Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Abstract: Supply chains are complex, conflicting and uncertain management environments, where the
best alternatives are usually not previously know, they need to be built based on the managers
objectives. For this reason, its decision-makers have been looking for management tools that expand
their understanding in order to identify which objectives best represent their values regarding the
decision context. With this in mind, this paper aims to develop a Performance Evaluation Model for the
operations of the internal supply chain of an organization of the refrigeration equipment sector. The
study adopts a mixture of qualitative and quantitative approaches and applies them through a case
study. The data collection was conducted through unstructured interviews with the decision-maker as
well as specialists appointed by him and supplemented by documentary research. The applied
intervention instrument is the Multricriteria Decision Aid Constructivist (MCDA-C) due to its capacity
of expanding the knowledge in the decision-maker about the consequences of his decisions on the
criteria that he deems critical to the success of the company. One of the results of this research was
the identification of the objectives that, according to the decision-maker perception, should drive the
1 INTRODUO
2 METODOLOGIA
2.1 MCDA-C
A MCDA-C remonta suas origens h mais de 200 anos atrs, mas sua
consolidao como instrumento cientfico de gesto ocorreu somente nos anos 90,
com a publicao dos trabalhos de Roy (1996), Landry (1995), Keeney (1992), Bana
e Costa (1993), dentre outros. Distingue-se da MCDA (Metodologia Multricritrio de
Apoio Deciso) tradicional por sua estruturao para apoiar a deciso em
ambientes complexos, conflituosos e incertos. Complexos por envolver mltiplas
variveis julgadas relevantes pelo Decisor e por gerar percepes distintas do que
seja a situao quando vista por diferentes pessoas . Conflituosos devido aos
diferentes interesses dos atores envolvidos no contexto. E incertos pela carncia de
conhecimento acerca dos aspectos quantitativos e qualitativos envolvidos, para os
quais os decisores desejam criar escalas mensurveis e que, segundo suas
percepes, sejam fiis ao que se propem a medir (ENSSLIN et al., 2010).
3 RESULTADOS E DISCUSSES
3.1 ESTRUTURAO
3.1.1 Contextualizao
3.1.3 Conceitos
9, 10, 19, 5, 6, 7, 11, 1, 2, 4, 8, 3, 12, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38, 20a, 20b, 20c, 24, 25, 26,
21, 41 17, 46, 53, 18, 45, 60 13, 14, 39, 42, 47,51, 27, 28, 29, 22a, 22b, 52, 36a, 36b,
55, 56, 68 15, 16 34, 66, 67, 71, 72, 73, 59, 62, 63a, 43, 44, 69,
23a, 23b, 40, 48, 49, 50, 63b, 64 70
54, 61, 65
3.1.7 Descritores
3.2 AVALIAO
Fonte: Autores
nk
VPVFk (a) wi ,k vi ,k (a) (1)
i 1
Onde:
VPVFk (a) : Valor Global da ao a do PVFk, para k = 1, m;
3.3 RECOMENDAES
4 CONCLUSO
REFERNCIAS
CAI, J., LIU X., XIAO Z., LIU J. Improving supply chain performance management: A
systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment. Decision Support
Systems, v. 46, p. 512-521, 2009.
CHAN, F.T.S., QI, H.J. An innovative performance measurement method for supply
chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production
Management, v. 8, no. 3, p. 209-223, 2003.
DE MORAES, L., et al. The multicriteria analysis for construction of bench markers to
support the Clinical Engineering in the Healthcare Technology Management.
European Journal of Operational Research, v. 200, p. 607-615, 2010.
DELLA BRUNA JUNIOR, E., ENSSLIN, L., ENSSLIN , S.R. Seleo e anlise de um
portflio de artigos sobre avaliao de desempenho na cadeia de suprimentos.
GEPROS. Gesto da Produo, Operaes e Sistemas, v. 7, n. 1, p. 113-125,
2012.
ENSSLIN, L., QUEIROZ, S., GRZEBIELUCKAS, C., ENSSLIN, S.R., NICKEL, E.,
BUSON, M.A., BALBIM JUNIOR, A., Identificao das necessidades do consumidor
no processo de desenvolvimento de produtos: uma proposta de inovao ilustrada
para o segmento automotivo. Produo (So Paulo. Impresso), v. 21, p. 555-569,
2011.
GUNASEKARAN, A., PATER, C., MCGAUGHEY, R.E. A framework for supply chain
performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, v.
87, p. 333-347, 2004.
KANNAN, V.R., TAN, K.C. Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain
management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance.
Omega, v. 33, p. 153-162, 2005.
LEE, H.L. The Triple-A Supply Chain. Harvard Business Review, v. 82 n. 10, p.
102-112, 2004.
ROY, B. Paradigms and challenges, multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the
art survey. In: GRECO, J. F., EHRGOTT, S. M. (eds.) Multicriteria Decision
Analysis: state of the art survey [edited by.]. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Springer
Verlag, 2005. p. 03-24
SHENHAR, A. J. One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency
domains. Management Science, v. 47, p. 394-414, 2001.
WOMACK, J.P., JONES, D.T. From lean production to lean enterprise. Harvard
Business Review, v. 75, p. 93-103, 1996.
ZAMCOP, C.F., ENSSLIN, L., ENSSLIN, S.R., DUTRA, A., Modelo para avaliar o
desempenho de Operadores logsticos - um estudo de caso na indstria txtil.
Gesto & Produo, v. 17 n. 4, p. 1-13, 2010.