Lab Sample No(s) Customer Sample Ref. AGS Ref. Depth (m) Sampled Date
7633992 Location 1 0.00 20/06/2013
7633993 Location 2 0.00 20/06/2013
7633994 Location 3 0.00 20/06/2013
Only received samples which have had analysis scheduled will be shown on the following pages.
16:07:08 08/07/2013
Page 2 of 10
Validated
SOLID
7633992
7633993
7633994
Results Legend Lab Sample No(s)
X Test
No Determination
N
Possible
Customer
Location 1
Location 2
Location 3
Sample Reference
AGS Reference
0.00
0.00
0.00
Depth (m)
250g Amber Jar (AL
250g Amber Jar (AL
250g Amber Jar (AL

400g Tub (ALE214)
400g Tub (ALE214)
400g Tub (ALE214)
Container
Asbestos ID in Solid Samples All NDPs: 0

Tests: 3
X X X
Boron Water Soluble All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
Cyanide All NDPs: 0
Comp/Free/Total/Thiocyanate Tests: 3
X X X
Easily Liberated Sulphide All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
Hexavalent Chromium (s) All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
Metals in solid samples by OES All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
PAH by GCMS All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
pH All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
Phenols by HPLC (S) All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
Sample description All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
Total Sulphate All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
Total Sulphur All NDPs: 0
Tests: 3
X X X
16:07:08 08/07/2013
Page 3 of 10
Validated
Sample Descriptions
Grain Sizes
very fine <0.063mm fine 0.063mm - 0.1mm medium 0.1mm - 2mm coarse 2mm - 10mm very coarse >10mm
Lab Sample No(s) Customer Sample Ref. Depth (m) Colour Description Grain size Inclusions Inclusions 2
7633992 Location 1 0.00 Dark Brown Sand 0.063 - 0.1 mm Vegetation None
7633993 Location 2 0.00 Dark Brown Sand 0.1 - 2 mm Stones Vegetation
7633994 Location 3 0.00 Dark Brown Loamy Sand 0.1 - 2 mm Stones None
These descriptions are only intended to act as a cross check if sample identities are questioned, and to provide a log of
sample matrices with respect to MCERTS validation. They are not intended as full geological descriptions.
We are accredited to MCERTS for sand, clay and loam/topsoil, or any of these materials - whether these are derived from
naturally ocurring soil profiles, or from fill/made ground, as long as these materials constitute the major part of the sample.
Other coarse granular materials such as concrete, gravel and brick are not accredited if they comprise the major part of the
sample.
16:07:08 08/07/2013
Page 4 of 10
Validated
Results Legend Customer Sample R Location 1 Location 2 Location 3

# ISO17025 accredited.
M mCERTS accredited.
aq Aqueous / settled sample.
Depth (m) 0.00 0.00 0.00
diss.filt
Dissolved / filtered sample.
tot.unfilt
Total / unfiltered sample. Sample Type Soil/Solid Soil/Solid Soil/Solid
* Subcontracted test. Date Sampled 20/06/2013 20/06/2013 20/06/2013
** % recovery of the surrogate standard to Sample Time . . .
check the efficiency of the method. The 20/06/2013 20/06/2013 20/06/2013
Date Received
results of individual compounds within
SDG Ref 130621-132 130621-132 130621-132
samples aren't corrected for the recovery
(F) Trigger breach confirmed Lab Sample No.(s) 7633992 7633993 7633994
1-4&@ Sample deviation (see appendix) AGS Reference
Component LOD/Units Method
Phenol <0.01 TM062 (S) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
mg/kg M M M
Cresols <0.01 TM062 (S) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
mg/kg M M M
Xylenols <0.015 TM062 (S) <0.015 <0.015 <0.015
mg/kg M M M
1-Naphthol <0.01 TM062 (S) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
mg/kg
2,3,5-Trimethylphenol <0.01 TM062 (S) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
mg/kg M M M
2-Isopropylphenol <0.015 TM062 (S) <0.015 <0.015 <0.015
mg/kg M M M
Phenols, Total Detected 5 <0.06 TM062 (S) <0.06 <0.06 <0.06
speciated mg/kg M M M
Sulphur, Total <0.02 % TM132 0.0505 0.0644 0.023
# # #
pH 1 pH TM133 8 8.31 8.62
Units M M M
Chromium, Hexavalent <0.6 TM151 <0.6 <1.2 <0.6
mg/kg # # #
Cyanide, Total <1 mg/kg TM153 <1 <1 <1
M M M
Cyanide, Free <1 mg/kg TM153 <1 <1 <1
M M M
Thiocyanate <1 mg/kg TM153 <1 <1 <1
M M M
Sulphide, Easily liberated <15 TM180 <15 <15 <15
mg/kg # # #
Arsenic <0.6 TM181 7.13 8.88 5.27
mg/kg M M M
Cadmium <0.02 TM181 0.0556 0.212 <0.02
mg/kg M M M
Chromium <0.9 TM181 18.9 17.2 20.5
mg/kg M M M
Copper <1.4 TM181 16.9 16.5 12.4
mg/kg M M M
Lead <0.7 TM181 62.3 61.1 550
mg/kg M M M
Mercury <0.14 TM181 <0.14 0.176 <0.14
mg/kg M M M
Nickel <0.2 TM181 20 17.7 14.3
mg/kg M M M
Selenium <1 mg/kg TM181 <1 <1 <1
# # #
Zinc <1.9 TM181 69.2 65.9 102
mg/kg M M M
Sulphate, Total <48 TM221 230 516 241
mg/kg M M M
Total Sulphur (ASB) <0.0016 TM221 0.00768 0.0172 0.00805
%
Boron, water soluble <1 mg/kg TM222 <1 <1 1.38
M M M
16:07:08 08/07/2013
Page 5 of 10
Validated
PAH by GCMS
Results Legend Customer Sample R Location 1 Location 2 Location 3
# ISO17025 accredited.
M mCERTS accredited.
aq Aqueous / settled sample.
Depth (m) 0.00 0.00 0.00
diss.filt
Dissolved / filtered sample.
tot.unfilt
Total / unfiltered sample. Sample Type Soil/Solid Soil/Solid Soil/Solid
* Subcontracted test. Date Sampled 20/06/2013 20/06/2013 20/06/2013
** % recovery of the surrogate standard to Sample Time . . .
check the efficiency of the method. The 20/06/2013 20/06/2013 20/06/2013
Date Received
results of individual compounds within
SDG Ref 130621-132 130621-132 130621-132
samples aren't corrected for the recovery
(F) Trigger breach confirmed Lab Sample No.(s) 7633992 7633993 7633994
1-4&@ Sample deviation (see appendix) AGS Reference
Component LOD/Units Method
Naphthalene <9 g/kg TM218 12.4 29.7 <9
M M M
Acenaphthylene <12 g/kg TM218 <12 <12 <12
M M M
Acenaphthene <8 g/kg TM218 <8 <8 <8
M M M
Fluorene <10 g/kg TM218 <10 <10 <10
M M M
Phenanthrene <15 g/kg TM218 57.9 95.8 <15
M M M
Anthracene <16 g/kg TM218 <16 26.4 <16
M M M
Fluoranthene <17 g/kg TM218 71.4 193 21.8
M M M
Pyrene <15 g/kg TM218 63.7 178 24.7
M M M
Benz(a)anthracene <14 g/kg TM218 49.9 116 24.6
M M M
Chrysene <10 g/kg TM218 41.4 116 14.1
M M M
Benzo(b)fluoranthene <15 g/kg TM218 45.6 186 22
M M M
Benzo(k)fluoranthene <14 g/kg TM218 21.6 65.5 <14
M M M
Benzo(a)pyrene <15 g/kg TM218 39.6 128 17.8
M M M
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <18 g/kg TM218 27 91.3 <18
M M M
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <23 g/kg TM218 <23 25.4 <23
M M M
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <24 g/kg TM218 45.3 138 <24
M M M
PAH, Total Detected <118 TM218 476 1390 125
USEPA 16 g/kg
16:07:08 08/07/2013
Page 6 of 10
Validated
Asbestos Identification - Solid Samples

Date of Analysis Analysed By Comments Amosite Chrysotile Crocidolite Fibrous Fibrous Fibrous Non-Asbestos
(Brown) (White) (Blue) Asbestos Actinolite Anthophyllite Tremolite Fibre
Asbestos Asbestos
Cust. Sample Ref. Location 1 08/07/13 Kevin Bowron - Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected
Depth (m) 0.00 (#) (#) (#) (#) (#) (#)
Sample Type SOLID
Date Sampled 20/06/2013 00:00:00
Date Receieved
SDG 130621-132
Original Sample 7633992
Method Number TM048
Cust. Sample Ref. Location 2 08/07/13 Kevin Bowron - Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Detected
Depth (m) 0.00 (#) (#) (#) (#) (#) (#)
Sample Type SOLID
Date Sampled 20/06/2013 00:00:00
Date Receieved
SDG 130621-132
Method Number TM048
Cust. Sample Ref. Location 3 08/07/13 Kevin Bowron - Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected
Depth (m) 0.00 (#) (#) (#) (#) (#) (#)
Sample Type SOLID
Date Sampled 20/06/2013 00:00:00
Date Receieved
SDG 130621-132
Method Number TM048
16:07:08 08/07/2013
Page 7 of 10
Validated
Table of Results - Appendix

Wet/Dry Surrogate
Method No Reference Description
Sample Corrected
ASB_PREP
PM001 Preparation of Samples for Metals Analysis
PM024 Modified BS 1377 Soil preparation including homogenisation, moisture screens of
soils for Asbestos Containing Material
TM048 HSG 248, Asbestos: The analysts' guide for Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Material
sampling, analysis and clearance procedures
TM062 (S) National Grid Property Holdings Methods for the Determination of Phenols in Soils by HPLC
Collection & Analysis of Samples from National
Grid Sites version 1 Sec 3.9
TM132 In - house Method ELTRA CS800 Operators Guide
TM133 BS 1377: Part 3 1990;BS 6068-2.5 Determination of pH in Soil and Water using the GLpH pH
Meter
TM151 Method 3500D, AWWA/APHA, 20th Ed., 1999 Determination of Hexavalent Chromium using Kone analyser
TM153 Method 4500A,B,C, I, M AWWA/APHA, 20th Determination of Total Cyanide, Free (Easily Liberatable)
Ed., 1999 Cyanide and Thiocyanate using the Skalar SANS+ System
Segmented Flow Analyser
TM180 Sulphide in waters and waste waters 1991 ISBN The Determination Of Easily Liberated Sulphide In Soil
01 175 7186 SCA rec. 2007 (unpublished)' Samples by Ion Selective Electrode Technique
TM181 US EPA Method 6010B Determination of Routine Metals in Soil by iCap 6500 Duo
ICP-OES
TM218 Microwave extraction EPA method 3546 Microwave extraction - EPA method 3546
TM221 Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Determination of Acid extractable Sulphate in Soils by IRIS
Spectroscopy. An Atlas of Spectral Information: Emission Spectrometer
Winge, Fassel, Peterson and Floyd
TM222 In-House Method Determination of Hot Water Soluble Boron in Soils (10:1
Water:soil) by IRIS Emission Spectrometer
Applies to Solid samples only. DRY indicates samples have been dried at 35C. NA = not applicable.
16:07:08 08/07/2013
Page 8 of 10
Validated
Test Completion Dates

Lab Sample No(s) 7633992 7633993 7633994
Location 1 Location 2 Location 3
Customer Sample Ref.
AGS Ref.
Depth 0.00 0.00 0.00
Type SOLID SOLID SOLID
Asbestos ID in Solid Samples 08-Jul-2013 08-Jul-2013 08-Jul-2013
Boron Water Soluble 28-Jun-2013 28-Jun-2013 28-Jun-2013
Cyanide Comp/Free/Total/Thiocyanate 03-Jul-2013 03-Jul-2013 03-Jul-2013
Easily Liberated Sulphide 27-Jun-2013 27-Jun-2013 27-Jun-2013
Hexavalent Chromium (s) 02-Jul-2013 03-Jul-2013 03-Jul-2013
Metals in solid samples by OES 01-Jul-2013 01-Jul-2013 01-Jul-2013
PAH by GCMS 05-Jul-2013 05-Jul-2013 05-Jul-2013
pH 27-Jun-2013 27-Jun-2013 27-Jun-2013
Phenols by HPLC (S) 03-Jul-2013 03-Jul-2013 03-Jul-2013
Sample description 24-Jun-2013 24-Jun-2013 24-Jun-2013
Total Sulphate 28-Jun-2013 28-Jun-2013 28-Jun-2013
Total Sulphur 08-Jul-2013 08-Jul-2013 08-Jul-2013
16:07:08 08/07/2013
Page 9 of 10
Appendix
General
1. Results are expressed on a dry weight basis (dried at 35C) for all soil analyses except 20. For the BSEN 12457-3 two batch process to allow the cumulative release to be
for the following: NRA and CEN Leach tests, flash point LOI, pH, ammonium as NH 4 by the calculated, the volume of the leachate produced is measured and filtered for all tests. We
BRE method, VOC TICS and SVOC TICS. therefore cannot carry out any unfiltered analysis. The tests affected include volatiles
GCFID/GCMS and all subcontracted analysis.
2. Samples will be run in duplicate upon request, but an additional charge may be incurred.
21. For all leachate preparations (NRA, DIN, TCLP, BSEN 12457-1, 2, 3) volatile loss may
3. If sufficient sample is received a sub sample will be retained free of charge for 30 days occur, as we do not employ zero headspace extraction.
after analysis is completed (e-mailed) for all sample types unless the sample is destroyed
on testing. The prepared soil sub sample that is analysed for asbestos will be retained for a 22. We are accredited to MCERTS for sand, clay and loam /topsoil, or any of these
period of 2 months after the analysis date. All bulk samples will be retained for a period of 6 materials - whether these are derived from naturally occurring soil profiles, or from fill /made
months after the analysis date. All samples received and not scheduled will be disposed of ground, as long as these materials constitute the major part of the sample. Other coarse
one month after the date of receipt unless we are instructed to the contrary. Once the initial granular material such as concrete, gravel and brick are not accredited if they comprise the
period has expired, a storage charge will be applied for each month or part thereof until the major part of the sample.
client cancels the request for sample storage. ALcontrol Laboratories reserve the right to
charge for samples received and stored but not analysed. 23. Analysis and identification of specific compounds using GCFID is by retention time
only, and we routinely calibrate and quantify for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzenes and
4. With respect to turnaround, we will always endeavour to meet client requirements xylenes (BTEX). For total volatiles in the C5 -C12 range, the total area of the
wherever possible, but turnaround times cannot be absolutely guaranteed due to so many chromatogram is integrated and expressed as ug /kg or ug/l. Although this analysis is
variables beyond our control. commonly used for the quantification of gasoline range organics (GRO), the system will
also detect other compounds such as chlorinated solvents, and this may lead to a falsely
5. We take responsibility for any test performed by sub -contractors (marked with an high result with respect to hydrocarbons only. It is not possible to specifically identify these
asterisk). We endeavour to use UKAS/MCERTS Accredited Laboratories, who either non-hydrocarbons, as standards are not routinely run for any other compounds, and for
complete a quality questionnaire or are audited by ourselves. For some determinands there more definitive identification, volatiles by GCMS should be utilised.
are no UKAS/MCERTS Accredited Laboratories, in this instance a laboratory with a known
track record will be utilised.
6. When requested, the individual sub sample scheduled will be analysed in house for the
presence of asbestos fibres and asbestos containing material by our documented in house
method TM048 based on HSG 248 (2005), which is accredited to ISO17025. If a specific Sample Deviations
asbestos fibre type is not found this will be reported as Not detected. If no asbestos fibre
types are found all will be reported as Not detected and the sub sample analysed deemed 1 Container with Headspace provided for volatiles analysis
to be clear of asbestos. If an asbestos fibre type is found it will be reported as detected (for 2 Incorrect container received
each fibre type found). Testing can be carried out on asbestos positive samples, but, due 3 Deviation from method
to Health and Safety considerations, may be replaced by alternative tests or reported as No 4 Holding time exceeded before sample received
Determination Possible. The quantity of asbestos present is not determined unless Sampled on date not provided
specifically requested.
Sample holding time exceeded in laboratory
@ Sample holding time exceeded due to sampled on date
7. If no separate volatile sample is supplied by the client, or if a headspace or sediment is
& Sample Holding Time exceeded - Late arrival of instructions.
present in the volatile sample, the integrity of the data may be compromised. This will be
flagged up as an invalid VOC on the test schedule and the result marked as deviating on
the test certificate.
Asbestos
8. If appropriate preserved bottles are not received preservation will take place on receipt . Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Materials & Soils
However, the integrity of the data may be compromised.
The results for identification of asbestos in bulk materials are obtained from supplied bulk
9. NDP -No determination possible due to insufficient/unsuitable sample. materials which have been examined to determine the presence of asbestos fibres using
Alcontrol Laboratories (Hawarden) in-house method of transmitted/polarised light
10. Metals in water are performed on a filtered sample, and therefore represent dissolved microscopy and central stop dispersion staining, based on HSG 248 (2005).
metals -total metals must be requested separately.
The results for identification of asbestos in soils are obtained from a homogenised sub
11. Results relate only to the items tested. sample which has been examined to determine the presence of asbestos fibres using
Alcontrol Laboratories (Hawarden) in-house method of transmitted/polarised light
12. LODs for wet tests reported on a dry weight basis are not corrected for moisture microscopy and central stop dispersion staining, based on HSG 248 (2005).
content.
13. Surrogate recoveries -Most of our organic methods include surrogates, the recovery
of which is monitored and reported. For EPH, MO, PAH, GRO and VOCs on soils the Asbestos Type Common Name
result is not surrogate corrected, but a percentage recovery is quoted. Acceptable limits for
Chrysotile WhiteAsbestos
most organic methods are 70 -130 %.
Amosite BrownAsbestos
14. Product analyses -Organic analyses on products can only be semi -quantitative due to
Crocidolite Blue Asbestos
the matrix effects and high dilution factors
employed. Fibrous Actinolite -
15. Phenols monohydric by HPLC include phenol, cresols (2-Methylphenol, 3-Methylphenol FibrousAnthophylite -
and 4-Methylphenol) and Xylenols (2,3 Dimethylphenol, 2,4 Dimethylphenol, 2,5
Fibrous Tremolite -
Dimethylphenol, 2,6 Dimethylphenol, 3,4 Dimethyphenol, 3,5 Dimethylphenol).
16. Total of 5 speciated phenols by HPLC includes Phenol, 2,3,5-Trimethyl Phenol,

Visual Estimation Of Fibre Content
2-Isopropylphenol, Cresols and Xylenols (as detailed in 15).
Estimation of fibre content is not permitted as part of our UKAS accredited test other than :
17. Stones/debris are not routinely removed. We always endeavour to take a
-
representative sub sample from the received sample.
Trace -Where only one or two asbestos fibres were identified.
18. In certain circumstances the method detection limit may be elevated due to the sample
Further guidance on typical asbestos fibre content of manufactured products can be
being outside the calibration range. Other factors that may contribute to this include
found in HSG 264.
possible interferences. In both cases the sample would be diluted which would cause the
method detection limit to be raised.
The identification of asbestos containing materials and soils falls within our
schedule of tests for which we hold UKAS accreditation, however opinions,
19. Mercury results quoted on soils will not include volatile mercury as the analysis is
interpretations and all other information contained in the report are outside the
performed on a dried and crushed sample.
scope of UKAS accreditation.
16:07:38 08/07/2013
Page 10 of 10

Topsoil Stripping Method Statement

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Topsoil Stripping Method Statement

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

G.

Scarfo & Son

Topsoil Stripping/ Bund Relocation Method Statement

Arboricultural Method Statement Oakwood Ecology

by Simon Cope BSc, MSc, MCIEEM

For: G. Scarfo & Son

Oakwood Ecology, Bwlch-y-garnedd, Meifod, Powys, SY22 6DR.

2 Arboricultural implications assessment ...................................... 5

3 Arboricultural method statement ............................................... 6

4 Schedule of work ........................................................................ 9

Appendix 1: Photographs ...................................................................... 10

1.1 Site overview

Figure 2. Post-restoration configuration (taken from Creative Landscape, 2011).

1.2 Authors qualifications

1.2.2 I am also a highly-trained ecologist and my knowledge and experience of British

2 Arboricultural implications assessment

3 Arboricultural method statement

3.1 General arboricultural recommendations

No access facilitation pruning is necessary.

3.2 Measures for the protection of retained trees

Stem diameter RPA radius CEZ dimensions

2.0m wide strip from

Table 1. Dimensions of the CEZ.

BS5837:2012 Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction Recommendations.

Photo 3. Group 3 the hedgerow that will be protected by the establishment of a

Alcontrol Soil Analysis Existing Bund

Date: 08 July 2013

All chemical testing (unless subcontracted) is performed at ALcontrol Hawarden Laboratories.

Alcontrol Laboratories is a trading division of ALcontrol UK Limited

Received Sample Overview

250g Amber Jar (AL

250g Amber Jar (AL

400g Tub (ALE214)

400g Tub (ALE214)

Asbestos ID in Solid Samples All NDPs: 0

7633993 Location 2 0.00 Dark Brown Sand 0.1 - 2 mm Stones Vegetation

Results Legend Customer Sample R Location 1 Location 2 Location 3

Asbestos Identification - Solid Samples

Table of Results - Appendix

Test Completion Dates

16. Total of 5 speciated phenols by HPLC includes Phenol, 2,3,5-Trimethyl Phenol,

Você também pode gostar