Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
The plea is the commencement of the trial process in criminal proceedings. Once
the charge sheet is drawn with the relevant charges, it is presented in a court of
law and the suspect(s) are also present for plea taking.
This is an important stage of the proceedings as it is at this forum that the parties
to the criminal proceedings state what the subject-matter of the case is or will be
in open court.
It is also important that the suspect(s) understand the charges leveled against
them before they can decide on the next option to take.
PLEATAKING PROCESS
The plea-taking process is clearly laid down in Section 207 of the Criminal
Procedure Code which states as follows;
1. The substance of the charge(s) shall be read to the accused person [in a
language he understands and include the ingredients of the offence], he shall
be asked whether he admits or denies the truth of the charge.
2. If the accused person admits the charge(s) [unequivocally] the admission
shall be recorded as nearly as possible in the words used by him.
3. The Court shall be informed by the [prosecution] or the court may require the
complainant to outline the facts upon which the charge was founded. The
prosecution will state the facts upon which the offence is based. The accused
person is given an opportunity to admit dispute explain or add any facts. If the
accused person denies the facts, a plea of not guilty is entered on the court
record.
4. [If the accused person admits the facts that gave rise to the charge
unequivocally], then the court will convict the accused person on the charges
admitted.
1
5. On the basis of the plea, the court will be addressed on the accused persons
record by the prosecution
6. The accused person will mitigate
7. Then the court will pass sentence
8. If the accused person does not admit the charge [a plea of not guilty shall be
entered in the Court record] and shall proceed to hear the case
9. If the accused person refuses to plead, the court shall order plea of not guilty
entered for him.
The court is required to state the substance of the charge to the accused person.
The trial commences with the reading of the charge. The accused person has a
constitutional right under section 77 of the Constitution, to be informed in a
language he/she understands the substance of the charge.
2
Where he does not understand the language of the court, he is entitled without
payment to an interpreter.
The charge contains specific offences known in law and the necessary
particulars and information as to the nature of the offence charged. No person
can be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and penalty
prescribed by written law (Section 77 (8))
Under the Constitution, the prosecution of criminal cases is vested in the Attorney
General.
Section 26 of the Constitution is instructive; the Attorney General has the power
to institute proceedings, takeover ongoing proceedings, withdraw proceedings.
Section 85 (1) empowers the Attorney General by notice in the Kenya Gazette to
appoint public prosecutors. Therefore the prosecution of cases is by duly
appointed prosecutors.
3
PROCESS
Police officers searched the appellants home and found a television set that had
been stolen. He did not have a receipt or permit for it. He was charged with being
in possession of suspected stolen property c/s 323 of the Penal Code.
When plea was taken, he pleaded guilty to the charge and was convicted and
sentenced to 1 year and 6 months imprisonment. On appeal, his advocate
submitted that the facts did not support the charge as the appellant was not given
a chance to defend himself as to how he came to be in possession of the TV as
required in section 323 of the Penal Code.
The facts must support the charge and all ingredients of the charge read and
understood by the accused. The appeal was successful.
On appeal, the appellants advocate told the court, that the 8 charges did not
amount to pleas of guilty as the ingredients of the charges; in a manner
dangerous to the public is complex to appreciate and the appellant did not
admit the essential ingredient of fault on his part. Secondly, dangerous driving is
capable of diverse interpretations.
4
The respondent stated that there was no appeal against sentence, the facts
outlined at the trial were accepted by the appellant, and viewed objectively,
disclosed an element of dangerous driving. The appellant understood the
charges and pleaded guilty unequivocally.
Court held;
There was evidence that the charges were read out and the ingredients
explained and then interpreted to the appellant and he must have understood
the charges before he replied to them.
There was no evidence that he disputed the facts or sought to assert other
facts. Appeal dismissed.
Where the advocate represents the accused person, the accused person
must personally plead to the charge; his lawyer cannot plead for him, on
his behalf.
PLEA OF GUILTY
When the accused person (s) plead guilty, the Court must record the
admission as nearly as possible in the words used by him/her
5
KARIUKI VS REPUBLIC (1984) KLR 809
The Accused person was charged with 4 others with importing goods contrary to
the Customs and Excise Act. The charges were read to al accused persons.
After, the prosecutor narrated the facts, the court record stated as follows;
The court record did not contain the Accused persons answer to the charges. It
was not clear from the record which counts the appellant pleaded to. The
irregularities and omissions in the trial did not afford the appellant a satisfactory
trial. The appeal was allowed.
Where the accused person is charged with more than 1 count, the court should
record a plea on each count separately. The aim is to ensure that the plea is
unequivocal.
The appellants were convicted of selling goods over the maximum price and
failing to display a price list c/s Price Control Act (CAP504).
They pleaded to 6 counts yet 1 plea was recorded.
They were convicted without the court hearing and recording the facts of the
case.
6
The Court held;
It is good practice to record a plea for each count separately
Whether the plea is unequivocal or not depends on circumstances of the
case
Prosecutor in stating that facts are as per charge sheets was an error.
The statements of facts must be explained to the accused, it enables him to
understand the charges against him.
Where 2 or more persons are charged jointly, their pleas should not be
recorded as a joint plea.
Once the accused person pleads guilty to the charge, the prosecutor is required
to state the facts upon which the charge is based on. The accused person should
be given a chance to admit, dispute, explain or add any relevant facts. If the
accused person denies the facts, a plea of not guilty is entered on the court
record.
An accused person convicted on his own plea of guilt has no right of appeal
against conviction but only sentence as prescribed in section 348 CPC.
7
In order for a plea of guilty to be valid it must be a plea that was entered
voluntarily.
The appellant was convicted on his own plea of guilt to a charge of neglecting to
prevent a felony c/s 392 of the Penal Code.
On appeal, the respondent raised a preliminary objection to section 348 CPC
which prohibits an appeal against a conviction on a plea of guilty. The appellant
made an application to call additional evidence to be taken.
Where the charge is read to the accused person for the offence (s) charged
and he pleads guilty to them, the facts read out by the prosecution must be
facts related to the specific charges only.
8
Court held;
Section 72 (1)of the Constitution and section 207 CPC indicate the trial court
can only convict for the offence charged and the facts should relate to that
charge only.
When the charges are read to the accused person and he pleads guilty, the
prosecution should read out the facts of the charge and produce exhibits where
necessary or relevant.
Court held;
The prosecutor did not read the facts and every ingredient of the charge had
not been explained to the accused persons.
The plea was not sufficient to amount to a plea of guilt
The plea did not support the conviction.
The appellants were charged with robbery with violence c/s 296 (2) of the Penal
Code and were convicted and sentenced to death. On appeal, the Court record
did not contain or reflect Plea taking. The record showed the 2 appellants went to
court the first day and were given hearing dates to the trial.
Court held;
9
PLEA OF GUILTY IN THE ABSENCE OF ACCUSED PERSON
Section 77 of the Constitution requires that the trial should take place in the
presence of the accused person. However there is a proviso, that if the accused
person conducts himself in such a way to render continuation of the trial of the
trial in his or her presence impossible, such an accused person maybe removed
from court and the trial and the trial may proceed in his absence.
The CPC allows attendance of court by the suspect maybe waived with the
Courts leave for petty offences where the sentence will not exceed 3 months
imprisonment and a fine.
Where the accused person stands mute of malice, the court will enter a plea of
not guilty.
Where the accused person is silent, the court may adjourn plea taking
proceedings and ask for a medical report on whether, the accused person is fit
plead.
If an objection is taken to the charge before plea, the court ought to deal with the
preliminary objection first before plea taking. If the objection is dismissed, then
the plea taking proceeds, if the objection is upheld, depending on the issue the
court will determine the fate of the proceedings.
10
The plea taking procedure is similar to the Magistrates courts only that the
information is the one read to the suspect.
When asked to plead, the accused person may, or may fail to adopt any of the
various approaches in answer to the charges;
1. Plead guilty
2. Plead not guilty
3. Say nothing; depending on the circumstances; if the accused person is
disabled; cannot hear or speak, but he is fit to plead, the court will avail a sign
language interpreter; if he is of unsound mind, then he is not fit to plead;
based on the medical record, may postpone proceedings, have him/her kept
in safe custody and the matter referred for the order of the President.
4. Assert the court lacks jurisdiction over the matter.
5. Demurrer; give a legal opinion, that is admit the facts but say they do not
amount to an offence known to law.
6. Plead Autrefois convict
7. Plead Autrefois acquit
8. Plead ( having previously been) pardon [ed]
Demurrer
11
It is an objection to the form and substance of the charge. It is a legal objection,
that though facts are true, no offence is disclosed.
Jurisdiction
CHANGE OF PLEA
An accused person, who has pleaded guilty to a charge, may change the plea to
one of not guilty before he/she is sentenced.
For a long time, it was held that once an accused person entered a plea of guilty,
the plea could not be changed because the court becomes functus officio.
12
AMENDMENT AND SUBSTITUTION OF CHARGES
13
MACHARIA Vs REPUBLIC 1975 E.A. 193
An advocate was charged with an offence in court. The charge was amended
and was not read to the accused person to take plea on the amended charge. It
was argued that there was no prejudice, as the accused person was an
advocate.
Court held:
In law, the status of the accused person is irrelevant; the fact that the accused
person was an advocate did not absolve the court from its duty to inform the
accused person of the right to answer to the substituted charge and to cross
examine the witnesses who had testified.
When the charge is changed, amended or substituted, the court should allow, the
accused person if he/she wishes to recall and reexamine witnesses. The
requirement must be complied with and recorded.
Where the charge relates to perishable goods, it is inappropriate for the court to
order disposal of the goods before they are exhibited in court.
14