The Vermillion Fruit: Debordist image in the works of Glass

R. John Reicher

Department of Politics, University of Oregon

1. Contexts of absurdity
“Society is unattainable,” says Lacan; however, according to Pickett[1] , it is not so much society
that is unattainable, but
rather the genre, and hence the futility, of society. Neocapitalist cultural
theory implies that narrative must come from the collective unconscious.

However, many narratives concerning not dematerialism, but predematerialism

may be found. In Nova Express, Burroughs examines Debordist image; in
Naked Lunch, however, he affirms neocapitalist narrative.

It could be said that Marx’s model of neocapitalist cultural theory holds

that academe is capable of intentionality. Derrida promotes the use of
Foucaultist power relations to deconstruct elitist perceptions of reality.

Therefore, if neocapitalist cultural theory holds, the works of Burroughs

are postmodern. Humphrey[2] suggests that we have to choose
between Sontagist camp and subdialectic construction.

2. Debordist image and the textual paradigm of context

“Class is part of the genre of narrativity,” says Lyotard. In a sense, the
primary theme of the works of Burroughs is a postconstructivist whole. The
premise of cultural discourse states that sexuality is fundamentally used in
the service of capitalism, but only if art is interchangeable with language; if
that is not the case, Marx’s model of the textual paradigm of context is one of
“subdialectic nihilism”, and thus part of the absurdity of reality.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between

figure and ground. However, Lyotard suggests the use of Debordist image to
analyse society. The main theme of Werther’s[3] essay on
Foucaultist power relations is the role of the artist as poet.

In a sense, Foucaultist power relations holds that class, somewhat

paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning. Bataille promotes the use of the textual
paradigm of context to challenge hierarchy.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a precultural structural theory

that includes language as a paradox. An abundance of theories concerning
Debordist image exist.

But Sontag suggests the use of Foucaultist power relations to attack and
read society. If the textual paradigm of context holds, we have to choose
between neotextual sublimation and cultural subtextual theory.

Therefore, in Nova Express, Burroughs reiterates the textual paradigm

of context; in The Last Words of Dutch Schultz, although, he affirms
capitalist dematerialism. The primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the
difference between sexual identity and class.
3. Narratives of defining characteristic
“Society is a legal fiction,” says Debord; however, according to Cameron[4] , it is not so much
society that is a legal fiction, but
rather the rubicon, and eventually the collapse, of society. However, von
Junz[5] states that we have to choose between Foucaultist
power relations and the postdialectic paradigm of discourse. The defining
characteristic, and some would say the stasis, of cultural subdialectic theory
which is a central theme of Eco’s The Island of the Day Before is also
evident in The Name of the Rose, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of textual truth.

But if Foucaultist power relations holds, we have to choose between the textual
paradigm of context and neocultural objectivism. Baudrillard uses the term
‘Debordist image’ to denote the role of the observer as artist.

It could be said that the premise of the textual paradigm of context implies
that expression is created by the masses, given that Sontag’s model of
Debordist image is valid. Baudrillard uses the term ‘Debordist situation’ to
denote a textual whole.

In a sense, Sontag promotes the use of Foucaultist power relations to

challenge class divisions. Lacan uses the term ‘postcultural narrative’ to
denote the role of the writer as artist.

It could be said that the premise of Debordist image holds that sexual
identity has objective value. Cameron[6] suggests that we
have to choose between the structural paradigm of consensus and Sontagist camp.

In a sense, the main theme of Tilton’s[7] analysis of the

textual paradigm of context is a self-referential totality. Marx suggests the
use of the preconstructivist paradigm of expression to modify society.

4. Debordist image and deconstructive materialism

“Sexual identity is intrinsically unattainable,” says Foucault; however,
according to Prinn[8] , it is not so much sexual identity
that is intrinsically unattainable, but rather the dialectic of sexual
identity. But the primary theme of the works of Tarantino is not, in fact,
narrative, but neonarrative. Debord uses the term ‘Foucaultist power relations’
to denote the bridge between class and narrativity.

It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a Debordist image

that includes reality as a reality. The main theme of Dahmus’s[9] essay on postmodernist
libertarianism is the role of the
observer as poet.

However, Bataille promotes the use of Debordist image to deconstruct the

status quo. Derrida’s critique of Foucaultist power relations implies that
consensus comes from communication, but only if truth is distinct from reality.

5. Joyce and the dialectic paradigm of context

“Society is used in the service of sexism,” says Lacan. Therefore, if
deconstructive materialism holds, we have to choose between Derridaist reading
and neosemanticist patriarchialism. The primary theme of the works of Joyce is
a mythopoetical paradox.

If one examines Debordist image, one is faced with a choice: either reject
the dialectic paradigm of narrative or conclude that the State is capable of
significant form. In a sense, Sartre uses the term ‘deconstructive materialism’
to denote the meaninglessness, and some would say the failure, of submodernist
sexual identity. The main theme of Porter’s[10] model of
Debordist image is the difference between class and society.

“Class is part of the economy of sexuality,” says Foucault. It could be said

that Debord uses the term ‘deconstructive materialism’ to denote the role of
the writer as artist. Foucault suggests the use of Debordist image to attack
and modify society.

Thus, many narratives concerning the bridge between class and society may be
discovered. The primary theme of the works of Rushdie is not dematerialism, as
Baudrillard would have it, but neodematerialism.

Therefore, a number of discourses concerning postcultural desemioticism

exist. Sartre promotes the use of Foucaultist power relations to challenge
outdated, colonialist perceptions of sexual identity.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a dialectic

paradigm of consensus that includes truth as a totality. The premise of
deconstructive materialism suggests that society, ironically, has intrinsic
meaning, given that Foucault’s essay on subdeconstructivist narrative is
invalid.

But Derrida suggests the use of deconstructive materialism to read

consciousness. The premise of Batailleist `powerful communication’ holds that
the purpose of the writer is deconstruction.

Therefore, Derrida uses the term ‘deconstructive materialism’ to denote the

collapse, and subsequent genre, of patriarchial society. The characteristic
theme of Bailey’s[11] critique of the dialectic paradigm of
discourse is the common ground between sexual identity and class.

6. Foucaultist power relations and Batailleist `powerful

communication’
In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between
closing and opening. But Sartre promotes the use of neocultural objectivism to
deconstruct the status quo. Cameron[12] suggests that the
works of Rushdie are an example of capitalist Marxism.

“Class is fundamentally responsible for elitist perceptions of sexual

identity,” says Debord; however, according to von Ludwig[13] , it is not so much class that is
fundamentally
responsible for elitist perceptions of sexual identity, but rather the defining
characteristic of class. However, Sontag suggests the use of Debordist image to
analyse and attack culture. If Foucaultist power relations holds, we have to
choose between postcultural materialism and the textual paradigm of expression.

“Society is a legal fiction,” says Marx. But Lacan uses the term
‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote not theory, but subtheory. The
primary theme of the works of Rushdie is the role of the poet as participant.

Therefore, von Junz[14] implies that we have to choose

between preconceptual capitalist theory and postsemioticist construction. Lacan
uses the term ‘Debordist image’ to denote the bridge between art and class.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a constructive premodernist

theory that includes language as a paradox. The characteristic theme of
Humphrey’s[15] analysis of Debordist image is not narrative
as such, but subnarrative.

It could be said that textual postcapitalist theory suggests that

consciousness is capable of significance, but only if sexuality is equal to
narrativity; otherwise, society has objective value. Sartre promotes the use of
Foucaultist power relations to challenge class divisions.

Therefore, Sontag’s model of Batailleist `powerful communication’ holds that

the establishment is part of the economy of consciousness, given that dialectic
rationalism is valid. Lacan uses the term ‘Debordist image’ to denote the role
of the poet as artist.

1. Pickett, K. E. Y. (1994)
Foucaultist power relations and Debordist image. Cambridge University
Press

2. Humphrey, U. ed. (1986) Textual Discourses: Debordist

image in the works of Gibson. Loompanics

3. Werther, D. V. Y. (1990) Debordist image and

Foucaultist power relations. University of Southern North Dakota at Hoople
Press

4. Cameron, M. ed. (1986) Deconstructing Lacan:

Foucaultist power relations in the works of Eco. University of Illinois
Press

5. von Junz, P. V. (1994) Debordist image in the works of

Lynch. O’Reilly & Associates

6. Cameron, W. ed. (1985) Patriarchialist Constructions:

Foucaultist power relations and Debordist image. Yale University
Press

7. Tilton, S. I. E. (1976) Debordist image in the works of

Spelling. O’Reilly & Associates

8. Prinn, S. ed. (1995) Reading Marx: Foucaultist power

relations in the works of Tarantino. Panic Button Books
9. Dahmus, T. P. V. (1976) Debordist image in the works of
Joyce. University of Southern North Dakota at Hoople Press

10. Porter, T. ed. (1983) Dialectic Discourses:

Foucaultist power relations in the works of Rushdie. O’Reilly &
Associates

11. Bailey, W. Y. (1972) Debordist image and Foucaultist

power relations. University of Massachusetts Press

12. Cameron, V. D. Z. ed. (1990) The Rubicon of Context:

Debordist image in the works of Rushdie. University of Michigan
Press

13. von Ludwig, T. Z. (1989) Foucaultist power relations

and Debordist image. Cambridge University Press

14. von Junz, K. ed. (1997) Forgetting Baudrillard:

Debordist image and Foucaultist power relations. Schlangekraft

15. Humphrey, S. F. O. (1974) Debordist image, Marxist

socialism and capitalism. University of Illinois Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the
Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable
page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system
for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios
(this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 17,436,777 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST,
when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer
Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using
Recursive Transition Networks“.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics
Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism
publication.

dada engine

SEARCH
Search for:
Search …
SEARCH
TEXT GENERATORS
Adolescent Poetry
Band Names
Postmodernism
Subgenius Brag
Time Cube
OTHER THINGS
Buy Me Something
Discordian Tarot
Drainspotting
Emperor Norton
Loteria Collection
ADS
TAGS
amazon art Bicycle bush Car-Free Cool copyright Culture customer_service DIY drainspotting
eco_footprint elsewhere Events External Brain flickr For Sale Gadgets gear google hacks Humor
Internet Links Listening loteria make Manhole Movies/TV music Personal police preparedness
Rants Reading Seattle Stupid People Technology tools video wifi wordpress wtf xtracycle youtube
META
Log in
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
WordPress.org
Search for:
Search …
SEARCH
RECENT POSTS
Turning Off Your Gas: A Public Service Announcement
2017/11/14
Yeah, I’m out.
2017/11/02
More adventures in homeownership
2017/10/30
Tunes to learn
2017/08/21
Folklife 2017 Thoughts
2017/05/29
RECENT COMMENTS
Kristy on Folklife 2017 Thoughts
Anonymous on New Loteria Uploads
Sanjay Mishra on No wine before its time
Josh on Turning Off Your Gas: A Public Service Announcement
Josh on More adventures in homeownership
Communications From Elsewhere Proudly powered by WordPress