Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CR.P.C
Posted by Mumtaz Yousaf
Date: November 21, 2016
in: Legal Drafts
Leave a comment
875 Views
PETITIONER
VS
The State
..RESPONDENT
RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:-
1. That the petitioner is the accused in the above mentioned case which is pending for
adjudication before this Honorable Court and is fixed for today.
2. That on the complaint of Mr. _____ R/o _______, Islamabad, the police of police station
_______ Islamabad, has registered the above mentioned case against the petitioner.
3. That it is alleged in the FIR that the petitioner along with other co-accused has put the
garage of the said house of the complainant on fire.
4. That the allegations leveled in the FIR are false, frivolous, baseless, flimsy and concocted
and the petitioner has no concerned whatsoever with the commission of the said offence.
5. That the prosecution has badly failed to produce evidence before this Honourable Court,
number of opportunities have been given to the prosecution but failed to produce even a
single evidence/witness before this Honble Court.
6. That after conducting the investigation the police has submitted his Challan under section
173 of Cr.PC in which the police categorically stated that there is no concrete evidence
against the petitioner and thereafter the name of petitioner put in column No.2.
7. That in view of the facts available on the prosecution record, there is no justification of
continuing the process of case. These are the valid and sufficient grounds of abusing
court process and wastage of precious time of the court.
8. That petitioner is facing the agony of trial and there is no chance of conviction of the
petitioners/accused.
9. That if this application is not accepted the petitioner will suffer an irreparable loss.
Note. This is the first application, which is ever moved before this Honorable Court.
PETITIONER
THROUGH
Advocate