Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
204]
Original Article
2016 Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry|Published by Wolters KluwerMedknow 391
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Monday, October 30, 2017, IP: 201.82.18.204]
35.0
were polished with 320 grit silicon carbide paper to
31.17
prepare flat enamel surface for treatment and bonding.
30.0 26.98
Mean Shear bond strength (MPa)
24.04
25.0 The specimens were divided into following four
20.0 groups. All the groups consisted of twenty specimens.
15.34
Group1(20)No bleaching(control group)
15.0
Group 2a (20) Bleaching with 15% carbamide
10.0 peroxide only
5.0 Group 2b (20) Bleaching with 15% carbamide
0.0
peroxide followed by application of 10% sodium
Control Group 2A Group 2B Group 2C ascorbate gel
group Group 2c (20) Bleaching with 15% carbamide
peroxide followed by application of 5% PA agent.
No bleaching Bleached, without antioxidant
Forty intact human premolars extracted for orthodontic A total adhesive (3M ESPE ADPER Single Bond
purpose were collected. All the teeth were thoroughly 2, USA) was applied to all specimens according
cleaned free of debris and calculus using scalers and to manufacturers instruction. A plastic tube with
were stored in isotonic saline (D.J. Laboratories Pvt. internaliamete dr of 2 and 2 mm height was placed
Ltd., India) until use. Teeth with caries, cracks, or onto bonded specimens before curing the adhesive,
developmental enamel defects were excluded from and then light cured for 30 s. The plastic tube was filled
this study. Carbide disc was used to remove roots at with composite (3M ESPE Filtek Z350 XT, USA) and
the level of cementoenamel junction. Each crown was light cured for 40 s; then tubes were removed.
sectioned with carbide disc longitudinally to obtain
non occlusalbuccal and lingual enamel surface, and a Shear bond strength analysis
total of eighty enamel specimens were obtained. All The shear bond strength assessment was done using
specimens were mounted in acrylic resin blocks such Instron Universal Testing Machine. The specimens
that only the enamel surfaces were exposed. Specimens were placed in the Instron Universal Testing Machine
392 Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry|OctDec 2016|Vol 34|Issue 4 |
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Monday, October 30, 2017, IP: 201.82.18.204]
such that the chisel model (fixture) of the machine Table1: Comparison of mean bond strength
would lie perpendicular to the composite cylinders. between control group and experimental groups
Force was then applied over the composite cylinders
Group Shear bond strength(MPa)
at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min until the cylinders
MeanSD Range
got detached from the enamel surface.
Control 24.040.55 23.07-24.97
The amount of load needed to detach the composite Group2a 15.341.24 13.36-18.80
cylinders was noted and the bond strength was Group2b 26.981.51 23.01-30.32
calculated using the formula: Group2c 31.171.52 28.36-34.48
Control versus Group2a t=28.76, P<0.001
Bond strength=Force in kilogram needed to debond Control versus Group2b t=8.17, P<0.001
the composite cylinder9.8/total surface area. Control versus Group2c t=22.38, P<0.001
Unpaired ttest; P<0.001, HS. Control group:No bleaching; Group2a:Only
bleaching with 15% carbamide peroxide; Group 2b: Bleaching with 15%
Statistical analysis carbamide peroxide followed by application of 10% sodium ascorbate gel;
The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed Group2c:Bleaching with 15% carbamide peroxide followed by application
using statistical product and service solutions of 5% proanthocyanidin agent; SD:Standard deviation; HS:Highly significant
version 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Oneway analysis of variance for multiple group Table2: Comparison of mean bond strength
comparison and post hoc Tukeys test for individual between experimental groups
group comparison were used. P 0.05 was considered
Group Shear bond strength(MPa)
statistical significance.
MeanSD Range
Group2a 15.341.24 13.36-18.80
Results Group2b 26.981.51 23.01-30.32
Group2c 31.171.52 28.36-34.48
Group 1 (no bleaching) showed significantly higher Oneway ANOVA F=726.07, P=0.00**
shear bond strength than Group2a(bleached, without
Groupwise Mean difference P
antioxidant; 15.34 1.24 MPa). When compared comparison
to Group 1 (no bleaching), Group 2b (10% sodium
Group2a versus 2b 11.64 0.00**
ascorbate gel; 26.981.51 MPa), and Group2c(5% PA;
Group2a versus 2c 15.83 0.00**
31.17 1.52 MPa) showed significantly higher shear
Group2b versus 2c 4.19 0.00**
bond strength values[Table1 and Figure 1].
**Highly significant, Post hoc Tukeys test; P<0.001, HS. Group 2a: Only
bleaching with 15% carbamide peroxide; Group 2b: Bleaching with 15%
Among experimental groups, Group 2a (bleached, carbamide peroxide followed by application of 10% sodium ascorbate gel;
without antioxidant) showed the lowest mean Group2c:Bleaching with 15% carbamide peroxide followed by application of
shear bond strength values compared to all other 5% proanthocyanidin agent. SD:Standard deviation; HS:Highly significant;
ANOVA:Analysis of variance
experimental groups(P<0.05). Group2b(10% sodium
ascorbate gel) showed significantly higher shear bond
strength(26.981.51 MPa) than Group2a(bleached, and comparatively inexpensive. Products currently
without antioxidant). When Group 2c and 2a were available in the market for nightguard vital bleaching
compared, Group 2c showed significantly higher technique use 10% carbamide peroxide with a pH close
shear bond strength values (31.17 1.52 MPa). to neutral. This solution is unstable and dissociates into
Group 2c (5% PA) showed significantly higher shear 3% hydrogen peroxide and 7% urea on contact with
bond strength than Group 2c (10% sodium ascorbate tissue or saliva. The hydrogen peroxide further breaks
gel)[Table2 and Figure 1]. down into oxygen and water, while urea degrades into
ammonia and carbon dioxide, which elevate the pH. The
Discussion oxidizers remove some unattached organic matter from
the tooth without dissolving the enamel matrix, and these
Tooth bleaching can be performed externally, termed pigments are removed by diffusion, leading to bleaching.
nightguard vital bleaching or vital tooth bleaching, or In this technique, after carbamide peroxide breakdown,
intracoronally in rootfilled teeth, called nonvital tooth the concentration of peroxide is lower than previous
bleaching.[1] The mechanism of action of bleaching inoffice bleaching techniques. However, home bleaching
agents is based on a complex oxidation reaction, which comprises daily application of 58h for 25weeks.[6,7]
releases oxygen free radicals that penetrate through the
porosities of the enamel prism to the dentin, possibly Esthetic restorations require the use of bonding
due to the low molecular weight(about 30g/mol) of technique. However, it is unknown whether immediate
these substances.[5] bonding of resin after bleaching procedures decreases
the bond strength of these restorative materials.[810]
Nightguard vital bleaching introduced by Haywood This is likely to be caused by delayed release of oxygen
and Heymann in 1989 is simple, apparently safe, that could interfere with resin infiltration into etched
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry|OctDec 2016|Vol 34|Issue 4 | 393
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Monday, October 30, 2017, IP: 201.82.18.204]
enamel or inhibit polymerization of resins that cure ability of sodium ascorbate that helps to neutralize
through free radical polymerization. If the oxygenrich and reverse the oxidizing effects of bleaching agents.
surface layer of enamel is removed, the composite to Furthermore, sodium ascorbate allows for the free
enamel bond strength returns to near normal. The radical polymerization of the adhesive to proceed
exact depth of this oxygenrich layer of enamel is without premature termination by restoring the altered
unknown. However, it must be>510m; otherwise, redox potential of the oxidized bonding substrate.[24]
the acid etching would have removed it.[11]
However, with regards to the concentration of the
Furthermore, some studies have suggested physical hydrogel(either 10% or 20%), there was no significant
alterations in enamel after bleaching with carbamide difference observed in the bond strengths between
peroxide. They found an increased porosity of enamel the groups. Kimayi and Valizadeh observed similar
as manifested by an overetched appearance with loss findings and suggested that 10% sodium ascorbate
of prismatic structure. Furthermore, loss of calcium, hydrogel might be as effective as 20% sodium ascorbate
a decrease in microhardness and alterations in the hydrogel in neutralizing the oxidizing agents and
organic substance, might be factors that contribute to increasing the bond strength.[24]
the decrease in the bond strengths.[12,13]
Sodium ascorbate was used in gel form instead of
Clinicians should be aware of the outcome of the solution since gel form is more acceptable clinically.
bleaching treatment and the interactions with further Patients can apply gel in the same tray used for
dental treatments, especially additional adhesive bleaching, thus reducing the chairside time.[22,24] The
esthetic interventions such as composite bonding, or manipulation of solution is more difficult than gel,
laminate veneers.[14] and the efficiency of sodium ascorbate solution is swift
and shortterm. In addition, solution should be used
Some techniques have been suggested to solve several times before bonding procedure.[25]
the clinical problems related to post bleaching
compromised bond strength. Barghi and Godwin In this study, another antioxidant used was PA which
treated bleached enamel with alcohol before was found in high concentrations in natural sources
restoration,[15] Cvitko etal. proposed the removal such as grape seed extract, cocoa beans, pine bark
of the superficial layer of enamel,[11] and Sung etal. extract, cranberries, lemon tree bark, and hazelnut tree
suggested the use of adhesives containing organic leaves. Grape seed extract was chosen for this study
solvents.[16] However, the general approach is to since it yields a 10% higher concentration of PAs. This
postpone any bonding procedure for a period after PA is designated as PA B230gallate. PAs are high
bleaching, because the reduction in bond strength has molecular weight polymers comprised the monomeric
been shown to be temporary.[17] and has been reported flavan3ol(+) catechin and() epicatechin. Oligomeric
to vary from 24h to 4weeks.[18,19] proanthocyanidin complex (OPC) contains multiple
electron donor sites (hydroxyl sites) that bind to
Lai etal. in their study suggested that the antioxidant unstable molecules called free radicals by donating its
needs to be applied for no less than onethird the hydrogen atoms. OPC also recycles other antioxidants
bleaching time for it to completely reverse its effects. such as Vitamin C and glutathione by removing the
This corresponds to approximately 3h, which is a long free radicals they bind with and freeing them up to
duration for carrying out restorative treatment in the interact again with other free radicals. The presence
same visit following bleaching. Shorter application of gallic acid also increases the free radical scavenging
time is clinically desirable. Therefore, the application activity.[26]
time of 10min was chosen in this study, as this duration
is considered to be adequate for clinical application of Therapeutic applications of OPCs in the field of
the antioxidant in solution form.[17,20,21] medicine for the treatment of various vascular
disorders are well documented. These compounds also
The present invitro study evaluated the efficacy of demonstrate antibacterial, antiviral, anticarcinogenic,
two antioxidant agents, namely, sodium ascorbate and antiinflammatory, and antiallergic properties. In vitro
PA(grape seed extract) in reversing the compromised studies have confirmed that the free radical scavenging
bonding to bleached enamel surface by measuring the ability and the antioxidant potential of OPCs are fifty
shear bond strength at the resinenamel interface. times greater than Vitamin C and twenty times greater
than that of Vitamin E.[26,27]
In this study, treatment of the bleached enamel with
10% sodium ascorbate hydrogel before bonding The present study showed that the shear bond strength
appeared to restore the reduced shear bond strength of of Group1(unbleached group) is significantly greater
composite resin to enamel. The results concur with the than that of Group2(bleached group). These findings
previous studies,[20,22] where similar reversal of bond are in accordance with the studies performed by
strength was observed by antioxidant treatment.[23] The various other authors such as Titley et al.,[28] Stokes
possible explanation for this could be the antioxidant etal.,[27] Miles etal.,[29] and Spyrides etal.[30]
394 Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry|OctDec 2016|Vol 34|Issue 4 |
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Monday, October 30, 2017, IP: 201.82.18.204]
The results of our study showed that the shear bond Conflicts of interest
strengths of both Group 2b (10% sodium ascorbate There are no conflicts of interest.
applied) was significantly greater than that of
Group2(bleached). Similar findings were reported by References
Torresetal.[31] who used 10% sodium ascorbate solution
for a period of 20min and found improvement in shear 1. HeymannHO. Additional conservative esthectic procedures.
bond strength compared to bleached enamel but lower In: RobersonTM, HaymannHO, SwiftEJ, editors. Sturdevents
when compared to unbleached enamel. Kimyai etal.[32] Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5thed. Noida: Reed
showed that the bond strength of teeth treated with Elsevier India Private Limited; 2009. p.62541.
10% sodium ascorbate for 10 min was significantly 2. DabasD, PatilAC, UppinVM. Evaluation of the effect of
higher than bleached and immediately bonded teeth. concentration and duration of application of sodium ascorbate
hydrogel on the bond strength of composite resin to bleached
In the literature, sodium ascorbate has proven its enamel. JConserv Dent 2011;14:35660.
efficacy as an antioxidant in the reversal of reduced 3. BastingRT, RodriguesJA, SerraMC, PimentaLA. Shear bond
bond strength to bleached enamel, but literature is strength of enamel treated with seven carbamide peroxide
scarce on studies using grape seed extract as viable bleaching agents. JEsthet Restor Dent 2004;16:2509.
alternatives to sodium ascorbate. There are many 4. OskoeePA, NavimipourEJ, OskoeeSS, MoosaviN. Effect
reports of using these products in medicine for of 10% sodium ascorbate on bleached bovine enamel surface
centuries as therapeutic agents. Hence, in this study, morphology and microhardness. Open Dent J 2010;4:20710.
emphasis was placed on the use of grape seed extract 5. GarciaEJ, OldoniTL, AlencarSM, ReisA, LoguercioAD,
as an antioxidant before bonding procedure was GrandeRH. Antioxidant activity by DPPH assay of potential
performed on bleached enamel. solutions to be applied on bleached teeth. Braz Dent J 2012;23:227.
6. HaywoodVB. History, safety, and effectiveness of current
This study shows that treatment with Grape seed bleaching techniques and applications of the nightguard vital
extract(Group2c) increases bond strength significantly bleaching technique. Quintessence Int 1992;23:47188.
compared with Group 1, 2a, and 2b. This could be 7. HaywoodVB, RobinsonFG. Vital tooth bleaching with
attributed to the following: nightguard vital bleaching. Curr Opin Cosmet Dent 1997;4:4552.
1. The specificity of OPCs for hydroxyl free radicals 8. CrimGA. Postoperative bleaching: Effect on microleakage.
2. The presence of multiple donor sites on OPCs that Am J Dent 1992;5:10912.
trap superoxide radicals 9. Swift EJ Jr., Perdigo J. Effects of bleaching on teeth and
3. The esterification of() epicatechin by gallic acid in restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:81520.
OPCs, which enhances the free radical scavenging 10. Perdigo J, FrancciC, Swift EJ Jr., AmbroseWW, LopesM.
ability.[33,34] Ultramorphological study of the interaction of dental
adhesives with carbamide peroxidebleached enamel. Am J
The present study indicated that the shear bond Dent 1998;11:291301.
strength of the antioxidant group(Group2c) is higher 11. CvitkoE, DenehyGE, Swift EJ Jr., PiresJA. Bond strength of
than all the other three groups. In addition, the shear composite resin to enamel bleached with carbamide peroxide.
bond strength of the bleached group (Group 2a) is JEsthet Dent 1991;3:1002.
significantly lower than all the other three groups. This 12. McCrackenMS, HaywoodVB. Demineralization effects of 10
implies that the use of antioxidants increases the bond percent carbamide peroxide. JDent 1996;24:3958.
strength to bleached enamel. 13. Hegeds C, BisteyT, FlraNagyE, KeszthelyiG, JeneiA.
An atomic force microscopy study on the effect of bleaching
agents on enamel surface. JDent 1999;27:50915.
Conclusion 14. ChristensenGJ. Bleaching teeth: Practitioner trends. JAm
Dent Assoc 1997;128Suppl:16S8S.
Within the limits of this study, the following 15. BarghiN, GodwinJM. Reducing the adverse effect of bleaching
conclusions were drawn: on compositeenamel bond. JEsthet Dent 1994;6:15761.
1. Bleaching of enamel reduced the shear bond 16. SungEC, ChanSM, MitoR, CaputoAA. Effect of carbamide
strength peroxide bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite
2. Application of antioxidants immediately after to dental bonding agent enhanced enamel. JProsthet Dent
bleaching showed significantly increased bond 1999;82:5959.
strength 17. TorneckCD, TitleyKC, SmithDC, AdibfarA. Effect of water
3. Among the antioxidants tested in this study, Grape leaching on the adhesion of composite resin to bleached and
seed extract (PA agent) was the most effective unbleached bovine enamel. JEndod 1991;17:15660.
antioxidant in reversing the bond strength; hence, it 18. TitleyKC, TorneckCD, SmithDC, CherneckyR, AdibfarA.
may be an innovative option for esthetic treatment Scanning electron microscopy observations on the penetration
after bleaching. and structure of resin tags in bleached and unbleached bovine
enamel. JEndod 1991;17:725.
Financial support and sponsorship 19. DishmanMV, CoveyDA, BaughanLW. The effects of
Nil. peroxide bleaching on composite to enamel bond strength.
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry|OctDec 2016|Vol 34|Issue 4 | 395
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Monday, October 30, 2017, IP: 201.82.18.204]
396 Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry|OctDec 2016|Vol 34|Issue 4 |