Você está na página 1de 7

Attachment 8.

2
DFG-Erstantrag
Chiara Gianollo - Paths of development in the syntax of Indo-European adnominal genitive

Bibliographic references cited in the project proposal (Literatur)


Abney, Steven. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Doctoral
dissertation, MIT.
Aland, Kurt & Barbara Aland. 1989. The Text of the New Testament. Translated and revised
edition. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional structure in nominals: nominalization and ergativity.
Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2002. Word Order Patterns in Greek Nominals: Aspects of Diachronic
Change. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 27, 91-107.
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2009. Adnominal arguments and Case in the DP. Paper presented at the
Fachbereichkolloquium, July 9, 2009. University of Konstanz.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou. 2007. Noun Phrase in the
Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Alexiadou, Artemis & Chris Wilder. 1998. Adjectival Modification and Multiple Determiners. In
Alexiadou, Artemis & Chris Wilder (eds), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the
Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 303-332.
Allen, Cynthia. 1998. Loss of the postnominal genitive in English. Proceedings of the
Australian Linguistic Society 1998. http://emsah.uq.edu.au/linguistics/als/als98/allen387.html
Allen, Cynthia. 2003. Deflexion and the development of the genitive in English. English
Language and Linguistics 7.1, 128.
Allen, Cynthia. 2008. Genitives in Early English: Typology and Evidence. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Bastiaensen, Antoon. 1987. Atti e Passioni dei Martiri. Milano: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla.
Beames, John. 1872/1970. A Comparative Grammar of the Modern Aryan Languages of
India: to wit, Hindi, Panjabi, Sindhi, Gujarati, Marathi, Oriya, and Bangali. New Delhi:
Munshiram Manoharlal, second reprint 1970 (1872-1879 edition: London: Trbner).
Benedetti, Marina. 2002. Radici, morfemi nominali e verbali: alla ricerca dellinaccusativit
indoeuropea. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 87, 20-45.
Benveniste, mile. 1935. Origines de la formation des noms en indo-europen. Paris:
Maisonneuve.
Benveniste, mile. 1948. Noms dagent et noms daction en indo-europen. Paris:
Maisonneuve.
Benveniste, mile. 1960a. tre et avoir dans leurs fonctions linguistiques. Bulletin de la
Societ de Linguistique. 55, 113-134. Repr. 1966 in Problmes de linguistique gnrale, I.
Paris: Gallimard, 187-207.
Benveniste, mile. 1960b. Gnitif et adjectif en latin. Studii Clasice 2, 65-67.
Benveniste, mile. 1962. Pour lanalyse des fonctions casuelles: le gnitif latin. Lingua, 11,
10-18. Repr. 1966 in Problmes de linguistique gnrale, I. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 140-148.
Bloch, Jules. 1920. La Formation de la Langua Marathe. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Bloch, Jules. 1934/1965. Indo-Aryan from the Vedas to Modern Times. Translated 1965 from
L'Indo-Aryen du Veda aux temps modernes, 1934. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense. Vol. I: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bgel, Tina, Miriam Butt & Sebastian Sulger. 2008. Urdu ezafe and the morphology-syntax
interface. In Butt, Miriam & Tracy Holloway King (eds), Proceedings of the LFG08
Conference, 129-149.
Brjars, Kersti. 2003. Morphological status and (de)grammaticalisation: the Swedish
possessive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26.2, 133163.
Chatterji, Suniti Kumar. 1926/1970. The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language.
Vol. II. Woking and London: George Allen and Unwin (1926: Calcutta University Press).
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on Nominalization. In Jacobs, Roderick & Peter
Rosenbaum (eds), Reading in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham MA: Ginn & Co.,
184-221.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In
Cinque, Guglielmo et al. (eds), Paths Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of
Richard S. Kayne. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 85-110.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. A phrasal movement analysis of the Romanian DP. In Minu, Ana
Maria & Eugen Munteanu (eds), Studia linguistica et philologica in honorem D. Irimia. Iai:
Editura Universitii A. I. Cuza, 129-142.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenbergs Universal 20 and Its Exceptions. Linguistic
Inquiry 36.3, 315-332.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2007. The syntax of adjectives. A comparative study. Ms., available in
electronic form, http://hdl.handle.net/10278/883
Corbett, Greville G. 1987. The morphology/syntax interface: evidence from possessive
adjectives in Slavonic. Language 63: 299-345.
Crisma, Paola. 2004. Triggering syntactic change: the history of English genitives. Paper
presented at DiGS VIII, Yale University. In press in Jonas, Dianne, John Whitman, Andrew
Garrett (eds), Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Crisma, Paola & Chiara Gianollo. 2006. Where did Romance N-raising come from? A parallel
study of parameter resetting in Latin and English. In Doetjes, Jenny & Paz Gonzlez (eds),
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Selected Papers from Going Romance 2004.
Amsterdam: Benjamins, 71-93.
Crisma, Paola & Giuseppe Longobardi. 2009. Change, Relatedness, and Inertia in Historical
Syntax. In Crisma, Paola & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds), Historical Syntax and Linguistic
Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-13.
Delbrck, Berthold. 1878. Syntaktische Forschungen III. Die altindische Wortfolge aus dem
atapathabrhmaa dargestellt. Halle: Waisenhaus.
Delbrck, Berthold. 1888. Altindische Syntax. Halle: Waisenhaus.
Delbrck, Berthold. 1893. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Erster
Teil. Strassburg: Trbner.
Delbrck, Berthold. 1900. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Dritter
Teil. Strassburg: Trbner.
Demske, Ulrike. 2001. Merkmale und Relationen. Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase des
Deutschen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Demske, Ulrike. 2002. Nominalization and Argument Structure in Early New High German.
ZAS Papers in Linguistics 27, 67-90.
den Dikken, Marcel. 1995. Particles: on the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative
constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
den Dikken, Marcel. 1998. Predicate Inversion in DP. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Chris Wilder
(eds), Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase. Amsterdam:
Benjamins, 177-214.
2
Dittmer, Arne & Ernst Dittmer. 1998. Studien zur WortstellungSatzgliedstellung in der
althochdeutschen Tatianbersetzung. Gttingen: Vandehoeck & Ruprecht.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2008a. Order of Genitive and Noun. In Haspelmath, Martin & al. (eds) The
World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 86.
http://wals.info/feature/86
Dryer, Matthew S. 2008b. Order of Adjective and Noun. In Haspelmath, Martin & al. (eds)
The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter
87. http://wals.info/feature/87
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine. 2006. Old Russian possessive constructions: A construction
grammar account. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo.
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine. 2009. Quantifying syntactic influence: Possession and definiteness
in Greek and Old Church Slavic. Paper presented at the 19th International Conference on
Historical Linguistics. August 10-15, 2009. Radboud University Nijmegen.
Eilers, Helge. 2003. Die Syntax Notkers des Deutschen in seinen bersetzungen. Berlin:
Walter de Gruyter.
Fortson, Benjamin W. 2010. Indo-European Language and Culture. An Introduction. 2nd
revised edition. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fox, Anthony. 1995. Linguistic Reconstruction. An Introduction to Theory and Method.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallmann, Peter. 1998. Case Underspecification in Morphology, Syntax and the Lexicon. In
Alexiadou, Artemis & Chris Wilder (eds), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the
Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 141-176.
Gallmann, Peter & Thomas Lindauer. 1994. Funktionale Kategorien in Nominalphrasen.
Beitrge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 116, 1-27.
Gianollo, Chiara. 2005. Constituent structure and parametric resetting in the Latin DP: a
diachronic study. Doctoral dissertation, Universit di Pisa.
Gianollo, Chiara, 2007. The Internal Syntax of the Nominal Phrase in Latin. In Purnelle,
Grald & Joseph Denooz (eds), Ordre et cohrence en Latin. Lige: Librairie Droz, 65-80.
Gianollo, Chiara. 2009a. Prepositional genitives in Romance and the issue of parallel
development. Paper presented at the 11th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference. July
22-24, 2009. University of Campinas. Submitted to Galves, Charlotte (ed.), Diachronic
syntax: Parameter theory and dynamics of change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gianollo, Chiara. 2009b. Genitive arguments in Latin and German DPs. Paper presented at
the Swiss Generative Grammar Meeting. April 24, 2009. University of Neuchtel.
http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/home/gianollo/Material/Gianollo2009-HONeuchatel.pdf
Gianollo, Chiara. 2009c. Native syntax and translation effects. Adnominal arguments in the
Greek and Latin New Testament. Accepted. In press in Welo, Eirik (ed.), Indo-European
syntax and pragmatics. Oslo: Oslo Studies in Language.
Gianollo, Chiara & Cristina Guardiano. 2007. Genitives and adjectives in the history of Greek
and Latin. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics.
August 6-11, 2007. Universit du Qubec Montral.
Gianollo, Chiara, Cristina Guardiano & Giuseppe Longobardi. 2004. Historical Implications of
a Formal Theory of Syntactic Variation. Paper presented at the 8th Diachronic Generative
Syntax Conference. June 24-27, 2004. Yale University.
Gianollo, Chiara, Cristina Guardiano & Giuseppe Longobardi. 2008. Three fundamental
issues in parametric linguistics. In Biberauer, Theresa (ed.). The Limits of Syntactic Variation.
Amsterdam: Benjamins, 109-142.
Gil, David. 2008 Genitives, Adjectives, and Relative Clauses. In Haspelmath, Martin & al.
(eds) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library,

3
chapter 60. http://wals.info/feature/60
Giorgi, Alessandra & Giuseppe Longobardi. 1991. The Syntax of Noun Phrases. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Glauch, Sonja. 2000. Die Martianus-Capella-Bearbeitung Notkers des Deutschen. Tbingen:
Niemeyer.
Greenberg, Joseph H.. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with particular reference to the
order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of Language.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 73-113.
Grierson, George A. 1903. On certain suffixes in the Modern Indo-Aryan Vernaculars.
Zeitschrift fr Vergleichende Sprachforschung 38, 473-491.
Grimshaw, Jane B. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
de Groot, Albert Willem. 1956. Classification of the uses of a case illustrated on the genitive
in Latin. Lingua 6, 8-66.
Hajnal, Ivo. 2000. Der adjektivische Genitivausdruck der luwischen Sprachen (im Lichte
neuerer Erkenntnis). In Ofitsch, Michaela & Christian Zinko (eds), 125 Jahre Indogermanistik
Graz. Graz: Leykam, 159-184.
Haudry, Jean. 1977. Lemploi des cas en Vedique. Introduction ltude des cas en Indo-
Europen. Lyon: LHermes.
Hettrich, Heinrich. 2006. Some remarks on the adverbal genitive in gvedic Sanskrit.
Presentation given at the XIII World Sanskrit Conference, Edinburgh, July 2006. In press in
the Proceedings.
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik. From Case to Adposition: The development of configurational
syntax in Indo-European languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hinterhlzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova 2005. Rhetorical Relations and Verb Placement in
Early Germanic Languages. Evidence from the Old High German Tatian Translation (9th
century). In Stede, Manfred et al. (eds), Salience in Discourse. Multidisciplinary Approaches
to Discourse. Mnster: Stichting/Nodus, 71-79.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2000. Persian Ezafe Construction Revisited: Evidence for Modifier
Phrase. In Jensen, John T. & Gerard van Herk (eds), Proceedings of the 2000 annual
conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Ottawa: Cahiers Linguistique dOttawa,
173-185.
Kayne, Richard. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47,
3-31.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard. 2002. On Some Prepositions That Look DP-internal: English of and French
de. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1, 71-115.
Keenan, Edward. 1994. Creating anaphors. An historical study of the English reflexive
pronouns. Los Angeles: UCLA. Ms.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 1993. Nominalizations. London: Routledge.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1978. On the history of the genitive plural in Slavic, Baltic, Germanic, and
Indo-European. Lingua 45, 281-300.
Kroch, Anthony. 2001. Syntactic Change. In Baltin, Mark & Chris Collins (eds), The
Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 699-729.
Kuryowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.
Larson, Richard & Sungeun Cho. 1999. Temporal Adjectives and the Structure of Possessive
DPs. In Bird, Sonya et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics. University of Arizona in Tucson: Cascadilla Press, 299-311.

4
Lazzeroni, Romano. 1997. La transitivit come categoria linguistica. I nomi dazione
indoeuropei. Incontri Linguistici 20, 71-82.
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Lindauer, Thomas. 1995. Genitivattribute. Eine morphosyntaktische Untersuchung zum
deutschen DP/NP-System. Tbingen: Niemeyer.
Lindauer, Thomas. 1998. Attributive Genitive Constructions in German. In Alexiadou, Artemis
& Chris Wilder (eds), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase.
Amsterdam: Benjamins, 109-140.
Lbel, Elisabeth. 1991. Apposition und das Problem der Kasuszuweisung und
Adjazenzbedingung in der Nominalphrase. In Fanselow, Gisbert & Sascha W. Felix (eds),
Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien. Tbingen: Narr, 1-32.
Lfstedt, Einar. Genetiv und Adjektiv. In Lfstedt, Einar, Syntactica III. Lund: Gleerup, 107-
124.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1996. The Syntax of N-raising: a minimalist theory. Utrecht: OTS
Working Papers.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001a. Formal syntax, diachronic Minimalism, and etymology: the
history of French 'chez'. Linguistic Inquiry 32.2, 275-302.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001b. The Structure of DPs: Some Principles, Parameters, and
Problems. In Baltin, Mark & Chris Collins (eds), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic
Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 562-603.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2003. Methods in Parametric Linguistics and Cognitive History.
Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3, 101-138.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2009. Toward a phylogeny of grammars. Invited paper presented at
the 19th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. August 10-15, 2009. Radboud
University Nijmegen.
Lhr, Rosemarie. 1991. Adjazenz in komplexen Nominalphrasen. In Fanselow, Gisbert &
Sascha W. Felix (eds), Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien. Tbingen: Narr,
33-51.
Lhr, Rosemarie. 2009. Translating information structure: A study of Notkers translation of
Boethius Latin De Consolatione Philosophiae into Old High German. In Hinterhlzl, Roland
& Svetlana Petrova (eds), Information Structure and Language Change: New Approaches to
Word Order Variation in Germanic. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 323-366.
Lunt, Horace G. 20017. Old Church Slavonic Grammar. 7th revised edition. Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter.
Luraghi, Silvia & Pierluigi Cuzzolin. 2007. Mediating culture through language. Contact-
induced phenomena in the early translations of the Gospels. In Roma, Elisa (ed.), Europe
and the Mediterranean as linguistic areas: convergencies from a historical and typological
perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 133-158.
Magni, Elisabetta. 2008. The evolution of Latin word (dis)order, in Scalise, Sergio et al. (eds),
Universals of Language Today. Berlin: Springer, 225-252.
Manolessou, Io. 2000. Greek Noun Phrase Structure. A Study in Syntactic Evolution.
Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Master, Alfred. 1967. A Grammar of Old Marathi. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Meenakshi, K. 1991. The genitive in Pini and in Epic Sanskrit. In Hock, Hans Henrich
(ed.), Studies in Sanskrit syntax: a volume in honor of the centennial of Speijer's Sanskrit
syntax. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 145-152.
Meillet, Antoine. 1908. Introduction l'tude comparative des langues indo-europennes.
2nd revised edition. Paris: Hachette.
5
Meillet, Antoine & Joseph Vendryes. 1953. Trait de grammaire compare des langues
classiques. 2nd revised edition. Paris: Champion.
Melchert, Craig. 2010. Genitive Case and Possessive Adjective in Anatolian. In press.
Available at http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/Melchert/anatoliangenitive.pdf
Mittelberger, Hermann. 1966. Genitiv und Adjektiv in den altanatolischen Sprachen. Kratylos
11, 99-106.
Neumann, Gnter. 1982. Die Konstruktionen mit Adiectiva genetivalia in den luwischen
Sprachen. In Neu, E. (ed.), Investigationes Indogermanicae. Gedenkschrift Heinz Kronasser.
Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 149-161.
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2005. Possible and probable languages. A generative perspective on
linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norde, Muriel. 1997. The History of the Genitive in Swedish. A Case Study in
Degrammaticalization. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Nunnally, Thomas E. 1992. Mans son/son of man: Translation, textual conditioning, and the
history of the English genitive. In Rissanen, Matti et al. (eds), History of Englishes. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter, 359-371.
Payne, John R. 1995. Inflecting postpositions in Indic and Kashmiri. In Plank, Frans (ed.),
Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 283-298.
Petrova, Svetlana. 2009. Information structure and word order variation in the Old High
German Tatian. In Hinterhlzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova (eds), Information Structure and
Language Change: New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic. Berlin: Walter de
Gruyter, 251-279.
Plank, Frans. 1992. From cases to adpositions. In Pantaleo, Nicola (ed.), Aspects of English
Diachronic Linguistics. Papers read at the Second National Conference of History of English.
Fasano: Schena, 19-61.
Plank, Frans (ed.). 2003. Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton
de Gruyter.
Renou, Louis. 1954. Le passage du nom daction linfinitif dans le Rigvda.
Sprachgeschichte und Wortbedeutung. Festschrift A. Debrunner. Bern: Francke, 385-388.
Ritter, Elisabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in Noun Phrases: Evidence from modern
Hebrew. In Rothstein, Susan (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 26. San Diego: Academic Press,
37-62.
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian. 2008. Macroparameters, Markedness and Typological Drift. Paper presented at
the International Conference Level of analysis in the evolution of Indo-European
Languages. May 22-24, 2008. University of Trieste.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change. A minimalist approach to
grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosn, Hannah. 1981. Studies in the syntax of the verbal noun in Early Latin. Mnchen:
Fink.
Rosenbach, Anette. 2002. Genitive variation in English: conceptual factors in synchronic and
diachronic studies. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Scarlata, Salvatore. 1999. Die Wurzelkomposita im Rg-Veda. Wiesbaden: Reichert.

Schlerath, Bernfried.1994. Hatte das Indogermanische einen Genitiv? In Dunkel, George E.,
Gisela Meyer, Salvatore Scarlata, Christian Seidl (eds), Frh-, Mittel-, Sptindogermanisch.
Akten der IX. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 337-
348.
Siloni, Tal. 1997. Noun Phrases and Nominalizations. The syntax of DPs. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

6
Sndal, Magns. 1998. A Concordance to Biblical Gothic. Reykjavk: Institute of Linguistics,
University of Iceland.

Sommer, Ferdinand. 1902. Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre. Heidelberg:
Winter.
Speijer, Jakob S. 1886. Sanskrit Syntax. Leiden: Brill.
Speijer, Jakob S. 1896. Vedische und Sanskrit-Syntax. Strassburg: Trbner.
Spencer, Andrew. 2007. The possessum-agreement construction or Does Albanian have a
genitive case?. http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~spena/PossMod/poss_agr_constr1.pdf
Stein, Achim & Carola Trips. 2009. Diachronic aspects of borrowing aspect: the role of Old
French in the development of the be going to infinitive construction. Paper presented at the
19th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. August 10-15, 2009. Radboud
University Nijmegen.
Streitberg, Wilhelm. 20007. Die Gothische Bibel. Der gotische Text und seine griechische
Vorlage. Seventh edition. Heidelberg: Winter.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3,
89-102.
Szemernyi, Oswald. 1996. Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics. Translated revised
edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, Ann. 2008. Contact effects of translation: Distinguishing two kinds of influence in Old
English. Language Variation and Change 20, 341-365.
Tichy, Eva. 1995. Die Nomina agentis auf -tar- im Vedischen. Heidelberg: Winter.
Tulpule, Sankara Gopala & Anne Feldhaus. 2000. A Dictionary of Old Marathi. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Villar, Francisco. 1995. Indo-European o-stems and feminine stems in . In Plank, Frans
(ed.), Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 243-
264.
Viti, Carlotta. 2008. Rheme before theme in the noun phrase. A case study from Ancient
Greek. Studies in Language 32.4, 894-915.
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1908. Genitiv und Adjectiv. Mlanges de linguistique offerts
Ferdinand de Saussure. Paris: Champion, 125-152.
Wackernagel, Jacob & Albert Debrunner. 1954. Altindische Grammatik. Band II.2: Die
Nominalsuffixe. Gttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Watkins, Calvert. 1967. Remarks on the Genitive. To honor Roman Jakobson. The Hague:
Mouton, 2191-2198.
Weerman, Fred & Petra de Wit. 1999. The decline of the genitive in Dutch. Linguistics 37.6,
1155-1192.
Whitney, William D. 1879. A Sanskrit Grammar. Leipzig: Breitkopp & Hrtel.
de Wit, Petra. 1997. Genitive Case and Genitive Constructions. Utrecht: OTS Dissertation
Series.
Zimmer 1978. Genetiv und konkurrierendes Adjektiv im Rigveda. Zeitschrift fr
Vergleichende Sprachforschung 92.1978(1979), 50-61.

Você também pode gostar