Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A Thesis
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
The undersigned have examined the thesis entitled Structural Design of a G+4 hotel at Addis Ababa presented by
DANIEL ABERA, GOYTOM KEBEDEW, MEHARI TSEGAY,
YOHANNES AREFE , a candidate for the degree of Bachelor of Science and hereby certify that it is worthy
of acceptance.
Fresenay Zerabruk
ii
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
UNDERTAKING
We certify that research work titled Structural Design of a G+4 Hotel Building at Addis
Ababa is my own work. The work has not been presented elsewhere for assessment. Where
material has been used from other sources it has been properly acknowledged / referred.
iii
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
ABSTRACT
This project is mainly concerned with the structural design and analysis of a G+4 building
intended for the purpose of Hotel. The Analysis is computed using ETABs V9.6 software and the
Design is done based on the Limitations and standards listed on EBCS 1995.
iv
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Primarily, we want to specially thank the Almighty GOD for giving us the inspiration to start and
patience to finalize this project work. Secondly, we want to extend our sincere appreciation to
our advisor, Ato FIRESENAY for his valuable advice, constant support, dedication,
encouragement and precious guidance, creative suggestions and critical comments, and for being
everlasting enthusiastic from the beginning to the end of the project.
Moreover, it will not be out place here to express special thanks to our dearest family, for their
consistent and continuous advises, support, and encouragements valuable not only for the
academic achievement but also for life lasting successfulness forwarded me during my stay in
student life starting from high school to the university level.
Thirdly, we are also grateful to all staffs of Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa Institute Of
Technology (AAIT) for their heartily cooperation during our stay of five year in the University.
Last, but not least, we would like to thanks for all our friends, and colleagues, for their love,
encouragement, patience and support throughout the project study.
v
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................1
1.1 General................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
2.1 General................................................................................................................................................................................. 7
6.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................... 38
vi
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
Slenderness.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 76
12.1 Determination of total building weight and Center mass ........................................................................................... 143
vii
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
Tables
Table 1 Depth determination of slab ............................................................................................... 8
viii
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
Figures
Figure 1 Typical floor slabs ............................................................................................................ 7
ix
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
Structures shall be designed appropriately so that they will sustain all actions and influences
likely to occur during their intended life. It is practical to choose types of structural members for
different criteria especially with regards to economy after assuring safety. They have to remain
fit for their intended purpose with adequate durability. It must also optimize the cost expended in
building the structure and for maintenance. If damages occur, they shall be minimized or avoided
by providing appropriate solutions such as:
- avoiding, eliminating or reducing the hazards which the structure is to sustain
- selecting a structural form which has low sensitivity to the hazards considered
- selecting a structural form and design that can survive adequately the accidental removal of an
individual element
- tying the structure together
Design of a certain structure involves determination of cross sectional dimensions, area of steel
and their distribution and the area and spacing of transverse bars satisfying all strength and
service equipment.
In case the structure fails, it must be in such a way it will minimize risks. It must extend the time
for evacuation of people inside a building. This requirement of structural design is accomplished
by a principle called ductility. Ductility allows yielding of steel reinforcement prior to the
collapse of the building.
Yielding of steel bars warns the start of failure of a structure or its part. Therefore, structures are
designed to be under reinforced by certain percent to assure ductility mode of failure if it
happens.
The design of any structure is categorized in to functional design and structural design.
Functional design: the structure to be constructed should primarily serve the basic purpose for
which it is to be used and must have a pleasing look.
Structural design: it is an art and science of understanding the behavior of structural members
subjected to loads and designing them with economy and elegance to give a safe, serviceable and
durable structure.
Design situations
The severe conditions which can be foreseen to occur in the life time of the building include:
1. Persistent and transient situations
2. Seismic situations
3. Accidental situation
This project is executed based on the Ethiopian Building Code Standard (EBCS) prepared in
1995 E.C, which follows the Limit State design approach.
occurrence can generally be tolerated than in the case of an ultimate limit state. The
major serviceability limit states include:
excessive deflections
excessive crack widths
undesirable vibrations
c) Special limit states: involves damage or failure due to abnormal conditions or abnormal
loadings and includes:
damage or collapse in extreme earthquakes,
structural effects of fire, explosions, or vehicular collisions,
structural effects of corrosion or deterioration, and
long-term physical or chemical instability
The structural design of this typical building involves design of solid slab for the floors, stairs,
frames analysis and lateral load analysis beams, columns and foundation.
In the design process, first the minimum depth of slab for serviceability limit state was
determined. The slabs were designed for partition load, floor finish load along with its self-
weight and live loads. The ground and typical floor slabs were designed using coefficient
method. Stairs and landings were designed as one-way slab.
The design of beams and columns is done for the critical moments shears and axial loads
obtained from the dead and live load combinations of the selected axis. Beams and columns were
designed according to EBCS-2, 1995 provisions.
To simplify the design procedure, calculations were done using designed MS-Excel
spreadsheets.
The size of the footing was determined from the bearing capacity of the soil; the thickness of the
footing is determined from punching and wide beam shear.
For the analysis of frames, the restrained conditions at the foundation level are assumed fixed.
Loads acting on beams from slab reactions and partition walls directly resting on beams and
lateral load acting on the frame were added to self-weight of beams to find total load acting on
beams. All the significant loads are inserted and analyzed for nine load combinations using
ETABS Nonlinear V9.6
Design criteria
The structure must be able to carry the design load safely without excessive material distress
and with deformations with in an acceptable range. The ability of a structure to carry loads
safely and without material distress is achieved by using safety factors in the design of the
element. By altering the size, shape, and choice of material, stresses in a structure can be
maintained at safe levels and such that material distress.
Class I workmanship and ordinary loading condition is used. In which values are measured by
weight and using mixer. It requires less safety factor.
Compressive strength:
fck = 0.8*25 = 20MPa where fck is the characteristic compressive strength of cylinder tests.
As it is difficult to obtain accurate data because of hardening problems empirical relations are
used to obtain tensile strength.
= 0.21(fck) 2/3
=1.5 MPa
= 0.21
= 0.21
= 1.03MPa
= 0.85fck
Reinforcement steel
Characteristic properties of reinforcement bar are expressed using its yielding strength and is
given as:
fyk 300
= = = 260.87MPa.
s 1.15
Partial safety factor for actions in building structure for persistent and transient design situation
is taken for unfavorable condition. Factor of safety for permanent and variable loading condition
are 1.3 and 1.6 respectively (EBCS 2 table 3.3).
Generally, a Hotel ground plus four (G+4) building will be designed in the pages that follow
with a solid slab and frame combining beams and columns, and foundation with isolated footing.
fyk Le
d (0.4 + 0.6* )
400 a
Le is the effective span. For two-way solid slabs it is the shorter span
a - is the appropriate constant which depends on the support condition of the slab
Note: For the purpose of construction simplicity and monolithic construction the governing
overall depth has been taken.
Using 12 rebar and concrete cover of 15mm ,Total depth (D) is calculated as:
D=Cover + +d
2
12
= 15+ + 142
2
= 163mm Use D=165mm for C4,C5,C6 & C7
For C1,C2,C3 and P1-P7
12
D= 15+ + 108 = 129mm Use D=150mm for ease of electrical installation
2
Unit
Depth load Unit
weight Depth load
(m) (KN/m2) weight
(KN/m3) (m) (KN/m2)
Own (KN/m3)
0.15 25 3.75 Own
weight 0.165 25 4.125
Cement weight
0.03 23 0.69 Cement
screed 0.03 23 0.69
Plastering 0.02 23 0.46 screed
Partition Load
For P1 and P3, by taking partition length and panel area from the architectural drawing we get
8.64m
6.1 KN/m *partition length/Panel area= 6.1 KN/m* =1.8 KN/m2
29.28m2
Similarly;
C1-C7.0.99 KN/m2
For P1 & P3 since 1.8KN/m2 > 1.5 KN/m2 use 1.8 KN/m2
For the rest use 1.5 KN/m2 which is minimum because they are less
Since the building is multifunctional the live loads are different depending on the function of the
building. According to EBCS 1(1995) we have live loads as following:
P1-P7 . 2 KN/m2
C1-C7 .. 4 KN/m2
For P1 & P3
Pd 1.3 5.084 1.8 1.6*2 12.15 KN / m2
For C1-C3
Pd 1.3 5.084 1.5 1.6*4 14.96 KN / m2
For C4-C7
Pd 1.3 5.459 1.5 1.6*4 15.45 KN / m2
2.4 Analysis
Analysis of the design moment will be done as per the EBCS-2-1995 Art A.3.2 for two-way
solid slabs and for one way solid slabs the calculation will be performed as 1m wide beam. The
analysis of slab moments of two way slabs is accomplished by coefficient method using the
formula:
Mi i Pd Lx 2
Where, Mi = the design moment per unit width at the point of reference
s = support
f = span
Reading i for each panel from EBCS 2, support and span moments of P1-P7 are shown
below:
For the cantilevers the moments are calculated using equilibrium equation.
For C1-C3
6.1KN
14.96 1.5
2
For C4 & C7
6.1KN
15.45 1.5
2
For C5 & C6
6.1KN
15.45 2
2
Moment Adjustment
For each support over which the slab is continuous there will thus generally be two different
support moments. The difference may be distributed between the panels on either side of the
support to equalize their moments, as in the moment distribution method for frames.
Two methods of differing accuracy are given here for treating the effects of this redistribution on
moments away from the support.
A. If M < 20% of the larger moment, the design moment is the average of the two
B. If M 20% then the unbalanced moment is distributed based on their stiffness, use
Moment Distribution Method. When using this method:
2.5 Design
For design, use C-25 concrete and S-300 steel which means fcu= 25MPa & fyk= 300 MPa
12
d=D-cover- =150-15- = 129mm
2 2
Sample is shown For Panel 1 and then summarized in a tabular form for the rest.
For P1
M sd
sds
fcd b d 2
12.732 KNm
=
11.33MPa *1000 mm 129 mm *1000
2
Step 2 Read Kz from the design chart of EBCS 1995, using sds 0.0675
Kz 0.955
Z Kz * d 0.955*0.129m
Z 0.123m
M sd 12.732*1000 Nm
As = =
Z * f yd 0.123m * 260.87 MPa
As 396.169 mm2
Step 5 Calculate spacing of rebars
10
2
b * as D2
S= as = = = 78.54 mm2
As 4 4
As
slab d Mxs1 sds Kz Z (mm2) S in mm
p1 0.129 0 0 1 0.129 0
p2 0.129 18.399 0.097557 0.94 0.12126 581.6386 134.963526
p3 0.129 18.399 0.097557 0.94 0.12126 581.6386 134.963526
p4 0.129 12.732 0.067509 0.952 0.122808 397.4171 197.525468
p5 0.129 9.287 0.049242 0.96 0.12384 287.469 273.072879
p6 0.129 10.24 0.054295 0.96 0.12384 316.9681 247.658967
p7 0.129 11.379 0.060335 0.96 0.12384 352.2246 222.86913
In the Y direction
Vx vx gd qd Lx
Vy vy gd qd Lx
3.2 Loading
Live load take LL=3KN/m2 according to EBCS2 1995 ,
Dead load on the stair (taking 1m strip)
Own weight=25*0.21=5.25 KN/m
Cement Screed=23*0.03=0.69 KN/m
Plastering=23*0.02=0.46 KN/m
Marble=27*0.025=0.674 KN/m
14KN/m 16.77KN/m
6.5m 1.5m
14KN/m
6.5m
M at Stair 1=78.45
16.77KN/m 7.93KN
1.5m
1.8m
M at landing for stair at section B=16.77*(1.82)/2+7.93*1.8=41.44
6.5m
M at Stair 2=(15.3*6.52)/8=80.8KNm
Wind actions are fluctuating with time. They act directly on the external surfaces of enclosed
structures and, through porosity of the external surface, also act indirectly on the internal
surfaces. They may also directly affect the internal surface of open structures. Pressures act on
areas of the surface providing forces normal to the surface for the structure or for individual
cladding components. Additionally, when large areas of structures are swept by the wind,
frictional forces acting tangentially to the surface, may be significant.
For this project, only Earthquake load is considered since it is clearly the dominant one at our
site. Plus Earth quake is not likely to occur simultaneously with wind or maximum flood or
maximum sea waves, so we design for earthquake alone.
to the fundamental period of vibration of the building. As the ground moves, inertia tends to keep
structures in place, resulting in the imposition of displacements and forces that can have
catastrophic results.
-the closer the frequency of the ground motion is to one of the natural frequencies of a structure,
the greater the likelihood of the structure experiencing resonance, resulting in an increase in both
displacement and damage.
-the taller a structure, the more susceptible it is to the effects of higher modes of vibration.
The purpose of seismic design is to proportion structures so that they can withstand the
displacements and the forces induced by the ground motion. Design for earthquakes differs from
design for gravity and wind loads in the relatively greater sensitivity of earthquake-induced
forces to the geometry of the structure. Without careful design, forces and displacements can be
concentrated in portions of a structure that are not capable of providing adequate strength or
ductility. Steps to strengthen a member for one type of loading may actually increase the forces
in the member and change the mode of failure from ductile to brittle.
(2) It require high reinforcement while it is constructed with large cross sectional area of frame
structure.
(3) It is not economical design and have normal reinforcement detailing.
Importance Factor (I)
i) The magnitude of importance factor that we will use in earth quake design depends on
building purpose or extent of building failure after anticipated earth quake hits.
ii) We use high value of importance factor (I) for hospitals and nuclear plant because we do not
allow any structural failure to these types of structures. After the earthquake hits, these buildings
should remain fully functional for their intended purposes.
iii) Using High value of importance factor (I) put the structure into elastic range with
larger columns.
Moment resisting factor (C1)
i) Have two values, for Reinforced Concrete C1=0.075 and for Steel C1=0.085. Higher value of
moment resisting factor gives higher Fundamental Period of Building (T1).
ii) We use lower value for Reinforced concrete because the connection of beams to columns is
homogeneously casted. It has to be higher value for steel structure because the connection is
relatively weaker as it is bolt or welding connection.
Soil Type (S)
i) It is found between the foundation of the building and bed rock.
ii) If the soil acceleration right below the foundation is too close or equal to bed rock
acceleration the magnitude of Earth Quake to the structure will be magnified. To avoid such type
of problem for example in Dubai where an exposed to earth quake foundation engineers
set soil acceleration to design standard. First by digging out and changing soil below the
foundation with different type of soil and second by compacting the soil to the required density.
Wiping Effect (Ft)
i) Such force come from second mode (Dynamic Analysis) which descends from top of
the building to the foundation.
ii) It has to be added at the top because it is the only larger value to be considered. Other second
mode forces to different building floors are insignificant to be taken to calculation.
iii) The whole structure of the building is resisted from Earth quake by its frame
system. The buildings lateral load distribution is computed as follows.
AAiT:BSc thesis Page 25
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
T1 = 0.075*(163/4) = 0.6
= 1.2*1.2/ (0.62/3)=2.0242<2.5 take =2.025
The behavior factor to account for energy dissipation capacity is given by:-
= o * KD*KR*KW 0.7 (EBCS-8, 1995, art.3.3.2.1 (1))
Where:-
o -basic value of the behavior factor, dependent on the structural type (table 3.2)
For frame system, o = 0.2
KD-factor reflecting the ductility class
Use KD = 2.0 for
KR-factor reflecting the structural regularity in elevation, for regular structures
KR= 1.0
Kw-factor reflecting the prevailing failure mode in structural system with walls
Kw= 1.0 for frame and frame equivalent dual systems
= 0.2*2.0*1.0*1.0 = 0.4 < 0.7 . Ok!
Sd(T) = **= 0.05*2.025*0.4 = 0.0405
Fb= 0.0405*18579.26075= 752.4600604KN
W=Wi=18579.26075KN
Table 9 Total building weight
The horizontal forces at each level, Fi, determined in the above manner are distributed to lateral
load resistive structural elements in proportion to their rigidities assuming rigid floor
diaphragms.
Floor W H Fb Ft W*H Fi
ground 2634.7 0 752.4601 31.60332 0 0
1 3689.301 3.2 752.4601 31.60332 11805.76 62.09363
2 3689.301 6.4 752.4601 31.60332 23611.53 124.1873
3 3689.301 9.6 752.4601 31.60332 35417.29 186.2809
4 3689.301 12.8 752.4601 31.60332 47223.05 248.3745
Roof 1187.358 16 752.4601 31.60332 18997.72 131.5238
18579.26 Sum 137055.3
Stiffness modifiers in ETABS are the factors to increase or decrease some properties of the cross
section for example area, inertia, torsion constant etc. Generally they are used to reduce stiffness
of concrete sections to model for cracked behavior of concrete. They are only applied to concrete
when designing for ultimate limit state members because it cracks under service loading.
For ultimate limit state.
j 1
G, j Gk , j '' '' Q,1QK ,1 '' '' Q ,i 0,i Qk ,i
i 1
Where
G Partial safety factor of permanent actions
Q Partial safety factor of variable actions
0 Factor for combination value of a variable action
+ Implies to be combined with
Implies the combined effect of
G, j Partial factor for permanent action j in calculating upper design
sup value
Q, i Partial factor for variable action i
STR Internal failure or excessive deformation of the structure or structural
members,
including footings, piles, basement walls, etc., where the strength of
construction
Design uncertainties
Modeling uncertainties
Material uncertainties
Construction defects
Un-avoidable and or Natural uncertainties
Therefore, for this reasons the frame structure could be sway while it is designed as non-sway
frame structure.
Ptot d r
If 0.1 then the frame is non-sway frame.
Vtot h
Otherwise consider the second order effect due to the horizontal displacement of the frame,
this can be considered by P-D analysing the frame model.
Sway moments are those associated with the horizontal translation of the top of a story relative to
the bottom of that story. They arise from horizontal loading and may also arise from vertical
loading if either the structure or the loading is asymmetrical
Alternatively, According to EBCS 2-1995
In the amplified sway moments method, the sway moments found by a first-order analysis shall
be increased by multiplying them by the moment magnification factor:
The amplified sway moments method shall not be used when the critical load ratio Nsd/Ncr, is
more than 0.25.
where; Nsd is the design value of the total vertical load
.Ncr is its critical value for failure in a sway mode.
As an alternative to determining Nsd/Ncr, direct, the following approximation may be used in
beam and-column type.
M=
Since all the value is<0.1 therefore, the frame type is non-sway.
3D model
Beam on axis 4
Material property
c/c spacing =
6.5 4.5
= 5.5m
2
Effective depth(d)
d=500mm- 25mm-8mm-7mm
d= 460mm
Below are shown design of one +ve and one ve moment for sample
Msd
sds =
fcd beff d 2
55.09 KNm
=
11.33MPa *1200 mm 460 mm *1000
2
Step 2 from the design chart of EBCS 1995, using sds = 0.018
Kx=0.062
Kz = 0.979
fyd 347.826
s= 10%0 > yd= = = 1.74 %0 , all bars have yielded
Es 200
M sd 769.69
As = =
Kz * d * f yd 300*460
As = 351.69 mm2
As As 356.89
No of bars = = 2 = = 2.28 .. Use 3 14 rebars
as r 49
20
dneg= 500-(25+ +8)= 457mm
2
Msd
sds =
fcd beff d 2
167.91*1000 Nm
sds =
11.33MPa *0.35m 457 mm
2
Step 2 from the design chart of EBCS 1995, using sds = 0.203
Kx=0.01
Kz = 0.882
fyd 347.826
s= 10%0 > yd= = = 1.74 %0 , all bars have yielded
Es 200
M sd 167.91*1000 Nm
As = =
Kz * d * f yd 0.882* 0.457*347.826 MPa
As = 1197.649 mm2
As As 1197.649
No of bars = = 2= = 3.81 .. Use 4 20 rebars
as r 100
If 50% of the negative rebar area is greater than the positive rebar area, take 50% of the negative
rebar. And the reverse is true. i.e.
50
50%(As ,-ve)= * (1256.64mm2) = 628.3185 mm2 > As ,+ve = 351.69 mm2
100
Therefore take As = 628.3185 mm2 to calculate No of rebar for the positive reinforcement i.e.
As As 628.3185
No of bars = = 2= = 4.082 .. Use 5 14 rebars
as r 49
Similarly for the negative moment on the left (129.75 KNm) , we get 3 20 rebars
design for flexure of the rest moments is summarized in the table below, which is done
on excel using template.
As
Beam
Moment(KN) sd,s As provided As provided for reversal effect
on b/n
No. As No. No.
Axis +ve +ve
-ve -ve +ve -ve +ve -ve positive bar positive bar Negative bar
b/n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.164
2&3 136.09 0 944.974 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
136.09 0.164 0 944.974 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
b/n 91.4
0.031 0 588.697 0 615.7522 0 628.3185 5 769.6902 5 14 0 0 0
3&4 6
152.85 0.185 0 1075.597 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
A
152.85 0.185 0 1075.597 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
b/n 66.2
0.017 0 423.072 0 461.8141 0 628.3185 5 769.6902 5 14 0 0 0
4&5 7
152.85 0.185 0 1075.597 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
b/n 152.85 0 1075.597 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
0 0 0.185
5&6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b/n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
2&3 157.65 0.19 0 1113.11 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
157.65 0.19 0 1113.11 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
b/n 79.0
0.026 0 507.123 0 615.7522 0 628.3185 5 769.6902 5 14 0 0 0
3&4 3
157.65 0.19 0 1113.11 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
B
157.65 0.19 0 1113.11 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
b/n 65.8
0.017 0 420.327 0 461.8141 0 628.3185 5 769.6902 5 14 0 0 0
4&5 4
156.13 0.188 0 1102.377 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
b/n 156.13 0.188 0 1102.377 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
0 0
5&6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C b/n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0
2&3
153.16 0.185 0 1077.778 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
153.16 0.185 0 1077.778 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
b/n 74.5
0.025 0 478.632 0 615.7522 0 942.4778 7 1077.566 7 14 0 0 0
3&4 9
217.74 0.263 0 1632.668 0 1884.956 0 0 0 0 0 1884.956 6 20
217.74 0.263 0 1632.668 0 1884.956 0 0 0 0 0 1884.956 6 20
b/n 122.
0.031 0 785.788 0 923.6282 0 942.4778 7 1077.566 7 14 0 0 0
4&5 08
217.74 0.263 0 1632.668 0 1884.956 0 0 0 0 0 1884.956 6 20
b/n 217.74 0.263 0 1632.668 0 1884.956 0 0 0 0 0 1884.956 6 20
0 0
5&6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b/n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
2&3 161.35 0.195 0 1144.371 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
161.35 0.195 0 1144.371 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
b/n 79.8
0.027 0 513.04 0 615.7522 0 942.4778 7 1077.566 7 14 0 0 0
3&4 7
214.98 0.26 0 1608.139 0 1884.956 0 0 0 0 0 1884.956 6 20
D
214.98 0.26 0 1608.139 0 1884.956 0 0 0 0 0 1884.956 6 20
b/n 116.
0.029 0 748.007 0 769.6902 0 942.4778 7 1077.566 7 14 0 0 0
4&5 33
214.98 0.26 0 1608.139 0 1884.956 0 0 0 0 0 1884.956 6 20
b/n 214.98 0.26 0 1608.139 0 1884.956 0 0 0 0 0 1884.956 6 20
0 0
5&6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b/n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
2&3 135.11 0.163 0 937.134 0 942.4778 0 0 0 0 0 942.4778 3 20
135.11 0.163 0 937.134 0 942.4778 0 0 0 0 0 942.4778 3 20
b/n 90.9
E 0.03 0 584.748 0 615.7522 0 628.3185 5 769.6902 5 14 0 0 0
3&4 4
145.85 0.176 0 1020.63 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
b/n 63.3 145.85 0.176 0 1020.63 0 1256.637 0 0 0 0 0 1256.637 4 20
0.016
4&5 3 0 403.89 0 461.8141 0 628.3185 5 769.6902 5 14 0 0 0
6.3 Shear
Failure due to shear is sudden and brittle compared to flexure failure, it should be
provided with enough stirrups. The following five modes of failure due to shear are
identified.
Diagonal tension failure: an inclined crack propagates rapidly due to inadequate shear
reinforcement.
Shear Compression Failure: There is crushing of the concrete near the compression
flange above the tip of the inclined crack.
Shear Tension Failure: Due to inadequate anchorage of the longitudinal bars, the
diagonal cracks propagate horizontally along the bars.
Web Crushing Failure: The concrete in the web crushes due to inadequate web
thickness.
Arch Rib Failure: For deep beams, the web may buckle and subsequently crush. There
can be anchorage failure or failure of the bearing.
The occurrence of a mode of failure depends on the span-to-depth ratio, loading, cross-
section of the beam, amount and anchorage of reinforcement. Shear failure starts at the
neutral axis and extends in both directions. It depends on the a/ ratio. Shear failure is
very explosive and brittle. That is why flexural failure is preferred over shear failure.
From comb 5
44.44 121.69
=
4.5 x x
44.44x = 547-121.69x
X = 3.296 m
300
For d = 460mm , Vsd*= = 104.70 KN
1.15
From comb 4
40.36 125.78
=
4.5 x x
40.36x = 125.78(4.5-x)
X = 3.41 m
For d = 457mm
N
VRD = 0.25* 11.33 *350mm * 457mm
mm 2
Vc = 0.25*fctd*k1*k2*bw*d
fctd = = =
c 1.5 1.5
k1= 1+50 2
= As/bd
For 514
769.69
= = 0.0057
300* 460
For 320
942.478
= = 0.00687
300* 457
k1= 1+50*0.00687=1.34
k2 = 1.6 d
N
Vc = 0.25*1.0315 *1.28*1.14*300*460 = 51.93 KN
mm 2
Vsd = Vc + Vs
Vs = Vsd Vc
Vs = 63.05 KN
Asv * f yd * d
S= , Asv=2*16 = 100.531 (two legs of 8 stirrups)
Vs
100.531*260.87*460
S= = 156.98mm ,use S=150mm
76.849*1000
Vs* = 61.709 KN
Asv * f yd * d 100.531*260.87*460
S= = = 195.49mm ,use S=190mm
Vs * 61.709*1000
2 2
(VRD) = (345.848) = 230.565 KN
3 3
2
Vsd < (VRD)
3
Comb 5 Comb 4
Vc= 51.93 KN
125.78 51.93
121.69 51.93
3.296 y 3.41 y
51.93*3.41
y
51.93*3.296
1.41mm y 1.41mm
121.69 125.78
2
Vsd (VRD )
3
b/n
96.09
3&4 100
769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 125.5 125.55 120
A
b/n
105.66
4&5 100
769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 114.2 114.17 110
b/n 100
17.36
5&6 769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 251.3 230 230
b/n 100
17.36
2&3 769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 251.3 230 230
b/n
134.12
3&4 157
769.69 14 10 .08 389.3 51.798 139.9 139.93 130
B
b/n
106.71
4&5 100
769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 113.1 113.05 110
b/n 100
17.36
5&6 769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 251.3 230 230
b/n 100
24.17
2&3 942.48 20 8 .53 388.5 54.302 251.3 228.5 220
b/n
129.07
3&4 157
942.48 20 10 .08 386.8 54.22 144.5 144.45 140
C
b/n
203.24
4&5 157
1077.6 14 10 .08 389.3 56.332 92.34 92.342 90
b/n 100
17.36
5&6 1077.6 14 8 .53 391 56.409 251.3 230 230
b/n 100
17.36
2&3 1077.6 14 8 .53 391 56.409 251.3 230 230
b/n
D 135.47
3&4 157
1077.6 14 10 .08 389.3 56.332 138.5 138.54 130
b/n 157
193.54
4&5 1077.6 14 10 .08 389.3 56.332 96.97 96.97 90
b/n 100
17.36
5&6 1077.6 14 8 .53 391 56.409 251.3 230 230
b/n 100
17.36
2&3 769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 251.3 230 230
b/n
95.72
3&4 100
769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 126 126.03 120
E
b/n
98.38
4&5 100
769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 122.6 122.62 120
b/n 100
17.36
5&6 769.69 14 8 .53 391 51.884 251.3 230 230
b/n
127.88
A&B 157
615.75 14 10 .08 389.3 49.531 146.8 146.76 140
b/n
134.89
B&C 157
615.75 14 10 .08 389.3 49.531 139.1 139.13 130
3
b/n
134.97
C&D 157
615.75 14 10 .08 389.3 49.531 139.1 139.05 130
b/n
127.91
D&E 157
615.75 14 10 .08 389.3 49.531 146.7 146.73 140
b/n
125.77
A&B 157
769.69 14 10 .08 389.3 51.798 149.2 149.22 140
b/n
209.54
B&C 157
769.69 14 10 .08 389.3 51.798 89.57 89.566 80
4
b/n
116.54
C&D 157
769.69 14 10 .08 389.3 51.798 161 161.04 160
b/n
120.93
D&E 157
615.75 14 10 .08 389.3 49.531 155.2 155.19 150
b/n
137.71
A&B 157
615.75 14 10 .08 389.3 49.531 136.3 136.28 130
5 b/n
B&C/
LANDI 267.89
NG 157
BEAM 1206.4 14 10 .08 389.3 58.228 70.06 70.057 70
b/n 157
C&D 133.29 615.75 14 10 .08 389.3 49.531 140.8 140.8 140
b/n
124.43
D&E 157
615.75 14 10 .08 389.3 49.531 150.8 150.83 150
Development length
Basic development length (lb)
fyd
lb
4 fbd
For good bond condition, fbd fctd . Plain bars
fbd 2 fctd .. Deformed bars
Other bond conditions , fbd 0.7 (good bond condition)
a * lb * As , cal
lbnet =1 for deformed bar
As , provided
1*844.25*896.99
lbnet 803.5mm
942.478
200mm
6.5 Serviceability
Is the fitness of the structure to serve the desired function satisfactorily under service
loads. It disrupts the use of the structure but do not cause total collapse.
These are the major serviceability limits;
Excessive crack width
Excessive deflection
Undesirable vibrations etc.
Limit state of cracking: Crack widths are concern for aesthetical appearance, leakage,
corrosion, reduction in the stiffness of members. There are various types of cracks. Load
induced cracks (i.e. axial, shear, flexural, torsion) imposed cracks and other various types
of cracks are the common ones.
Load induced cracks:
Tensile stresses induced by loads cause distinctive crack patterns. These are also further
divided into direct tension induced cracks which extends through the entire the cross
section. They are characterized by their vertical nature. The other common type of load
induced cracks are the flexural cracks that are when the section is subjected to moment.
These are also vertical in nature like the direct tension cracks. They can extend up to the
neutral axis. The shear cracks are the other types of load induced cracks caused when the
section is subjected to shear. These are different from the previous ones with their
orientation having an inclined orientation. They can extend high up to the neutral axis
and sometimes into the compression zone. Torsion cracks are also in this group caused
when the section is subjected to torsion. These types of cracks are characterized by their
spiral orientation around the beam. Bond cracks are the last types of cracks in this
category, which are characterized by splitting around the reinforcement.
Crack due to loads doesnt reach the final stage spontaneously rather it develops from
one stage to the other gradually. Ones the final stage is reached, the crack pattern has
stabilized and the further loading of the section merely widens the existing cracks. The
distance between the stabilized cracks is the function of the following factors;
The overall member thickness
Concrete cover
Efficiency of the bond
fck 20MPa
(b * D)( D / 2) (n 1) As1 * Y 1 (n 1) As 2 * Y 2
Y
b * D (n 1) As1 (n 1) As 2
(350*500)250 6*769.3*40 6*628*457
Y
350*500 6*769.3 6*628
Y 248.97m
n n
Iuncr Igi Ai di2
i 1 i 1
bD3
Iuncr bD( D / 2 Y ) 2 (n 1) As1(Y 1 Y ) 2 (n 1) As 2(Y 2 Y ) 2
12
350(500)3
Iuncr 350*500(250 248.97)2 6*769.3(40 248.97)2 6*628(457 248.97)2
12
Iuncr 4.01*109 mm4
AY i i
Y i 1
n
A
i 1
i
bY (Y / 2) ( n) As1 * Y 1 ( n 1) As 2 * Y 2
Y
bY (n 1) As1 (n 1) As 2
350Y (Y / 2) 7 * 769.3* 460 6 * 628* 43
Y
350Y 6 * 769.3 6 * 628
Y 99.41mm
n n
Icr I i Ai di2
i 1 i 1
3
bY
Icr (n 1) As1(Y 1 Y ) 2 (n 1) As 2(Y 2 Y ) 2
3
350(99.41)3
Icr 6*769.3(460 99.41) 2 6*628(43 99.41) 2 Step 6
3
Calculate
Icr 7.27*108 mm4
mean
strain of reinforcement ( sm )
s sr 2 s
sm 1 1 2( ) 0.4
Es s Es
Mcr T * Z , T fs * As
T
sr fs
As
Mcr 42.36*106 Nmm
sr
As * Z 769.3mm 2 *(460 99.41)mm
3
sr 128.99MPa
Mk 65.35*106 Nmm
s
As * Z 769.3mm2 *(460 99.41)mm
3
s 199MPa
Sm 50 0.25* K1* k 2 *
r
As As 769.3
r
Aeff 2.5d 1 * b 2.5(500 460)*350
r 0.02198
14
Sm 50 0.25*0.8*0.5*
0.02198
Sm 113.69mm
crack width ( wk )
Mk 82.27 KNm
As 2 5*100 1570.796mm2
(b * D)( D / 2) (n 1) As1 * Y 1 (n 1) As 2 * Y 2
Y
b * D (n 1) As1 (n 1) As 2
bD3
Iuncr bD( D / 2 Y )2 (n 1) As1(Y 1 Y ) 2 (n 1) As 2(Y 2 Y ) 2
12
350(500)3
Iuncr 350*500(250 244.807)2 6*769.3(460 244.807)2 6*1570(43 248.97)2
12
Iuncr 4.26*109 mm4
cracking moment
s sr 2 s
sm 1 1 2( ) 0.4
Es s Es
x
Z d ,
3
350 x 2
6*769.3*43 7*1570.796*457
x 2 130.62mm
350 x 6*769.3 7*1570.796
Mk 82.27*106 Nmm
s
As * Z 1570.796mm2 *(457 130.62 )mm
3
s 126.67 MPa
crack width ( wk )
wk 1.7wm 1.7*0.0576mm 0.0979mm
Deflection
There are number of reasons for limiting the deflection, out of them these are the
following;
Aesthetics or psychological discomfort
Crack width limitation (limiting the deflection limits the crack width )
Effect on attached structural and non-structural elements
Short term (immediate) deflection: occurs on application of load, consider live load
and dead load. Factors affecting short term deflection include
magnitude of live load and its mode of distribution
span of the structure
type of end restraint
cross-sectional properties
percentage of tensile reinforcement
grade of concrete
amount and extent of flexural cracking
Long term (additional) deflection: occurs due to
differential shrinkage
creep and temperature variation
Mcr
i L2
EcmIi
5 k
1
48 10
82.27 82.27
k 2.518
65.35
5 2.58
1 0.078
48 10
6
42.36*10 Nmm
i 0.078*(4500mm) 2 0.575mm
29*103 N * 4.01*109 mm4
mm2
Mk Mcr
ii L2
0.75Es * As * Z (d x)
(65.35 42.36) * 10 Nmm
6
ii 0.078(4500mm) 2
0.75 * 200 * 103 N * 769.3mm 2 * 426.86mm(460mm 99.41mm)
mm 2
ii 2.04mm
6
65.35 * 10 Nmm
max 0.078(4500mm)2
200 * 103 N * 769.3mm2 * 426.86mm(460mm 99.41mm)
mm2
max 4.36mm
As 2
lt 2 1.2 st 0.6 st
As1
628
lt 2 1.2 2.615 0.6 *2.615
769.3
lt 2.67mm 1.569
take, lt 2.67mm
Final deflection;
Le
t st lt
300
4500
t 2.615 2.67
300
t 5.285mm 15mm ..OK!
3. A frame may be classified as non-sway, for a given load, if the critical load ratio for
Where;
- the horizontal displacement at the top of story relative to the bottom of the story
Free body diagram of these columns is taken from the frame on axis 5 and axis D for C5-D
and axis E for C5-E.
i.e. Frame on axis 5 is:
34.06 23.43
Bending moment diagram for column Bending moment diagram for column
on axis-D & axis-5 between ground on axis-E & axis-5 between ground
floor and first floor. floor and first floor.
4.58 29.57
5.86 22.09
b. Design axial load and bending moment of central column ( C4-C) between Ground floor
and 1st floor.
29.95
Bending moment diagram for column on axis -C & axis-4 between ground
floor and first floor.
26.11
9.62
7.2.2 Slenderness
It is a parameter which defines the column response while supporting the design load.
The slenderness ratio is given as follows:
a) For isolated columns, the slenderness ratio is defined by:
= , = EBCS 2 1995,
Limits of slenderness
According to EBCS 2 1995 section 4.4.6
1. The slenderness ratio of concrete column shall not exceed 140
2. The second order effects in compressive members need not be taken in to account in the
following Cases:
A. For sway frames
Max where =
b. Sway mode
= 0.15
Where: = ( )
Where
and are column stiffness
coefficients ( )
is the stiffness coefficient of the column being designed.
Is stiffness coefficient of the beam.
opposite end.
= 1.0 if opposite end elastically or rigidly restrained
The above approximate equation for effective length calculation is applicable for
values of and not exceeding 10. If a base shear is designed to resist the column
moment, may be taken as 1.0.
Stiffness coefficient at ground joint (in x- direction)
= , = 1, =
= = 1.19
= = 1.32
= = = 1.255
= 0.7
= = =129.96mm
= = = 19.94
Critical in x- direction.
e1= = =2.17mm
e2= = =2.79mm
emax =max
emax=e2=2.79mm
Additional eccentricity in y- direction, .
= 20mm
= =8.64 20 mm
= 20 mm.
= = = 0.046
= , = 1, & =0 =
= 3.45
= = 3.81
= = =3.63
= 0.7
= = =129.96mm
= = = 22.41
emax = max
emax = max
= 27.94mm.
= 20mm
= =9.71 20 mm
= 20 mm.
= = = 0.0976
= = 0.90
Determine .
= = 25+8+20/2 = 43mm
Read from chart No. 35 with, = 0.90 , =0.0976 and =0.046 and read .
= 0.17
5.The amount of reinforcement required by the substitute column is computed and the
moment of inertia of the reinforcement with respect to the centroid of the concrete
section is determined.
Determine the amount of reinforcement, .
= = =1126.465 mm2.
= 8% = 0.08*450mm*450mm = 16200mm2.
20, n = = 5.16. n = 6,
= 0.25 + 0.1 *p
= = = = 1.0315
k1 = 1+50 2 , = = = 0.0137
k1 = 1+50*0.0137= 1.685 2 ok
k2 = 1.6-d 1
= 1.6-0.407 = 1.193 1 0k
= = = 0.00133
Lateral Reinforcement
= > 6mm
= = 5mm< 6mm.
= min
S =
= = 162mm>150mm
Therefore the number of longitudinal reinforcement bar has to increase until the spacing
between two coscative re-bar alonge the tie is less than 150mm.
Use 12 20, = 3769.911 mm2.
Checke spacing, S = =
S=101.33mm<150 safe!!!
The center-to-center distance of the furthest longitudinal re-bar from the edge is
101.33+20=131.33mm.
15* tie=15*8=120mm<131.33mm
this indicates an additional intermmedate transverse re-bar is needed because the c/c
spacing is greater than 15 times the transverse diameter.
1220mm
450mm
= bh3 = 450*4503 = 3.42 * 109 mm4
= , = 1, =
= = 2.39
= = 2.64
= = = 2.51
= 0.7
= = =129.96mm
= = = 21.67
Critical in x- direction.
= max
= =
= max
= max
= max
=25.61 mm
= 20mm
= = 9.39 20 mm
= 20 mm.
= P( ) = 1154.61KN *46.61mm
=53.816KNm
= = = .052
= , = 1, & =0 =
= 3.45
= = 3.81
= = =3.63
= 0.7
= = =129.96mm
= = = 22.41
= max
= =
= max
= max
= max
e max, y = 26.095mm.
Additional eccentricity in x- direction, .
= 20mm
= =9.71 20 mm
= 20 mm.
Therefore = + + = 20 + 26.095=46.095mm.
= P( ) = 1154.61KN *46.095mm
= 53.222KNm
= = = 0.052
= 0.50
Determine .
= = 25+8+20/2 = 43mm
Enter to the chart with = 0.50, =0..052 and =.052 and read .
=0
Provided the amount of reinforcement, .
= 0.25 + 0.1 *p
= = = = 1.0315
k1 = 1+50 2 , = = = 0.0137
k1 = 1+50*0.0137= 1.685 2 ok
k2 = 1.6-d 1
= 1.6-0.407 = 1.193 1 0k
= = = 0.00133
Lateral Reinforcement
= > 6mm
= = 5mm< 6mm.
= min
S =
= = 162mm>150mm
Therefore the number of longitudinal reinforcement bar has to increase until the spacing
between two coscative re-bar alonge the tie is less than 150mm.
Use 12 20, = 3769.911 mm2.
Checke spacing, S = =
S=101.33mm<150 safe!!!
The center-to-center distance of the furthest longitudinal re-bar from the edge is
101.33+20=131.33mm.
15* tie=15*8=120mm<131.33mm
this indicates an additional intermmedate transverse re-bar is needed because the c/c
spacing is greater than 15 times the transverse diameter.
1220mm
600mm
= , = 1, =
= = 3.77
= = 4.16
= = = 3.965
= 0.7
= = = 173.21mm
= = = 16.92
Critical in x- direction.
= max
= =
= max
= max
= max
= 8.68mm.
Additional eccentricity in x- direction, .
= 20mm
= = 9.77mm 20 mm
= 20 mm.
= P( ) = 3010.34KN *28.68mm
= 86.336KNm
= = = 0.035
= , = 1, & =
= 4.46
= = 4.92
= = = 4.69
= 0.7
= = = 173.21mm
= = = 17.18
Critical in y- direction.
= 50 - 25( ) = 50- 25( ) = 65.55
= max
= =
= max
= max
= max
= 15.995mm.
= 20mm
= = 9.92 20 mm
= 20 mm.
= P( ) = 3010.34KN *35.995mm
= 108.357KNm
= = = 0.0443
= 0.74
Determine .
= = 25+8+20/2 = 43mm
biaxial chart No. 34 and = 0.80 , =0.0353 and =0.0443 & read 2 .
= 8% = 0.08*450mm*450mm = 16200mm2.
provide .
Use 1220.
. Check the 600mm dimension is enough for 1220.
600-2*(25)-2*(8) = 534mm
534 = n(20) + (n-1)25
559 = 45n
n = 12.42 > 12 OK.
= 0.25 + 0.1 *p
= = = = 1.0315
k1 = 1+50 2 , = = = 0.0113
k1 = 1+50*0.0113= 1.564 2 ok
k2 = 1.6-d 1
= 1.6-0.557 = 1.043 1 0k
= 0.25* 1.0315N/mm2 *1.564*1.043*600*557+0.1* *3010.34*103
= = = 0.00133
Lateral Reinforcement
= > 6mm
= = 5mm< 6mm.
= min
Detailing
1220mm
S= = =151.33mm>150mm
Therefore the number of longitudinal reinforcement bar has to increase until the spacing
between two consecutive re-bar along the tie is less than 150mm.
Use 16 20, = 5026.54mm2.
S= = =108.5mm<150mm
Therefore the distance of the furthest longitudinal re-bar from the edge is
(108.5*2)+20=237mm
This indicates an additional transverse re-bar is needed because the c/c spacing is greater
than 15*8=120mm.
1620mm
c
o
colum m column in M3-3 As d in
n No. b b/n floor P(KNm) M2-2 vsd sd,21-2 sd,3-3 As used mm No.of bar use
Foundation
C 4-C 1 & ground -3177.16 -1.468 0.191 5.969 -3.865 0.778716 0.026557 0.028396 0 0 2880 20 9.1673 12
Foundation
C 4-C 2 & ground -2383.18 -1.085 0.133 27.022 250.699 0.584113 0.019914 0.12188 0.049964 586.0729 2880 20 9.1673 12
Foundation
C 4-C 3 & ground -2382.57 -1.118 0.153 -18.069 -256.497 0.583963 0.019922 0.124244 0.059797 701.4194 2880 20 9.1673 12
Foundation
C 4-C 4 & ground -2382.94 -1.076 0.128 28.182 255.095 0.584054 0.019908 0.123674 0.057467 674.0927 2880 20 9.1673 12
Foundation
C 4-C 5 & ground -2382.81 -1.126 0.158 -19.229 -260.894 0.584022 0.019927 0.126042 0.067393 790.5203 2880 20 9.167325 12
Foundation
C 4-C 6 & ground -2492.7 52.488 294.04 3.749 -5.66 0.610956 0.14048 0.022677 0.108988 1278.431 2880 20 9.167325 12
Foundation
C 4-C 7 & ground -2273.04 -54.69 -293.754 5.205 -0.138 0.557118 0.138568 0.020697 0.039812 466.9979 2880 20 9.167325 12
Foundation
C 4-C 8 & ground -2492.41 52.498 294.033 5.189 -0.202 0.610885 0.140474 0.022483 0.109052 1279.178 2880 20 9.167325 12
Foundation
C 4-C 9 & ground -2273.34 -54.701 -293.747 3.765 -5.596 0.557191 0.138568 0.020859 0.042809 502.1475 2880 20 9.167325 12
Ground&1s
C 4-C 1 t -3010.36 48.155 -29.952 47.532 9.555 0.737833 0.044266 0.044011 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
Ground&1s
C 4-C 2 t -2258.07 36.156 -22.505 -44.054 153.055 0.553449 0.033218 0.080971 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
Ground&1s
C 4-C 3 t -2257.47 36.077 -22.423 -38.389 -138.722 0.553301 0.033181 0.075111 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
Ground&1s
C 4-C 4 t -2257.83 36.1 -22.48 52.038 157.209 0.55339 0.033193 0.082666 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
st
C 4-C 5 Ground&1 -2257.71 36.133 -22.448 -57.331 -142.877 0.55336 0.033206 0.07681 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 6 Ground&1s -2344.73 -16.658 159.951 -24.565 4.558 0.574689 0.084496 0.029191 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
t
Ground&1s
C 4-C 7 t -2170.81 88.891 -204.879 8.138 9.774 0.532061 0.101428 0.021728 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
Ground&1s
C 4-C 8 t -2344.43 -16.727 159.982 -73.305 9.716 0.574615 0.084506 0.049099 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
Ground&1s
C 4-C 9 t -2171.11 88.96 -204.91 0.742 4.617 0.532135 0.101443 0.019624 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 1 1st&2nd -2281.2 54.146 -87.243 -29.845 49.079 0.559118 0.054276 0.038686 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
-
C 4-C 2 1st&2nd -1711.08 40.648 -65.493 106.864 137.564 0.419382 0.040733 0.070174 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 3 1st&2nd -1710.72 40.571 -65.371 62.097 -63.946 0.419294 0.04068 0.040098 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
-
C 4-C 4 1st&2nd -1710.94 40.599 -65.399 108.832 139.648 0.419348 0.040694 0.071024 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 5 1st&2nd -1710.86 40.619 -65.466 64.065 -66.03 0.419328 0.04072 0.040951 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 6 1st&2nd -1771.26 -54.321 48.98 -21.148 35.503 0.434132 0.036661 0.028974 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 7 1st&2nd -1650.54 135.54 -179.844 -23.62 38.115 0.404544 0.08695 0.029055 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 8 1st&2nd -1771.08 -54.381 49.097 -23.591 38.088 0.434088 0.036684 0.030028 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 9 1st&2nd -1650.72 135.6 -179.961 -21.177 35.53 0.404588 0.087 0.028 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 1 2nd&3rd -1554.39 49.6 -72.18 -27.394 39.965 0.380978 0.042185 0.029025 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
-
C 4-C 2 2nd&3rd -1165.9 37.232 -54.184 108.324 90.376 0.28576 0.031659 0.053775 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 3 2nd&3rd -1165.68 37.168 -54.085 67.232 -30.43 0.285706 0.031617 0.036988 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
-
C 4-C 4 2nd&3rd -1165.82 37.194 -54.128 110.364 91.85 0.28574 0.031636 0.054608 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 5 2nd&3rd -1165.76 37.206 -54.141 69.273 -31.904 0.285725 0.031641 0.037822 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 6 2nd&3rd -1201.44 -66.83 10.441 -19.265 29.05 0.294471 0.037116 0.021683 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 7 2nd&3rd -1130.14 141.23 -118.71 -21.827 30.897 0.276995 0.066925 0.021854 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 8 2nd&3rd -1201.34 -66.877 10.511 -21.798 30.88 0.294446 0.037134 0.022429 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 9 2nd&3rd -1130.24 141.277 -118.78 -19.294 29.067 0.27702 0.066945 0.021108 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 1 3rd&4th -827.75 64.619 -80.641 -36.313 44.814 0.20288 0.039704 0.025069 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
-
C 4-C 2 3rd&4th -620.85 48.491 -60.522 101.061 57.72 0.152169 0.029795 0.046355 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 3 3rd&4th -620.77 48.438 -60.439 46.59 9.5 0.15215 0.029761 0.024104 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
-
C 4-C 4 3rd&4th -620.83 48.46 -60.472 102.928 58.229 0.152164 0.029775 0.047118 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 5 3rd&4th -620.79 48.469 -60.489 48.458 8.991 0.152154 0.029781 0.024867 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 6 3rd&4th -637.36 -41.775 -39.854 -26.064 33.294 0.156216 0.022272 0.018808 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 7 3rd&4th -604.26 138.704 -81.107 -28.406 33.927 0.148103 0.061597 0.018796 0.02802 328.6791 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 8 3rd&4th -637.33 -41.814 -39.791 -28.383 33.925 0.156208 0.022288 0.019065 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 9 3rd&4th -604.29 138.743 -81.17 -26.087 33.295 0.14811 0.061613 0.018538 0.028037 328.8787 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 1 4th&roof -98.17 4.757 -58.283 1.902 30.473 0.024061 0.02461 0.01325 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 2 4th&roof -73.62 3.578 -43.74 -28.053 21.053 0.018044 0.018469 0.012061 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 3 4th&roof -73.64 3.557 -43.685 30.906 24.657 0.018049 0.018447 0.013227 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 4 4th&roof -73.63 3.584 -43.719 -28.469 20.474 0.018047 0.018461 0.012231 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 5 4th&roof -73.63 3.551 -43.706 31.322 25.236 0.018047 0.018455 0.013396 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 6 4th&roof -78.05 -30.932 -52.149 1.686 23.22 0.01913 0.02194 0.010123 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 7 4th&roof -69.21 38.068 -35.277 1.166 22.49 0.016963 0.016116 0.009753 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 8 4th&roof -78.06 -30.924 -52.123 1.17 22.501 0.019132 0.02193 0.009829 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
C 4-C 9 4th&roof -69.2 38.06 -35.302 1.683 23.209 0.016961 0.016113 0.010046 0 0 2880 20 9.167325 12
Foundation
C 5-D 1 & ground -1880.87 -1.888 0.949 -0.769 0.441 0.82 0.038253 0.044892 0.016 105.57 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
Foundation
C 5-D 2 & ground -1410.78 -0.501 -4.731 -15.119 90.995 0.615 0.031902 0.090867 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
Foundation
C 5-D 3 & ground -1410.53 -2.331 6.154 13.965 -90.334 0.615 0.033275 0.090938 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
Foundation
C 5-D 4 & ground -1390.29 -0.773 6.202 -17.821 105.188 0.606 0.032929 0.099182 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
Foundation -
C 5-D 5 & ground -1431.02 -2.059 -4.779 16.667 104.527 0.624 0.03234 0.100223 0.010865 71.69079 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
Foundation
C 5-D 6 & ground -1199.52 2.262 96.671 1.145 -8.6 0.523 0.116835 0.033963 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
Foundation
C 5-D 7 & ground -1621.78 -5.095 -95.248 -2.299 9.261 0.707 0.123635 0.043883 0.134523 887.5997 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
Foundation
C 5-D 8 & ground -1174.09 1.925 110.243 -2.209 9.019 0.512 0.129484 0.033155 0.05053 333.4062 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
Foundation
C 5-D 9 & ground -1647.22 -4.758 -108.82 1.056 -8.358 0.718 0.137269 0.044432 0.027907 184.1325 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 1 Ground&1st -1753.3 16.728 -9.22 19.028 2.765 0.764 0.050152 0.056331 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 2 Ground&1st -1315.89 13.46 -8.439 49.113 90.247 0.573 0.038516 0.118501 0.054024 356.4587 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 3 Ground&1st -1314.07 11.633 -5.391 -57.883 -86.099 0.573 0.036712 0.071875 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 4 Ground&1st -1300.27 10.048 -1.298 -5.022 104.224 0.567 0.03491 0.102427 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
-
C 5-D 5 Ground&1st -1329.69 15.044 -12.532 52.282 100.076 0.579 0.040317 0.078863 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
-
C 5-D 6 Ground&1st -1147.03 20.001 71.952 -45.992 -6.761 0.5 0.091883 0.056618 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 7 Ground&1st -1482.93 45.094 -85.782 -19.385 10.909 0.646 0.11178 0.044285 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
-
C 5-D 8 Ground&1st -1127.64 24.237 80.816 71.363 10.59 0.491 0.100091 0.082393 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 9 Ground&1st -1502.32 49.329 -94.646 -52.455 -6.443 0.655 0.120738 0.06977 0.069161 456.3329 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 1 1st&2nd -1330.08 19.387 -31.29 -4.73 6.124 0.58 0.056056 0.034388 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 2 1st&2nd -998.96 16.104 -25.677 -58.167 78.488 0.435 0.044208 0.060812 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 3 1st&2nd -996.17 12.976 -21.258 51.072 -69.301 0.434 0.039875 0.056396 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 4 1st&2nd -988.39 11.812 -20.408 -66.847 90.08 0.431 0.038902 0.06605 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 5 1st&2nd -1006.73 17.269 -26.527 59.752 -80.894 0.439 0.045182 0.062135 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
-
C 5-D 6 1st&2nd -879.92 30.237 35.339 1.969 -2.769 0.383 0.051259 0.022142 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 7 1st&2nd -1115.2 59.317 -82.275 -9.064 11.956 0.486 0.101263 0.032062 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
-
C 5-D 8 1st&2nd -866.81 35.566 41.881 -8.807 11.621 0.378 0.057339 0.026023 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 9 1st&2nd -1128.32 64.646 -88.816 1.711 -2.435 0.492 0.10785 0.027865 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 1 2nd&3rd -908.36 17.618 -25.736 -5.555 7.582 0.396 0.042511 0.025094 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 2 2nd&3rd -682.79 14.65 -20.561 -54.322 62.247 0.298 0.033132 0.045637 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 3 2nd&3rd -679.76 11.777 -18.042 45.989 -50.874 0.296 0.030634 0.04018 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 4 2nd&3rd -676.78 10.524 -16.991 -62.175 71.265 0.295 0.029559 0.049765 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 5 2nd&3rd -685.77 15.902 -21.612 53.842 -59.891 0.299 0.034207 0.044592 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 6 2nd&3rd -610.89 31.315 21.9 0.841 -0.077 0.266 0.042152 0.015023 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 7 2nd&3rd -751.65 57.741 -60.504 -9.174 11.45 0.328 0.073142 0.023216 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
-
C 5-D 8 2nd&3rd -603.43 36.436 26.332 -8.908 11.117 0.263 0.046966 0.019549 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 9 2nd&3rd -759.12 62.863 -64.935 0.575 0.256 0.331 0.077577 0.018501 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 1 3rd&4th -487.91 21.976 -28.054 -5.591 8.164 0.213 0.036613 0.015416 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 2 3rd&4th -367.23 17.471 -21.841 -42.116 40.876 0.16 0.02826 0.028635 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 3 3rd&4th -364.63 15.493 -20.241 33.73 -28.631 0.159 0.02666 0.024603 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 4 3rd&4th -364.62 14.186 -20.099 -48.028 46.433 0.159 0.026523 0.031372 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 5 3rd&4th -367.25 18.777 -21.983 39.642 -34.188 0.16 0.028398 0.027464 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
-
C 5-D 6 3rd&4th -332.59 19.326 1.012 -0.403 2.525 0.145 0.025154 0.009476 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 7 3rd&4th -399.27 52.29 -43.093 -7.983 9.72 0.174 0.058364 0.014055 0.037937 250.3103 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
-
C 5-D 8 3rd&4th -329.34 23.403 3.174 -7.741 9.424 0.144 0.029039 0.012259 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 9 3rd&4th -402.52 56.367 -45.256 -0.645 2.822 0.175 0.062375 0.011228 0.038984 257.2223 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 1 4th&roof -68.65 -0.507 -17.907 -5.042 7.485 0.03 0.018669 0.005169 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 2 4th&roof -52.03 0.363 -14.242 -22.768 21.313 0.023 0.014798 0.012012 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 3 4th&roof -50.94 -1.124 -12.618 15.205 -10.085 0.022 0.013204 0.008405 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 4 4th&roof -51.38 -0.898 -14.052 -25.525 23.579 0.022 0.014601 0.013302 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 5 4th&roof -51.59 0.137 -12.808 17.962 -12.352 0.022 0.013401 0.009726 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 6 4th&roof -42.36 -16.83 -6.021 -1.967 4.08 0.018 0.017117 0.002969 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 7 4th&roof -60.61 16.069 -20.84 -5.596 7.148 0.026 0.021353 0.004819 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
-
C 5-D 8 4th&roof -41.56 18.395 -5.785 -5.389 6.893 0.018 0.018617 0.004248 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-D 9 4th&roof -61.41 17.634 -21.075 -2.174 4.334 0.027 0.021596 0.003506 0 0 1620 20mm 5.15662 8
C 5-E 9 Ground&1st -783 3.012 -54.941 57 22.046 0.341 0.068362 0.070356 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 1 1st&2nd -885.56 -32.28 51.57 -33.926 52.645 0.386 0.067084 0.068125 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 2 1st&2nd -747.55 -21.657 35.023 -62.182 86.28 0.326 0.048389 0.098021 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 3 1st&2nd -580.78 -26.764 42.332 11.293 -7.313 0.253 0.052237 0.022182 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 4 1st&2nd -745.73 -28.924 43.596 -56.357 78.924 0.325 0.056655 0.090863 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 5 1st&2nd -582.6 -19.497 33.759 5.468 0.044 0.254 0.043971 0.016577 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 6 1st&2nd -724.97 -55.395 77.88 -29.132 44.14 0.316 0.08945 0.05678 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 7 1st&2nd -603.36 6.974 -0.525 -21.757 34.828 0.263 0.018437 0.045408 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 8 1st&2nd -722.71 -64.416 88.523 -21.901 35.007 0.315 0.099712 0.047893 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 9 1st&2nd -605.62 15.996 -11.167 -28.988 43.96 0.264 0.027217 0.054294 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 1 2nd&3rd -613.95 -30.043 44.321 -32.897 47.597 0.268 0.054805 0.057977 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 2 2nd&3rd -509.79 -20.13 31.517 -60.634 66.598 0.222 0.04039 0.074359 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 3 2nd&3rd -411.14 -24.933 34.965 11.289 4.797 0.179 0.041818 0.018893 2.26E-05 0.149378 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 4 2nd&3rd -508.75 -27.395 36.965 -55.103 61.58 0.222 0.045645 0.06948 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 5 2nd&3rd -412.17 -17.668 29.518 5.758 9.814 0.18 0.036564 0.017485 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 6 2nd&3rd -497.23 -55.761 57.885 -28.18 38.891 0.217 0.065679 0.047287 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 7 2nd&3rd -423.69 10.697 8.597 -21.165 32.504 0.185 0.018563 0.039678 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 8 2nd&3rd -495.95 -64.779 64.648 -21.313 32.662 0.216 0.072329 0.041231 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 9 2nd&3rd -424.98 19.715 1.835 -28.032 38.733 0.185 0.02732 0.045735 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 1 3rd&4th -341.17 -37.669 48.652 -39.909 52.133 0.149 0.053716 0.057087 0.0408 269.2035 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 2 3rd&4th -278.95 -26.625 35.463 -58.59 54.846 0.122 0.03974 0.062134 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 3 3rd&4th -232.81 -29.879 37.515 -1.273 23.354 0.101 0.040834 0.027122 0.0792 522.5715 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 4 3rd&4th -278.48 -32.699 37.908 -54.235 52.183 0.121 0.042099 0.057908 0.0632 417.0015 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 5 3rd&4th -233.28 -23.805 35.071 -5.629 26.016 0.102 0.038476 0.029709 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 6 3rd&4th -273.59 -56.555 47.394 -32.701 40.815 0.119 0.06006 0.044819 0.0648 427.5585 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 7 3rd&4th -238.17 0.051 25.584 -27.162 37.384 0.104 0.029385 0.040811 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 8 3rd&4th -273 -64.095 50.429 -27.295 37.511 0.119 0.067349 0.041608 0.0648 427.5585 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 9 3rd&4th -238.76 7.592 22.549 -32.569 40.689 0.104 0.026458 0.044022 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 1 4th&roof -69.22 -7.79 38.532 -11.216 40.679 0.03 0.038651 0.04073 0.007664 50.5676 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 2 4th&roof -58.19 -4.738 27.773 -21.122 35.022 0.025 0.028019 0.035038 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 3 4th&roof -45.65 -6.948 30.024 4.298 25.996 0.02 0.029956 0.026056 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 4 4th&roof -58.05 -7.012 27.704 -19.31 34.32 0.025 0.02795 0.034356 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 5 4th&roof -45.78 -4.673 30.093 2.486 26.698 0.02 0.030025 0.026738 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 6 4th&roof -56.85 -18.027 30.334 -9.585 30.992 0.025 0.030473 0.03111 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 7 4th&roof -46.98 6.341 27.464 -7.239 30.026 0.02 0.027503 0.029984 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 8 4th&roof -56.68 -20.851 30.249 -7.335 30.121 0.025 0.030387 0.030263 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C 5-E 9 4th&roof -47.15 9.165 27.549 -9.489 30.897 0.021 0.027588 0.03083 0 0 1620 20 5.15662 8
C3-A 3769.911
12
3769.911
C3-B
12
3769.911
C3-C
12
C3-D 3769.911
12
3769.911
C3-E
12
C4-A 3769.9112880
12
C4-B 5026.548
16
C4-C 5026.548
16
C4-D 5026.548
16
C4-E 3769.911
12
C5-A 3769.911
12
5026.548
C5-B
16
C5-C 5026.548
16
C5-D 3769.9112880
12
C5-E 3769.9112880
12
b. Combined footing: This type is used to support two or more column loads. The
combined footing becomes necessary in situations where a wall column has to be placed
a property line, column spacing, or other considerations limit the footing clearance on the
column location. The combined footings are more economical to construct in the case of
closely spaced columns.
c. wall footing: They are used to support partitions and structural masonry walls that
carry loads from floors and beams. This type of footing preferable for location which is
liable to earthquake.
d. Cantilever (strap) footing: They are basically the same as combined footings except
that they are isolated footings joined by a strap beam that transfers the effect of the
bending moment produced by the eccentric column load at the exterior column (possibly
located along the property line) to the adjacent interior column footing that lies at a
considerable distance from it.
e. Mat (Raft) foundation: This is a large continuous footing supporting all of the
columns and walls of a structure. A mat or a raft footing is used when the soil conditions
are poor so that isolated footing can't be used due to its high susceptible to differential
settlement and a pile foundation is not economical.
2. Deep foundations
This type of foundation becomes essential when the supporting soil consists of poor
layers of material to an extended depth such that an individual or mat foundation is not
feasible.
Selection of foundation type
The selection of foundation type is the role of geotechnical engineer. The criteria that
should be considered during the selection are:
Soil type
Bearing capacity of the soil
Susceptibility of the soil and the building to deflections
Variability of the soil type over the area and with increasing depth
The following steps are the minimum required for designing a foundation:
1. Locate the site and the position of load. A rough estimate of the foundation
load(s) is usually provided by the client or made in-house. Depending on the site
or load system complexity, a literature survey may be started to see how others have
approached similar problems.
2. Physically inspect the site for any geological or other evidence that may indicate a
potential design problem that will have to be taken into account when making the design
or giving a design recommendation. Supplement this inspection with any previously
obtained soil data.
3. Establish the field exploration program and, on the basis of discovery (or what is
found in the initial phase), set up the necessary supplemental field testing and any
laboratory test program.
4. Determine the necessary soil design parameters based on integration of test data,
scientific principles, and engineering judgment.
5. Design the foundation using the soil parameters from step 4. The foundation should
be economical and be able to be built by the available construction personnel.
Based on the above conditions stated, the types of foundations chosen for our building
are Isolated Footing and Combined Footing. The design is based on EBCS-7 1995, and
design axial loads and bending moments are obtained from 3D frame analysis using
ETABS v9.7.
8.1 Design philosophy
1. Load Resistance Factored Design (LRDF)
In Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) method, load factors are applied to the
loads and resistance factors to the internal resistances or capacities of sections. The
value of a load factor depends on the accuracy with which a load can be determined and
the probability of its simultaneous occurrence with other loads in a combination for a
specific limit state. For any structural design including foundation we use LRDF method.
2. Allowable Stress Design (ASD)
Members proportioned so that the stresses in the steel and concrete resulting from normal
service loads were within allowable stress (specified limits), were only fractions of the
failure stresses of the materials. Allowable stresses, in practice were set at about one-half
the concrete compressive strength and one-half the yield stress of the steel.
This method is adopted for footing proportioning, in order to avoid application of safety
factor for third time in analysis and design.
AAiT:BSc thesis Page 114
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 BUILDING 2016
1st- Dead load and live load factored with 1.3 and 1.6 respectively.
2nd - Concrete and Steel cross sectional capacity factored by 1.5 and 1.15
respectively
3rd- Using Ultimate capacity (Allowable Stress * Safety factor) of the soil is the
governing capacity to avoid third time safety factor and be economical.
Footing Area = Unfactored load / Allowable Stress
= (Dead Load + Live Load)/ (Allowable Stress)
OR
Footing Area = Factored Load / (Allowable Stress * Safety factor)
= (1.3*Dead Load + 1.6*Live Load)/ (Allowable Stress*Factor of Safety).
Factor of Safety used to determine footing area is the average value Dead Load and Live
Load safety factor.
Factor of safety= (Factor of safety of Dead load + Factor of safety of Live load)/2
= (1.3+1.6)/2
= 1.45
As the dead load of the structure is the dominate one, for footing design we use a factor
of safety (FS) =1.4.
For all footing proportioning we use ASD method with a factor of safety ranges from 2.5
to 3.
Design combination for isolated and combined footing
For our project foundation design we use combination one which only take in
consideration factored dead load and live load. As the base shear force located at the
bottom of the ground floor, earthquake doesnt have any effect.
= (1 )
Where = & =
The thickness of a given footing that determined by checking the thickness needed
for punching shear criteria and wide beam shear criteria. The greater of the two governs
the depth of the footing.
Design procedures
a a
Material and geometry property
Concrete - C25
S-400
Column dimension 450mmx450mm
. Area proportioning
Assume maximum allowable bearing capacity of the soil, to be 200KN/ m2 , d = 250mm
, and a/b = 1.0 .
all > max
all = 280 KN/m2
max = P/A (16ea/a 6eb/b) ..........................*
For square footing assuming a = b
ea & eb are eccentricity in the x & y direction respectively
ea = My-y/P = 2.155/2132.71=0.00101m
eb = Mx-x/P = 274..652/2132.71=0.1288m
max = 188.575KN/m2
Substituting these values in equation *, the dimensions of the footing is calculated as
fallows
280 = 2132.71/b (16*0.001010/b6 *0.1288/b)
b = 7.62 (1 6.06*10-3/b 0.773/b)
So by using excel sheet iteration the value of a will be
b = 3.675 = a, so use b = a = 3.7m
Stress distribution
maxA = P/A (1-(6ea/a)-(6eb/b)) My-y +ve & Mx-x -ve
= 2132.71/3.72 (1-(6*0.00101/3.7)-(6*0.1288/3.7))
= 122.997KN/m2
maxB = P/A (1-(6ea/a) +(6eb/b)) = 188.064KN/m2 My-y +ve & Mx-x +ve
maxC = P/A (1+(6ea/a) -(6eb/b)) = 123.51KN/m2 My-y -ve & Mx-x -ve
maxD = P/A (1+(6ea/a)+(6eb/b)) = 188.575KN/m2 My-y -ve & Mx-x +ve
2
avg = 155.786KN/m
Depth determination
1. Check for punching shear
Allowable punching Vp is given by
VRD =0.25fctd*k 1 *K 2
Where fctd = 0.21*fck0.66/cm
k1= (1+50) 2, = As/bd
x3-3 2.725
x4-4 2.725
Using critical line which are line 2-2 and line 1-1 we use the stresses from both;
At x2-2: =188.4400636 and =123.3733548 from the above line equation
results
maxD=188.5745958 and maxC=123.507887 are the distributed stresses
Average of all four stresses is avg=155.9739753
Along x-x
Location of critical section from the origin=a/2+a'/2 where a=3.7 and a=0.45 will be at
2.075
At x5-5: the stresses are =188.3503754 and =123.2836667
The average of these two stresses will be avg=155.8170211
The maximum stresses at D and C respectively maxD=188.5745958 and
maxC=123.507887
The average of these two maximum stresses will be avg=156.0412414
Along x-x
sd,s=Msd/(fcd*b*(d^2))
b 1 M
sd,s 0.086
SRS
Kz 0.946
As 1924.346 mm2/m
spacing 163.2551 Mm
use s 160 Mm
Along y-y
sd,s=Msd/(fcd*b*(d^2))
b 1 M
sd,s 0.091
SRS
Kz 0.944
As 2049.599 mm2/m
spacing 153.2784 mm
use s 150 mm
s(mm) x- s(mm) x- s
Column Load P M2 M3 a b D As x-x As y-y diameter As x s used x used
C9 COMB1 -2246.26 -1.743 1.803 2.9 2.9 0.65 1873.218 1874.024 20 314.1593 167.71 160 167.638 160
C11 COMB1 -1269.02 2.813 2.063 2.2 2.2 0.45 1360.219 1363.622 20 314.1593 230.962 230 230.385 230
C14 COMB1 -3177.16 0.191 -3.865 3.4 3.4 0.8 2270.75 2270.33 20 314.1593 138.35 130 138.376 130
C9 COMB2 -1687.21 -6.529 106.64 2.7 2.7 0.55 1716.217 1695.266 20 314.1593 183.053 180 185.315 180
C11 COMB2 -1104.59 -8.35 94.511 2.3 2.3 0.45 1337.356 1315.204 20 314.1593 234.91 230 238.867 230
C14 COMB2 -2383.18 0.133 250.699 3.2 3.2 0.75 1895.687 2167.192 20 314.1593 165.723 160 144.961 140
C9 COMB3 -1682.17 3.916 -103.935 2.7 2.7 0.55 1708.982 1686.4 20 314.1593 183.828 180 186.289 180
C11 COMB3 -798.95 12.57 -91.417 2.1 2.1 0.35 1267.546 1248.275 20 314.1593 247.848 240 251.674 250
C14 COMB3 -2382.57 0.153 -256.497 3.2 3.2 0.75 1898.056 2168.961 20 314.1593 165.516 160 144.843 140
C9 COMB4 -1696.32 3.884 90.507 2.7 2.7 0.55 1710.721 1691.475 20 314.1593 183.641 180 185.73 180
C11 COMB4 -1101.03 12.535 80.187 2.3 2.3 0.45 1313.65 1301.021 20 314.1593 239.149 230 241.471 240
C14 COMB4 -2382.94 0.128 255.095 3.2 3.2 0.75 1897.649 2168.715 20 314.1593 165.551 160 144.859 140
C9 COMB5 -1673.07 -6.498 -87.803 2.7 2.7 0.55 1685.98 1667.955 20 314.1593 186.336 180 188.349 180
C11 COMB5 -802.51 -8.316 -77.092 2 2 0.35 1223.757 1201.82 20 314.1593 256.716 250 261.402 260
C14 COMB5 -2382.81 0.158 -260.894 3.3 3.3 0.75 1911.611 2185.798 20 314.1593 164.342 160 143.727 140
C9 COMB6 -1793.65 89.655 11.492 3 3 0.55 1806.368 1874.694 20 314.1593 173.917 170 167.578 160
C11 COMB6 -1059.66 85.573 10.552 2.4 2.4 0.4 1352.71 1478.933 20 314.1593 232.244 230 212.422 210
C14 COMB6 -2492.7 294.04 -5.66 4 4 0.7 2135.342 2247.189 20 314.1593 147.123 140 139.8 130
C9 COMB7 -1575.74 -92.269 -8.787 2.8 2.8 0.55 1537.361 1615.231 20 314.1593 204.349 200 194.498 190
C11 COMB7 -843.88 -81.354 -7.457 2.2 2.2 0.35 1179.538 1340.037 20 314.1593 266.34 260 234.44 230
C14 COMB7 -2273.04 -293.754 -0.138 3.8 3.8 0.7 2071.546 2030.289 20 314.1593 151.654 150 154.736 150
C9 COMB8 -1804.95 102.583 -8.535 3 3 0.55 1815.488 1894.158 20 314.1593 173.043 170 165.856 160
C11 COMB8 -1055.24 111.5 -7.231 2.5 2.5 0.45 1202.975 1340.094 20 314.1593 261.151 260 234.43 230
C14 COMB8 -2492.41 294.033 -0.202 3.9 3.9 0.7 2119.298 2234.13 20 314.1593 148.237 140 140.618 140
C9 COMB9 -1564.44 -105.197 11.24 2.9 2.9 0.55 1549.669 1631.348 20 314.1593 202.726 200 192.576 190
C11 COMB9 -848.3 -107.281 10.326 2.4 2.4 0.4 1075.36 1233.861 20 314.1593 292.143 290 254.614 250
C14 COMB9 -2273.34 -293.747 -5.596 3.8 3.8 0.7 2074.127 2031.984 20 314.1593 151.465 150 154.607 150
s(mm) s(mm) s
Column Load P M2 M3 a b d As x-x As y-y diametr as x-x s used x-x used
C1 COMB7 -1023.58 -115.772 6.34 2.5 2.5 0.4 1322.976 1487.859 20 314.1593 237.464 230 211.148 210
C2 COMB6 -1198.47 126.028 -2.109 2.7 2.7 0.45 1410.457 1554.139 20 314.1593 222.735 220 202.143 200
C3 COMB6 -1119.96 111.88 7.229 2.6 2.6 0.45 1299.923 1431.559 20 314.1593 241.675 240 219.452 210
C4 COMB7 -1652.65 -108.793 8.537 2.9 2.9 0.55 1636.156 1723.288 20 314.1593 192.01 190 182.302 180
C5 COMB6 -1951.06 105.707 15.319 3.1 3.1 0.6 1817.208 1884.487 20 314.1593 172.88 170 166.708 160
C6 COMB7 -1706.64 -100.847 8.735 2.9 2.9 0.55 1693.123 1774.247 20 314.1593 185.55 180 177.066 170
C7 COMB1 -2821.79 -2.397 -8.114 3.2 3.2 0.7 2275.807 2275.764 20 314.1593 138.043 130 138.045 130
C8 COMB9 -1647.22 -108.82 -8.358 2.9 2.9 0.55 1630.662 1717.844 20 314.1593 192.657 190 182.879 180
C9 COMB8 -1804.95 102.583 -8.535 3 3 0.55 1815.488 1894.158 20 314.1593 173.043 170 165.856 160
C10 COMB9 -1022.87 -115.541 -6.264 2.5 2.5 0.4 1320.556 1486.547 20 314.1593 237.899 230 211.334 210
C11 COMB8 -1055.24 111.5 -7.231 2.5 2.5 0.45 1202.975 1340.094 20 314.1593 261.151 260 234.43 230
C12 COMB8 -1152.65 125.379 2.023 2.7 2.7 0.45 1353.659 1496.056 20 314.1593 232.081 230 209.991 200
C13 COMB6 -2246.85 310.942 -0.429 3.9 3.9 0.7 2061.923 2022.719 20 314.1593 152.362 150 155.315 150
C14 COMB6 -2492.7 294.04 -5.66 4 4 0.7 2135.342 2247.189 20 314.1593 147.123 140 139.8 130
C15 COMB8 -2144.91 313.79 3.312 3.8 3.8 0.65 1949.916 2090.569 20 314.1593 161.114 160 150.274 150
9 REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
9.1 Slab Detailing
Section A-A
Section B-B
Section C-C
Section D-D
Section E-E
Section 1-1
Section 2-2
Section 4-4
Section 5-5
Beam on Axis E
Beam on Axis 3, 4, 5
On Axis 3, 4, 5
0.45
0.45
10 CONCLUSION
So far we took different courses concerning structural design of a building such as:
theory of structures, reinforced concrete and others which enabled us to accomplish this
project. This project helped us compile our knowledge in structural design which will in
turn enhance our capacity to perform well in the jobs we will be engaged.
While designing every element of this building such as: slabs, beams, columns and
footings the use of software played a great role. We used ETABS analysis results for
design by first assigning every expected load on the structural members and considering
possible load combinations. When we use software we have to make sure that we
inserted correct data so that we wont get false output which may lead to failure of the
structure if we used it for design.
This report doesnt include roof design mainly due to the reason that we havent learned
Steel and timber structures by the time we begun project and also time limit.
Four of the five floors in this building are typical(the same ) so design of slabs and
beams is done accordingly for one floor. Design of this building is according to the
specification and limits of EBCS 1995.
The foundation footing was made square footing because both axes have similar
Probability of experiencing the biaxial moment. Besides square footings are simpler for
Supervision in construction.
11 RECOMMENDATION
It has been quite bulky to prepare a precise reinforcement detail. However, since it
is essential to achieve proper performance of a structure under the situation it is designed
for, the detailing has to be done seriously. Detailing is used as a guide to put the paper
work in to practical, hence strict supervision is necessary at site during construction.
For engineers in addition to designing safe structure, economy should be considered. So
instead of designing for the maximum all the time, critical conditions are selected. For
example, critical conditions for flexure are maximum negative moments at support and
maximum positive at span, for this the design will be safe and number of reinforcement
bars to be used is reduced.
While designing a structural element it is better to make it non sway because design
faults may occur and workmanship may not meet design requirements. In our case we
recommend using low ductility class for design, because high ductility class requires
advanced level of understanding and also results a complicated detailing.
.
12 APPENDICES
12.1 Determination of total building weight and Center mass
Table 21 Typical Floor Weight and Center Mass
Distance in Distance
Nota the in the
Tion x-axis, Xi Load Wi Wi*Xi y-axis, Yi Wi*Yi
P1 2.25 201.357 453.05325 9.75 1963.23075
P2 11.25 192.582 2166.5475 9.75 1877.6745
P3 15.75 201.357 3171.37275 9.75 1963.23075
P4 2.25 192.582 433.3095 4.25 818.4735
P5 6.75 192.582 1299.9285 4.25 818.4735
P6 11.25 192.582 2166.5475 4.25 818.4735
P7 15.75 192.582 3033.1665 4.25 818.4735
C1 2.25 44.442 99.9945 13.75 611.0775
C2 11.25 44.442 499.9725 13.75 611.0775
C3 15.75 44.442 699.9615 13.75 611.0775
C4 2.25 46.97325 105.689813 1.25 58.7165625
C5 6.75 62.631 422.75925 1 62.631
C6 11.25 62.631 704.59875 1 62.631
C7 15.75 46.97325 739.828688 1.25 58.7165625
C8 8.1 100.3158 812.55798 9.75 978.07905
W1 2.25 27.45 61.7625 14.5 398.025
W2 5.85 16.47 96.3495 14.5 238.815
W3 11.25 27.45 308.8125 14.5 398.025
W4 15.75 27.45 432.3375 14.5 398.025
W5 0 9.15 0 13.75 125.8125
W6 4.5 9.15 41.175 13.75 125.8125
W7 7.2 9.15 65.88 13.75 125.8125
W8 9 9.15 82.35 13.75 125.8125
Distance Distance
Nota in the x- in the
Tion axis, Xi Load Wi Wi*Xi y-axis, Yi Wi*Yi
B1 0 4.21875 0 13.75 58.0078125
B2 4.5 4.21875 18.984375 13.75 58.0078125
B3 9 4.21875 37.96875 13.75 58.0078125
B4 13.5 4.21875 56.953125 13.75 58.0078125
B5 18 4.21875 75.9375 13.75 58.0078125
B6 2.25 12.65625 28.4765625 13 164.53125
B7 6.75 12.65625 85.4296875 13 164.53125
B8 11.25 12.65625 142.3828125 13 164.53125
B9 15.75 12.65625 199.3359375 13 164.53125
B10 0 18.28125 0 9.75 178.2421875
B11 4.5 18.28125 82.265625 9.75 178.2421875
B12 9 18.28125 164.53125 9.75 178.2421875
B13 13.5 18.28125 246.796875 9.75 178.2421875
B14 18 18.28125 329.0625 9.75 178.2421875
B15 2.25 12.65625 28.4765625 6.5 82.265625
B16 6.75 12.65625 85.4296875 6.5 82.265625
13 REFFERANCE
1. Design of concrete structures, 14th edition, H.Nilson, David Darwin, and Charles
W.D
2. Ethiopian building code standards(EBCS 1995)
2.1 EBCS-1
2.3 EBCS-2
2.2 EBCS-7
2.3 EBCS-8
3. Reinforced concrete design materials
4. Structural analysis and design books
5. Software used
Auto CAD 2007
SAP 2000 14
ETABS V9.6
MS-EXEL
MS-Word
Sketch-up pro
Paint
6. Previous Sample papers