Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
the new state. Instead, the opposition wants the institutions of the
incumbent regimes, for instance the military in Egypt, to carry
out substantial reforms on behalf of the revolutionthat is, to
modify the constitution, to ensure free elections, to guarantee free
political parties, and in the long run to institutionalize democratic
governance. Here again lies a key anomaly of these revolutions
they enjoy enormous social power, but lack administrative authority;
they garner remarkable hegemony, but do not actually rule. Thus,
the incumbent regimes continue to stand; there are no new states or
governing bodies, nor novel means and modes of governance that
altogether embody the will of the revolution.
It is true that, like their Arab counterparts, the Eastern
European revolutions of the late 1990s were also non-violent,
civil, and remarkably rapidEast Germanys revolution took
only ten daysbut they managed, unlike in Tunisia and Egypt,
to completely transform the political and economic systems. This
was possible because the imploded East German communist state
could simply dissipate and dissolve into the already existing West
German governing body. And broadly, since the difference between
what East European people had (one party, communist state) and
what they wanted (liberal democracy and market economy) was so
distinctly radical, the trajectory of change had to be revolutionary.
Half-way, superficial, and reformist change would have been easily
detected and resisted, which is something quite different from the
Arab revolutions in which the demands of change, freedom, and
social justice are broad enough to be claimed even by the counter-
revolution. Consequently, the Arab revolutions resemble perhaps
more Georgias Rose Revolution of 2003 and Ukraines Orange
Revolution of November 2004January 2005 where in both cases
a massive and sustained popular protest brought down incumbent
fraudulent rulers. In these instances, the trajectory of change looks
more reformist than revolutionary, strictly speaking.
But there is a more promising side to the Arab political upheavals.
One cannot deny the operation of a powerful revolutionary mode
in these political episodes, which make them more profound than
those in Georgia or Ukraine. In Tunisia and Egypt, the departure of
despotic rulers and their apparatus of coercion have opened up an
unprecedented free space for citizens, notably the subaltern subjects,
to reclaim their societies. As is the case in most revolutionary turning
points, an enormous energy has been released in the societys body
politics. Banned political parties have come to surface and new
ones are getting established. Societal organizations have become