Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
September 2008
The sole responsibility for the content of this study lies with the authors. It does not represent the
opinion of the Community. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be
made of the information contained therein.
Summary
1. Introduction.................................................................................. 3
1. Introduction
The work here reported has as a starting point the study carried out by
ESTIF within the EU Project Key issues for Renewable Heat in
Europe (K4RES-H), EIE/04/240/S07.38607, entitled Best practice
regulations for solar thermal, August 2007 [1], as well as the country
reports on the implementation of the EPBD, available in the website of the
EPBD Buildings Platform [2].
The spin-off of this learning process from the past experience will be an
ideal model of STO to be implemented by our Local project partners,
according to local conditions. This ideal model will be presented separately,
within the overall deliverable D.2.1.
The STO case studies referred in this report 4 from Italy, 4 from Spain, 1
from Germany, 1 from Ireland, and 1 from Portugal were analysed
throughout a questionnaire, in Annex A, with focus on the following
questions:
Baden-Wrttemberg, Germany:
Ireland:
Italy:
- at local level:
The Law no. 15/2004 of the Regione di Lazio [12] foresees the
mandatory use of solar thermal energy and the rational use of water
in buildings. Its scope includes both new and under refurbishment
buildings.
The law itself does not go into details regarding specific measures to
be applied, leaving to the Municipalities the duty to apply the law in
details.
- at national level:
The Law no. 192 (August, 19th 2005) [13], modified and integrated
through Law no. 311 (December, 29th 2006) [14], is the
implementation, at national level for Italy, of the EC Directive
2002/91/CE, about energy efficiency in buildings.
Portugal:
Spain:
- at local level:
Notes:
1. We present in this study only two ordinances. One, the
Barcelona Ordinance, it was the first in Spain, and there is an
evaluation report about their application [20]. Another, the
Pamplona Ordinance, it is a representative of one of some eighty
ordinances covering all Spain (see more cases in [21]).
- at national level:
Below, the main success factors (and therefore barriers) for developing and
implementing a STO are listed and commented.
Communicating the STO is a key issue for its success: if you are able to
inform people why you are doing that, they will understand and agree and
they will end with considering this STO as their law.
Try to address each one of the actors with the most appropriate message:
architects: solar could be beautiful or solar is for sure beautiful, when
you use it properly;
final users:
a) solar homes are the best where to live, for economics, environment
and comfort;
b) if you like and want solar, the right moment when to install it is when
the building is under construction or refurbishment;
building companies, designers:
a) surplus cost is low; provide them with simple (and correct!) figures;
b) at the same time solar homes have clear added values and they
could give you competitiveness;
c) you have the legal responsibility to comply with the law;
d) there are checks and corresponding fees and both of them are
actually and effectively working;
Municipality staff: our solar obligation is easy to apply;
all the actors:
a) our STO is easy to apply;
b) our STO has a wide impact on reducing energy consumption and
emissions in our City/Province/Region/Country; show that you have
a business plan, with clear targets and figures (emission savings,
clean energy production, etc.) ;
c) the building we build now will require energy for the next 50 years,
so why should we rely on fossil fuels and not on clean renewable
energy for the next 50 years?;
d) this law gives you the guaranteed right of using clean, renewable
and no-cost energy.
In order to have a high impact, the scope of the STO should include a
remarkable share of the building stock. Therefore:
include not only residential buildings, but also tertiary activities which
consume hot water (elderly homes, hospitals, jails, sport centres and
gyms, etc.);
include as many refurbishment activities as possible, for instance,
foresee the obligation for any refurbishment which concerns heat supply
plants.
Exemptions to the accomplishment of the law should be not too many and
not ambiguous:
in particular, clear rules should be established for historical and
protected buildings/areas; it would be advisable not to have a 100%
exemption, but rules for architecturally integrating technologies in order
to lower their visual impact;
do not ask that the solar collectors should not be seen from street level;
do not ask for internal boiler only;
industrial buildings could be exempted;
buildings with small consumption of hot water could be exempted;
seasonal buildings (when the consumption is mainly in cold seasons!)
could be exempted.
In general:
IS IT WORKING WELL?
Buildings:
number of buildings addressed by the STO (also in terms of m2 of living
area and of people addressed by the STO);
share of buildings addressed on the total building stock;
if the ordinance is not solar only: share of buildings (new/refurbished)
which chose solar thermal to comply with the law;
real figures for surplus cost in new/refurbished buildings (check that this
value is reasonable);
how many buildings applied successfully for being exempted?
number of cases where the minimum obligation foreseen has been
definitely overcome (e.g. buildings which chose a 50% share of solar
thermal on hot water demand, when the STO requirement is 30%).
Checks:
how many people in the Administration have been trained to perform
checks?
share of negative checks in the design phase;
number of random checks in the installation or operation phase and
share of negative situations;
number of sanctioned situations and rate of accomplishment (payment
of the fees).
Others:
how many external actors (e.g. building companies, banks, etc.) have
been involved in information workshops?
how many people have been involved in information campaigns
addressing final users?
how many Municipalities replicated a similar ordinance?
are final users happy with the law? A questionnaire could be developed
and spread.
BIRTH
DEVELOPMENT
Baseline
Assessment
Preparation
Phase
Implemen-
tation
Objectives
Understanding the regulatory, political, economical, societal framework
for a STO;
developing a suitable approach/proposal for starting public consultation
with all parties concerned.
Process
Analysis of the regulatory, political, economical, societal framework;
analysis of internal and external factors, risks and opportunities;
stakeholder analysis;
lessons learned from external best practices.
Objectives
Drafting of a STO regulation ready for enacting;
achieving broad support and acceptance for the STO implementation.
Both political and from the stakeholders concerned.
Process
Commencement of them process by the competent public
administration;
iterative process of public consultation with policy makers, stakeholders
and advisors;
drafting of the STO with all elements required;
planning of the implementation phase (e.g. flanking measures,
monitoring);
setting-up of suitable structures.
Political Public
Promoter Stakeholders Advisors
decision makers administration
leading force
absorption of
close cooperation ideally also
the process
with politicians and leading force
coordination
administration
participate in
participate in coordinate
consultation
participate in consultation public participate in
process
consultation process consultations consultation
advice and
process ensure political coordinate process
support to
support drafting
drafting
planning of
implementation, advice and
work sharing work sharing
setting-up of support
structures
PHASE 3: IMPLEMENTATION
Objectives
High efficiency and impact of the STO at low cost;
good acceptance;
multiplication effects, additional benefits.
Political Public
Promoter Stakeholders Advisors
decision makers administration
leading force ideally also
close cooperation ideally also leading force support to
with politicians and leading force coordination of STO
administration measures
enacting of the
political support support
STO
coordination of
flanking advice and
work sharing political support work sharing
measures and support
monitoring
The present document is the starting point for the development of tools for
introducing STOs at local level.
Success factors and barriers analysed in chapter 3 were considered.
Besides, inputs by participating communities (chapter 4) were analysed.
This process enabled to identify well targeted tools.
The various tools range from text proposals for the ordinance over
background reports and best practice examples to software tools for
mapping the potential of solar thermal in your community. New tools are
develop and already available instruments are collected and made
available.
According to the needs of the communities involved in the project, the STO
tools have been divided according to a simple structure:
1. Context
Communities need first of all background information about in order to
learn more about the objectives, the impact, the efficiency and the
effort of STOs. For this reason it is recommended to make existing
experiences available. Once the background information is available,
communication tools are required in order to effectively disseminate
the choice of introducing a STO. In particular hints for good reasons
for introducing a STO are useful. Following tools will therefore be
produced within the project:
Brochure for promoting STOs
Guideline for supporting local communities while introducing
STOs;
Process model showing the different phases of the introduction
and the involved actors.
2. Baseline Assessment
Before introducing a STO it is crucial to realise a detailed analysis of
the local situation and of the local boundary conditions. This means
investigating the actual conditions at different levels, assessing the
potential impact of the STO and evaluating its feasibility. Following
tools are necessary:
Base line assessment: templates (such as check lists) to be
used as starting point and adapted to the local needs could be a
useful tool for accompanying local communities in the assessment
phase.
Besides, examples of complete assessments carried out
previously by other communities would help in collecting the
3. Ordinance components
Once the decision of introducing a STO has been taken, communities
face the problem of creating the contents of the law. A lot of mistakes
have been made in the past and can now be avoided by learing from
existing experiences. Analysis and comparison of past experiences,
which is described in chapters two and three of this document, clearly
showed that criteria and procedures should be made available to local
communities.
Scope: a clear definition of the scope of the STO is fundamental.
This mainly means to decide which buildings will be affected by
the STO and which exemptions should be considered. Besides,
technologies accepted for meeting the requirements must be
exactly defined.
Calculation procedures must be clearly defined and well
targeted. Since this is a technical issue, communities need
support in this phase. Looking at existing examples will help
newcomers a lot.
Quality requirements: the effect of STOs on product quality must
be controlled. For this reason a set of minimum quality
requirement will help communities a lot. This, again, is a mainly
technical issue, which needs specific knowledge that public
administrations are not supposed to have.
Architectural integration and protected buildings are further
technical hot topics in the implementation of a STO. Different
approaches have been adopted in the past and should be made
available.
Administration and procedures are probably the most time
consuming phase of a STO, since they affect the whole
implementation phase. Check lists, as well as existing
experiences, will be very useful for newcomers.
Training of community staff: community technicians are key
actors in the implementation phase. They must be trained in order
to assure an effective implementation. For this purpose, however,
a specific training approach is needed, which strongly differs from
those usually adopted in the training of professionals.
5. Monitoring
Tools of the Monitoring section are useful for tracking the
achievements obtained with the STO.
Monitoring of the market helps evaluating the real impact of the
STO.
Evaluation of the impact of the STO
Supervision is on of the hottest topics to address, since checks
are expensive. What is more, defining fees and penalties is very
difficult and can make the difference between a a good and a bad
STO.